The significance of non-T-cell pathways in graft rejection: implications for transplant tolerance. Transplantation. 2010;90:1043-1047. [PMID: 20686444 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181efcfe9]

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies Intra-Graft Population Heterogeneity in Acute Heart Allograft Rejection in Mouse

Transplant rejection remains a major barrier to graft survival and involves a diversity of cell types. However, the heterogeneity of each cell type in the allograft remains poorly defined. In the present study, we used single-cell RNA sequencing technology to analyze graft-infiltrating cells to describe cell types and states associated with acute rejection in a mouse heart transplant model. Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed 21 distinct cell populations. Macrophages formed five cell clusters: two resident macrophage groups, two infiltrating macrophage groups and one dendritic cell-like monocyte group. Infiltrating macrophages were predominantly from allogeneic grafts. Nevertheless, only one infiltrating macrophage cluster was in an active state with the upregulation of CD40, Fam26f and Pira2, while the other was metabolically silent. Re-clustering of endothelial cells identified five subclusters. Interestingly, one of the endothelial cell populations was almost exclusively from allogeneic grafts. Further analysis of this population showed activation of antigen processing and presentation pathway and upregulation of MHC class II molecules. In addition, Ubiquitin D was specifically expressed in such endothelial cell population. The upregulation of Ubiquitin D in rejection was validated by staining of mouse heart grafts and human kidney biopsy specimens. Our findings present a comprehensive analysis of intra-graft cell heterogeneity, describe specific macrophage and endothelial cell populations which mediate rejection, and provide a potential predictive biomarker for rejection in the clinic.

High-resolution phenotyping of early acute rejection reveals a conserved alloimmune signature

Alloimmune responses in acute rejection are complex, involving multiple interacting cell types and pathways. Deep profiling of these cell types has been limited by technology that lacks the capacity to resolve this high dimensionality. Single-cell mass cytometry is used to characterize the alloimmune response in early acute rejection, measuring 37 parameters simultaneously, across multiple time points in two models: a murine cardiac and vascularized composite allotransplant (VCA). Semi-supervised hierarchical clustering is used to group related cell types defined by combinatorial expression of surface and intracellular proteins, along with markers of effector function and activation. This expression profile is mapped to visualize changes in antigen composition across cell types, revealing phenotypic signatures in alloimmune T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and myeloid subsets that are conserved and that firmly distinguish rejecting from non-rejecting grafts. These data provide a comprehensive, high-dimensional profile of cellular rejection after allograft transplantation.

Adaptive features of innate immune cells and their relevance to graft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allograft rejection involves both innate and adaptive immune cells, and the adaptive immune cells have dominated transplant studies for decades. Recent studies have identified surprising new features for the innate immune cells, including memory recall responses, which may have significant implications in further improvement of transplant outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplant survival is excellent in the short-term, but the long-term graft outcomes are not so, and most grafts are continuously lost to chronic rejection in the clinic. In both animal models and clinical settings, graft loss to chronic rejection is often dominated by innate immune cells, especially macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells in the grafts. Recent studies suggest that innate immune cells can acquire features of adaptive cells in that they either directly sense allogeneic nonself or become 'trained' in the allogeneic milieu, where they show features of memory recall responses. In certain models, targeting the adaptive features of such innate immune cells can promote long-term allograft survival. These findings may open new therapeutic opportunities in promoting transplant survival in the clinic.

SUMMARY

The discovery of donor specificity and memory recall responses of certain innate immune cells, which are prominently featured in chronic allograft rejection, may open novel therapeutic opportunities in transplantation, as well as in treatment of cancers and autoimmune diseases.

Mast cell-mediated mechanistic pathways in organ transplantation

Adaptive immunity has gained importance in transplant immunology for years, based on models in which T-cells orchestrate the immune responses during rejection. Most recently, researches revealed that innate immune cells, including mast cells (MCs) also play a pivotal role in allograft rejection. MC mediated immunoregulatory responses influence the innate and adaptive immune responses. Their capability to produce an array of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, expressing a wide range of costimulatory molecules in addition to acting as antigen-presenting cells (APCs), make them effective immune cells far beyond their classical role as primary orchestrator cells of allergy. Activated regulatory Tcells (Treg) cells contribute to MC recruitment into grafts by releasing interleukin (IL)-9. Tregs are capable of stabilizing MCs and suppressing IgE mediated degranulation through interaction of Treg expressing OX40 with MCs expressing OX40L. MCs in turn release transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-10 which possess suppressive properties. Thus, these cells can suppress the proliferation of T-cells and support the generation of Tregs. MCs in addition to orchestrating immune responses in grafts by cell-to-cell interactions with variety of immune cells, cause histologic changes, mainly fibrosis by releasing mediators such as histamine, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), TGF-β, chymase, and cathepsin G. The role of MCs in transplant rejection remains controversial. The accumulation of MCs in rejected grafts suggests that they play a role in preventing graft tolerance, and contribute to the progression of chronic rejection of allografts. However, high expression of MC-related gene products in tolerant grafts and their known interaction with Tregs on the other hand, support the notion that they are an integral component in achieving peripheral tolerance.

Mast cells participate in allograft rejection: can IL-37 play an inhibitory role?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of mast cells (MCs) in allograft rejection, eventually inhibited by IL-37. Immune cells including MCs participate in allograft rejection by generating IL-1, IL-33, TNF and other cytokines.

METHODS

We evaluated allograft rejection on the experience of our experimental data and using the relevant literature.

RESULTS

MCs are involved in initiation and regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses-pathways. MCs are important pro-inflammatory cells which express high-affinity receptor FceRI and can be activated by IgE and some pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1 and IL-33. The cross-linkage of high affinity IgE receptor on MCs by antigen ligation has a crucial role in allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, cancer and allograft rejection. MCs mediate immunity in organ transplant, leading to the activation of allospecific T cells implicated in the rejection and generate pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines. IL-1 pro-inflammatory cytokine family members released by MCs mediate allograft rejection and inflammation. IL-37 is also an IL-1 family member generated by macrophage cell line in small amounts, which binds to IL-18Rα and produces an anti-inflammatory effect. IL-37 provokes the inhibition of TLR signaling, TLR-induced mTOR and (MyD88)-mediated responses, suppressing pro-inflammatory IL-1 family members and increasing IL-10.

CONCLUSION

IL-37 inhibition offers the opportunity to immunologically modulate MCs, by suppressing their production of IL-1 family members and reducing the risk of allograft rejection, resulting as a potential good therapeutic new cytokine. Here, we report the relationship between inflammatory MCs, allograft rejection and pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory IL-37.

Macrophage subpopulations and their impact on chronic allograft rejection versus graft acceptance in a mouse heart transplant model

Macrophages infiltrating the allografts are heterogeneous, consisting of proinflammatory (M1 cells) as well as antiinflammatory and fibrogenic phenotypes (M2 cells); they affect transplantation outcomes via diverse mechanisms. Here we found that macrophage polarization into M1 and M2 subsets was critically dependent on tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), respectively. In a heart transplant model we showed that macrophage-specific deletion of TRAF6 (LysM^Cre Traf6 ^fl/fl ) or mTOR (LysM^Cre Mtor^fl/fl ) did not affect acute allograft rejection. However, treatment of LysM^Cre Mtor^fl/fl recipients with CTLA4-Ig induced long-term allograft survival (>100 days) without histological signs of chronic rejection, whereas the similarly treated LysM^Cre Traf6 ^fl/fl recipients developed severe transplant vasculopathy (chronic rejection). The presentation of chronic rejection in CTLA4-Ig-treated LysM^Cre Traf6 ^fl/fl mice was similar to that of CTLA4-Ig-treated wild-type B6 recipients. Mechanistically, we found that the graft-infiltrating macrophages in LysM^Cre Mtor^fl/fl recipients expressed high levels of PD-L1, and that PD-L1 blockade readily induced rejection of otherwise survival grafts in the LysM^Cre Mtor^fl/fl recipients. Our findings demonstrate that targeting mTOR-dependent M2 cells is critical for preventing chronic allograft rejection, and that graft survival under such conditions is dependent on the PD-1/PD-L1 coinhibitory pathway.

The future of cardiac transplantation

The first human-to-human heart transplant was performed 50 years ago in 1967. Heart transplantation has now entered an era of tremendous growth and innovation. The future of heart transplantation is bright with the advent of newer immunosuppressive medications and strategies that may even result in tolerance. Much of this progress in heart transplant medicine is predicated on a better understanding of acute and chronic rejection pathways through basic science studies. The future will also include personalized medicine where genomics and molecular science will dictate customized treatment for optimal outcomes. The introduction of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has changed the landscape for patients with severe heart failure to stabilize the most ill patient and make them better candidates for heart transplant. As ex vivo preservation takes hold, we may witness an expansion of the donor pool through the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. In addition, further geographical donor heart sharing through ex vivo preservation may further decrease waitlist mortality by enabling longer distance donor hearts to be allocated for the sickest waitlist patient. It is no doubt an exciting time to be involved in the field of heart transplantation. In this perspective, we will summarize the present state of heart transplantation and discuss various innovations that are being pursued.

Tolerance in liver transplantation: Biomarkers and clinical relevance

Transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage organ failure, and modern immunosuppression has allowed important progress in short-term outcomes. However, immunosuppression poorly influences chronic rejection and elicits chronic toxicity in current clinical practice. Thus, a major goal in transplantation is to understand and induce tolerance. It is well established that human regulatory T cells expressing the transcription factor FoxP3 play important roles in the maintenance of immunological self-tolerance and immune homeostasis. The major regulatory T cell subsets and mechanisms of expansion that are critical for induction and long-term maintenance of graft tolerance and survival are being actively investigated. Likewise, other immune cells, such as dendritic cells, monocyte/macrophages or natural killer cells, have been described as part of the process known as "operational tolerance". However, translation of these results towards clinical practice needs solid tools to identify accurately and reliably patients who are going to be tolerant. In this way, a plethora of genetic and cellular biomarkers is raising and being validated worldwide in large multi-center clinical trials. Few of the studies performed so far have provided a detailed analysis of the impact of immunosuppression withdrawal on pre-existing complications derived from the long-term administration of immunosuppressive drugs and the side effects associated with them. The future of liver transplantation is aimed to develop new therapies which increase the actual low tolerant vs non-tolerant recipients ratio.

Graft-Infiltrating Macrophages Adopt an M2 Phenotype and Are Inhibited by Purinergic Receptor P2X7 Antagonist in Chronic Rejection

Macrophages exhibit diverse phenotypes and functions; they are also a major cell type infiltrating chronically rejected allografts. The exact phenotypes and roles of macrophages in chronic graft loss remain poorly defined. In the present study, we used a mouse heart transplant model to examine macrophages in chronic allograft rejection. We found that treatment of C57BL/6 mice with CTLA4 immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA4-Ig) prevented acute rejection of a Balb/c heart allograft but allowed chronic rejection to develop over time, characterized by prominent neointima formation in the graft. There was extensive macrophage infiltration in the chronically rejected allografts, and the graft-infiltrating macrophages expressed markers associated with M2 cells but not M1 cells. In an in vitro system in which macrophages were polarized into either M1 or M2 cells, we screened phenotypic differences between M1 and M2 cells and identified purinergic receptor P2X7 (P2x7r), an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-gated ion channel protein that was preferentially expressed by M2 cells. We further showed that blocking the P2x7r using oxidized ATP (oATP) inhibited M2 induction in a dose-dependent fashion in vitro. Moreover, treatment of C57BL/6 recipients with the P2x7r antagonist oATP, in addition to CTLA4-Ig treatment, inhibited graft-infiltrating M2 cells, prevented transplant vasculopathy, and induced long-term heart allografts survival. These findings highlight the importance of the P2x7r-M2 axis in chronic rejection and establish P2x7r as a potential therapeutic target in suppression of chronic rejection.

Non-invasive molecular imaging of inflammatory macrophages in allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Macrophages represent a critical cell type in host defense, development and homeostasis. The ability to image non-invasively pro-inflammatory macrophage infiltrate into a transplanted organ may provide an additional tool for the monitoring of the immune response of the recipient against the donor graft. We therefore decided to image in vivo sialoadhesin (Sn, Siglec 1 or CD169) using anti-Sn mAb (SER-4) directly radiolabelled with (99m)Tc pertechnetate.

METHODS

We used a heterotopic heart transplantation model where allogeneic or syngeneic heart grafts were transplanted into the abdomen of recipients. In vivo nanosingle-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed 7 days post transplantation followed by biodistribution and histology.

RESULTS

In wild-type mice, the majority of (99m)Tc-SER-4 monoclonal antibody cleared from the blood with a half-life of 167 min and was located predominantly on Sn(+) tissues in the spleen, liver and bone marrow. The biodistribution in the transplantation experiments confirmed data derived from the non-invasive SPECT/CT images, with significantly higher levels of (99m)Tc-SER-4 observed in allogeneic grafts (9.4 (±2.7) %ID/g) compared to syngeneic grafts (4.3 (±10.3) %ID/g) (p = 0.0022) or in mice which received allogeneic grafts injected with (99m)Tc-IgG isotype control (5.9 (±0.6) %ID/g) (p = 0.0185). The transplanted heart to blood ratio was also significantly higher in recipients with allogeneic grafts receiving (99m)Tc-SER-4 as compared to recipients with syngeneic grafts (p = 0.000004) or recipients with allogeneic grafts receiving (99m)Tc-IgG isotype (p = 0.000002).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we demonstrate that imaging of Sn(+) macrophages in inflammation may provide an important additional and non-invasive tool for the monitoring of the pathophysiology of cellular immunity in a transplant model.

Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells on Transplantation: Immunotherapy Based on Second Signal Blockage

Dendritic cells (DCs), the most important professional antigen-presenting cells (APC), play crucial role in both immunity and tolerance. It is well known that DCs are able to mount immune responses against foreign antigens and simultaneously tolerate self-antigens. Since DCs can be modulated depending on the surrounding microenvironment, they can act as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. However, the mechanisms that support this dual role are not entirely clear. Recent studies have shown that DCs can be manipulated ex vivo in order to trigger their tolerogenic profile, what can be a tool to be used in clinical trials aiming the treatment of various diseases and the prevention of transplant rejection. In this sense, the blockage of costimulatory molecules on DC, in the attempt of inhibiting the second signal in the immunological synapse, can be considered as one of the main strategies under development. This review brings an update on current therapies using tolerogenic dendritic cells modulated with costimulatory blockers with the aim of reducing transplant rejection. However, although there are current clinical trials using tolerogenic DC to treat allograft rejection, the actual challenge is to modulate these cells in order to maintain a permanent tolerogenic profile.

Ischemia/reperfusion Injury and its Consequences on Immunity and Inflammation

Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), an inherent component of transplantation, affects organ quality and transplant outcomes. Although the complexity of the pathophysiology is recognized, detailed mechanisms remain unclear, and strategies preventing the consequences of IRI have been challenging. Of critical significance appears the link between IRI, the initiation of innate immune responses, and the (potential) augmentation of adaptive immunity. An improved understanding of those complex mechanisms and interactions may pave the way for more effective treatment strategies.

Impact of Mast Cells in Rejection of Allografts

Mast cells in the tissue are located close to nerves in and around the small vessels where they orchestrate important immune response after antigen recognition through Toll-like receptors. Mast cells can activate T and B lymphocytes and dendritic cells and have been postulated to act directly within tissue allografts and/or to induce indirect effects via inflammatory mediator release, therefore they have been shown to play an indispensable role in allograft tolerance. Major limitation in the success of transplantation is the immune response of the recipient to the donor tissue. The failure of tissue grafting is caused by an inflammatory reaction called rejection. Mast cells play a role during immune response and are elicited with transplanted allograft and also may exhibit their immune-regulatory effects directly through secretion of modulatory cytokines and activation of metabolic pathways. However, the role of mast cells in transplantation is poorly understood. The most severe rejection episodes have been found in patients with an increased number of mast cells. Mast cell mediators which can activate latent forms of TGF-β or increase angiotensin II levels are capable of inducing fibrosis through various mechanisms, activating fibroblasts and inducing collagen synthesis. Mast cells are also implicated in regulatory T-cell functions and are required to sustain peripheral tolerance via Treg, therefore there is an interaction between mast cells and Treg cells. Treg create IL-9 in enhancing mast cell growth and Chemotaxis, suggesting that Treg and mast cells form a functional unit that mediates graft tolerance. In this study we concentrate our attention on the role of mast cells in rejection of allografts and try to understand the role of mast cell-related immune mechanisms in organ transplantation.

Transplant tolerance: new insights and strategies for long-term allograft acceptance

One of the greatest advances in medicine during the past century is the introduction of organ transplantation. This therapeutic strategy designed to treat organ failure and organ dysfunction allows to prolong the survival of many patients that are faced with no other treatment option. Today, organ transplantation between genetically dissimilar individuals (allogeneic grafting) is a procedure widely used as a therapeutic alternative in cases of organ failure, hematological disease treatment, and some malignancies. Despite the potential of organ transplantation, the administration of immunosuppressive drugs required for allograft acceptance induces severe immunosuppression in transplanted patients, which leads to serious side effects such as infection with opportunistic pathogens and the occurrence of neoplasias, in addition to the known intrinsic toxicity of these drugs. To solve this setback in allotransplantation, researchers have focused on manipulating the immune response in order to create a state of tolerance rather than unspecific immunosuppression. Here, we describe the different treatments and some of the novel immunotherapeutic strategies undertaken to induce transplantation tolerance.

Achieving operational tolerance in transplantation: how can lessons from the clinic inform research directions?

Since the first solid organ transplant between the Herrick twins in 1954, transplantation immunology has sought to move away from harmful immunosuppressive regimens towards tolerogenic strategies that promote long-term graft survival. This has required a concerted multinational effort with scientists and clinicians working towards a common goal. Reports of immunosuppression-free kidney and liver allograft recipients have provided the proof-of-principle, but intentional generation of tolerance in clinical transplantation is still only achieved infrequently. Recently, there have been an increasing number of encouraging developments in the field in both experimental and clinical studies. In this article, we review the latest advances in tolerance research and consider possible future barriers and solutions in achieving reliable graft acceptance in the long term.

Cell mediated rejection

Rejection is the major barrier to successful transplantation and usually results from the integration of multiple mechanisms. Activation of elements of the innate immune system, triggered as a consequence of tissue injury sustained during cell isolation or organ retrieval as well as ischemia-reperfusion, will initiate and amplify the adaptive response. For cell mediated rejection, T cells require multiple signals for activation, the minimum being two signals; antigen recognition and costimulation. The majority of B cells require help from T cells to initiate alloantibody production. Antibodies reactive to donor HLA molecules, minor histocompatibility antigens, endothelial cells, red blood cells, or autoantigens can trigger or contribute to rejection early as well as late after transplantation.

The future of heart transplantation

The field of heart transplantation has seen significant progress in the past 40 years. However, the breakthroughs in long-term outcome have seen stagnation in the past decade. Through advances in genomics and transcriptomics, there is hope that an era of personalized transplant therapy lies in the future. To see where heart transplantation truly fits into the long term, searching for and understanding the alternative approaches for heart failure therapy is both important and inevitable. The application of mechanical circulatory support has contributed to the largest advancement in treatment of end stage heart failure. It has already been approved for destination therapy of heart failure, and greater portability and ease of use of the device will be the future trend. Although it is still not prime time for stem cell therapy, clinical experiences have already suggested its potential therapeutic effects. And finally, whole organ engineering is on the horizon as new techniques have opened the way for this to proceed. In the end, progress on alternative therapies largely depends on our deeper understanding of the mechanisms of heart failure and how to prevent it.

Innate immunity and resistance to tolerogenesis in allotransplantation

The development of immunosuppressive drugs to control adaptive immune responses has led to the success of transplantation as a therapy for end-stage organ failure. However, these agents are largely ineffective in suppressing components of the innate immune system. This distinction has gained in clinical significance as mounting evidence now indicates that innate immune responses play important roles in the acute and chronic rejection of whole organ allografts. For instance, whereas clinical interest in natural killer (NK) cells was once largely confined to the field of bone marrow transplantation, recent findings suggest that these cells can also participate in the acute rejection of cardiac allografts and prevent tolerance induction. Stimulation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), another important component of innate immunity, by endogenous ligands released in response to ischemia/reperfusion is now known to cause an inflammatory milieu favorable to graft rejection and abrogation of tolerance. Emerging data suggest that activation of complement is linked to acute rejection and interferes with tolerance. In summary, the conventional wisdom that the innate immune system is of little importance in whole organ transplantation is no longer tenable. The addition of strategies that target TLRs, NK cells, complement, and other components of the innate immune system will be necessary to eventually achieve long-term tolerance to human allograft recipients.

Mechanisms of rejection: current perspectives

Rejection is the major barrier to successful transplantation. The immune response to an allograft is an ongoing dialogue between the innate and adaptive immune system that if left unchecked will lead to the rejection of transplanted cells, tissues, or organs. Activation of elements of the innate immune system, triggered as a consequence of tissue injury sustained during cell isolation or organ retrieval and ischemia reperfusion, will initiate and amplify the adaptive response. T cells require a minimum of two signals for activation, antigen recognition, and costimulation. The activation requirements of naive T cells are more stringent than those of memory T cells. Memory T cells are present in the majority of transplant recipients as a result of heterologous immunity. The majority of B cells require help from T cells to initiate antibody production. Antibodies reactive to donor human leukocyte antigen molecules, minor histocompatibility antigens, endothelial cells, RBCs, or autoantigens can trigger or contribute to rejection early and late after transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection triggered by alloantibody binding and complement activation is recognized increasingly as a significant contribution to graft loss. Even though one component of the immune system may dominate and lead to rejection being described in short hand as T cell or antibody mediated, it is usually multifactorial resulting from the integration of multiple mechanisms. Identifying the molecular pathways that trigger tissue injury, signal transduction and rejection facilitates the identification of targets for the development of immunosuppressive drugs.

Innate NK cells and macrophages recognize and reject allogeneic nonself in vivo via different mechanisms

Both innate and adaptive immune cells are involved in the allograft response. But how the innate immune cells respond to allotransplants remains poorly defined. In the current study, we examined the roles of NK cells and macrophages in recognizing and rejecting allogeneic cells in vivo. We found that in naive mice NK cells are the primary effector cells in the killing of allogeneic cells via "missing self" recognition. However, in alloantigen-presensitized mice, NK cells are dispensable. Instead, macrophages become alloreactive and readily recognize and reject allogeneic nonself. This effect requires help from activated CD4(+) T cells and involves CD40/CD40L engagement, because blocking CD40/CD40L interactions prevents macrophage-mediated rejection of allogeneic cells. Conversely, actively stimulating CD40 triggers macrophage-mediated rejection in the absence of CD4(+) T cells. Importantly, alloantigen-primed and CD4(+) T cell-helped macrophages (licensed macrophages) exhibit potent regulatory function in vivo in an acute graft-versus-host disease model. Together, our data uncover an important role for macrophages in the alloimmune response and may have important clinical implications.