Independent Validation of a Model Predicting the Need for Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion at Liver Transplantation

Viscoelastometry to Manage Bleeding in Liver Disease

A state of "re-balanced haemostasis" describes complex coagulation changes that arise in patients with liver disease. Changes include alterations in procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, platelets and von Willebrand factor, as well as the fibrinolytic system. Various circumstances including infection, trauma, or surgery may disrupt this balance and predispose an individual to bleeding or thrombosis. The prothrombin time, international normalised ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time are conventional coagulation screening tests that are routinely employed by clinicians to investigate unexplained bleeding, monitor anticoagulation, and inform preoperative assessments of bleeding risk. These standard coagulation tests assess quantitative defects in procoagulant clotting factors and are insensitive to levels of natural anticoagulants, which together with procoagulant factors, are often perturbed in liver disease. Therefore, the prolongation of clotting times measured by these tests often does not reflect the multifaceted alterations of haemostasis in these patients. Viscoelastic testing (VET) provides a more encompassing assessment of clotting function by recording real-time viscoelastic changes in whole blood and includes parameters that provide information on coagulation factor function, platelet contribution to clot formation, as well as fibrinolysis. To date, VET has been employed to predict and inform transfusion support in obstetric, trauma, and cardiac surgical fields, and its use in patients undergoing liver transplantation is well established. The ability of VET to accurately predict bleeding risk and precisely guide transfusion algorithms for patients with liver disease undergoing other invasive procedures or experiencing bleeding complications has been the topic of research over the last decade. This review is a critical summary of this data and provides a detailed snapshot of the position of VET as a clinical tool in patients with liver disease.

Systematic review highlights high risk of bias of clinical prediction models for blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion can be a lifesaving intervention after perioperative blood loss. Many prediction models have been developed to identify patients most likely to require blood transfusion during elective surgery, but it is unclear whether any are suitable for clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Transfusion Evidence Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies reporting the development or validation of a blood transfusion prediction model in elective surgery patients between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2021. We extracted study characteristics, discrimination performance (c-statistics) of final models, and data, which we used to perform risk of bias assessment using the Prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

We reviewed 66 studies (72 developed and 48 externally validated models). Pooled c-statistics of externally validated models ranged from 0.67 to 0.78. Most developed and validated models were at high risk of bias due to handling of predictors, validation methods, and too small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

Most blood transfusion prediction models are at high risk of bias and suffer from poor reporting and methodological quality, which must be addressed before they can be safely used in clinical practice.

Should Cell Salvage Be Used in Liver Resection and Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative blood cell salvage and autotransfusion (IBSA) use on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and postoperative outcomes in liver surgery.

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative RBC transfusions are common in liver surgery and associated with increased morbidity. IBSA can be utilized to minimize allogeneic transfusion. A theoretical risk of cancer dissemination has limited IBSA adoption in oncologic surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from inception until May 2021. All studies comparing IBSA use with control in liver surgery were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently, in duplicate. The primary outcome was intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion (proportion of patients and volume of blood transfused). Core secondary outcomes included: overall survival and disease-free survival, transfusion-related complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Data from transplant and resection studies were analyzed separately. Random effects models were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one observational studies were included (16 transplant, 5 resection, n=3433 patients). Seventeen studies incorporated oncologic indications. In transplant, IBSA was associated with decreased allogeneic RBC transfusion [mean difference -1.81, 95% confidence interval (-3.22, -0.40), P =0.01, I 2 =86%, very-low certainty]. Few resection studies reported on transfusion for meta-analysis. No significant difference existed in overall survival or disease-free survival in liver transplant [hazard ratio (HR)=1.12 (0.75, 1.68), P =0.59, I 2 =0%; HR=0.93 (0.57, 1.48), P =0.75, I 2 =0%] and liver resection [HR=0.69 (0.45, 1.05), P =0.08, I 2 =0%; HR=0.93 (0.59, 1.45), P =0.74, I 2 =0%].

CONCLUSION

IBSA may reduce intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion without compromising oncologic outcomes. The current evidence base is limited in size and quality, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

Blood products and liver transplantation: A strategy to balance optimal preparation with effective blood stewardship

BACKGROUND

Unanticipated transfusion requirements during liver transplantation can delay lifesaving intraoperative resuscitation and strain blood bank resources. Risk-stratified preoperative blood preparation can mitigate these deleterious outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A two-tiered blood preparation protocol for liver transplantation was retrospectively evaluated. Eleven binary variables served as criteria for high-risk (HR) allocation. Primary outcomes included red blood cell (RBC), plasma (FFP), and platelet (Plt) utilization. Secondary outcomes included product under- and overpreparation. Contingency tables for transfusion requirements above the population means were generated using 15 clinical variables. Modified protocols were developed and retrospectively optimized using the study population.

RESULTS

Of 225 recipients, 102 received HR preoperative orders, which correlated to higher intraoperative transfusion requirements. However, univariate analysis identified only two statistical risk factors per product: Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl (p < .001) and MELD ≥38 (p = .035) for RBCs, Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl (p = .002) and acute alcoholic hepatitis (p = 0.015) for FFP, and Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl (p = .001) and normothermic liver preservation (p = .037) for Plts. Based on these findings, we developed modified protocols for individual products, which were evaluated retrospectively for their effectiveness at reducing under-preparatory events while limiting product overpreparation. Cohort statistics were used to define the preparation strategy for each protocol. Retrospective comparative analysis demonstrated the superiority of the modified protocols by improving the under-preparation rate from 24% to <10% for each product, which required a 1.56-fold and 1.44-fold increase in RBC and FFP overpreparation, respectively. Importantly, there was no difference in Plt overpreparation.

DISCUSSION

We report translatable data-driven blood bank preparation protocols for liver transplantation.

Validation of 5 models predicting transfusion, bleeding, and mortality in liver transplantation: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Historically, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with massive blood loss, blood transfusion and morbidity. In order to predict such outcomes five nomograms have been published relating to transfusions and morbidity associated with OLTs. These nomograms, developed on the basis of three cohorts of patients consisting of 406, 750, and 800 having undergone OLTs, aimed to predict a transfusion of ≥1 red blood cell unit (RBC), a transfusion of >2 RBC units, a blood loss of >900 ml, as well as one-month and one-year survival rates. The aim of this study was to validate these five nomograms in a contemporary, independent cohort of patients.

METHODS

Five nomograms were previously developed based on 406, 750, and 800 OLTs. In this study we performed a temporal validation of these nomograms on contemporary patients that consisted of three cohorts of 800, 250, and 200 OLTs. Logistic regression coefficients from the historic development cohorts were applied to the three contemporary temporal validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The most accurate nomogram was able to predict transfusion of ≥1 RBC units with an area under the curve (AUC) was 0.91. The second-best nomogram was able to predict bleeding of >900 ml with an AUC of 0.70. T he AUC of the third nomogram (transfusion of >2 RBC units) was 0.70. However, is temporal validation was suboptimal, due to a low prevalence of OLTs transfused with >2 RBC units. The last 2 nomograms exhibited clearly suboptimal AUC values of 0.54 and 0.61.

CONCLUSION

Two of the five nomograms predict blood transfusion and blood loss with excellent accuracy. Transfusion of ≥1 RBC unit and blood loss of >900 ml can be predicted on the basis of these nomograms. However, these nomograms are not accurate to predict one-month and one-year survival rates. These results should be further cross-validated, ideally prospectively, in additional external independent cohorts.

Intraoperative phlebotomies and bleeding in liver transplantation: a historical cohort study and causal analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is associated with major bleeding and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. No well-designed causal analysis on interventions used to reduce transfusions, such as an intraoperative phlebotomy, has been conducted in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a historical cohort study among liver transplantations performed from July 2008 to January 2021 in a Canadian centre. The exposure was intraoperative phlebotomy. The outcomes were blood loss, perioperative RBC transfusions (intraoperative and up to 48 hr after surgery), intraoperative RBC transfusions, and one-year survival. We estimated marginal multiplicative factors (MFs), risk differences (RDs), and hazard ratios by inverse probability of treatment weighting both among treated patients and the whole population. Estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 679 patients undergoing liver transplantations of which 365 (54%) received an intraoperative phlebotomy. A phlebotomy did not reduce bleeding, transfusion risks, or mortality when estimated among the treated but reduced bleeding and transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population (MF, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.99; perioperative RD, -15.2%; 95% CI, -26.1 to -0.8; intraoperative RD, -14.7%; 95% CI, -23.2 to -2.8). In a subgroup analysis on 584 patients with end-stage liver disease, slightly larger effects were observed on both transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population while beneficial effects were observed on the intraoperative transfusion risk when estimated among the treated population.

CONCLUSION

The use of intraoperative phlebotomy was not consistently associated with better outcomes in all targets of inference but may improve outcomes among the whole population.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT04826666); registered 1 April 2021.

Association of Phlebotomy on Blood Product Transfusion Requirements During Liver Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study on 1000 Cases

Background

During the past 2 decades, transfusion requirements have decreased drastically during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and transfusion-free transplantation is nowadays increasingly common. Understanding that liberal intravenous volume loading in cirrhotic patients may have detrimental consequences is key. In contrast, phlebotomy is a method to lower central venous pressure and portal venous pressure. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of phlebotomy in the early phase of blood transfusion, blood loss, renal function, and mortality.

Methods

The present study evaluated the impact of phlebotomy on bleeding, transfusion rate, renal dysfunction, and mortality in 1000 consecutive OLTs. Two groups were defined and compared using phlebotomy. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to determine predictors of bleeding, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, renal dysfunction, and mortality.

Results

A mean of 0.7 ± 1.5 RBC units was transfused per patient for 1000 OLTs, 75% did not receive any RBCs, and the median and interquartile range (25-75) were 0 for all blood products transfused. The phlebotomy was associated with decreased transfusion (RBCs, plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, albumin), with less bleeding, and with an increased survival rate, both 1 mo and 1 y. Phlebotomy was not associated with renal dysfunction.

Conclusions

The practice of phlebotomy to lower portal venous pressure was associated with reduced blood product transfusions and blood loss during liver dissection without deleterious effect on renal function.

Successful Management of a Patient with Intraoperative Bleeding of More than 80,000 mL and Usefulness of QTc Monitoring for Calcium Correction

Intraoperative massive bleeding is associated with high rates of mortality and anesthetic management of massive bleeding is challenging because it is necessary to achieve volume resuscitation and electrolyte correction simultaneously during massive transfusion. We report a case of life-threatening bleeding of more than 80,000 mL during liver transplantation in which real-time QTc monitoring was useful for an extremely large amount of calcium administration for treatment of hypocalcemia. A 47-year-old female with a giant liver due to polycystic liver disease was scheduled to undergo liver transplantation. During surgery, life-threatening massive bleeding occurred. The maximum rate of blood loss was approximately 15,000 mL/hr and the total amount of estimated blood loss was 81,600 mL. It was extremely difficult to maintain blood pressure and a risk of cardiac arrest continued due to hypotension. In addition, even though administration of insulin and calcium was performed, electrolyte disturbances of hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia with prolongation of QTc interval occurred. At that time, we visually noticed that the QT interval was shortened in response to bolus calcium administration, and we used the change of real-time QTc interval as a supportive indicator for calcium correction. This monitoring allowed for us to administer calcium at an unusually high rate, by which progression of hypocalcemia was prevented. Levels of hemoglobin and coagulation factors were preserved both by restriction of crystalloid infusion and by a massive transfusion protocol. The patient was extubated without pulmonary edema or cardiac overload and was finally discharged without any sequelae. Intensive and cooperative management for massive transfusion and electrolyte correction using QTc monitoring was considered to be a key for successful management.

Thromboelastography does not reduce transfusion requirements in liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare total blood product requirements in liver transplantation (LT) assisted by thromboelastography (TEG) or conventional coagulation tests (CCTs).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A tertiary care referral center for LT.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing LT from deceased donor.

INTERVENTION

Hemostasis was monitored by TEG or CCTs and corresponding transfusion algorithms were adopted.

MEASUREMENTS

Number and types of blood products (red blood cells, RBC; fresh-frozen plasma, FFP; platelets, PLT) transfused from the beginning of surgery until the admission to the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We compared data retrospectively collected in 226 LTs, grouped according to the type of hemostasis monitoring (90 with TEG and 136 with CCTs, respectively). Confounding variables affecting transfusion needs (recipient age, sex, previous hepatocellular carcinoma surgery, Model for End Stage Liver Disease - MELD, baseline hemoglobin, fibrinogen, creatinine, veno-venous by pass, and trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) were managed by propensity score match (PSM).

MAIN RESULTS

The preliminary analysis showed that patients in the TEG group received fewer total blood products (RBC + FFP + PLT; p = 0.001, FFP (p = 0.001), and RBC (p = 0.001). After PSM, 89 CCT patients were selected and matched to the 90 TEG patients. CCT and TEG matched patients received similar amount of total blood products. In a subgroup of 39 patients in the top MELD quartile (MELD ≥25), the TEG use resulted in lower consumption of FFP units and total blood products. Nevertheless, due to the low number of patients, any meaningful conclusion could be achieved in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, TEG-guided transfusion in LT does not reduce the intraoperative blood product consumption. Further studies are warranted to assess an advantage for TEG in either the entire LT population or the high-MELD subgroup of patients.

Validation of predictive models identifying patients at risk for massive transfusion during liver transplantation and their potential impact on blood bank resource utilization

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative massive transfusion (MT) is common during liver transplantation (LT). A predictive model of MT has the potential to improve use of blood bank resources.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Development and validation cohorts were identified among deceased-donor LT recipients from 2010 to 2016. A multivariable model of MT generated from the development cohort was validated with the validation cohort and refined using both cohorts. The combined cohort also validated the previously reported McCluskey risk index (McRI). A simple modified risk index (ModRI) was then created from the combined cohort. Finally, a method to translate model predictions to a population-specific blood allocation strategy was described and demonstrated for the study population.

RESULTS

Of the 403 patients, 60 (29.6%) in the development and 51 (25.5%) in the validation cohort met the definition for MT. The ModRI, derived from variables incorporated into multivariable model, ranged from 0 to 5, where 1 point each was assigned for hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL, platelet count of less than 100 × 10⁹ /dL, thromboelastography R interval of more than 6 minutes, simultaneous liver and kidney transplant and retransplantation, and a ModRI of more than 2 defined recipients at risk for MT. The multivariable model, McRI, and ModRI demonstrated good discrimination (c statistic [95% CI], 0.77 [0.70-0.84]; 0.69 [0.62-0.76]; and 0.72 [0.65-0.79], respectively, after correction for optimism). For blood allocation of 6 or 15 units of red blood cells (RBCs) based on risk of MT, the ModRI would prevent unnecessary crossmatching of 300 units of RBCs/100 transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk indices of MT in LT can be effective for risk stratification and reducing unnecessary blood bank resource utilization.

Transfusional optimization in liver transplant using viscoelastic test guided therapy

BACKGROUND

Assess the reduction of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion in liver transplantation (LT) after the introduction of the thromboelastometry as intraoperative coagulation monitor.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study (n=92), randomized into two groups: groupA (control), in whom transfusion therapy was based on conventional laboratory tests (CLT), and groupB (ROTEM), whose blood transfusion was performed as protocolized algorithms, guided by thromboelastometry (ROTEM). We analyzed packed red blood cells (PRBCs) units, transfused units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets units, fibrinogen and tranexamic acid. We used the chi square test for the comparison of proportions and Student's t test to compare means when the distribution was normal. Otherwise, Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

RESULTS

In groupA 84.8% of patients required transfusion of PRBCs, with a median (IQR) of 4 (1.5-6), compared with 67.4% in groupB with a median (IQR) of 2 (0-4) (P<.05). We also found differences in the following variables: FFP transfusion rate was 84.8% with a median (IQR) of 5 (2-12) IU in groupA and 56.5% (median (IQR) of 1 (0-4.5) in B (P<.001) and in the fibrinogen administration, that was 6.5% in groupA and 34.8% in groupB (P<.01). Backward stepwise logistic regression model showed associations between the clamping time, the preoperative hemoglobin, the portal hypertension (PHT) and being or not in the treatment group and the need for perioperative transfusion. We didn't find significant differences in the incidence of complication during the early postoperative period between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) measurements in hemostatic therapy algorithms reduces the transfusion rate of FFP and PRBCs during liver transplantation. The using of ROTEM derived thresholds leads to detecting higher requirements of fibrinogen compared to conventional laboratory tests.

Impact of MELD Score-Based Organ Allocation on Mortality, Bleeding, and Transfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Before-and-After Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system on mortality, bleeding, and transfusion requirement in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

DESIGN

OLTs were studied for this observational study (before-and-after observational cohort study).

SETTING

One community hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 686 patients who underwent 750 consecutive OLTs.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients who underwent OLT in the MELD era had an adjusted lower 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.24-0.83]) compared with patients who underwent OLT the pre-MELD era. No significant difference in 1-month mortality was observed. Other variables with a significant effect on 1-year mortality in multivariate analysis were preoperative international normalized ratio, intraoperative use of a phlebotomy, total intraoperative volume of crystalloid infused, and retransplantation. Blood loss was greater in the MELD era (median difference 200 mL; p < 0.001), as were red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate transfusions. More patients in the MELD era received at least 1 transfusion (27% v 20%; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The MELD allocation system did not affect 1-month mortality, but a decrease in 1-year mortality was demonstrated. Blood loss and transfusions increased during OLTs performed in the MELD era. The role of other variables should be explored further to explain postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Development of a Predictive Model for Blood Transfusions and Bleeding During Liver Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) frequently is associated with major blood loss and considerable transfusion requirements. The goal of this study was to define the risk factors for multiple transfusions and major bleeding during OLT and to help identify higher risk patients that could benefit from targeted interventions.

DESIGN

OLTs were studied for this observational cohort study.

SETTING

Community hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 800 consecutive OLTs were studied.

INTERVENTION

No intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline and intraoperative data were gathered. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to find variables associated with 2 outcomes: transfusion of more than 2 units of red blood cells (RBC) and bleeding ≥900 mL. Two nomograms were developed to predict individual risks. The overall intraoperative RBC transfusion was 0.6 ± 1.4 units on average, and 61 surgeries (7.6%) received more than 2 units of RBC (4.5 ± 1.9). Some variables were associated with the outcomes: 5 were associated with transfusion of more than 2 units of RBC (patient's height, starting hemoglobin concentration, starting bilirubin value, the use of a phlebotomy, and central venous pressure [CVP] at the time of vena cava clamping) and 3 with blood loss of ≥900 mL (starting hemoglobin value, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, and CVP at the time of vena cava clamping). Preclamping CVP showed the strongest association with both outcomes. Nomograms were developed to predict the individual OLT recipients' risk of requiring more than 2 units RBC and suffering from major bleeding. Among the variables associated with multiple RBC transfusions and major bleeding, 3 can lead to interventions: baseline hemoglobin value, the use of a phlebotomy, and the preclamping CVP.

CONCLUSION

Some variables were able to predict the risk of multiple transfusions and major bleeding in this low bleeding liver transplantation population. Further studies based on these variables should be done to better define the role of targeted interventions in higher risk liver transplant recipients.

Anesthesia Patients with Concomitant Cardiac and Hepatic Dysfunction

Anesthesia and surgery in patients with hepatic and cardiac dysfunction poses a challenge for anesthesiologists. It is imperative to optimize these patients perioperatively. Cirrhosis is associated with a wide range of cardiovascular abnormalities. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is characterized by blunted contractile responsiveness or systolic incompetence, and/or diastolic dysfunction. In liver disease, anesthetic drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination may be altered. Among patients with liver disease, propofol is a reasonable anesthetic choice and cisatracurium is the preferred neuromuscular blocker. Regional anesthesia should be used whenever appropriate if not contraindicated by coagulopathy, because it reduces the need for systemic analgesia.

Survey of hemostasis management and transfusion in liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the management of haemostasis and transfusion practice in the field of liver transplantation in Spain.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed for physicians in anaesthesiology of all centres performing liver transplantation in Spain. The information required made reference to the 12 months prior to its distribution, from January 1 to December 31, 2011.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 24 centres in which liver transplantation is performed in Spain. Only 46% reported that they had protocols or practice guidelines for the management of haemostasis, and 83% of hospitals responded that they knew the percentage of transfused patients, but only 57% knew the mean transfusion. Regarding the degree of satisfaction with the management of haemostasis/coagulation, 50% said they were not satisfied. Thromboelastometry was used as an additional method of preoperative monitoring in only 8% of the centres and intra-operatively in one-third. Less than half (46%) of the centres performed preoperative correction of coagulation deficits based on conventional tests. The mean number of packed red cells used was ≤4 in 57% of centres. Consumption of fresh frozen plasma was highly variable, while 100% of centres consumed less than 4 pools of platelets per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variability in the management of haemostasis and transfusion practice among Spanish centres. There are no guidelines or they are not widely used. The mean use of transfused blood products remain high. There was a decrease in centres using new methods of monitoring.

Point-of-care haemostasis monitoring during liver transplantation reduces transfusion requirements and improves patient outcome

BACKGROUND

Optimal haemostasis management can improve patient outcomes and reduce blood loss and transfusion volume in orthotopic-liver-transplant (OLT).

METHODS

We performed a prospective study including 200 consecutive OLTs. The first 100 patients were treated according to the clinic's standards and the next 100 patients were treated using the new point-of-care (POC)-based haemostasis management strategy. Transfusion parameters and other outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Transfusion requirements were reduced in the POC group. The median and IQR of red-blood-cells (RBC) transfusion units were reduced from 5 [2-8] to 3 [0-5] (p < 0.001), plasma from 2 [0-4] to 0 (p < 0.001), and platelets from 1 [0-4] to 0 [0-1] (p < 0.001), into the POC group only four patients received tranexamic acid and fibrinogen transfusion rate was 1.13 ± 1.44 g (p = 0.001). We also improved the incidence of transfusion avoidance, 5% vs. 24% (p < 0.001) and reduced the incidence of massive transfusion (defined as the transfusion of more than 10 RBC units), 13% vs. 2% (p = 0.005). We also observed a relationship between RBC transfusion requirements and preoperative haemoglobin, and between platelet transfusion and preoperative fibrinogen levels. The incidence of postoperative complications, such as, reoperation for bleeding, acute-kidney-failure or haemodynamic instability was significantly lower (13.0% vs. 5%, p = 0.048, 17% vs. 2%, p < 0.001, and 29% vs. 16%, p = 0.028). Overall, blood product transfusion was associated with increased risk of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A haemostatic therapy algorithm based on POC monitoring reduced transfusion and improved outcome in OLT.

Management of bleeding and transfusion during liver transplantation before and after the introduction of a rotational thromboelastometry-based algorithm

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains a potentially hemorrhagic procedure. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care device used to monitor coagulation during OLT. Whether it allows blood loss and transfusions to be reduced during OLT remains controversial. Excellent correlations and predictive values have been found between ROTEM parameters and fibrinogen. We hypothesized that the use of a ROTEM-based transfusion algorithm during OLT would lead to more fibrinogen transfusion and decreased bleeding and blood transfusion. Sixty adult patients were consecutively included in a prospective, without-versus-with study: 30 in the group without ROTEM results and 30 in the group with the ROTEM-based algorithm. A small and nonsignificant increase in median fibrinogen transfusions was found for the with group (6.0 g versus 4.5 g, P = 0.50). It was not associated with a decrease in blood transfusions or in the number of patients exposed to blood products.

Impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on transfusion rates in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (OLT) can entail a high risk of blood loss requiring transfusions, which increase morbidity and mortality. In recent years many efforts have been spent to improve the surgical and anesthetic management to decrease transfusion rates during OLT. Preoperative predictors for transfusion in OLT, remain uncertain.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the 219 OLT performed from 2005 to 2011 focusing on blood product (BP) transfusions. Statistical analysis sought the impact of transfusions on OLT outcomes to identify possible independent predictors of higher BP requirements.

RESULTS

The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 86.6% and 76.45% for patients and 81.0% and 71.8% for grafts respectively. The mean intra- and perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates were 12.3 ± 11.7 U and 15.5 ± 13.0 U respectively. A statistical analysis demonstrated a significant influence of BP transfusion on post-OLT complications and survivals. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to be the only independent predictor of perioperative RBC transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed the link between intra- and perioperative transfusions and outcome of OLT patients. MELD score resulted the only independent variable associated with increased perioperative RBC transfusions.

Factors associated with blood transfusion in donor hepatectomy: results from 2344 donors at a large single center

BACKGROUND

The safety of healthy living donors undergoing hepatic resection for living-donor liver transplantation is of paramount concern. Although blood transfusions have been associated with morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy, there is limited information about the risk factors associated with blood transfusion in living liver donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2344 donors who underwent a hepatectomy for living-donor liver transplantation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine blood transfusion predictors in living-donor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Of these donors, 48 (2.0%) and 97 (4.1%) were transfused with packed red blood cell (PRBC) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), respectively. The amount of PRBC and FFP administered to donors transfused with blood products were 1.9±0.8 and 3.7±2.5 units, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a low preoperative hemoglobin level was found to be an independent predictor of PRBC transfusion in donor hepatectomy (odds ratio=0.585; 95% confidence interval=0.451-0.758; P<0.001). A high graft-to-donor weight ratio predicted an FFP transfusion in donor hepatectomy (odds ratio=2.997; 95% confidence interval=1.226-7.327; P=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that, in donor hepatectomy, the preoperative hemoglobin value and graft-to-donor weight ratio can provide useful information on the probability of PRBC and FFP transfusion, respectively.

Aprotinin versus tranexamic acid during liver transplantation: impact on blood product requirements and survival

BACKGROUND

Historically, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with major blood loss and the need for blood product transfusions. Activation of the fibrinolytic system can contribute significantly to bleeding. Prophylactic administration of antifibrinolytic agents was found to reduce blood loss.

METHODS

The efficacy of two antifibrinolytic compounds--aprotinin (AP) and tranexamic acid (TA)--was compared in OLT. Four hundred consecutive OLTs were studied: 300 patients received AP and 100 received TA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of intraoperative transfusion requirement and 1-year patient mortality.

RESULTS

There was no intergroup difference in intraoperative blood loss (1082±1056 vs. 1007±790 mL), red blood cell transfusion per patient (0.5±1.4 vs. 0.5±1.0), final hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (93±20 g/L vs. 95±22 g/L), the percentage of OLT cases requiring no blood product administration (80% vs. 82%), and 1-year survival (85.1% vs. 87.4%). Serum creatinine concentrations were also the same (116±55 vs. 119±36 μmol/L) 1 year after surgery. Two variables, starting Hb and phlebotomy, correlated with the two primary outcome measures (transfusion and 1-year survival).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, administration of AP was not superior to TA with regards to blood loss and blood product transfusion requirement during OLT. In addition, we found no difference between the groups in the 1-year survival rate and renal function. Furthermore, we suggest that starting Hb concentration should be considered when prioritizing patients on the waiting list and planning perioperative care for OLT recipients.

Intraoperative management of liver transplant patients

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease results in excellent outcomes. Patient and graft outcome is closely monitored on a national level, and 1-year survival is between 80% and 95%. Liver transplantation relies on a multidisciplinary approach, with close involvement of anesthesiologists and intensivists. However, intraoperative care of these patients remains inconsistent and is highly institution dependent. This brief-review article will focus on controversial topics of intraoperative care. Existing evidence on intraoperative monitoring, intraoperative fluid and transfusion management, electrolyte and glucose management, postoperative patient disposition, and, lastly, anesthesia team management will be reviewed.

Risk factors for bleeding and transfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

While orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can be associated with haemorrhage, the risk factors for bleeding and transfusion remain difficult to predict. Perioperative transfusion has potentially deleterious side effects and impairs graft and patient survival. Preoperative identification of patients at high risk of bleeding is of clinical interest to manage perioperative transfusion and blood product storage.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All OLT conducted between 2004 and 2008 in the University Hospital of Bordeaux were studied. Risk factors for bleeding greater than one blood volume and for massive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis. Thresholds were determined with ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight transplantations were studied. Preoperative haemoglobin and Child class A were independent protective risk factors for bleeding greater than one blood volume (OR 0.81 [0.67-0.98] and 0.27 [0.10-0.72], respectively). Preoperative Hb was a protective risk factor (OR 0.71 [0.58-0.88]) whereas history of oesophageal varicose bleeding was a risk factor (OR 4.67 [1.45-15.05]) for transfusion of more than eight RBC.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for bleeding and transfusion during OLT identified in this study were of little clinical usefulness so blood products should always be available during the procedure.

Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework

Cancer prediction models are becoming ubiquitous, yet we generally have no idea whether they do more good than harm. This is because current statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to their clinical value. Prediction models are typically evaluated in terms of discrimination or calibration. However, it is generally unclear how high discrimination needs to be before it is considered "high enough"; similarly, there are no rational guidelines as to the degree of miscalibration that would discount clinical use of a model. Classification tables do present the results of models in more clinically relevant terms, but it is not always clear which of two models is preferable on the basis of a particular classification table, or even whether either model should be used at all. Recent years have seen the development of straightforward decision analytic techniques that evaluate prediction models in terms of their consequences. This depends on the simple approach of weighting true and false positives differently, to reflect that, for example, delaying the diagnosis of a cancer is more harmful than an unnecessary biopsy. Such decision analytic techniques hold the promise of determining whether clinical implementation of prediction models would do more good than harm.