1
|
Zhang L, Chen L, Jiang Y, Jin G, Yang J, Sun H, Liang J, Lv G, Yang Q, Yi S, Chen G, Liu W, Ou J, Yang Y. Cross-species metabolomic profiling reveals phosphocholine-mediated liver protection from cold and ischemia/reperfusion. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00346-0. [PMID: 38878865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Cold and ischemia/reperfusion (IR)-associated injuries are seemingly inevitable during liver transplantation and hepatectomy. Because Syrian hamsters demonstrate intrinsic tolerance to transplantation-like stimuli, cross-species comparative metabolomic analyses were conducted with hamster, rat, and donor liver samples to seek hepatic cold and IR-adaptive mechanisms. Lower hepatic phosphocholine contents were found in recipients with early graft-dysfunction and with virus-caused cirrhosis or high model for end-stage liver disease scores (≥30). Choline/phosphocholine deficiency in cultured human THLE-2 hepatocytes and animal models weakened hepatocellular cold tolerance and recovery of glutathione and ATP production, which was rescued by phosphocholine supplements. Among the biological processes impacted by choline/phosphocholine deficiency, 3 lipid-related metabolic processes were downregulated, whereas phosphocholine elevated the expression of genes in methylation processes. Consistently, in THLE-2, phosphocholine enhanced the overall RNA m6A methylation, among which the transcript stability of fatty acid desaturase 6 (FADS6) was improved. FADS6 functioned as a key phosphocholine effector in the production of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which may facilitate the hepatocellular recovery of energy and redox homeostasis. Thus, our study reveals the choline-phosphocholine metabolism and its downstream FADS6 functions in hepatic adaptation to cold and IR, which may inspire new strategies to monitor donor liver quality and improve recipient recovery from the liver transplantation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lele Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Jiang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guanghui Jin
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinghong Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haobin Sun
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinliang Liang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo Lv
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhong Yi
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guihua Chen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Jingxing Ou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Biotherapy and Translational Medicine of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blake HA, Sharples LD, Boyle JM, Kuryba A, Moonesinghe SR, Murray D, Hill J, Fearnhead NS, van der Meulen JH, Walker K. Improving risk models for patients having emergency bowel cancer surgery using linked electronic health records: a national cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1564-1576. [PMID: 38285065 PMCID: PMC10942147 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Life-saving emergency major resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a high-risk procedure. Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality for patients undergoing this procedure is essential for both healthcare performance monitoring and preoperative risk assessment. Risk-adjustment models for CRC patients often include patient and tumour characteristics, widely available in cancer registries and audits. The authors investigated to what extent inclusion of additional physiological and surgical measures, available through linkage or additional data collection, improves accuracy of risk models. METHODS Linked, routinely-collected data on patients undergoing emergency CRC surgery in England between December 2016 and November 2019 were used to develop a risk model for 90-day mortality. Backwards selection identified a 'selected model' of physiological and surgical measures in addition to patient and tumour characteristics. Model performance was assessed compared to a 'basic model' including only patient and tumour characteristics. Missing data was multiply imputed. RESULTS Eight hundred forty-six of 10 578 (8.0%) patients died within 90 days of surgery. The selected model included seven preoperative physiological and surgical measures (pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, breathlessness, sodium, urea, albumin, and predicted peritoneal soiling), in addition to the 10 patient and tumour characteristics in the basic model (calendar year of surgery, age, sex, ASA grade, TNM T stage, TNM N stage, TNM M stage, cancer site, number of comorbidities, and emergency admission). The selected model had considerably better discrimination compared to the basic model (C-statistic: 0.824 versus 0.783, respectively). CONCLUSION Linkage of disease-specific and treatment-specific datasets allowed the inclusion of physiological and surgical measures in a risk model alongside patient and tumour characteristics, which improves the accuracy of the prediction of the mortality risk for CRC patients having emergency surgery. This improvement will allow more accurate performance monitoring of healthcare providers and enhance clinical care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen A. Blake
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London
| | - Linda D. Sharples
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | - Jemma M. Boyle
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England
| | - Angela Kuryba
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England
| | - Suneetha R. Moonesinghe
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Dave Murray
- Anaesthetic Department, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - James Hill
- Division of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary
| | - Nicola S. Fearnhead
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jan H. van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Junger H, Knoppke B, Schurr L, Brennfleck FW, Grothues D, Melter M, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Brunner SM, Goetz M. Good outcomes after repeated pediatric liver retransplantations: A justified procedure even in times of organ shortage. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14699. [PMID: 38433343 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric liver transplantations generally represent advanced surgery for selected patients. In case of acute or chronic graft failure, biliary or vessel complications, a retransplantation (reLT) can be necessary. In these situations massive adhesions, critical patient condition or lack of good vessels for anastomosis often are problematic. METHODS Between 2008 and 2021, 208 pediatric patients received a liver transplantation at our center. Retrospectively, all cases with at least one retransplantation were identified and stored in a database. Indication, intra- and postoperative course and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS Altogether 31 patients (14.9%) received a reLT. In 22 cases only one reLT was done, 8 patients received 2 reLTs and 1 patient needed a fourth graft. Median age for primary transplantation, first, second and third reLT was 14 (range: 1-192 months), 60.5 (range: 1-215 months), 58.5 (range: 14-131 months) and 67 months, respectively. Although biliary atresia (42%) and acute liver failure (23%) represented the main indications for the primary liver transplantation, acute and chronic graft failure (1st reLT: 36%, 2nd reLT: 38%), hepatic artery thrombosis (1st reLT: 29%, 2nd reLT: 25%, 3rd reLT: 100%) and biliary complications (1st reLT: 26%, 2nd reLT: 37%) were the most frequent indications for reLT. OS was 81.8% for patients with 1 reLT, 87.5% with 2 reLTs and 100% with 3 reLTs. CONCLUSION Pediatric liver retransplantation is possible with a good outcome even after multiple retransplantations in specialized centers. Nevertheless, careful patient and graft selection, as well as good preoperative conditioning, are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Junger
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Birgit Knoppke
- University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Leonhard Schurr
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Frank W Brennfleck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany
| | - Dirk Grothues
- University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Melter
- University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Edward K Geissler
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Brunner
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Goetz
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibrahim M, Callaghan CJ. Beyond donation to organ utilization in the UK. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:212-221. [PMID: 37040628 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Optimizing deceased donor organ utilization is gaining recognition as a topical and important issue, both in the United Kingdom (UK) and globally. This review discusses pertinent issues in the field of organ utilization, with specific reference to UK data and recent developments within the UK. RECENT FINDINGS A multifaceted approach is likely required in order to improve organ utilization. Having a solid evidence-base upon which transplant clinicians and patients on national waiting lists can base decisions regarding organ utilization is imperative in order to bridge gaps in knowledge regarding the optimal use of each donated organ. A better understanding of the risks and benefits of the uses of higher risk organs, along with innovations such as novel machine perfusion technologies, can help clinician decision-making and may ultimately reduce the unnecessary discard of precious deceased donor organs. SUMMARY The issues facing the UK with regards to organ utilization are likely to be similar to those in many other developed countries. Discussions around these issues within organ donation and transplantation communities may help facilitate shared learning, lead to improvements in the usage of scarce deceased donor organs, and enable better outcomes for patients waiting for transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ivanics T, Claasen MPAW, Patel MS, Giorgakis E, Khorsandi SE, Srinivasan P, Prachalias A, Menon K, Jassem W, Cortes M, Sayed BA, Mathur AK, Walker K, Taylor R, Heaton N, Mehta N, Segev DL, Massie AB, van der Meulen JHP, Sapisochin G, Wallace D. Outcomes after liver transplantation using deceased after circulatory death donors: A comparison of outcomes in the UK and the US. Liver Int 2023; 43:1107-1119. [PMID: 36737866 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Identifying international differences in utilization and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) after donation after circulatory death (DCD) donation provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and population-level insight. METHODS Adult (≥18 years) LT data between 2008 and 2018 from the UK and US were used to assess mortality and graft failure after DCD LT. We used time-dependent Cox-regression methods to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for risk-adjusted short-term (0-90 days) and longer-term (90 days-5 years) outcomes. RESULTS One-thousand five-hundred-and-sixty LT receipts from the UK and 3426 from the US were included. Over the study period, the use of DCD livers increased from 15.7% to 23.9% in the UK compared to 5.1% to 7.6% in the US. In the UK, DCD donors were older (UK:51 vs. US:33 years) with longer cold ischaemia time (UK: 437 vs. US: 333 min). Recipients in the US had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, higher body mass index, higher proportions of ascites, encephalopathy, diabetes and previous abdominal surgeries. No difference in the risk-adjusted short-term mortality or graft failure was observed between the countries. In the longer-term (90 days-5 years), the UK had lower mortality and graft failure (adj.mortality HR:UK: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.49-0.80); graft failure HR: UK: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91). The cumulative incidence of retransplantation was higher in the UK (5 years: UK: 11.9% vs. 4.6%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS For those receiving a DCD LT, longer-term post-transplant outcomes in the UK are superior to the US, however, significant differences in recipient illness, graft quality and access to retransplantation were seen between the two countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto.,Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto.,Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Emmanouil Giorgakis
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Rockefeller Cancer Center Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shirin E Khorsandi
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.,Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Parthi Srinivasan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Wayel Jassem
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Miriam Cortes
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Blayne A Sayed
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Taylor
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Department of Statistics, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jan H P van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - David Wallace
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ivanics T, So D, Claasen MPAW, Wallace D, Patel MS, Gravely A, Choi WJ, Shwaartz C, Walker K, Erdman L, Sapisochin G. Machine learning-based mortality prediction models using national liver transplantation registries are feasible but have limited utility across countries. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:64-71. [PMID: 36695623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Many countries curate national registries of liver transplant (LT) data. These registries are often used to generate predictive models; however, potential performance and transferability of these models remain unclear. We used data from 3 national registries and developed machine learning algorithm (MLA)-based models to predict 90-day post-LT mortality within and across countries. Predictive performance and external validity of each model were assessed. Prospectively collected data of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent primary LTs between January 2008 and December 2018 from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (Canada), National Health Service Blood and Transplantation (United Kingdom), and United Network for Organ Sharing (United States) were used to develop MLA models to predict 90-day post-LT mortality. Models were developed using each registry individually (based on variables inherent to the individual databases) and using all 3 registries combined (variables in common between the registries [harmonized]). The model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The number of patients included was as follows: Canada, n = 1214; the United Kingdom, n = 5287; and the United States, n = 59,558. The best performing MLA-based model was ridge regression across both individual registries and harmonized data sets. Model performance diminished from individualized to the harmonized registries, especially in Canada (individualized ridge: AUROC, 0.74; range, 0.73-0.74; harmonized: AUROC, 0.68; range, 0.50-0.73) and US (individualized ridge: AUROC, 0.71; range, 0.70-0.71; harmonized: AUROC, 0.66; range, 0.66-0.66) data sets. External model performance across countries was poor overall. MLA-based models yield a fair discriminatory potential when used within individual databases. However, the external validity of these models is poor when applied across countries. Standardization of registry-based variables could facilitate the added value of MLA-based models in informing decision making in future LTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Delvin So
- The Centre of Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Annabel Gravely
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Woo Jin Choi
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lauren Erdman
- The Centre of Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Disparities in the Use of Older Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Allografts in the United States Versus the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2022; 106:e358-e367. [PMID: 35642976 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the characteristics and posttransplant survival of patients who received donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts from donors aged >60 y. METHODS Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry and the United Network for Organ Sharing databases. Cohorts were dichotomized into donor age subgroups (donor >60 y [D >60]; donor ≤60 y [D ≤60]). Study period: January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015. RESULTS 1157 DCD LTs were performed in the United Kingdom versus 3394 in the United States. Only 13.8% of US DCD donors were aged >50 y, contrary to 44.3% in the United Kingdom. D >60 were 22.6% in the United Kingdom versus 2.4% in the United States. In the United Kingdom, 64.2% of D >60 clustered in 2 metropolitan centers. In the United States, there was marked inter-regional variation. A total of 78.3% of the US DCD allografts were used locally. One- and 5-y unadjusted DCD graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom versus the United States (87.3% versus 81.4%, and 78.0% versus 71.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). One- and 5-y D >60 graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom (87.3% versus 68.1%, and 77.9% versus 51.4%, United Kingdom versus United States, respectively; P < 0.001). In both groups, grafts from donors ≤30 y had the best survival. Survival was similar for donors aged 41 to 50 versus 51 to 60 in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the United Kingdom, older DCD LT utilization remained low in the United States, with worse D >60 survival. Nonetheless, present data indicate similar survivals for older donors aged ≤60, supporting an extension to the current US DCD age cutoff.
Collapse
|