Chronic Histologic Changes Are Present Regardless of HLA Mismatches: Evidence from HLA Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplants

Application of spatial-omics to the classification of kidney biopsy samples in transplantation

Improvement of long-term outcomes through targeted treatment is a primary concern in kidney transplant medicine. Currently, the validation of a rejection diagnosis and subsequent treatment depends on the histological assessment of allograft biopsy samples, according to the Banff classification system. However, the lack of (early) disease-specific tissue markers hinders accurate diagnosis and thus timely intervention. This challenge mainly results from an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying late allograft failure. Integration of large-scale multimodal approaches for investigating allograft biopsy samples might offer new insights into this pathophysiology, which are necessary for the identification of novel therapeutic targets and the development of tailored immunotherapeutic interventions. Several omics technologies - including transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomic tools (and multimodal data analysis strategies) - can be applied to allograft biopsy investigation. However, despite their successful application in research settings and their potential clinical value, several barriers limit the broad implementation of many of these tools into clinical practice. Among spatial-omics technologies, mass spectrometry imaging, which is under-represented in the transplant field, has the potential to enable multi-omics investigations that might expand the insights gained with current clinical analysis technologies.

Socioeconomic dependency and kidney transplantation accessibility and outcomes: a nationwide observational cohort study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status is an important determinant for patients' accessibility to, and prognosis of, kidney transplantation. However, the association between socioeconomic dependency and kidney transplantation accessibility or prognosis after kidney transplantation remains unclear.

METHODS

In this nationwide cohort study, based on the claims database of South Korea, we included 12,889 kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2015 and stratified them according to health insurance categories that reflect socioeconomic dependency: workplace-independent (employed, N = 3257), workplace-dependent (dependent to the workplace-independent, N = 3661), community-representative (heads of the household but self-employed or unemployed, N = 2479), community-member (N = 1618), aided-representative (heads of household receiving medical aid from the government, N = 1580), and aided-member (N = 294). The incidence of kidney transplantation was calculated to evaluate its accessibility. The risk of graft failure was assessed using the Cox regression analysis, adjusted for clinicodemographic variables, including financial status.

RESULTS

End-stage kidney disease patients who were employed (workplace-independent group) had the highest incidence proportion of kidney transplantation. The dependent groups' prognoses were worse than those of their independent counterparts [workplace-dependent versus workplace-independent, HR 1.26 (1.11-1.43) and community-dependent versus community-independent, HR 1.46 (1.23-1.74)], although no difference was observed between the aided subgroups [aided-dependent versus aided-independent, adjusted HR 1.16 (0.90-1.50)].

CONCLUSION

Disparities in kidney transplantation accessibility were present in South Korea according to socioeconomic dependency; these differences may have an impact on prognosis.