Long-term impact of donor-recipient size mismatching in deceased donor kidney transplantation and in expanded criteria donor recipients

Pediatric renal transplantation-A UNOS database analysis of donor-recipient size mismatch

BACKGROUND

We used the BSAi (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether transplanting a small or large kidney into a pediatric recipient relative to his/her size influences renal transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We included 14 322 single-kidney transplants in pediatric recipients (0-17 years old) (01/2000-02/2020) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. We divided cases into four BSAi groups (BSAi ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 2, 2 < BSAi ≤ 3, BSAi > 3).

RESULTS

There were no differences concerning delayed graft function (DGF) or primary non-function (PNF) rates, whether the grafts were from living or brain-dead donors. In both transplants coming from living donors and brain-dead donors, cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with 2 < BSAi ≤ 3 had similar graft survival (p = .13 for transplants from living donors, p = .413 for transplants from brain-dead donors), and both groups had longer graft survival than cases with 1 < BSAi ≤ 2 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 (p < .001). The difference in 10-year graft survival rates between cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 reached around 25% in both donor types. The better graft survival in transplants with BSAi > 2 was confirmed in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant impact of donor-recipient size mismatch on DGF and PNF rates in pediatric renal transplants. However, graft survival is significantly improved when the donor's size is more than twice the pediatric recipient's size.

Excellent Clinical Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Small Pediatric Donors (Age ≤ 5 Years) Despite Early Hyperfiltration Injury

Background:

The use of small pediatric donors (age ≤ 5 years and body weight < 20kg) for adult transplant recipients is still regarded controversially in terms of early complications, long-term outcomes, and development of hyperfiltration injury due to body size mismatch.

Objective:

To investigate long-term outcomes of adult renal allograft recipients receiving a kidney from small pediatric donor (SPD) in terms of kidney function and early features of hyperfiltration injury such as histological changes and proteinuria.

Design:

Retrospective, single center study.

Settings:

Transplant center of the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.

Patients:

Adult renal allograft recipients receiving a kidney from a small pediatric donor at our center between 2005 and 2017.

Methods:

The outcome of 47 transplants from SPD were compared with 153 kidney transplants from deceased-standard criteria donors (SCD) occurring during the same time period. Incidence of clinical signs of hyperfiltration injury (eg, proteinuria) was investigated. According to our policy, surveillance biopsies were taken at 3 and 6 months post-transplant and were evaluated in terms of signs of hyperfiltration injury.

Results:

At a median follow-up of 2.3 years post-transplant, death-censored graft survival of SPD was comparable to transplants from SCD (94% vs 93%; P = .54). Furthermore, allograft function at last follow-up (estimated glomerular filtration rate–Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) was significantly higher in pediatric transplant (80 vs 55 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = .002). We found histological signs of early hyperfiltration injury in 55% of SPD. There was an equally low proteinuria in both groups during follow-up.

Limitations:

It is a single center and retrospective observational study with small sample size. The outcomes were investigated in a well-selected population of recipients with low body mass index, low immunological risk, and well-controlled hypertension and was not compared with equal selected group of recipients.

Conclusions:

Early histological and clinical signs of hyperfiltration injury in SPD is frequent. Despite the hyperfiltration injury, there is an equal allograft survival and even superior allograft function in SPD compared with SCD during follow-up. This observation supports the concept of high adaptive capacity of pediatric donor kidneys.

Combined Donor-Recipient Obesity and the Risk of Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation

Background: As the prevalence of obesity increases globally, appreciating the effect of donor and recipient (DR) obesity on graft outcomes is of increasing importance.

Methods: In a cohort of adult, kidney transplant recipients (2000–2017) identified using the SRTR, we used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between DR obesity pairing (body mass index (BMI) &gt;30 kg/m2), and death-censored graft loss (DCGL) or all-cause graft loss, and logistic regression to examine risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and ≤30 days graft loss. We also explored the association of DR weight mismatch (&gt;30 kg, 10-30 kg (D&gt;R; D&lt;R) and &lt;10 kg (D = R)) with each outcome, stratifying by DR obesity pairing.

Results: Relative to non-obese DR, obese DR were highest risk for all outcomes (DCGL: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.22–1.32; all-cause graft loss: HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06–1.12; DGF: OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.89–2.08; early graft loss: OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19–1.51). Donor obesity modified the risk of recipient obesity and DCGL [p = 0.001] and all-cause graft loss [p &lt; 0.001] but not DGF or early graft loss. The known association of DR weight mismatch with DCGL was attenuated when either the donor or recipient was obese.

Conclusion: DR obesity status impacts early and late post-transplant outcomes.

Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery. However, the disparity between supply versus demand for organs means many either die or are removed from the waiting-list before receiving a kidney allograft. Reducing unnecessary discard of deceased donor kidneys is important to maximize utilization of a scarce and valuable resource but requires nuanced decision-making. Accepting kidneys from deceased donors with heterogenous characteristics for waitlisted kidney transplant candidates, often in the context of time-pressured decision-making, requires an understanding of the association between donor characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes. Deceased donor clinical factors can impact patient and/or kidney allograft survival but risk-versus-benefit deliberation must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with remaining on the waiting-list. In this article, the association between deceased kidney donor characteristics and post kidney transplant outcomes for the recipient are reviewed. While translating this evidence to individual kidney transplant candidates is a challenge, emerging strategies to improve this process will be discussed. Fundamentally, tools and guidelines to inform decision-making when considering deceased donor kidney offers will be valuable to both professionals and patients.

The Role of Donor Sex in Females Undergoing Repeat Kidney Transplant: Does Prior Donor Sex Matter?

Female recipients of male donor kidneys are at increased risk for graft failure because of the HY antigen effect. However, whether prior transplant with a male donor impacts subsequent transplant outcomes is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether prior male-current male donor sex is associated with an increased risk of graft failure in female recipients.

Methods

We performed a cohort study of adult female recipients undergoing a second kidney transplant (2000-2017), identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Using multivariable Cox models, we analyzed the risk of death-censored graft loss (DCGL) if the second transplant was from a male versus female kidney donor, conditional on donor sex at the time of the first transplant. In a secondary analysis, we stratified results by recipient age (>50 or ≤50 y) at the time of retransplant.

Results

Of 5594 repeat kidney transplants, 1397 (25.0%) developed DCGL. Overall, there was no association between first and second donor sex pairing and DCGL. A prior and current female donor (FD₁FD₂) posed a higher risk for DCGL in recipients aged >50 y at second transplant (hazard ratio,≤0.67, confidence interval 0.46-0.98, for all other donor combinations), but posed a lower risk if aged ≤50 y at retransplant (hazard ratio, ≥1.37, confidence interval 1.04-1.80, for all other donor combinations).

Conclusions

Overall, past-current donor sex pairing was not associated with DCGL in female recipients undergoing second kidney transplant; however, the risk with a past and current female donor was increased in older, and decreased in younger, female recipients at retransplant.

Risk Due to ABO Incompatibility and Donor-Recipient Weight Mismatch in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study

The effect of donor-recipient weight mismatch is not well established in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). A total of 2584 LDKT patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of ABO incompatibility and donor-recipient weight mismatch (donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) < 0.8). In a multivariable Cox analysis, the combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility (n = 124) was an independent risk factor for graft survival (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.11-6.70) and patient survival (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.39-9.04), whereas neither factor alone was a significant risk factor for either outcome. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was not an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven graft rejection (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88-1.82); however, it was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.64-5.57). The mortality rate due to infection was higher among patients with both ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility than among patients with neither factor or with either factor alone. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was an independent risk factor for graft and patient survival after LDKT, whereas neither factor alone significantly affected graft or patient survival. Thus, donor-recipient weight matching should be cautiously considered in LDKT with ABO incompatibility.

The implications of donor-recipient size mismatch in renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Transplanting kidneys small for recipient's size results in inferior graft function. Body surface area (BSA) is related to kidney size. We used the BSA index (BSAi) (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether the renal graft size is sufficient for the recipient.

METHODS

We included 26,223 adult single kidney transplants (01/01/2007-31/12/2019) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided renal transplants into groups: BSAi ≤ 0.75, 0.75 < BSA ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25, BSAi > 1.25. We compared delayed graft function rates, primary non-function rates and graft survival among them. (Reference category: BSAi ≤ 0.75).

RESULTS

Cases with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the highest delayed graft function rates in living-donor renal transplants (11.1%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.32-1.1, p = 0.095, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23-0.89, p = 0.022, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.13-0.77, p = 0.011) and in renal transplants from donors after brain death (26.2%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.96, p = 0.024, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.47-0.83, p = 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47-0.9, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death regarding delayed graft function rates (~ 40% in all groups). Graft survival was similar among BSAi groups in renal transplants from living donors and donors after brain death. Renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the shortest graft survival (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.74, p < 0.001, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66, p < 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31-0.66, p < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival rate was 58.4% for renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function risk is higher in renal transplants with BSAi ≤ 0.75 coming from living donors and donors after brain death. Graft survival is greatly reduced in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75.

Analysis of Factors Influencing Kidney Function of Recipients After Renal Transplantation in Southwestern China: A Retrospective Study

Background: Factors influencing the kidney function of patients after renal transplantation include both recipient-related factors and donor-related factors. To gain a better understanding of these factors and to improve clinical decision-making, we performed a retrospective study of southwestern Chinese people receiving kidney transplantation.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, a total of 2,462 recipients receiving allogeneic kidney transplantation in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from December 13, 2008 to January 10, 2018 were included. Data on recipient and donor characteristics were extracted from the Transplant Center Database and stratified by discrete time points after kidney transplantation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out on the study variables, and kidney function of postoperative patients was monitored using cystatin C (CysC) as the outcome indicator.

Results: From the univariate analysis, several factors showed statistically significant short-term impact on kidney function based on CysC after kidney transplantation, including age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and HLA A-B-DR-DQ loci mismatch. Gender of recipients and gender-consistency between donors and recipients revealed both short-term and long-term influence. Younger donors had significantly better medium-and-long-term influence on kidney function. From the multivariate logistic regression analysis, recipient gender, ethnicity, BMI, and donor age were independent factors affecting postoperative CysC recovery at discrete time points.

Conclusion: Several factors of recipients related to renal function after kidney transplantation, such as gender, ethnicity, BMI and donor's age should be paid more attention to. Moreover, female and non-Han recipients decreased the risk of poor outcome during postoperative kidney function recovery while large BMI of recipients and higher donor age increased the risk. It is useful to predict the postoperative renal function earlier according to corresponding factors, and improve the patient's quality of life.

Pediatric Donor Glomerulopathy Is a Possible Cause of Abnormal Urinalysis in Adults Receiving Small Pediatric Donor Kidneys

Background.

Reports about prognosis of adults receiving small pediatric-donor kidneys (PDK) as compared to those receiving elder pediatric or adult donor kidneys (ADKs) are controversial. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of adults receiving small PDK and possible prognostic factors.

Methods.

The records of adults who received kidneys from donors < 10 years old at our center from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2018 were reviewed.

Results.

A total of 121 adults were small PDK recipients. Twenty-three patients received 29 biopsies or nephrectomy between 6 and 896 days posttransplantation days. Seven patients (30.4%) had pediatric donor glomerulopathy (PDG), which developed from 113 to 615 days posttransplantation. The incidence of proteinuria and hematuria was significantly higher in the PDG group. The characteristic pathological finding in PDG was irregular lamination and splintering of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). Donor age, donor weight, and donor kidney volume were significantly less in PDG cases compared with the non-PDG cases. For the risk factors of PDG, increasing urinary RBC count during follow-up was an independent predictor, while increasing donor age and body weight were protective factors. PDG was not a significant risk factor for Scr increasing of PDKs.

Conclusions.

PDG is a potential cause of abnormal urinalysis in adults receiving small PDKs. The pathological characteristic change of PDG is splitting and lamination of GBM. Persistent hematuria after transplantation in recipients of PDK is a predictor of PDG development.

Clinical consequences of developmental programming of low nephron number

Nephron number in humans varies up to 13-fold, likely reflecting the impact of multiple factors on kidney development, including inherited body size and ethnicity, as well as maternal health and nutrition, fetal exposure to gestational diabetes or preeclampsia and other environmental factors, which may potentially be modifiable. Such conditions predispose to low or high offspring birth weight, growth restriction or preterm birth, which have all been associated with increased risks of higher blood pressures and/or kidney dysfunction in later life. Low birth weight, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction are associated with reduced nephron numbers. Humans with hypertension and chronic kidney disease tend to have fewer nephrons than their counterparts with normal blood pressures or kidney function. A developmentally programmed reduction in nephron number therefore enhances an individual's susceptibility to hypertension and kidney disease in later life. A low nephron number at birth may not lead to kidney dysfunction alone except when severe, but in the face of superimposed acute or chronic kidney injury, a kidney endowed with fewer nephrons may be less able to adapt, and overt kidney disease may develop. Given that millions of babies are born either too small, too big or too soon each year, the population impact of altered renal programming is likely to be significant. Many gestational exposures are modifiable, therefore urgent attention is required to implement public health measures to optimize maternal, fetal, and child health, to prevent or mitigate the consequences of developmental programming, to improve the health future generations.

Effect of recipient-donor sex and weight mismatch on graft survival after deceased donor renal transplantation

This study evaluated the combined effect of recipient-to-donor weight and sex mismatch after deceased-donor renal transplantation in a German transplant cohort and the evolution of recipient-to-donor weight difference over a 13-year observation period. The association of absolute weight and sex difference with graft failure was explored in an outpatient cohort of deceased-donor transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2012. Graft failure was defined as repeated need for dialysis or death with a functioning graft. Recipient and donor sex pairings were classified as sex concordant (MDMR/FDFR) or discordant (MDFR/FDMR). These classes were further stratified into four groups according to recipient-to-donor weight mismatch ≥10 kg (recipient > donor) or <10 kg (recipient < donor). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to evaluate the time to graft loss adjusting for donor, immunologic, surgical, organizational, and recipient predictors. Sex-concordant transplant pairings <10 kg weight difference served as the reference group. Among 826 transplant recipients, 154 developed graft failure (18.6%). Median graft survival time was 3.9 years; first quartile (0.2–1.2), second quartile (1.2–2.9), third quartile (2.9–5.8), and fourth quartile (5.8–12.4). After multivariable adjustment, the highest relative hazard for graft failure was observed for sex-discordant transplant pairings with a ≥10 kg weight difference between recipient and donor (compared to the reference group MDMR/FDFR with weight difference <10 kg, MDMR/FDFR with weight difference ≥10 kg, hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.07–3.32—p = 0.029; MDFR/FDMR with weight difference <10 kg, hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.78–1.68—p = 0.507, and MDFR/FDMR with weight difference ≥10 kg, hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.15–3.48—p = 0.014). A recipient-to-donor weight mismatch of ≥10 kg was associated with an increased risk of graft loss or recipient death with a functioning graft. Concurrent sex discordance seemed to enhance this effect as indicated by an increase in the hazard ratio. We detected no significant tendency for increasing recipient-to-donor weight differences from 2000 to 2012.

The Influence of Donor to Recipient Size Matching on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Nephron endowment in renal transplantation is infrequently considered, but may have important implications for post kidney transplantation outcomes. In this population-cohort study, we analyzed the deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes stratified by donor-to-recipient size ratios.

Methods

Data for all deceased-donor adult kidney transplantation recipients between 2003 and 2015 were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry. We used weight as a surrogate marker for kidney size and defined the following mismatch categories (donor weight/recipient weight × 100): less than 75% (small donor kidney), 75% to 125% (weight matched kidney), and greater than 125% (large donor kidney). Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to assess the relationship between this marker and patient outcomes.

Results

Outcomes for 11 720 transplants were analyzed with weight mismatch stratified as follows; small donor kidney (n = 1608, 13.7%), weight matched kidney (n = 7247, 61.8%) and large donor kidney (n = 2865, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, no significant differences were detected in overall (P = 0.876) or death-censored (P = 0.173) graft survival, or in rates of delayed graft function (P = 0.396) between these 3 groups. However, 12-month creatinine levels were found to decline progressively across the groups (P < 0.001), with adjusted averages of 144.2 μmol/L for recipients of small donor kidneys, 134.7 μmol/L in weight matched kidneys, and 124.9 μmol/L in recipients of large donor kidneys. In addition, patient survival was found to be significantly shorter in recipients of larger kidneys than those with weight matched kidneys (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.40; P = 0.009), which is inconsistent with the existing literature.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that 12-month creatinine is influenced by donor-to-recipient difference in body weight, but that no such difference is observed for either delayed graft function or death-censored graft survival. However, we observed increased mortality in recipients receiving larger kidneys; an observation which conflicts with the existing literature and warrants further investigation.

The impact of donor and recipient weight incompatibility on renal transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Donor/recipient size mismatching and correlation to allograft outcome remains poorly defined. This study assessed the impact of donor body weight (DBW) to recipient body weight (RBW) ratio on allograft function and survival.

METHODS

A total of 898 deceased donor renal transplant recipients were included in the study. Patients were divided into quartiles depending on the ratio of DBW/RBW: Q1 (≤ 0.88), Q2 (0.89-1.00), Q3 (1.01-1.22) and Q4 (> 1.22). Donor and recipient characteristics were obtained from the national kidney transplant service database. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 and 5 years after transplant were compared.

RESULTS

Q4 patients had a higher eGFR 1 year post-transplant (median 59.5 ml/min, IQR 46.8-76.2) compared to Q1-Q3 which had median eGFRs of 54.3, 54.8 and 55.3 ml/min, respectively (p < 0.001). At 5 years post-transplant, there were modest differences in the eGFR across the four quartiles, Q1-4 with median eGFRs of 56.9, 61.1, 61.2 and 58.6 ml/min, respectively (p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences in 1- and 5-year allograft survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of deceased donor renal transplantation, mismatching of donor to recipient weight had no impact on 5-year allograft survival, but a low DBW/RBW ratio is modestly associated with lower eGFR.

Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors

The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.

Donor-Recipient Weight and Sex Mismatch and the Risk of Graft Loss in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Relatively smaller kidney donor to recipient size is proposed to result in higher graft loss due to nephron underdosing and hyperfiltration injury, but the potentially additive effect of sex and weight mismatch has not been explored in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if concurrent donor and recipient absolute weight and sex mismatch was associated with graft loss in a cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The association of kidney donor and recipient absolute weight and sex difference with death-censored graft loss was explored using a cohort of United States deceased donor recipients between 2000 and 2014 through the Scientific Registry of Transplants Recipients. Donor-recipient sex pairings (male donor-male recipient; female donor-female recipient; male donor-female recipient; female donor-male recipient) were further stratified by donor and recipient absolute weight difference (>30 or 10-30 kg [donorrecipient] or <10 kg [donor=recipient]) resulting in 20 weight and sex pairings. Time to death-censored graft loss for each pairing was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for donor, immunologic, surgical, and recipient predictors of graft loss compared with the reference group of male donor-male recipients with no weight mismatch (<10 kg difference).

RESULTS

Of 115,124 kidney transplant recipients, 21,261 developed death-censored graft failure (median graft survival time was 3.8 years; quartile 1 to 3, 0.0 to 14.8 years). After multivariable adjustment, the highest relative hazards for graft failure were observed for female recipients of male donor kidneys and male recipients of female donor kidneys in situations where the recipient was >30 kg larger than donor (hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 1.70; hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.45, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A concurrent mismatch in donor-recipient weight (donor Collapse

Key Words

• United States
• female
• graft failure
• graft survival
• kidney
• kidney transplantation
• male
• nephrons
• proportional hazards models
• registries
• sex characteristics
• sex mismatch
• size mismatch
• tissue donors
• transplant recipients

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Body Weight
• Cohort Studies
• Female
• Graft Survival
• Humans
• Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Proportional Hazards Models
• Registries
• Risk Factors
• Sex Factors
• Tissue Donors
• Transplant Recipients
• United States

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Amanda J. Miller Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and
Bryce A. Kiberd Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and
Ian P. Alwayn Department of General Surgery, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; and
Ayo Odutayo Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Karthik K. Tennankore Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and

Collapse

Can only histological evaluation determine the allocation of ECD kidneys?

INTRODUCTION

There is a recent debate on the "transplantability" of ECD (Expanded Criteria Donors) kidneys and the selection criteria used to allocate them to single or double transplantation. Remuzzi et al. have defined a protocol incorporating pre-transplant donor biopsy to guide the use of older donor organs. They allocated organs as single or double transplants on the basis of histological findings. We aim to show the pros and cons of the only histological evaluation in the allocation of ECD kidneys, to compare the different experiences in United States and Europe and thus to discuss whether this tool should be used alone or included in a comprehensive clinical and histopathological evaluation.

DISCUSSION

In the United States many Authors stated that the biopsy actually increases the percentage of kidney discarded and they raised questions about the importance of the biopsy in evaluating ECD kidneys for transplantation. On the other hand, the experiences of the majority of european transplant centers showed that allocating kidneys as single or dual transplant based on biopsy findings may achieve good graft and patient outcomes. Moreover, the experience of some centers as ours showed that kidneys allocated as DKT (Dual Kidney Transplant) on the basis of Remuzzi's score could have been suitable for single transplantation suggesting the need of an adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System. Many Authors, who are in favor of histological evaluation, actually believe that a comprehensive clinical and histopathological assessment before transplantation remains necessary. We lack precise national- or international-based selection criteria to guide clinicians. An adjustment of the Remuzzi Score System could be taken into consideration such as narrowing the indication for DKT from those ECD kidneys with higher scores and including the histological evaluation in a multifactor score.

Does graft mass impact on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the evolution of renal size and function in pediatric transplant patients according to the graft mass/recipient size ratio.

METHODS

Fifty pediatric renal transplant recipients were followed over 2 years. Grafts were weighed, and three different graft mass/m(2) ratios were determined: (1) low graft mass (58 g/m(2), range 31-57 g/m(2)), (2) median (142 g/m(2), range 59-141 g/m(2)) and high (267 g/m(2), range 143-353 g/m(2)). Patients underwent repeated ultrasound Doppler scans and repeated measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 1 week and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months), urinary retinol-binding protein (RBP) and proteinuria (1 week and 6, 12 and 24 months).

RESULTS

The volume of renal tissue increased by 12 ± 5.6 cm(3) at 24 months (p = 0.035) in the low graft mass and decreased by -14 ± 7 cm(3) (p = 0.046) in the high graft mass. The eGFR increased when either low (30 ± 5 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p < 0.001) or median (19 ± 4 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p < 0.001) graft mass was transplanted but remained stable when high graft mass was transplanted. The resistive index (RI) presented a significant decrease throughout early follow-up in the transplants involving low and median graft mass, whereas a slight rise was observed in those involving high graft mass. A significant difference was apparent 6 months post-transplant. Transplants of low and median graft mass were associated with an initial higher urinary RBP. No significant differences in proteinuria were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Small kidneys undergo increases in volume and function without escalation of either proteinuria or urinary RBP, characterizing an adequate adaptation to the recipient. Children receiving larger kidneys present a reduction in volume, stable GFR and higher RI at 6 months.

Gender differences in renal transplant graft survival

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A long-term retrospective study was conducted to assess the risk factors of renal transplant graft failure focusing on the effects of gender of both the donor and the recipient.

METHODS

Medical records of primary renal transplantation performed in a single transplant hospital were reviewed. Cases of ABO incompatibility, positive cross-matches, or multiple organ transplants were excluded. A total of 766 patient records were reviewed, and variables were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression to determine the independent factors associated with graft survival.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 84.7% and 92.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significantly poorer prognosis in male patients and in those with acute rejection, delayed function, or more mismatches in human lymphocyte antigens. Multivariate analysis with step-wise regression identified three independent prognostic factors for poor graft survival (male gender, acute rejection, and delayed function). The 5-year graft survival rates for female and male patients were 87.9% and 81.3%, respectively. The risk ratio of graft failure for male renal transplant recipients was 1.3732, when compared with that for female patients. The risk ratios for those with acute rejection and delayed function were 1.8330 and 1.5422, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, in addition to acute rejection and delayed function, was found to be an independent prognostic factor for poor renal transplant survival in this long-term retrospective study.

Predicting the outcome of renal transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Renal transplantation has dramatically improved the survival rate of hemodialysis patients. However, with a growing proportion of marginal organs and improved immunosuppression, it is necessary to verify that the established allocation system, mostly based on human leukocyte antigen matching, still meets today's needs. The authors turn to machine-learning techniques to predict, from donor-recipient data, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the recipient 1 year after transplantation.

DESIGN

The patient's eGFR was predicted using donor-recipient characteristics available at the time of transplantation. Donors' data were obtained from Eurotransplant's database, while recipients' details were retrieved from Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum's database. A total of 707 renal transplantations from cadaveric donors were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Two separate datasets were created, taking features with <10% missing values for one and <50% missing values for the other. Four established regressors were run on both datasets, with and without feature selection.

RESULTS

The authors obtained a Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and real eGFR (COR) of 0.48. The best model for the dataset was a Gaussian support vector machine with recursive feature elimination on the more inclusive dataset. All results are available at http://transplant.molgen.mpg.de/.

LIMITATIONS

For now, missing values in the data must be predicted and filled in. The performance is not as high as hoped, but the dataset seems to be the main cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Predicting the outcome is possible with the dataset at hand (COR=0.48). Valuable features include age and creatinine levels of the donor, as well as sex and weight of the recipient.