Looking Into the Crystal Chip: Can Microarrays Predict Graft Function?

Preoperative assessment of the deceased-donor kidney: from macroscopic appearance to molecular biomarkers

Variation in deceased-donor kidney quality can significantly affect outcomes after kidney transplantation. Suboptimal organ selection for a given recipient can result in primary nonfunction, premature graft failure, or inappropriate discard of a suitable organ. Appraisal and appropriate selection of deceased-donor kidneys for use in transplantation is therefore critical. A number of predictive tools have been developed to assist the transplant team in evaluating the suitability of a deceased-donor kidney for transplantation to a given recipient. These include stratification of donors into "standard-" or "expanded-criteria" categories based on clinical parameters, pre-implantation biopsy scores, donor risk scores, machine perfusion characteristics, functional kidney weight, donor biomarkers and molecular diagnostic tools, ex vivo viability assessment using postmortem normothermic perfusion, and overall macroscopic appraisal by the surgical team. Consensus as to the role and predictive value of each of these tools is lacking and clinical practice regarding evaluation and selection of kidneys varies considerably.In this review, we seek to critically appraise the literature and evaluate the levels of evidence for tools used to assess deceased-donor kidneys. Although a plethora of appraisal tools exist, very few demonstrate desirable predictive power to be useful in clinical decision-making. Further research using large, well-designed prospective studies is urgently needed to advance this important field of transplantation science.

Identifying biomarkers as diagnostic tools in kidney transplantation

There is a critical need for biomarkers for early diagnosis, treatment response, and surrogate end point and outcome prediction in organ transplantation, leading to a tailored and individualized treatment. Genomic and proteomic platforms have provided multiple promising new biomarkers during the last few years. However, there is still no routine application of any of these markers in clinical transplantation. This article will discuss the existing gap between biomarker discovery and clinical application in the kidney transplant setting. Approaches to implementing biomarker monitoring into clinical practice will also be discussed.

Molecular pathways involved in loss of graft function in kidney transplant recipients

Interstitial fibrosis (IF) and tubular atrophy (TA) are integral parts of chronic allograft dysfunction and represent in the new classification a separate entity with or without the identification of a specific etiology. Loss of kidney graft function with IF/TA is one of the causes of most kidney allograft losses. Despite progress in immunosuppression, chronic allograft dysfunction remains the main clinical challenge for improving long-term graft survival. The sustained damage to the allograft does not represent a single entity but the summated effects of tissue injury from several pathogenic insults, as well as the kidney's healing response, modified by alloimmunity and immunosuppression. A major challenge in the future of kidney transplantation includes the study of chronic allograft dysfunction pathogenesis to identify early markers of disease progression, as well as potential therapeutics pathways.

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in pediatric liver allograft recipients

The use of CNI in pediatric LTx has dramatically improved the outcome for children with end-stage liver disease by significantly reducing the rate of acute and chronic rejection. Long-term concerns about CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects remain an issue, particularly as the emphasis moves from short-term survival to long-term quality of life. This review summarizes lessons learnt from pediatric and adult solid organ transplantation in minimizing CNI use in immunosuppression protocols in children following LTx. There are three models for CNI minimization: dose reduction, withdrawal or avoidance, supplemented by the use of IL-2 receptor blocking antibodies in the peri-transplant period, and early transition to alternate drugs such as MMF or SRL. Prospective studies evaluating reduction or withdrawal protocols in adult and pediatric LTx indicate that rejection rates are comparable with traditional CNI-based immunosuppression and that two and five yr patient and graft survival are similar, with recovery in renal function. There are few studies evaluating complete avoidance of CNI, apart from that in renal transplantation, although the benefits of long-term reduction in cardiovascular, metabolic, and possibly neoplastic side effects may justify this approach. It is not clear yet how CNI minimization will affect the development of tolerance but experimental and preliminary clinical studies indicate that CNI and steroid avoidance or minimization in the peri-operative period may favor the development of long-term graft tolerance. In summary, CNI minimization may be safe and effective in the short term but large-scale pediatric randomized studies are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of these regimes in the development of chronic rejection, PTLD, and graft tolerance.