Inadequate immune regulatory function of CD4+CD25bright+FoxP3+ T cells in heart transplant patients who experience acute cellular rejection

Case Report: A Case of Acute Cellular Rejection Due to Atopic Dermatitis Exacerbation 3 Years After Heart Transplantation

Background

Little evidence has been presented about the association between previous atopic/allergic disease and graft rejection after solid organ transplantation. Thus, we present a case wherein acute cellular rejection (ACR) after heart transplantation (HTx) was noted along with exacerbation of atopic disease.

Case Summary

A 32-year-old man was admitted at our hospital for regular monitoring of graft rejection. He had undergone heart transplant 3 years prior due to dilated cardiomyopathy. Echocardiogram revealed good biventricular function, and no abnormal findings were found in blood sampling tests. However, biopsy showed moderate ACR [Grade 2R(ISHLT 2004)/3A(ISHLT 1990)], which required twice-repeated steroid pulses with intensified immunosuppression. Meanwhile, his atopic dermatitis, which was diagnosed before having heart failure, was getting worse for the past 6 months. The exacerbation of atopic dermatitis was presumed to be related to the development of the intractable cellular rejection.

Discussion

This case suggested the association of atopic disease and graft rejection after HTx. We examined 76 patients from a cohort of previous studies who underwent HTx at our hospital, which suggested that patients with atopic/allergic disorders such as atopic dermatitis and asthma tended to have a significantly higher frequency of moderate rejection than non-allergic patients. (p = 0.012; Fisher’s exact test). Our case also suggests that exacerbation of atopic dermatitis might cause graft rejection of the transplanted organ, so that it is important to carefully evaluate the risk of graft rejection if there is a previous history of atopic/allergic disease.

Fas, FasL and Foxp3 gene expression in post-liver transplant autoimmune hepatitis patients with and without acute rejection

Aim of the study

In this study we investigated Fas, FasL and Foxp3 expression in relation to liver graft rejection and its severity in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients.

Material and methods

Twenty-three AIH patients including five post-transplant patients with acute rejection (AR) and 18 patients without AR (non-AR) were studied for Fas, FasL and Foxp3 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on days 1, 3 and 7 after transplantation by real-time PCR. The relationships between gene expression and clinical features were determined.

Results

Real-time PCR showed various Fas gene expression levels with no significant difference between the days in AR patients (p = 0.52). In non-AR patients, Fas level increased from 0.98 ±0.24 fold on the first day to 1.89 ±0.42 fold on day 3 after transplantation (p < 0.01). In this group of patients, we also found a significant increase in FasL expression on day 7 (29.91 ±6.89 fold) compared to day 1 (13.50 ±7.44 fold, p < 0.05). Foxp3 gene expression in both groups showed decreased levels during the first week after transplantation. The decreased Foxp3 expression in AR patients was correlated with rejection activity index (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Increased Fas and FasL gene expression levels in non-AR patients and decreased Foxp3 gene expression in both groups suggested the important role of these molecules in the alloreactive response after liver transplantation in AIH patients. Foxp3 expression might be useful for monitoring rejection severity.

Monitoring alloimmune response in kidney transplantation

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is generally performed by protocols and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients are likely to receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. Developing reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival. Emerging data indicate that many assays, likely used in panels rather than single assays, have potential to be diagnostic and predictive of short and also long-term outcome. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Of note, some prospective, randomized, multicenter biomarker-driven studies are currently on-going aiming at confirming such preliminary data. These works as well as other future studies are highly warranted to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Monitoring T cell alloreactivity

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is center-specific, protocol-driven, and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. The individualization of immunosuppression requires the development of assays able to reliably quantify and/or predict the magnitude of the recipient's immune response toward the allograft. As alloreactive T cells are central mediators of allograft rejection, monitoring T cell alloreactivity has become a priority for the transplant community. Among available assays, flow cytometry based phenotyping, T cell proliferation, T cell cytokine secretion, and ATP release (ImmuKnow), have been the most thoroughly tested. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Future studies are required to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Rotterdam: main port for organ transplantation research in the Netherlands

This overview describes the full spectrum of current pre-clinical and clinical kidney-, liver-, heart- and lung transplantation research performed in Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. An update is provided on the development of a large living donor kidney transplantation program and on optimization of kidney allocation, including the implementation of a domino kidney-donation program. Our current research efforts to optimize immunosuppressive regimens and find novel targets for immunosuppressive therapy, our recent studies on prevention of ischemia-reperfusion-induced graft injury, our newest findings on stimulation of tissue regeneration, our novel approaches to prevent rejection and viral infection, and our latest insights in the regulation of allograft rejection, are summarized.

Differing effects of rapamycin or calcineurin inhibitor on T-regulatory cells in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients

In a cross-sectional study, we assessed effects of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or rapamycin on T-regulatory (Treg) cells from children with stable liver (n = 53) or kidney (n = 9) allografts several years posttransplant. We analyzed Treg number, phenotype, suppressive function, and methylation at the Treg-specific demethylation region (TSDR) using Tregs and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Forty-eight patients received CNI (39 as monotherapy) and 12 patients received rapamycin (9 as monotherapy). Treg numbers diminished over time on either regimen, but reached significance only with CNI (r =-0.424, p = 0.017). CNI levels inversely correlated with Treg number (r =-0.371, p = 0.026), and positively correlated with CD127+ expression by Tregs (r = 0.437, p = 0.023). Patients with CNI levels >3.6 ng/mL had weaker Treg function than those with levels <3.6 ng/mL, whereas rapamycin therapy positively correlated with Treg numbers (r = 0.628, p = 0.029) and their expression of CTLA4 (r = 0.726, p = 0.041). Overall, CTLA4 expression, TSDR demethylation and an absence of CD127 were important for Treg suppressive function. We conclude that rapamycin has beneficial effects on Treg biology, whereas long-term and high dose CNI use may impair Treg number, function and phenotype, potentially acting as a barrier to attaining host hyporesponsiveness to an allograft.

Relevance of regulatory T cell promotion of donor-specific tolerance in solid organ transplantation

Current clinical strategies to control the alloimmune response after transplantation do not fully prevent induction of the immunological processes which lead to acute and chronic immune-mediated graft rejection, and as such the survival of a solid organ allograft is limited. Experimental research on naturally occurring CD4⁺CD25^highFoxP3⁺ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) has indicated their potential to establish stable long-term graft acceptance, with the promise of providing a more effective therapy for transplant recipients. Current approaches for clinical use are based on the infusion of freshly isolated or ex vivo polyclonally expanded Tregs into graft recipients with an aim to redress the in vivo balance of T effector cells to Tregs. However mounting evidence suggests that regulation of donor-specific immunity may be central to achieving immunological tolerance. Therefore, the next stages in optimizing translation of Tregs to organ transplantation will be through the refinement and development of donor alloantigen-specific Treg therapy. The altering kinetics and intensity of alloantigen presentation pathways and alloimmune priming following transplantation may indeed influence the specificity of the Treg required and the timing or frequency at which it needs to be administered. Here we review and discuss the relevance of antigen-specific regulation of alloreactivity by Tregs in experimental and clinical studies of tolerance and explore the concept of delivering an optimal Treg for the induction and maintenance phases of achieving transplantation tolerance.

DR(high+)CD45RA(-)-Tregs potentially affect the suppressive activity of the total Treg pool in renal transplant patients

Recent studies show that regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an essential role in tolerance induction after organ transplantation. In order to examine whether there are differences in the composition of the total CD4⁺CD127^low+/−FoxP3⁺- Treg cell pool between stable transplant patients and patients with biopsy proven rejection (BPR), we compared the percentages and the functional activity of the different Treg cell subsets (DR^high+CD45RA⁻-Tregs, DR^low+CD45RA⁻-Tregs, DR⁻CD45RA⁻-Tregs, DR⁻CD45RA⁺-Tregs). All parameters were determined during the three different periods of time after transplantation (0–30 days, 31–1,000 days, >1,000 days). Among 156 transplant patients, 37 patients suffered from BPR. The most prominent differences between rejecting and non-rejecting patients were observed regarding the DR^high+CD45RA⁻-Treg cell subset. Our data demonstrate that the suppressive activity of the total Treg pool strongly depends on the presence of these Treg cells. Their percentage within the total Treg pool strongly decreased after transplantation and remained relatively low during the first year after transplantation in all patients. Subsequently, the proportion of this Treg subset increased again in patients who accepted the transplant and reached a value of healthy non-transplanted subjects. By contrast, in patients with acute kidney rejection, the DR^high+CD45RA⁻-Treg subset disappeared excessively, causing a reduction in the suppressive activity of the total Treg pool. Therefore, both the monitoring of its percentage within the total Treg pool and the monitoring of the HLA-DR MFI of the DR⁺CD45RA⁻-Treg subset may be useful tools for the prediction of graft rejection.

Monitoring of CD4+CD25highIL-7Rαhigh activated T cells in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In humans, circulating CD4(+)CD25(high) T cells contain mainly regulatory T cells (Treg; FoxP3(+)IL-7Rα(low)), but a small subset is represented by activated effector T cells (Tact; FoxP3(-)IL-7Rα(high)). The balance between Tact and Treg may be important after transplantation. The aim of this study was first to analyze and correlate CD4(+)CD25(high) Tact and Treg with the clinical status of kidney transplant recipients and second to study prospectively the effect of two immunosuppressive regimens on Tact/Treg during the first year after transplantation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

CD4(+)CD25(high) Tact and Treg were analyzed by flow cytometry, either retrospectively in 90 patients greater than 1 year after kidney transplantation (cross-sectional analysis) or prospectively in 35 patients receiving two immunosuppressive regimens after kidney transplantation (prospective analysis).

RESULTS

A higher proportion of Tact and a lower proportion of Treg were found in the majority of kidney recipients. In chronic humoral rejection, a strikingly higher proportion of Tact was present. A subgroup of stable recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or sirolimus) had Tact values that were similar to healthy individuals. In the prospective analysis, the proportion of Tact significantly increased in both immunosuppression groups during the first year after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight distinct patterns in the proportion of circulating Tact depending on the clinical status of kidney recipients. Moreover, the prospective analysis demonstrated an increase in the proportion of Tact, regardless of the immunosuppressive regimen. The measurement of Tact, in addition to Treg, may become a useful immune monitoring tool after kidney transplantation.

Do CD4+ Foxp3+ Treg cells correlate with transplant outcomes: a systematic review on recipients of solid organ transplantation

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are considered to be critical for the induction of transplant tolerance. Tregs counts were measured in blood, biopsy and urine sample after transplantation in many studies. Although not unanimous, some studies have suggested that Tregs is associated with better outcome and can also serve as an immune marker to predict the individual risk of rejection and identify tolerant patients. In this study, we systematically reviewed the correlation between Tregs and transplant outcomes, identifying if Tregs can predict transplant rejection and tolerance. A total of 22 articles were included and assessed, the results showed that Tregs in recipients are helpful to maintain a stable graft function, reduce acute/chronic rejection rate. And the Tregs in graft and urine, rather than in PBL, may have a better diagnostic value for transplant outcomes. However, since the low quality of included studies, results may be influenced by bias. More high quality studies with bigger sample size are still needed in future.

Local IL-17 production and a decrease in peripheral blood regulatory T cells in an animal model of bronchiolitis obliterans

BACKGROUND

Recently, it has been reported that Th17 contributes to allograft rejection after transplantation. We investigated the alteration of Th17 and regulatory T cells (Treg) distribution in an animal model of bronchiolitis obliterans following ectopic tracheal transplantation model.

METHODS

Tracheal grafts from B6 mice transplanted into subcutaneous sites of C3H mice. Allografts were histologically evaluated, and expressions of CD4, CD8, CD25, CD28, CD127, CD152 and Foxp3, and intracellular interleukin (IL)-4, -6, -17, and interferon-gamma, in peripheral blood lymphocytes were analyzed. Tracheal graft IL-6 and -17 mRNA expression was assessed using a quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. All the data in allogenic transplantation was compared with those in isograft controls. In addition, the effect of IL-6 neutralization on the allograft was evaluated with histopathology and the IL-17 mRNA expression.

RESULTS

Treg was significantly lower in peripheral blood of allogenic mice, whereas no significant difference in Th17 in the CD4 T-cell population was observed after allogenic or isogenic transplantation. Locoregional histologic examination revealed the presence of IL-6-producing lymphocytes and endothelium in the allograft, and the luminal obliteration by fibroblast proliferation. Both IL-6 and IL-17 mRNA levels were elevated in the allograft. Severity of tracheal obliteration and IL-17 mRNA level was significantly suppressed in the IL-6 neutralized allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

After allograft in a mouse bronchiolitis obliterans model, IL-17 production increases locally without an alteration in peripheral blood Th17 cells, whereas peripheral Tregs decreases. Th17 cells, which can be regulated by IL-6 stimulation, may play a role in posttransplantation rejection of the allograft.

Detecting adaptive immunity: applications in transplantation monitoring

In recent decades, continuous improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have led to a significant increase in kidney allograft survival. Despite innovative developments and improvements in immunosuppression, chronic allograft injury and late graft loss still remain major causes of morbidity and mortality. In clinical practice, long-term immunosuppression is adapted and fine-tuned according to drug levels, kidney function, and biopsy results. As an invasive procedure, indication biopsy still represents an indispensible diagnostic gold standard. However, in an effort to further improve outcomes on the basis of individualized treatment, there is an urgent need for noninvasive assays, as well as biomarkers, to more accurately monitor allogeneic responses and predict the risk of acute and chronic allograft rejection. This article discusses strategies for immune monitoring of T-cell responsiveness and humoral alloreactivity. Furthermore, new microarray and gene profiling data are highlighted, which may identify hyporesponsive transplant recipients who could benefit from a reduction or even withdrawal of immunosuppression. Finally, supplementary transplant risk assessment markers, such as soluble CD30 and urinary effector molecule analysis, are discussed as promising new tools. Recent developments and improvements in test principles to monitor and predict allograft immunity are encouraging and may herald the transition of present empiric immunosuppression to individualized immunosuppressive treatment. Nonetheless, before implementation of immune monitoring in routine clinical practice, there is still a need for prospective trials designed to clarify the actual diagnostic potential of individual test systems in a therapeutic context.

Regulatory T cells in alloreactivity after clinical heart transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the knowledge of CD4+CD25bright+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in experimental transplant models grows, we need to understand how and to what extent these suppressor cells regulate donor-directed immune events in the transplantation clinic. This review focuses on the function of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood and the transplanted organ of patients after heart transplantation during immunological quiescence and rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, we present data that peripheral CD4+CD25bright+FoxP3+ T cells of heart transplant patients who experience acute rejection have inadequate immune regulatory function in vitro compared with those of nonrejecting patients. During rejection, potent donor-specific T-cell suppressors are present in the transplanted organ.

SUMMARY

The studies in transplant patients' show that the function of CD4+CD25bright+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in alloimmunity is to inhibit the activation of effector T cells, to prevent rejection, and to control the antidonor response at the graft itself at later stages of immune reactivity.