1
|
Buemi A, Mourad NI, Bouzin C, Devresse A, Hoton D, Daumerie A, Zech F, Darius T, Kanaan N, Gianello P, Mourad M. Exploring Preservation Modalities in a Split Human Pancreas Model to Investigate the Effect on the Islet Isolation Outcomes. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1654. [PMID: 38881744 PMCID: PMC11177812 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In islet transplantation, the use of dynamic hypothermic preservation techniques is a current challenge. This study compares the efficacy of 3 pancreas preservation methods: static cold storage, hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), and oxygenated HMP. Methods A standardized human pancreas split model was employed using discarded organs from both donation after brain death (n = 15) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) (n = 9) donors. The pancreas head was preserved using static cold storage (control group), whereas the tail was preserved using the 3 different methods (study group). Data on donor characteristics, pancreas histology, isolation outcomes, and functional tests of isolated islets were collected. Results Insulin secretory function evaluated by calculating stimulation indices and total amount of secreted insulin during high glucose stimulation (area under the curve) through dynamic perifusion experiments was similar across all paired groups from both DCD and donation after brain death donors. In our hands, islet yield (IEQ/g) from the pancreas tails used as study groups was higher than that of the pancreas heads as expected although this difference did not always reach statistical significance because of great variability probably due to suboptimal quality of organs released for research purposes. Moreover, islets from DCD organs had greater purity than controls (P ≤ 0.01) in the HMP study group. Furthermore, our investigation revealed no significant differences in pancreas histology, oxidative stress markers, and apoptosis indicators. Conclusions For the first time, a comparative analysis was conducted, using a split model, to assess the effects of various preservation methods on islets derived from pancreas donors. Nevertheless, no discernible variances were observed in terms of islet functionality, histological attributes, or isolation efficacy. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Buemi
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nizar I Mourad
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Caroline Bouzin
- IREC Imaging Platform (2IP, RRID:SCR_023378), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Devresse
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Delphine Hoton
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aurelie Daumerie
- IREC Imaging Platform (2IP, RRID:SCR_023378), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francis Zech
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom Darius
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nada Kanaan
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Gianello
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Mourad
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parajuli S, Odorico J, Breyer I, Zona E, Aziz F, Lorden H, Garonzik-Wang J, Kaufman D, Mandelbrot D. Analysis of Individual Components of Frailty in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney, and Solitary Pancreas Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1523. [PMID: 37649788 PMCID: PMC10465099 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds It is not known which of the 5 components of the Fried frailty score have the most predictive value for outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and solitary pancreas transplant (SPT) recipients. Methods In this study, we sought to investigate the association between pretransplant overall frailty and individual frailty components, with posttransplant outcomes among SPK and SPT recipients. Outcomes of interest were length of stay, kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF), readmission within 30 d after discharge, cardiovascular events, acute rejection, pancreas death-censored graft failure (DCGF), kidney DCGF, and death. Results Of the individual frailty components among SPK (n = 113), only slow walk time was associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.99; P = 0.03). Among SPT (n = 49), higher sum frailty scores (coefficient correlation 0.29; P = 0.04) and weight loss (coefficient correlation = 0.30; P = 0.03) were associated with prolonged length of stay. Similarly, weight loss among SPT was associated with an increased risk of DCGF (aOR: 4.34; P = 0.049). Low grip strength was strongly associated with an increased risk of early readmission (aOR: 13.08; P = 0.008). Conclusions We found that not all components of frailty contribute equally to predicting outcomes. Objective measurements of slow walk time, unintentional weight loss, and low grip strength were found to be associated with less optimal outcomes in pancreas transplant recipients. Targeted interventions may improve posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| | - Jon Odorico
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Isabel Breyer
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Emily Zona
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| | - Heather Lorden
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Dixon Kaufman
- UW Health Transplant Center
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- UW Health Transplant Center
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parsons RF, Tantisattamo E, Cheungpasitporn W, Basu A, Lu Y, Lentine KL, Woodside KJ, Singh N, Scalea J, Alhamad T, Dunn TB, Rivera FHC, Parajuli S, Pavlakis M, Cooper M. Comprehensive review: Frailty in pancreas transplant candidates and recipients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14899. [PMID: 36591953 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Well-selected patients with kidney disease and diabetes mellitus who undergo simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation often experience dramatic improvements in quality of life and long-term survival compared to those who remain on medical therapy. Over the past several years the importance of frailty in the pancreas transplant candidate and recipient populations has grown. More patients with advanced age have entered the waitlist, and complications from prolonged diabetes, even in younger patients, have created increased evidence of risk for frailty. Given these concerns, and the broad challenges facing pancreas transplantation volumes overall, we generated this review to help establish the impact and implications. We summarize the interplay of immunological factors, aging, environmental factors, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease that put these patients at risk for frailty. We discuss its measurement and recommend a combination of two instruments (both well-validated and one entirely objective). We describe the outcomes for patients before and after pancreas transplantation who may have frailty, and what interventions can be taken to mitigate its effects. Broader investigation into frailty in the pancreas transplant population is needed to better understand how to select patients for pancreas transplantation and to how manage its consequences thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yee Lu
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Neeraj Singh
- John C. McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Shreveport, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Joseph Scalea
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Tarek Alhamad
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ty B Dunn
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Martha Pavlakis
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cos H, Zárate Rodríguez JG, Srivastava R, Bewley A, Raper L, Li D, Dai R, Williams GA, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Lu C, Sanford DE, Hammill CW. 4,300 steps per day prior to surgery are associated with improved outcomes after pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:91-99. [PMID: 36272956 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decreased preoperative physical fitness and low physical activity have been associated with preoperative functional reserve and surgical complications. We sought to evaluate daily step count as a measure of physical activity and its relationship with post-pancreatectomy outcomes. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatectomy were given a remote telemonitoring device to measure their preoperative levels of physical activity. Patient activity, demographics, and perioperative outcomes were collected and compared in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS 73 patients were included. 45 (61.6%) patients developed complications, with 17 (23.3%) of those patients developing severe complications. These patients walked 3437.8 (SD 1976.7) average daily steps, compared to 5918.8 (SD 2851.1) in patients without severe complications (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, patients who walked less than 4274.5 steps had significantly higher odds of severe complications (OR = 7.5 (CI 2.1, 26.8), p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Average daily steps below 4274.5 before surgery are associated with severe complications after pancreatectomy. Preoperative physical activity levels may represent a modifiable target for prehabilitation protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidy Cos
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jorge G Zárate Rodríguez
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rohit Srivastava
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alice Bewley
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lacey Raper
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dingwen Li
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ruixuan Dai
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gregory A Williams
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William G Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chenyang Lu
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dominic E Sanford
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chet W Hammill
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|