Screening for De Novo Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies in Nonsensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Does Not Predict Acute Rejection

CD5-Positive B Lymphocytes after Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney diseases. Unfortunately, kidney allograft recipients rarely develop tolerance or accommodation and require life-long immunosuppression. Among many other regulatory mechanisms, CD5+ B lymphocytes (mainly B-1a) seem to be involved in the process of allograft acceptance. These cells are the major source of natural, low-affinity antibodies, which are polyreactive. Thus, we hypothesized that CD5+ B cells could be referred to as a biomarker in those patients who developed accommodation towards kidney allotransplant. In this study, 52 low-immunized kidney transplant recipients were evaluated for transplant outcome up to 8 y post-transplant. The follow up included anti-HLA antibodies, B cells phenotype and cytokines. We have identified a cohort of recipients who produced alloantibodies (Abs+), which was associated with increased levels of CD5+ B cells, mainly during the first year after transplantation but also later on. Importantly, creatinine levels were comparable between Abs+ and Abs− allorecipients at 2 years after the transplantation and graft survival rate was comparable between these groups even eight years post-transplant. So, it seems that despite the presence of alloantibodies the graft function was sustained when the level of CD5+ B cells was increased. Targeting CD5+ B cells may be a valuable therapeutic option to increase transplant success. The phenotype can be also tried as a biomarker to increase the effectiveness of individualized post-transplant treatments.

B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes?

Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.

Preemptive HLA Antibody Screening Prior to Episodic Transplant Renal Biopsy Enables Early Diagnosis and Therapeutic Response in Asymptomatic Chronically Active Antibody-Related Rejection: A Case Report

Common management of renal transplant recipients includes episodic renal biopsy based on clinical findings such as an increase in proteinuria or serum creatinine. When antibody-related rejection is suspected from the renal biopsy, subsequent testing for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is performed. We instead performed preemptive screening of asymptomatic post-renal transplant recipients for DSAs prior to renal biopsy. In this case, a 30-year-old woman with a secondary transplant was positive for 61 anti-HLA antibodies of class I and class II, among which DQ2 was a DSA with a mean fluorescence index of 2039. The patient had a living kidney transplant 9 years earlier. She had never been diagnosed with rejection, her serum creatinine was around 1.0 mg/dL, and her proteinuria was negative. Following the positive DSA result, a renal biopsy was performed, and she was diagnosed as C4d-negative chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) with a Banff score of cg1b, (g + ptc) ≥ 2, and C4d 0. Intravenous steroid pulse, deoxyspagarin, antithymocyte globulin, rituximab, and oral everolimus were administrated. The treatment resulted in a gradual decrease in the DSA, which became negative 1 year later. The patient's serum creatinine remains around 1.0 mg/dL, and proteinuria remains negative. Treatments for advanced CAABMR are often expensive and ineffective. Our present case suggests that early detection and treatment through preemptive HLA antibody screening could improve the prognosis of renal transplants.

Post-transplant donor specific antibody is associated with poor kidney transplant outcomes only when combined with both T-cell-mediated rejection and non-adherence

Post-transplant donor specific antibody (DSA) is associated with poor renal allograft outcomes. However, variable timing of DSA assessment and inclusion of patients who undergo desensitization treatments have hindered our understanding of its consequences and limited its predictive value. Here we prospectively studied non-desensitized patients to determine factors associated with poor four-year outcomes in patients who developed post-transplant DSA. Using serial monitoring, 67 of 294 patients were found to develop DSA by one year. Compared to patients who do not develop DSA, those with DSA exhibit an increased incidence of both clinical and subclinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). The combination of TCMR plus DSA led to an almost three-fold increase in graft loss compared to either DSA or TCMR alone. Moreover, DSA was associated with higher Banff grade TCMR and chronic changes at one year. Antibody-mediated rejection was uncommon and always associated with TCMR. Amongst factors independently associated with DSA plus TCMR; non-adherence is potentially modifiable. Non-adherence, measured as intra-patient variability of calcineurin trough levels during the first post-transplant year, further risk-stratified patients with DSA plus TCMR such that about 75% of these patients had impending graft loss by four years, whereas adherent patients with DSA plus TCMR had outcomes comparable to other patient groups. Thus, early post-transplant DSA, especially in non-adherent patients, is associated with increased incidence of TCMR and represents a high-risk group of patients who might benefit from targeted therapeutic interventions.

Evaluation of the current post-transplantation Human Leukocyte Antigen antibody screening in pediatric renal transplant recipients

The necessity of post-transplant monitoring for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is unclear. This study evaluates the clinical relevance of post-transplantation donor-specific HLA antibodies in pediatric renal transplant recipients, aiming at better stratification of patients at risk of graft dysfunction and better recommendations for post-transplant monitoring. A cohort of 68 pediatric kidney recipients, involving 76 transplantations between 2004 and 2014, was studied retrospectively. All patients were screened for HLA antibodies at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation and yearly thereafter. Samples testing positive were further analyzed to detect DSA. A biopsy was performed on clinical indication. We studied the baseline characteristics of the patients with biopsy, with DSA, and with rejection. We assessed the effect of post-transplant DSA on clinical outcome, including antibody-mediated acute rejection and GFR decrease. In our cohort, the prevalence of DSA was 19% (13/68 transplantations). Most patients with HLA antibodies after transplantation were DSA-positive (76%; 13/17). A clear association between DSA and subsequent rejection was found. At the end of the study period, a significantly lower GFR was found in patients with biopsy, DSA, or rejection. Based on our observations, we recommend routine post-transplantation screening for HLA and DSA. The presence of DSA justifies a renal biopsy even in the absence of clinical signs of rejection.

Effect of Early Immunosuppression Therapy on De Novo Anti-Human-Leukocyte-Antigen Antibody After Kidney Transplantation

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of immunosuppression therapy early after kidney transplantation, particularly exposure of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), on posttransplantation de novo HLA antibody production.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, enrolling the kidney transplant or pancreas-kidney transplant recipients who had surgery between January 2010 and February 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 214 recipients were included in the study with a median follow-up period of 1.06 years. A total of 30 recipients (14.0%) were positive in HLA antibody detection posttransplant with a median follow-up period of 1.46 years. Ten recipients (4.7%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, and 6 of them (60%) developed de novo HLA antibody after graft failure. Multivariate analysis showed that acute rejection significantly increased the risk of de novo HLA antibody (hazard ratio [HR], 2.732). Intensified MPA dosing therapy reduced the risk by 59.8% (HR, 0.402); low-dose CNI therapy increased the risk by 33.3% (HR, 1.333), and the effect of extremely low-dose CNI therapy was even larger (HR, 2.242).

CONCLUSION

The risk of de novo HLA antibody can be decreased by reducing the risk of acute rejection. A tendency was seen in low-dose CNI therapy to increase the risk of de novo HLA antibody, but intensified MPA dosing therapy may provide an umbrella protection effect by reducing the risk. Prospective study was required to confirm the effects.

Rejection of the Renal Allograft in the Absence of Demonstrable Antibody and Complement

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has stressed the prominent role of antibodies in graft loss. This study was designed to assess a growing perception that T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is no longer clinically relevant.

METHODS

Five hundred forty-five renal allograft recipients over a 3-year period were screened for biopsies with: (a) TCMR including borderline change (BL), (b) negative complement protein C4 degradation fragment, and (c) absence of donor-specific antibody at time of transplant, within 30 days of the biopsy, and up to 4 measurements at later time points.

RESULTS

These stringent requirements identified 28 "pure" cases of late TCMR/BL. Low-grade glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, or chronic transplant glomerulopathy were found in 9/28 (32%) biopsies. Serum creatinine showed complete short-term remission in 7/10 (70%) BL and 9/18 (50%) TCMR patients 1 month postbiopsy. Yet, both treated and untreated patients demonstrated further decline in graft function as assessed by serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Late TCMR seen in 7.9% of biopsies can contribute to significant deterioration of graft function in patients in whom the dominant contribution of antibody-mediated injury has been reasonably excluded. Our data also reinforce existing literature showing that microvascular lesions do not have absolute specificity for a diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.

Protocol Biopsies: Utility and Limitations

As both T cell and antibody-mediated rejection can have a subclinical phase, protocol biopsies provide an early opportunity to intervene before the onset of clinical allograft dysfunction. Protocol biopsies are usually done after reperfusion to establish baseline, between 3 and 6 months to identify subclinical rejection, and at 6-12 months to assess chronicity and persistent inflammation that have prognostic implication. Treatment of both subclinical T cell and antibody-mediated rejection prevents progression of rejection and development of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy or transplant glomerulopathy. Although subclinical rejection has become less frequent in low-risk patients on triple immunosuppression containing tacrolimus, protocol biopsies may still be useful in selected population. Protocol biopsies are more likely to benefit patients at higher risk for rejection, including those who are highly sensitized, transplanted across donor-specific antibody barriers, or on calcineurin inhibitor/corticosteroids sparing regimens. Interstitial fibrosis on protocol biopsies, especially in conjunction with persistent inflammation, predicts lower allograft survival.

B cells in transplantation

B cell responses underlie the most vexing immunological barriers to organ transplantation. Much has been learned about the molecular mechanisms of B cell responses to antigen and new therapeutic agents that specifically target B cells or suppress their functions are available. Yet, despite recent advances, there remains an incomplete understanding about how B cell functions determine the fate of organ transplants and how, whether or when potent new therapeutics should optimally be used. This gap in understanding reflects in part the realization that besides producing antibodies, B cells can also regulate cellular immunity, contribute to the genesis of tolerance and induce accommodation. Whether non-specific depletion of B cells, their progeny or suppression of their functions would undermine these non-cognate functions and whether graft outcome would suffer as a result is unknown. These questions were discussed at a symposium on "B cells in transplantation" at the 2015 ISHLT annual meeting. Those discussions are summarized here and a new perspective is offered.

Transitional B lymphocytes are associated with protection from kidney allograft rejection: a prospective study

Recent cross-sectional studies suggest an important role for transitional B lymphocytes (CD19 + CD24hiCD38hi) in promoting transplant tolerance, and protecting from late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, prospective studies are lacking. This study enrolled 73 de novo transplant recipients, and collected serial clinical, immunological and biochemical information over 48 ± 6 months. Cell phenotyping was conducted immediately prior to transplantation, and then on five occasions during the first year posttransplantation. When modeled as a time-dependent covariate, transitional B cell frequencies (but not total B cells or "regulatory" T cells) were associated with protection from acute rejection (any Banff grade; HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37-0.95; p = 0.03). No association between transitional B cell proportions and either de novo donor-specific or nondonor-specific antibody (dnDSA; dnNDSA) formation was evident, although preserved transitional B cell proportions were associated with reduced rejection rates in those patients developing dnDSA. Three episodes of ABMR occurred, all in the context of nonadherence, and all associated with in vitro anti-HLA T cell responses in an ELISPOT assay (p = 0.008 versus antibody-positive patients not experiencing ABMR). This prospective study supports the potential relevance of transitional ("regulatory") B cells as a biomarker and therapeutic intervention in transplantation, and highlights relationships between humoral immunity, cellular immunity and nonadherence.

Acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection is a diagnostic challenge in renal transplantation medicine. However, it is an important diagnosis to make, since chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) is the main cause of long-term graft loss. Antibody-mediated rejection is diagnosed by detecting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the blood in combination with observing typical histomorphological signs in kidney biopsy, as described in the Banff classification. Therapy is based on the removal of DSAs by administering intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), plasmapheresis, or immunoadsorption. Reoccurrence of antibodies is diminished by the use of rituximab, increased immunosuppression, and in some cases additional experimental substances. A combination of these techniques has been shown to be successful in the majority of cases of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Routine DSA monitoring is warranted for early detection of antibody-mediated rejection.

One-year protocol biopsies from ABO-incompatible renal allografts compared with a matched cohort of ABO-compatible allografts

Introduction

Early acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) occurs more frequently in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) than in ABO-compatible (ABOc) kidney transplantation. This could lead to increased inflammation/scarring in the ABOi grafts. Protocol biopsy data in ABOi kidney recipients are scarce.

Methods

A single-center retrospective matched cohort study was conducted. Eighty adult living donor (LD) renal transplant recipients without HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) transplanted between 2009 and 2012 were included; 20 ABOi and 60 ABOc controls matched for donor age and transplantation year. Protocol biopsies at one yr were scored according to the Banff classification. Three sums of scores were constructed: tubulointerstitial inflammation (t + i = 0 vs. >0), microvascular inflammation (g + ptc = 0 vs. >0), scarring/hyalinosis (ci + ct + cv + ah ≤ 1 vs. >1. Scores and presence of subclinical rejection (SCR) at one yr were compared.

Results

Protocol biopsy findings at one yr in the ABOi vs. ABOc matched control group were not statistically different: (t + i) > 0, 30% vs. 20%; (g + ptc) > 0, 5% vs. 8%; (ci + ct + cv + ah) > 1, 85% vs. 60%, respectively. No transplant glomerulopathy occurred. SCR rate at one yr was 30% vs. 18%, subclinical ABMR 5% vs. 7% (all with de novo HLA DSA).

Conclusion

One-year protocol biopsies of ABOi and ABOc LD recipients do not differ in chronic changes, inflammation, or SCRs.

High dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant recipients with acute and chronic graft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Postkidney transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) have been identified as important contributors to graft loss. Few therapeutic options exist and have been met with limited success. We report outcomes in patients with de novo DSA and graft damage treated with a protocol of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 28 kidney transplant recipients with de novo DSA and graft damage in the form of either chronic graft dysfunction (group 1, n=20) or a recent previous acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episode (group 2, n=8) prescribed a standard regimen of high-dose (5 g/kg) IVIG dosed over 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 70 total DSA decreased by 12%at the end of treatment (T1, P=0.14) and by 18%at last follow up (T2, P=0.035) compared with treatment initiation (T0) MFI. The most robust effect was seen in class I DSA (37% decrease at T2 versus T0, P=0.05) and in DSA from patients in group 2 (52% decrease at T2 versus T0, P=0.008). Graft function stabilized in patients in group 2 but continued to decline in those in group 1.

CONCLUSION

High-dose IVIG resulted in modest DSA MFI reductions in patients with previous graft damage, with a larger effect occurring in class I DSA in patients with a previous acute AMR. There was no clinical treatment benefit in patients with ongoing chronic graft damage, whereas high-dose IVIG may reduce the risk of chronic graft dysfunction in those with an acute AMR event.

Impact of HLA antibodies on graft survival in long-term renal recipients with functional grafts

OBJECTIVES

Accumulating evidence supports the hypothesis that HLA antibodies play an important role in early renal allograft injury. However, the effects of HLA antibodies on long-term graft survival are still poorly understood. In this study, we examined the impact of HLA antibodies on graft survival in long-term renal recipients with functional grafts for 10 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, long-term renal recipients were defined as kidney transplant recipients who had normally functioning renal grafts (serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl) for 10 years. Posttransplant serum samples from a total of 92 long-term renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine-based triple maintenance drug therapy (121.6 ± 0.886 months) were screened for the specificities of anti-HLA antibodies. The results of HLA antibodies before the transplantation, assessed using the same test method, were compared with those after their transplantations. Moreover, these 92 patients who received cadaveric renal transplant between January 2000 and December 2002 were followed up for about 10 years (range 107-135 months).

RESULTS

27 patients had HLA-I antibodies and 16 patients had HLA-II antibodies before the transplantation, whereas 12 patients had HLA-I antibodies and 18 patients had HLA-II antibodies after the transplantation. Moreover, the types of HLA antibodies were different from those found before the transplantation. In these renal recipients with functioning renal grafts, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 66.52 ± 14.52 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the HLA antibody-positive group (n = 23) and 69.09 ± 25.54 ml/min/1.73 m(2) negative in the HLA antibody-negative group (n = 69, p > 0.05). Three patients (3.26%) (3 out of 92) had donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). The frequency of DSA in this study was lower than that in the general Chinese Han renal recipient population.

CONCLUSIONS

We find that all HLA antibodies in the long-term renal grafts are newly formed after the transplantation. The HLA antibody status has little impact on the renal graft function in the long-term renal recipients.

Predicting 5-year risk of kidney transplant failure: a prediction instrument using data available at 1 year posttransplantation

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of kidney transplant failure remains imperfect. The objective of this study was to develop and validate risk scores predicting 5-year transplant failure, based on data available 12 months posttransplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Development and then independent multicenter validation of risk scores predicting death-censored and overall transplant failure.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Outcomes of kidney transplant recipients (n=651) alive with transplant function 12 months posttransplantation in Birmingham, United Kingdom, were used to develop models predicting transplant failure risk 5 years posttransplantation. The resulting risk scores were evaluated for prognostic utility (discrimination, calibration, and risk reclassification) in independent cohorts from Tours, France (n=736); Leeds, United Kingdom (n=787); and Halifax, Canada (n=475).

PREDICTORS

Weighted regression coefficients for baseline and 12-month demographic and clinical predictor characteristics.

OUTCOMES

Death-censored and overall transplant failure 5 years posttransplantation.

MEASUREMENTS

Baseline data and time to transplant failure.

RESULTS

Following model development, variables included in separate scores for death-censored and overall transplant failure included recipient age, sex, and race; acute rejection; transplant function; serum albumin level; and proteinuria. In the validation cohorts, these scores showed good to excellent discrimination for death-censored transplant failure (C statistics, 0.78-0.90) and moderate to good discrimination for overall transplant failure (C statistics, 0.75-0.81). Both scores demonstrated good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P>0.05 in all cohorts). Compared with estimated glomerular filtration rate in isolation, application of the scores resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant risk reclassification for death-censored transplant failure (net reclassification improvement [NRI], 36.1%-83.0%; all P<0.001) and overall transplant failure (NRI, 38.7%-53.5%; all P<0.001). Compared with the previously described US Renal Data System-based risk calculator, significant and relevant risk reclassification for overall transplant failure was seen (NRI, 30.0%; P<0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Validation is required in further populations.

CONCLUSIONS

These validated risk scores may be of prognostic utility in kidney transplantation, accurately identifying at-risk transplants, and informing clinicians and patients.

Posttransplant monitoring of de novo human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the evidence supporting the negative impact of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in renal transplantation and to describe the natural history associated with the development of dnDSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have increased our appreciation of the risk factors that predispose to dnDSA while illuminating how these risk factors may relate to the pathophysiology underlying its development. In addition, details regarding the natural history of dnDSA are now available in the context of the different clinical pathologic phenotypes that occur in the patients in whom it develops. Common pitfalls in defining and monitoring dnDSA, when understood, may provide some explanation for the heterogeneity in published studies.

SUMMARY

Recognizing that dnDSA is a major cause of late graft loss, and, more importantly, is detectable in many cases long before dysfunction or graft loss occurs, identifies an opportunity to intervene and change the outcome for the patient.

Early versus late acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, the diagnostic precision for acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR) in kidney transplant recipients has improved significantly. The phenotypes of early and late aABMR may differ. We assessed the characteristics and outcomes of early versus late aABMR.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010, aABMR was diagnosed in 67 grafts in 65 kidney recipients, with a median follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 61 days-7.3 years). Recipients were stratified by early aABMR (<3 months after transplantation; n=40) and late aABMR (>3 months after transplantation; n=27). The main outcome was kidney allograft loss. Outcome of aABMR was compared with recipients with acute early (n=276) or late (n=100) non-ABMR during the same period.

RESULTS

Recipients with late aABMR had significantly reduced graft survival compared with recipients with early aABMR (P<0.001, log-rank test; 40% vs. 75% at 4 years; hazard ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-8.42). Graft survival in late aABMR was also inferior to late non-ABMR acute rejections (P=0.008). At transplantation, more patients were presensitized to human leukocyte antigens (22 [55%] vs. 4 [15%] in the early vs. late aABMR group). The late aABMR group was characterized by younger recipient age (37.9 ± 12.9 vs. 50.9 ± 11.6 years; P<0.001), increased occurrence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (52% vs. 13%; P=0.001), and nonadherence/suboptimal immunosuppression (56% vs. 0%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with early aABMR, late aABMR had inferior graft survival and was characterized by young age, frequent nonadherence, or suboptimal immunosuppression and de novo donor-specific antibodies.

Impact of alloantibody strength in crossmatch negative DSA positive kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The clinical relevance of pre-transplant "low-level" donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in crossmatch negative kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. To determine what level of DSA associates with antibody mediated rejection (AMR) could be the way to measure the clinical relevance of pre-transplant "low-level" donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in crossmatch negative kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 221 patients from October 2008 to December 2009 was included in this study. Sera were obtained pre-transplant and two weeks post-transplant and tested for DSA using LABScreen single antigen beads.

RESULTS

Among the 221 patients, 11 experienced AMR within 200days after transplant (5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with AMR at multiple mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoffs (500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000; p=0.003, 0.001, 0.007, 0.003, and 0.003, respectively). No correlation was seen between acute T-cell mediated rejection (CMR) and pre-transplant DSA at any of the same MFI cutoffs. There was an increased risk of AMR with higher levels of pre-transplant DSA. Finally, an increase in DSA MFI from pre- to two weeks post-transplant was indicative of a higher probability of AMR.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this data supports using the single antigen bead to detect "low-level" DSA both pre- and post- as having a positive and persistent DSA may be predictive of higher AMR rates and poorer graft survival.

Belatacept: a novel immunosuppressive agent for kidney transplant recipients

Long-term graft and patient survival remain the most significant challenges in kidney transplantation, and new therapies are needed to improve long-term outcomes. Belatacept, a first-in-class selective costimulation blocker, has been approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant recipients who are positive for EBV. In Phase III trials, belatacept demonstrated superior preservation of renal function and comparable patient/graft survival compared with cyclosporine, while avoiding the renal toxicities and other adverse events associated with the use of a calcineurin inhibitor. Patients treated with belatacept had higher rates of acute rejection than cyclosporine-treated patients. However, acute rejection episodes that occurred early and did not recur were generally not associated with donor-specific antibodies, and few belatacept patients had graft loss due to rejection. The improved renal benefit with belatacept may translate into improvements in long-term graft and patient outcomes. Targeting T-cell costimulation is an important new option for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results.

METHODS

With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

Prevention of antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

There is increasing evidence that antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of late kidney graft failure. Prevention of antibody-mediated allograft damage has therefore become an important issue in kidney transplantation. Such prevention starts already before transplantation with the avoidance of sensitizing events. When a patient is already sensitized, precise characterization of alloantibodies and exact HLA typing of the donor at the time of transplantation are mandatory. To ensure timely and successful transplantation of highly sensitized patients, desensitization, and inclusion in special programs such as the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program should be considered. After transplantation, close monitoring of kidney function, testing for the de novo development or changing characteristics of alloantibodies, and attention to non-adherence to immunosuppression is obligatory. In the current overview, we discuss the currently available measures for the prevention of antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection.

Using donor-specific antibodies to monitor the need for immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Experience with tolerance protocols has shown that none is perfect and that each escape from tolerance must be identified early to prevent graft failure. In addition, some test is needed for patients who are weaned off immunosuppression (IS) to forewarn of weaning failure. The usual measures of function--such as serum creatinine levels--are not sensitive enough to detect rejection in a timely manner.

METHODS

A study was carried out on 72 patients who received living-donor kidney transplants with clonal deletion protocol (total lymphoid irradiation or bortezomib), and followed with reduced doses of maintenance IS. Every month or every 2 months, a test was performed for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) using Luminex mixed and/or single antigen beads.

RESULTS

After transplantation, DSA developed in 17% of the patients at 6 months, 41% at 1 year, and 57% at 2 years, with 95% confidence limits of 10%, 28%; 30%, 55%; and 44%, 71%, respectively. Fifty-three percent of patients weaned IS to less than 10 mg prednisone daily experienced DSA within 3 months. Furthermore, prednisone dose (per 2.5 mg) and years after transplantation were inversely associated with DSA production (risk ratio 0.92 [95% confidence limits: 0.85, 0.99], and 0.70 [0.49, 1.00]).

CONCLUSIONS

DSA monitoring is highly effective for detecting escape from tolerance and reemergence of the immune response in weaned patients. DSA appearance was inversely proportional to the level of maintenance drugs in the weaning process. Measurement of DSA on a monthly basis is adequate for detection of the change in immune reactivity.

Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant

The natural history for patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and the risk factors for its development have not been well defined. Furthermore, clinical and histologic correlation with serologic data is limited. We studied 315 consecutive renal transplants without pretransplant DSA, with a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 2.9 years. Protocol (n = 215) and for cause (n = 163) biopsies were analyzed. Solid phase assays were used to screen for dnDSA posttransplant. A total of 47 out of 315 (15%) patients developed dnDSA at a mean of 4.6 ± 3.0 years posttransplant. Independent predictors of dnDSA were HLA-DRβ1 MM > 0 (OR 5.66, p < 0.006); and nonadherence (OR 8.75, p < 0.001); with a strong trend toward clinical rejection episodes preceding dnDSA (OR 1.57 per rejection episode, p = 0.061). The median 10-year graft survival for those with dnDSA was lower than the No dnDSA group (57% vs. 96%, p < 0.0001). Pathology consistent with antibody-mediated injury can occur and progress in patients with dnDSA in the absence of graft dysfunction and furthermore, nonadherence and cellular rejection contribute to dnDSA development and progression to graft loss.

Posttransplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies negatively impact pancreas transplantation outcome

During a 9-year follow-up, 167 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients (152 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]) were followed for the detection of posttransplant anti-HLA antibodies. Forty patients (24%) developed anti-HLA antibodies, 26 (65%) had donor-specific antibodies (DSA; 61% anticlass 2) and 14 (35%) non-DSA (78.6% anticlass 1). More rejection episodes were observed in patients with positive anti-HLA antibodies than in patients without antibodies (42.5% vs. 11%; p = 0.001), with the highest incidence observed in DSA patients (53.8%). More severe rejections (according to rescue therapy) were observed in DSA patients compared to non-DSA (p < 0.05) or to negative patients (p < 0.001). Contrasting with the kidney, pancreas graft survival did not differ between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies. On the contrary, pancreas and kidney survivals were significantly lower in DSA positive patients (75% for both organs) as compared to non-DSA positive patients (100% for pancreas and 92% for kidney) or to HLA-negative patients (91% for pancreas and 89% for kidney). Nontechnical pancreas and kidney graft failures were significantly higher in positive than in negative anti-HLA patients (32.5% vs. 11%; p < 0.01). Occurrence of posttransplant DSA was an independent risk factor for both pancreas and kidney survival (HR 3.2; p = 0.039) in diabetic transplant recipients.

Monitoring and managing graft health in the kidney transplant recipient

Ongoing monitoring of kidney transplants is a widely accepted and practiced part of posttransplantation management. One reason to monitor is to evaluate whether the transplant is stable. The transplant community evaluates stability by checking kidney function. Despite problems with sensitivity and specificity, obtaining serial serum creatinine levels is the most common approach to assessing kidney function. Some programs supplement serial serum creatinine levels with surveillance kidney biopsies. Although not uniformly accepted as beneficial, surveillance biopsies are useful in select subsets of patients such as highly sensitized recipients. Recent biopsy studies shed light on which histopathology findings portend poor prognoses. The Long-Term Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function Study (DeKAF) and similar studies that will prospectively evaluate therapeutic interventions should help the transplant community better define how to monitor and manage the kidney transplant optimally. In the meantime, Kidney Diseases: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) provides an evidence-based approach toward monitoring and managing the kidney transplant.

Natural history of proteinuria in renal transplant recipients developing de novo human leukocyte antigen antibodies

BACKGROUND

The relationship between humoral rejection and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is established. Proteinuria is the hallmark of glomerular injury. The relationship between HLA antibody and proteinuria was explored in renal transplant recipients developing de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and nondonor-specific antibodies (NDSA).

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with de novo HLA antibody (38 DSA and 34 NDSA) were identified from 475 prevalent renal transplant recipients (15.2%). Antibody surveillance occurred every 6 months, with specificity characterized by a combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, flow-bead cytometry, and Luminex bead analysis. Pooled analysis of every glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary protein estimation in a 48-month window around the date of antibody detection was performed (4004 and 2084 measurements, respectively).

RESULTS

GFR slope (-5.85 vs. -3.21 mL/min/1.73 m per year) and graft failure rate (29% vs. 9%, P=0.039) were worse in patients with DSA. Three-year graft survival after antibody detection was worse in patients with DSA (69.5% vs. 91.1%, P=0.035). Patients with DSA had significantly more proteinuria than those with NDSA and 205 control patients with no alloantibodies, from 6 months before antibody detection (0.91 vs. 0.39 g/L, P=0.015). Graft failure was more likely in patients with DSA with excess of 0.2 g/L at antibody detection (42% vs. 0%, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Proteinuria is associated with DSA detection and is likely to be an important factor that determines rapid GFR decline and earlier graft failure in patients developing de novo HLA antibodies.

Inferior kidney allograft outcomes in patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies are due to acute rejection episodes

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation have been associated with poor graft outcomes in multiple studies. However, these studies have generally used stored sera or a single cross sectional screening test to identify patients with DSA. We evaluated the effectiveness of a prospective DSA screening protocol in identifying kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients at risk for poor graft outcomes.

METHODS

From September 2007 through September 2009, 244 consecutively transplanted kidney and kidney/pancreas recipients without pretransplant DSA were screened for de novo DSA at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months and when clinically indicated.

RESULTS

DSA was detected in 27% of all patients by protocol or indication screening. Patients with DSA (DSA+) were significantly more likely to have experienced acute rejection (AR) compared with no DSA (DSA-) (29% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), and lower estimated 2-year graft survival (83% vs. 98%, P<0.001). Only 3 of 19 DSA (+) patients with AR had DSA detected before the AR episode. When excluding patients with AR, 2-year graft survival was similar between DSA (+) and DSA (-) patients (100% vs. 99%) as was estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with DSA detected by protocol screening had similar outcomes compared with DSA (-), whereas those with DSA detected by indication experienced significantly worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with de novo DSA experience worse graft outcomes due to previous/concurrent episodes of AR. A prospective DSA screening protocol failed to identify patients at risk for AR or poor short-term graft outcomes.

The indirect alloimmune response causes microvascular endothelial dysfunction-a possible role for alloantibody

BACKGROUND

The causes of endothelial dysfunction after cardiac transplantation are unknown. Here, we have investigated whether the indirect alloimmune response mediates endothelial dysfunction in a major histocompatibility complex class I mismatch model.

METHODS

PVG.RT1 rat hearts were transplanted into thymectomized CD8 T-cell-depleted allogeneic (PVG.R8) or syngeneic (PVG.RT1) recipients. Alloantibody was assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy, the nature of the inflammatory infiltrate, and origin of endothelial cells were examined at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Endothelial function was assessed by Langendorff preparations at 1, 2, and 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Recipients produced alloantibody and showed luminal occlusion at 1 (17.7%±8.0%), 2 (23.2%±4.9%), 4 (34.3%±5.0%), and 8 weeks (58.1%±1.8%) posttransplantation. The major inflammatory features of the allografts consisted of CD11b monocytes, CD4 T cells, and C4d deposition. At 1 week, the basal coronary flow and the vasodilator response to 5-hydroxytrytamine of syngeneic and allografted hearts were inhibited compared with normal hearts. At 4 weeks, the basal coronary flow of allografts was 54% lower than syngrafts (P<0.01), and 5- hydroxytrytamine and sodium nitroprusside did not evoke an increase in coronary flow in the allograft heart compared with syngeneic controls (P<0.01). Culture of aortic rings with antibody to major histocompatibility complex class I inhibited endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine.

CONCLUSION

Transient microvascular endothelial dysfunction occurred in syngeneic and allogeneic cardiac grafts after transplantation. Syngeneic but not allogeneic grafts recovered, suggesting the indirect immune response, consisting of CD4 T cells, monocytes, and antibody, mediates endothelial dysfunction. A possible role for alloantibody in endothelial dysfunction is discussed.