Excellent Renal Allograft Survival in Donor-Specific Antibody Positive Transplant Patients—Role of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin

Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies

Solid organ transplantation is a curative therapy for hundreds of thousands of patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term outcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 years after transplant. One of the major challenges facing clinical transplantation is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by anti-donor HLA antibodies. AMR is highly associated with graft loss, but unfortunately there are few efficacious therapies to prevent and reverse AMR. This Review describes the clinical and histological manifestations of AMR, and discusses the immunopathological mechanisms contributing to antibody-mediated allograft injury as well as current and emerging therapies.

A Comparison of Two Types of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Therapy in Immunological High-Risk Kidney Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

Background

Induction treatment with rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) is frequent used in kidney transplant recipients with donorspecific HLA antibodies and shows acceptable outcomes. The two commonly used ATGs, Thymoglobulin and ATG-F have slightly different antigen profile and antibody concentrations. The two compounds have never been directly compared in a prospective trial in immunological high-risk recipients. Therefore we performed a prospective randomized controlled study comparing the two compounds in immunological high-risk kidney recipients in terms of safety and efficacy.

Methods

Immunological high-risk kidney recipients, defined as the presence of HLA DSA but negative CDC-B and T-cell crossmatches were randomized 1:1 to receive ATG-F or Thymoglobulin. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.

Results

The per-protocol analysis included 35 patients. There was no immediate infusion reaction observed with both compounds. No PTLD or malignancy occurred during the follow-up in both groups. The incidence of viral and bacterial infections was similar in both groups (p = 0.62). The cumulative incidence of clinical and subclinical antibody mediated allograft rejection as well as T-cell mediated allograft rejection during the first year between ATG-F and Thymoglobulin was similar (35% versus 19%; p = 0.30 and 11% versus 18%; 0.54 respectively). The two-year graft function was similar with a median eGFR of 56 ml/min/1.73m² (range 21–128) (ATG-F-group) and 51 ml/min/1.73m² (range 22–132) (Thymo-group) (p = 0.69).

Conclusion

We found no significant differences between the compared study drugs for induction treatment in immunological high-risk patients regarding safety and efficacy during follow-up with good allograft function at 2 years after transplantation.

Management of sensitized pediatric patients prior to renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Data on renal allograft outcome in sensitized children are scarce. We report the clinical courses of four children who received desensitization therapy prior to renal transplantation in our institution.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, four pediatric patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease received desensitization therapy due to: (1) positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and/or crossmatches with potential living donors, (2) more than three positive crossmatches with deceased donors or (3) high calculated panel-reactive antibody of >80 %. Desensitization with rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin and bortezomib was performed in all patients. Induction therapy included combinations of plasmapheresis and/or alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin. Standard post-transplant medications included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone.

RESULTS

Post-transplant screening revealed DSA in three patients. Biopsy showed no evidence of rejection at 1 month in two patients, one of whom developed chronic active antibody-mediated rejection 4.5 years later. One patient developed borderline acute cellular rejection at 1 month, but the serum creatinine level was stable and DSA disappeared without treatment 1 month later, with stable long-term allograft function at 3 years. Estimated or measured glomerular filtration rate of the patients ranged between 30 and 75 ml/min/1.73 m(2) after 1 to 4.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The four sensitized patients reported here who received desensitization therapy had successful renal transplants with a low risk of immediate post-transplant rejection. Overall, long-term allograft functions and complications from immunosuppression were encouraging.

Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch

Solid phase immunoassays (SPI) are now routinely used to detect HLA antibodies. However, the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains the established method for assessing final donor-recipient compatibility. Since 2005 we have followed a protocol whereby the final allocation decision for renal transplantation is based on SPI (not the FCXM). Here we report long-term graft outcomes for 508 consecutive kidney transplants using this protocol. All recipients were negative for donor-specific antibody by SPI. Primary outcomes are graft survival and incidence of acute rejection within 1 year (AR <1 year) for FCXM+ (n = 54) and FCXM- (n = 454) recipients. Median follow-up is 7.1 years. FCXM+ recipients were significantly different from FCXM- recipients for the following risk factors: living donor (24% vs. 39%, p = 0.03), duration of dialysis (31.0 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.008), retransplants (17% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.04), % sensitized (63% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and PRA >80% (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, 5-year actual graft survival rates are 87% and 84%, respectively. AR <1 year occurred in 13% FCXM+ and 12% FCXM- recipients. Crossmatch status was not associated with graft outcomes in any univariate or multivariate model. Renal transplantation can be performed successfully, using SPI as the definitive test for donor-recipient compatibility.

New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity

In the 30 years since the rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) Thymoglobulin^® was first licensed, its use in solid organ transplantation and hematology has expanded progressively. Although the evidence base is incomplete, specific roles for rATG in organ transplant recipients using contemporary dosing strategies are now relatively well-identified. The addition of rATG induction to a standard triple or dual regimen reduces acute cellular rejection, and possibly humoral rejection. It is an appropriate first choice in patients with moderate or high immunological risk, and may be used in low-risk patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimen from time of transplant, or if early steroid withdrawal is planned. Kidney transplant patients at risk of delayed graft function may also benefit from the use of rATG to facilitate delayed CNI introduction. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rATG has become an important component of conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, following demonstration of reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. More recently, a role for rATG has also been established in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. In autoimmunity, rATG contributes to the treatment of severe aplastic anemia, and has been incorporated in autograft projects for the management of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, and systemic sclerosis. Finally, research is underway for the induction of tolerance exploiting the ability of rATG to induce immunosuppresive cells such as regulatory T-cells. Despite its long history, rATG remains a key component of the immunosuppressive armamentarium, and its complex immunological properties indicate that its use will expand to a wider range of disease conditions in the future.

Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.

HLA antibody screening in kidney transplantation: current guidelines

BACKGROUND

In organ transplantation, the introduction of the solid phase immunoassay technology radically changed the practice of antibody monitoring against human leukocyte antigens (HLA).

PURPOSE

Precise identification of antibody specificities in complex sera of sensitized patients and monitoring of low levels of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the posttransplant phase became possible. However, at the same time, new technical problems and great variation emerged in the interpretation of test results, indicating a need for standardization.

CONCLUSION

In May 2012, The Transplantation Society (TTS) recruited a panel of laboratory and clinical experts to discuss emerging testing and clinical management issues that are associated with antibody testing in organ transplantation. In this article, we provide a summary of the TTS recommendations formulated in this international effort on the standardization of antibody monitoring in kidney transplantation.

An update on the impact of pre-transplant transfusions and allosensitization on time to renal transplant and on allograft survival

Background

Blood transfusions have the potential to improve graft survival, induce sensitization, and transmit infections. Current clinical practice is to minimize transfusions in renal transplantation candidates, but it is unclear if the evidence continues to support pre-transplant transfusion avoidance. Changes in the Medicare prospective payment system may increase transfusion rates. Thus there is a need to re-evaluate the literature to improve the management options for renal transplant candidates.

Methods

A review applying a systematic approach and conducted using MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, and the Cochrane Library for English-language publications (timeframe: 01/1984–03/2011) captured 180 studies and data from publically available registries and assessed the impact of transfusions on allosensitization and graft survival, and the impact of allosensitization on graft survival and wait time.

Results

Blood transfusions continued to be a major cause of allosensitization, with allosensitization associated with increased rejection and graft loss, and longer wait times to transplantation. Although older studies showed a beneficial effect of transfusion on graft survival, this benefit has largely disappeared in the post-cyclosporine era due to improved graft outcomes with current practice. Recent data suggested that it may be the donor-specific antibody component of allosensitization that carried the risk to graft outcomes.

Conclusions

Results of this review indicated that avoiding transfusions whenever possible is a sound management option that could prevent detrimental effects in patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

Poor kidney allograft survival associated with positive B cell - Only flow cytometry cross matches: a ten year single center study

The presence of donor specific antibody (DSA) to class 1 or class 2 HLA as detected respectively in T cell or B cell - only flow cytometry cross matches (FCXMs) are risk factors for renal allograft survival, though the comparative risk of these XMs has not been definitively established. Allograft survival and FCXM data in 624 microcytotoxicity (CDC) XM negative kidney transplants were evaluated. Short and long term allograft survival was significantly less in recipients with T(-) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 74%, 10 year, 58%) compared to T(+) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 84%, 10 year, 68%) and to T(-) B(-) FCXM (1 year, 90%, 10 year, 85%). Risk factors were positive FCXM, deceased donor (DD) transplantation and donor age, but not race, gender, recipient age or previous transplant. Recipients with T(-) B(+) and T(+) B(+) FCXMs were at 4.5 and 2.5 fold greater risk, respectively, of DD allograft failure compared to patients with T(-) B(-) FCXMs. The quantitative value of FCXM did not correlate with the duration of graft survival. We conclude that patients with DSA to class 2 HLA have a greater risk of early and late allograft failure compared to patients with DSA to class 1 HLA.

Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients enabled by peritransplant immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 therapy

Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients is a challenge that requires specific measures. Ten patients with positive crossmatch results (n = 9) or negative crossmatch results but strong donor-specific antibodies (DSA; n = 1) were desensitized using immunoadsorption (IA) and anti-CD20 antibody induction. IA was continued after transplantation and accompanied by HLA antibody monitoring and protocol biopsies. After a median of 10 IA treatments, all patients were desensitized successfully and transplanted. Median levels of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Luminex-DSA before desensitization were 6203 and decreased after desensitization and immediately before transplantation to 891. Patients received a median of seven post-transplant IA treatments. At last visit, after a median follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 10 patients had a functioning allograft and a median Luminex-DSA of 149 MFI; serum creatinine was 1.6 mg/dl, and protein to creatinine ratio 0.1. Reversible acute antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed in three patients. One allograft was lost after the second post-transplant year in a patient with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. We describe a treatment algorithm for desensitization of living donor kidney transplant recipients that allows the rapid elimination of DSA with a low rate of side effects and results in good graft outcome.

The role of therapeutic apheresis in high immunologic risk renal transplantation: a review of current trends

Immunologic sensitization, defined by the presence of antibodies directed against donor human leukocyte antigen (or so called donor-specific antibodies [DSA]), is common among those awaiting kidney transplantation, and is associated with worse outcomes following transplant. Existing DSA have historically been screened for pretransplant using complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatching and their risk circumnavigated through policies that prohibit transplants between incompatible donor-recipient pairs. This risk avoidance strategy maximizes outcomes following transplant, but at the expense of limiting access to transplant for sensitized individuals. Over the last decade, the field of kidney transplantation has moved to actively modify the risks posed by DSA, rather than to simply avoid them. More sensitive detection methods have provided detailed immunologic risk stratification of potential donor-recipient pairs. Desensitization protocols, in which therapeutic aphaeresis plays a central role, have been used to reduce the potential harms posed by DSA. More recently, desensitization and paired donor exchange programs have been used in combination to expand transplantation to highly sensitized patients with incompatible living donors. It is likely that this combination of risk mitigation and avoidance strategies will be used together more often to both maximize individuals' access to transplant, and optimize patient and graft outcomes.

Human leukocyte antigen antibody-incompatible renal transplantation: excellent medium-term outcomes with negative cytotoxic crossmatch

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody-incompatible renal transplantation has been increasingly performed since 2000 but with few data on the medium-term outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2011, 84 patients received renal transplants with a pretreatment donor-specific antibody (DSA) level of more than 500 in a microbead assay. Seventeen patients had positive complement-dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch (XM), 44 had negative CDC XM and positive flow cytometric XM, and 23 had DSA detectable by microbead only. We also reviewed 28 patients with HLA antibodies but no DSA at transplant. DSAs were removed with plasmapheresis pretransplant, and patients did not routinely receive antithymocyte globulin posttransplant.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up posttransplantation was 39.6 (range 2-91) months. Patient survival after the first year was 93.8%. Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 97.5%, 94.2%, and 80.4%, respectively, in all DSA+ve patients, worse at 5 years in the CDC+ve than in the CDC-ve/DSA+ve group at 45.6% and 88.6%, respectively (P<0.03). Five-year graft survival in the DSA-ve group was 82.1%. Rejection occurred in 53.1% of DSA+ve patients in the first year compared with 22% in the DSA-ve patients (P<0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HLA antibody-incompatible renal transplantation had a high success rate if the CDC XM was negative. Further work is required to predict which CDC+ve XM grafts will be successful and to treat slowly progressive graft damage because of DSA in the first few years after transplantation.

Slow and steady. Reducing thrombotic events in renal transplant recipients treated with IVIg for antibody-mediated rejection

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is increasing and is associated with a small but significant incidence of thrombosis. We determined thrombosis rates in patients treated with high-dose IVIg for AMR before and after alteration of an infusion protocol. The newer protocol introduced routine administration of aspirin 300 mg, enoxaparin 1 mg/kg, intravenous hydration and a maximum infusion rate of 100 mg/kg per hour (previously 200 mg/kg per hour). Nine thromboses in 275 infusions occurred before the protocol alteration (event rate 3.3%). Two were arterial thromboses including an acute myocardial infarct and a renal transplant artery thrombosis, which resulted in infarction of 2/3 of the graft. Seven venous thromboses occurred, six in arteriovenous fistulae and one case with bilateral above knee deep venous thromboses. Significant associations with thromboses were seen with higher IVIg dose and male sex. In the 6 months since the introduction of the new infusion protocol, 74 infusions have been administered with no thrombotic events. There have been no significant bleeding or fluid overload side-effects. Infusion times, however, have been doubled. A slower rate of infusion combined with antiplatelet and anticoagulation has thus far eliminated the small but significant IVIg-related thrombosis rate previously observed in our patients treated for AMR without resulting in significant side-effects. Further study is now required to define which elements of this protocol are essential.

Desensitization protocols and their outcome

In the last decade, transplantation across previously incompatible barriers has increasingly become popular because of organ donor shortage, availability of better methods of detecting and characterizing anti-HLA antibodies, ease of diagnosis, better understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, and the availability of effective regimens. This review summarizes all manuscripts published since the first publication in 2000 on desensitized patients and discusses clinical outcomes including acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection rate, the new agents available, kidney paired exchange programs, and the future directions in sensitized patients. There were 21 studies published between 2000 and 2010, involving 725 patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) who underwent kidney transplantation with different desensitization protocols. All studies were single center and retrospective. The patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively, at a 2-year median follow-up. Despite acceptable short-term patient and graft survivals, acute rejection rate was 36% and acute antibody-mediated rejection rate was 28%, which is significantly higher than in nonsensitized patients. Recent studies with longer follow-up of those patients raised concerns about long-term success of desensitization protocols. The studies utilizing protocol biopsies in desensitized patients also reported higher subclinical and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. An association between the strength of DSAs determined by median fluorescence intensity values of Luminex single-antigen beads and risk of rejection was observed. Two new agents, bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and eculizumab, an anti-complement C5 antibody, were recently introduced to desensitization protocols. An alternative intervention is kidney paired exchange, which should be considered first for sensitized patients.

An integrative approach for the transplantation of high-risk sensitized patients

BACKGROUND

Sensitized patients have a lower chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative kidney and, if transplanted, are at risk of antibody-mediated allograft rejection.

METHODS

For safe and timely transplantation of sensitized patients at our center, we developed an integrative algorithm that includes identification of high-risk patients, good human leukocyte antigen match, inclusion in the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program when applicable, apheresis, anti-CD20 therapy, posttransplant antibody monitoring, and protocol biopsies. Thirty-four high-risk recipients of a deceased donor kidney (DDK: n=28) or living donor kidney (LDK: n=6) were transplanted using this algorithm.

RESULTS

One-year graft survival, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival rates in DDK recipients were 92.4%, 96.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. No graft loss or patient death was observed in the six LDK patients. Median serum creatinine at 1 year in DDK and LDK recipients was 1.2 and 1.4 mg/dL, respectively. Eleven DDK and three LDK patients experienced at least one biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, mostly showing borderline changes. Antibody-mediated rejection without graft loss was diagnosed in two DDK and one LDK patients. Delayed graft function was observed in 13 DDK and 1 LDK patients. Infectious complications were infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe an algorithm for the categorization and treatment of presensitized high-risk patients. This protocol provides effective prevention of antibody-mediated rejection and is associated with a low rate of side effects and good graft outcome.

Accommodation in renal transplantation: unanswered questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accommodation, an acquired resistance of an organ to immune-mediated damage, has been recognized as an outcome of renal transplantation for more than 20 years. Accommodation was originally identified in blood group-incompatible kidney transplants that survived and functioned normally in recipients with high titers of antiblood group antibodies directed against antigens in the grafts. The most compelling questions today include how often and by which mechanisms accommodation occurs, and what might be the biological implications of accommodation. This communication summarizes recent advances in addressing these questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because its diagnosis has depended on identification of antidonor antibodies in serum, the prevalence of accommodation has been considered low. Recent research in animal models and clinical subjects may challenge that view. This research also suggests that sublethal graft injury of various types induces accommodation and that accommodation may be a dynamic condition, eventuating into tolerance on the one hand and chronic graft injury on the other.

SUMMARY

Burgeoning lines of investigation into accommodation now portray a condition of greater prevalence than once thought, exposing pathways that may contribute to the understanding of a range of responses to transplantation.

The strength of donor-specific antibody is a more reliable predictor of antibody-mediated rejection than flow cytometry crossmatch analysis in desensitized kidney recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCCM) as tools for predicting antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in desensitized kidney recipients. Sera from 44 patients with DSA at the time of transplant were reviewed. Strength of DSA was determined by single antigen Luminex bead assay and expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). T- and B-cell FCCM results were expressed as mean channel shift (MCS). AMR was diagnosed by C4d deposition on biopsy. Incidence of early AMR was 31%. Significant differences in the number of DSAs (p = 0.0002), cumulative median MFI in DSA class I (p = 0.0004), and total (class I + class II) DSA (p < 0.0001) were found in patients with and without AMR. No significant difference was seen in MCS of T and B FCCM (p = 0.095 and p = 0.307, respectively). The three-yr graft survival in desensitized patients with DSA having total MFI < 9500 was 100% compared to 76% with those having total MFI > 9500 (p = 0.022). Desensitized kidney transplant recipients having higher levels of class I and total DSA MFI are at high risk for AMR and poor graft survival. Recipient DSA MFI appears to be a more reliable predictor of AMR than MCS of FCCM.

Efficacy of induction therapy with ATG and intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with low-level donor-specific HLA-antibodies

Low-level donor-specific HLA-antibodies (HLA-DSA) (i.e. detectable by single-antigen flow beads, but negative by complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch) represent a risk factor for early allograft rejection. The short-term efficacy of an induction regimen consisting of polyclonal anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IvIg) in patients with low-level HLA-DSA is unknown. In this study, we compared 67 patients with low-level HLA-DSA not having received ATG/IvIg induction (historic control) with 37 patients, who received ATG/IvIg induction. The two groups were equal regarding retransplants, HLA-matches, number and class of HLA-DSA. The overall incidence of clinical/subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was lower in the ATG/IvIg than in the historic control group (38% vs. 55%; p = 0.03). This was driven by a significantly lower rate of clinical AMR (11% vs. 46%; p = 0.0002). Clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCR) was significantly lower in the ATG/IvIg than in the historic control group (0% vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). Within the first year, allograft loss due to AMR occurred in 7.5% in the historic control and in 0% in the ATG/IvIg group. We conclude that in patients with low-level HLA-DSA, ATG/IvIg induction significantly reduces TCR and the severity of AMR, but the high rate of subclinical AMR suggests an insufficient control of the humoral immune response.

Presensitized kidney graft recipients with HLA class I and II antibodies are at increased risk for graft failure: a Collaborative Transplant Study report

We have previously reported that kidney transplant recipients with enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay-reactive human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II antibodies are at an increased risk for graft failure. To determine whether positivity for both classes of HLA antibodies before transplantation can serve as an indicator for identification of high-risk patients, the impact of preformed HLA antibodies on graft survival was analyzed in a new series of 5315 kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2008. In line with our previous findings, 121 first transplant recipients positive for both HLA class I and II antibodies by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay had a poor 2-year graft survival rate of 76.5% +/- 4.0%, compared with a rate of 87.5% +/- 0.5% in 4175 recipients who were negative for both antibody classes (log-rank p < 0.001). Good survival rates of 82.7% +/- 3.2% and 86.1% +/- 2.7%, respectively, were observed in 149 HLA class I-positive/class II-negative recipients and in 183 HLA class I-negative/class II-positive recipients. Importantly, graft survival was good in HLA class I-positive and class II-positive patients when they received a kidney with a 0-1 HLA-A+B+DR mismatch. These data confirm our previous observation that kidney transplant recipients who simultaneously possess HLA class I and II antibodies in their pretransplantation serum are at increased risk for graft failure and require special attention.

Low levels of human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies detected by solid phase assay before transplantation are frequently clinically irrelevant

Since new technologies based on solid phase assays (SPA) have been routinely incorporated in the transplant immunology laboratory, the presence of pretransplantation donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules has generally been considered as a risk factor for acute rejection (AR) and, in particular, for acute humoral rejection (AHR). We retrospectively studied 113 kidney transplant recipients who had negative prospective T-cell and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches at the time of transplant. Pretransplantation sera were screened for the presence of circulating anti-HLA antibody and DSA by using highly sensitive and HLA-specific Luminex assay, and the results were correlated with AR and AHR posttransplantation. We found that approximately half of our patient population (55/113, 48.7%) had circulating anti-HLA antibody pretransplantation. Of 113 patients, 11 (9.7%) had HLA-DSA. Of 11 rejection episodes post-transplant, only two patients had pretransplantation DSA, of whom one had a severe AHR (C4d positive). One-year allograft survival was similar between the pretransplantation DSA-positive and -negative groups. Number, class, and intensity of pretransplantation DSA, as well as presensitizing events, could not predict AR. We conclude that, based on the presence of pretransplantation DSA, post-transplantation acute rejections episodes could not have been predicted. The only AHR episode occurred in a recipient with pretransplantation DSA. More work should be performed to better delineate the precise clinical significance of detecting low titers of DSA before transplantation.