Tuberculosis in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single Brazilian Center Experience

The potential liver donor with tuberculosis: A fresh look at international recommendations based on a survey of practice in Indian liver transplant centres

Background The western recommendations for the use of organs from liver donors with tuberculosis (TB) come from an environment where the burden of disease is low and cadaveric organ donation rates are high-in complete contrast to the Indian scenario, where these recommendations may be too restrictive. Methods A questionnaire relating to current practice on the use of organs from liver donors with TB was sent to all liver transplant centres in India. Results Responses were obtained from 94% of centres. Two-thirds accepted organs from deceased donors with TB in the elective setting, especially for recipients with a high MELD (Model for end-stage liver disease) score. The proportion rose by 1.5 times in the setting of acute liver failure. Two-thirds advised anti-TB treatment (ATT) for corresponding recipients, and the remaining advised isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) prophylaxis. Untreated living donors with TB were not accepted. Half the respondents accepted living donors after completion of ATT, and did not treat recipients postoperatively. The remainder accepted them after 8 weeks of treatment and advised INH prophylaxis or ATT for recipients. Conclusions That this practice has not impacted recipient outcomes suggests that the guidelines for management of liver donors and recipients may need to be altered for populations endemic for TB.

Increased risk of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis infection in patients with polycystic kidney disease: a nationwide population-based study with propensity score-matching analysis

Background

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a common renal disorder affecting approximately 1 in 1000 live births. Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease worldwide. This study investigated the risk of TB infection in patients with PKD.

Methods

A nationwide population-based cohort study was performed using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We used patients’ hospitalization files for the entire analysis during 2000–2012. As per diagnosis, we divided patients into PKD and non-PKD cohorts and the major outcome was TB infection.

Results

A total of 13,540 participants with 6770 patients in each cohort were enrolled. The PKD cohort had a higher risk of TB infection than did the non-PKD cohort after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51–2.43). When classifying by sites of pulmonary TB (PTB) and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), the PKD cohort demonstrated a significantly higher risk of EPTB (aHR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.46–4.08) as well as a risk of PTB (aHR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.29–2.22). When stratified by the presence or absence of a comorbidity, high TB infection risk was noted in the PKD patients without any comorbidity (HR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.69–4.30).

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings suggest that PKD is associated with a 1.91-fold increased risk of TB infection. Medical professionls should maintain a high index of suspicion in daily practice for patients with PKD, particularly those with EPTB infection.

Prevalence of active tuberculosis infection in transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is considered as a serious complication of organ transplant; therefore, the detection and appropriate treatment of active TB infection is highly recommended for the reduction of mortality in the future. The aim of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the prevalence of active TB infection in transplant recipients (TRs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched up to December 24, 2017. The prevalence of active TB was estimated using the random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated by subgroup analysis. Data were analyzed by STATA version 14.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of post-transplant active TB was estimated 3% [95% CI: 2-3]. The pooled prevalence of active TB in different transplant forms was as follows: renal,3% [95% CI: 2-4]; stem cell transplant (SCT), 1% [95% CI: 0-3]; lung, 4% [95% CI: 2-6]; heart, 3% [95% CI: 2-4]; liver, 1% [95% CI: 1], and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 2% [95% CI: 1-3]. The prevalence of different clinical presentations of TB was as follows: pulmonary TB (59%; 95% CI: 54-65), extra pulmonary TB (27%; 95% CI: 21-33), disseminated TB (15%; 95% CI: 12-19) and miliary TB (8%; 95% CI: 4-13). The pooled prevalence of different diagnostic tests was as follows: chest X-ray, 57% [95% CI, 46-67]; culture, 56% [95% CI, 45-68]; smear, 49% [95% CI, 40-58]; PCR, 43% [95% CI, 40-58]; histology, 26% [95% CI, 20-32], and tuberculin skin test, 19% [95% CI, 10-28].

CONCLUSION

A high suspicion level for TB, the early diagnosis and the prompt initiation of therapy could increase the survival rates among SOT patients. Overall, renal and lung TRs appear to have a higher predisposition for acquiring TB than other type of recipients. Monitoring of the high-risk recipients, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate treatment are required to manage TB infection among TRs especially in endemic areas.

Risk factors of tuberculosis after liver transplant in a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious opportunistic infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to clarify the frequency and risk factors for tuberculosis in LT recipients.

METHODS

A total of 884 LT recipients were investigated retrospectively at China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. We performed a case-control study (1:2) to investigate the potential risk factors and disease onset of TB after LT.

RESULTS

Among the 884 LT recipients, 25 of TB cases (2.8%) were reported from 2009 to 2016. The overall incidence of TB was 744 cases per 100,000 patient-year, which was 18-fold higher than the general population in Taiwan. The median time to develop TB after liver transplant was 20 months. Of the TB cases, 15 were pulmonary TB and 10 were extra-pulmonary TB. Five cases of those extra-pulmonary TB occurred in the first post-transplant year. Overall five-year survival rate was 63.3%. Multivariate analyses identified apical fibrotic change in pre-transplant computed tomographic (CT) finding and the exposure to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors before TB event as independent risk factors for TB development (Odd ratio (OR) 10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73-67.49, p = 0.01; OR 3.847, 95% CI 0.80-18.51, P = 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TB incidence in LT recipients is high in this study. Among those post-transplant recipients with long-term immunosuppression, abnormal CT finding and exposure to mTOR inhibitors before liver transplant might be the risk factors for TB.

Treatment of tuberculosis infection complicated with liver transplant

Liver transplant is considered the best choice for treating various end-stage liver diseases either at home or abroad. Among patients of liver transplant complicated with tuberculosis (TB), the incidence and mortality of postoperative active TB are bound to increase remarkably. Diagnosing and treating TB in patients with end-stage liver diseases who received immunosuppressants after liver transplant are difficult because of the absence of specific clinical manifestations while being complicated with TB, reduced sensitivity to cellular immunoassay, and interaction between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants. Therefore, the screening of high-risk groups, improvement in diagnostic accuracy, preoperative treatment, and reduced interaction between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants can help optimize diagnosis and treatment regimes and thus further improve the prognosis of patients.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: A review of more than 2000 cases

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a common pathogen worldwide, and it may cause significant infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). We reviewed all reported TB cases to provide an update on its epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcome after SOT.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID were reviewed from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2016, using keywords tuberculosis and solid organ transplant or transplantation.

RESULTS

There were 187 publications reporting 2082 cases of TB among kidney (n = 1719), liver (n = 253), heart (n = 77), lung (n = 25), and kidney-pancreas (n = 8) recipients. Among cohort studies, the median incidence was 2.37% (range, 0.05%-13.27%) overall. Most TB disease was considered reactivation of latent infection, occurring beyond the first year after SOT. Early-onset cases were seen among donor-derived TB cases. Fever was the most common symptom. Radiologic findings were highly variable. Extrapulmonary and disseminated TB occurred 29.84% and 15.96%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant TB was rare. Treatment using 4 or 5 drugs was commonly associated with hepatotoxicity and graft dysfunction. All-cause mortality was 18.84%.

CONCLUSIONS

This large review highlights the complexity of TB after SOT. Reactivation TB, donor-transmitted infection, extrapulmonary involvement, and disseminated disease are common occurrences. Treatment of TB is commonly associated with hepatotoxicity and graft dysfunction.

Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis

Gastrointestinal tuberculosis (TB) is a fascinating disease which can be observed both in the clinical context of active pulmonary disease and as a primary infection with no pulmonary involvement. It represents a significant clinical challenge because of the resurgence of TB as well as the diagnostic challenges it poses. A high clinical suspicion remains the most powerful tool in an era of medicine when reliance on diagnostic technology increases. Antimicrobial therapy is the mainstay of therapy, but surgical and endoscopic interventions are frequently required for intestinal TB. Gastrointestinal TB is truly the "great mimic" and continues to require the astute clinical acumen of skillful clinicians to diagnose and treat.

Isoniazid Prophylaxis for Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients in a Tuberculosis-Endemic Area

Background

Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis (Px) has good efficacy for preventing tuberculosis (TB) in the general population. However, its use for the treatment of latent TB infections (LTBI) in liver transplant (LT) recipients is challenging because little is known about INH-induced hepatotoxicity in graft recipients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of INH Px in LT recipients.

Material/Methods

From March 2008 to December 2012, we retrospectively reviewed data on 277 patients who received LT at a single center. We examined the results of tuberculin skin tests and interferon-γ release assays, use of INH, INH-induced hepatotoxicity, and post-LT TB occurrence.

Results

Among 277 recipients, 7 cases of post-transplant TB were detected (2.52%). Seventeen patients received post-transplant INH Px. Among INH Px recipients, post-LT TB infection did not occur. Hepatotoxicity after INH Px was significantly lower in the patients who received INH Px at an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level that was less than 50 U/L than in those who received INH Px at an AST level that was more than 50 U/L (P=0.046, 0.002).

Conclusions

INH is likely to be effective for preventing post-LT TB recurrence in LTBI. However, because of INH-induced hepatotoxicity, it is better to avoid using it in the early post-LT period and to wait to initiate INH Px until liver function is stable in LT recipients.

Tuberculosis in liver transplant recipients: experience of a South Indian liver transplant center

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious disease for liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Data on post-liver transplant TB from high-burden countries are scant. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of TB in LTRs from a high-prevalence area and to analyze the risk factors for the development of post-liver transplant TB. We performed a retrospective review of our database and a case-control study of identified cases with TB and age-matched LTRs without TB. The overall prevalence of TB in LTRs was comparable to the prevalence of TB in LTRs from low-prevalence countries (5/214 or 2.3%). A low rate of interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) testing before liver transplantation was observed (68/214 or 31%). Most patients were screened clinically and with chest radiography alone before transplantation. TB developed variably after transplantation [median = 72 days, interquartile range (IQR) = 534 days]. The presentation was mostly extrapulmonary and/or disseminated (4/5 or 80%). When cases with posttransplant TB were compared with matched healthy LTRs, the presence of unexplained granulomas in explants (2/5 or 40%, P = 0.01) was the only factor associated with the development of TB. When all explants showing granulomas were reviewed, TB (52.9%) remained the most common cause; however, in almost half (47.1%), other attributable causes were found. Patients were treated with a standard daily regimen for a median of 12 months (IQR = 7.5 months). Posttransplant TB was associated with a high mortality rate (2/5 or 40%). In conclusion, we observed a low prevalence of TB in LTRs from a high-prevalence region. The presence of granulomas suggestive of TB in liver explants warrants isoniazid prophylaxis in the absence of disease. Post-liver transplant TB is associated with a high mortality rate. The roles of routine IGRA testing and isoniazid prophylaxis in a high-prevalence setting urgently need to be studied.

Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in transplant donors: a donor-derived infections consensus conference report

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a ubiquitous organism that infects one-third of the world's population. In previous decades, access to organ transplantation was restricted to academic medical centers in more developed, low tuberculosis (TB) incidence countries. Globalization, changing immigration patterns, and the expansion of sophisticated medical procedures to medium and high TB incidence countries have made tuberculosis an increasingly important posttransplant infectious disease. Tuberculosis is now one of the most common bacterial causes of solid-organ transplant donor-derived infection reported in transplant recipients in the United States. Recognition of latent or undiagnosed active TB in the potential organ donor is critical to prevent emergence of disease in the recipient posttransplant. Donor-derived tuberculosis after transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which can best be prevented through careful screening and targeted treatment. To address this growing challenge and provide recommendations, an expert international working group was assembled including specialists in transplant infectious diseases, transplant surgery, organ procurement and TB epidemiology, diagnostics and management. This working group reviewed the currently available data to formulate consensus recommendations for screening and management of TB in organ donors.

Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients-Controversies in Current Diagnosis and Management

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease is increasingly being undertaken in India.(1) Routine tuberculin skin testing (TST) for latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and isoniazid prophylaxis in TST-positive liver-transplant recipients (LTRs) is recommended(2,3) but seldom implemented worldwide.(4-7) The role of TST-testing and isoniazid prophylaxis in LTRs remains further undefined in high prevalence areas, including India. We describe the burden of LTBI in LTRs; the epidemiological aspects of M. tuberculosis infection in high prevalence areas; identifiable risk factors for M. tuberculosis infection; the limitations of current diagnostic techniques for LTBI in LTRs and the efficacy and toxicity of isoniazid prophylaxis in TST-positive LTRs and suggest directions for future investigations in this area.

Acute liver failure due to antitubercular therapy: Strategy for antitubercular treatment before and after liver transplantation

The standard antitubercular treatment (ATT), which consists of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (PZA), is the best available treatment for tuberculosis (TB). However, the hepatotoxicity of INH and PZA can be severe, and even after drug withdrawal, patients may require liver transplantation (LT). In these cases, the strategy for the treatment of TB is poorly defined. Between 1986 and 2008, 14 patients presented at our department with severe hepatitis secondary to INH and PZA treatment. Four of these patients were immunosuppressed: 2 after renal transplantation and 2 because of human immunodeficiency virus infection. In seven of the 14 patients an alternative ATT was begun on admission, which was well tolerated. Hepatitis improved spontaneously in 5 patients, and alternative ATT was continued for 9.3 ± 4.2 months; 1 patient deteriorated and underwent LT, and 1 patient died. ATT was stopped definitively in 2 patients. Six patients required urgent LT, and alternative ATT was started after transplantation and was successful. Five patients receiving RIF had an episode of acute rejection. In conclusion, hepatitis secondary to ATT can be successfully treated with alternative anti-TB regimens. The use of RIF in LT patients may lead to acute rejection. RIF should therefore be avoided in these patients.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in liver transplantation

Mycobacterium tuberculosis can cause significant infections in liver transplant candidates and recipients. Its nonspecific clinical features and prolonged growth time in culture make the diagnosis difficult, and treating tuberculosis (TB) remains challenging because of significant toxicities and drug-drug interactions. The diagnosis of a latent TB infection may be accomplished with tuberculin skin testing and with the newer interferon-γ release assays, although this infection may be underrecognized because of host factors. Latent TB should be treated, but the degree of liver failure and the likelihood of progression to active TB will dictate whether this should occur before or after transplantation. Patients who have a history of TB, have used muromonab-CD3 or anti-T lymphocyte antibodies, or have experienced allograft rejection or coinfection with cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jiroveci, or Nocardia are at the greatest risk of developing active TB. Active TB in transplant patients is difficult to treat because of drug-induced hepatotoxicity and the significant interaction between rifampin and calcineurin inhibitors. In this article, we review the epidemiology, clinical features, and evaluation of transplant candidates and recipients. In addition, we offer recommendations on the appropriate diagnostic and treatment regimens for patients with latent and active TB infections.

Hepatotoxic effects of therapies for tuberculosis

Hepatotoxic effects attributable to antituberculosis therapy are considered unique among drug-related liver problems because almost all first-line antituberculosis medications have such adverse effects, which vary in severity according to the drug and the regimen. In addition, all regimens for the treatment of active tuberculosis include a combination of medications that must typically be administered for at least 6 months to ensure complete cure of the disease and to minimize the development of drug-resistant bacterial strains. Hepatotoxic effects are a serious problem in patients who are undergoing treatment for tuberculosis, not only because of the morbidity and mortality they directly cause, but also because the liver symptoms can necessitate interruption of therapy or affect a patient's adherence to it, which can limit the efficacy of the antitubercular regimen.

Serological profile of pretransplantation liver patients

INTRODUCTION

A liver transplantation is the first choice of treatment for patients with hepatic insufficiency due to chronic diseases. Infections in the postoperative period represent one of the main causes of mortality in these cases. However, few articles have evaluated the predominance of certain infectious diseases and their influence on postoperative mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 236 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 1997 to January 2007. In these records we checked the serological profiles for these diseases: toxoplasmosis, syphilis, human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV) I and II infection, Chagas disease, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, paracoccidioidomycosis, tuberculosis, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and mononucleosis (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]). The statistical analysis was performed by table frequencies.

RESULTS

CMV showed positivity (CMV-IgG) in 94.7% of patients, 95.8% for EBV, 33.3% for toxoplasmosis, 47.9% for hepatitis C, and 5% for hepatitis B.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed the importance of serological investigations and diagnostic examinations before the transplantation procedure, seeking to minimize possible reactivation of the disease after the use of immunosuppression drugs, particularly in the first 6 months after transplantation, or even to avoid a primary infection.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in transplant recipients: early diagnosis and treatment of resistant tuberculosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a better understanding and summarize recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite advances in SOT medicine, MTB causes substantial morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients, with reported prevalence rates of 0.4-6%. The primary source of posttransplant MTB is reactivation of pretransplant latent MTB infection. The short-term mortality rate in SOT recipients with drug-susceptible active MTB is 30%. In immunocompromised persons with extensively drug-resistant MTB, the mortality rate approaches 100%. Clinical presentation is often atypical with more than half of SOT recipients presenting with extrapulmonary or disseminated disease. Pretransplant latent MTB infection screening and treatment is the cornerstone for preventing reactivation and dissemination of active MTB posttransplant. Treatment of active MTB in SOT recipients is problematic, given significant drug toxicity and interaction with immunosuppressive agents.

SUMMARY

A high degree of suspicion for latent and active MTB infection in SOT candidates and recipients is warranted to establish a timely diagnosis and initiate life-saving appropriate therapy.