T-cell immune monitoring in organ transplantation

Biomarker-Based Assessment for Infectious Risk Before and After Heart Transplantation

Purpose of Review

Survival outcomes for heart transplant recipients have improved in recent decades, but infection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In this review, we discuss several biological markers, or biomarkers, that may be used to monitor immunologic status in this patient population.

Recent Findings

While modest, data on the utility of immune biomarkers in heart transplant recipients suggest correlation between low level of immune response and increased infection risk. More novel assays, such as the detection of circulating levels of pathogen cell-free DNA in plasma and the use of Torque teno virus load as a surrogate for net state of immunosuppression, have potential to be additional important biomarkers.

Summary

Biomarker approaches to individualize immunosuppression therapy among heart transplant recipients is a promising area of medicine. However, additional studies are needed to inform the optimal protocol in which to incorporate these biomarkers into clinical practice.

A New Window into the Human Alloresponse

Alloreactive T lymphocytes are the primary mediators of allograft rejection. The size and diversity of the HLA-alloreactive T cell repertoire has thus far precluded the ability to follow these T cells and thereby to understand their fate in human transplant recipients. This review summarizes the history, challenges, and recent advances in the study of alloreactive T cells. We highlight the historical development of assays to measure alloreactivity and discuss how high-throughput T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing-based assays can provide a new window into the fate of alloreactive T cells in human transplant recipients. A specific approach combining a classical in vitro assay, the mixed lymphocyte reaction, with deep T cell receptor sequencing is described as a tool to track the donor-reactive T cell repertoire for any specific HLA-mismatched donor-recipient pair. This assay can provide mechanistic insights and has potential as a noninvasive, highly specific biomarker for rejection and tolerance.

Optimal immunosuppression to prevent chronic allograft dysfunction

Prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction is currently one of the main goals in renal transplantation for the improvement of kidney graft survival. For this purpose, refinements in immunosuppressive regimens, both controlling alloimmune responses and avoiding calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-derived nephrotoxicity, are mandatory. The majority of trials aiming to avoid CNI-related nephrotoxicity have only reported short-term data, with different rates of acute rejection depending on the strategy performed. First attempts of CNI-free strategies in micophenolate mofetil-based regimens showed unsatisfactory results in terms of increased acute rejection events. With the advent of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, a new optimistic perspective seemed to appear. Despite an increased risk of rejection, better graft function and graft parenchyma preservation seem to be associated with such a strategy, at least in the short term, with a potential benefit in terms of less cardiovascular-related adverse events and malignancies. New biological agents such as belatacep have been developed as another interesting strategy for CNI avoidance. Importantly, in any case, longer-term analyses of all these CNI-avoidance strategies are warranted in order to confirm whether persistent immune-mediated graft damage can be safely overcome.

Immune monitoring and biomarkers to predict chronic allograft dysfunction

Late failure of a kidney transplant continues to be a major problem after transplantation, in spite of more potent immunosuppressive strategies and the focus of clinical management shifting toward prolonging long-term graft survival. It is now recognized that graft failure occurs because of two major complications: death with a functioning graft and intrinsic allograft failure. Recent studies of late kidney graft loss have indicated a complexity of findings, including etiologies that are both immune and non-immune. These studies suggest that late graft failure is not an inevitable fact and that further investigation into the etiology of transplant graft failure may lead to a new understanding of the biology that will provide novel therapeutic strategies and biomarkers. In this review, we will focus on late allograft failure due to intrinsic injury to the transplant. The role of immune monitoring will be discussed in the context of monitoring for ongoing injury or for identifying late injury. A variety of methodologies have been used, including genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, not only for monitoring allograft injury but also for identifying markers of graft failure that are more sensitive than serum creatinine. The available studies, as they relate to late or chronic graft injury, will also be reviewed.

Detecting rejection after mouse Islet transplantation utilizing islet protein-stimulated ELISPOT

Improved posttransplant monitoring and on-time detection of rejection could improve islet transplantation outcome. The present study explored the possibility of detecting harmful events after mouse islet transplantation measuring the immune responsiveness against islet extracts. Mouse islet transplantations were performed using various donor/recipient combinations, exploring autoimmune (NOD/SCID to NOD, n = 6) and alloimmune events (C57BL/6 to BALB/c, n = 20), a combination of both (C57BL/6 to NOD, n = 8), the absence of both (BALB/c to BALB/c, n = 21), or naive, nontransplanted control mice (n = 14). The immune reactivity was measured by ELISPOT, looking at the ex vivo release of IFN-γ from splenocytes stimulated by islet donor extracts (sonicated islets). The immune reactivity was not altered in the syngeneic and autoimmune models, demonstrating similar levels as nontransplanted controls (p = 0.46 and p = 0.6). Conversely, the occurrence of an allogeneic rejection alone or in combination to autoimmunity was associated to an increase in the level of immune reactivity (p = 0.023 and p = 0.003 vs. respective controls). The observed increase was transient and lost in the postrejection period or after treatment with CTLA4-Ig. Overall, allogeneic rejection was associated to a transient increase in the reactivity of splenocytes against islet proteins. Such a strategy has the potential to improve islet graft monitoring in human and should be further explored.