1
|
Savonius O, Kaskinen A, Hölttä T, Ylinen E, Tainio J, Nieminen T, Jahnukainen T. Serological responses to immunization during nephrosis in infants with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1392873. [PMID: 38756974 PMCID: PMC11097774 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1392873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pretransplant vaccination is generally recommended to solid organ transplant recipients. In infants with congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS), the immune response is hypothetically inferior to other patients due to young age and urinary loss of immunoglobulins, but data on the immunization response in severely nephrotic children remain scarce. If effective, however, early immunization of infants with CNS would clinically be advantageous. Methods We investigated serological vaccine responses in seven children with CNS who were immunized during nephrosis. Antibody responses to measles-mumps-rubella -vaccine (MMR), a pentavalent DTaP-IPV-Hib -vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b), varicella vaccine, combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) were measured after nephrectomy either before or after kidney transplantation. Results Immunizations were started at a median age of 7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 7-8], with a concurrent median proteinuria of 36,500 mg/L (IQR 30,900-64,250). Bilateral nephrectomy was performed at a median age of 20 months (IQR 14-25), and kidney transplantation 10-88 days after the nephrectomy. Antibody levels were measured at median 18 months (IQR 6-23) after immunization. Protective antibody levels were detected in all examined children for hepatitis B (5/5), Clostridium tetani (7/7), rubella virus (2/2), and mumps virus (1/1); in 5/6 children for varicella; in 4/6 for poliovirus and vaccine-type pneumococcal serotypes; in 4/7 for Haemophilus influenzae type B and Corynebacterium diphtheriae; in 1/2 for measles virus; and in 2/5 for hepatitis A. None of the seven children had protective IgG levels against Bordetella pertussis. Conclusion Immunization during severe congenital proteinuria resulted in variable serological responses, with both vaccine- and patient-related differences. Nephrosis appears not to be a barrier to successful immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okko Savonius
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu Kaskinen
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuula Hölttä
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elisa Ylinen
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juuso Tainio
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tea Nieminen
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Jahnukainen
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arora S, Kipp G, Bhanot N, Sureshkumar KK. Vaccinations in kidney transplant recipients: Clearing the muddy waters. World J Transplant 2019; 9:1-13. [PMID: 30697516 PMCID: PMC6347668 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v9.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine preventable diseases account for a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients and cause adverse outcomes to the patient and allograft. Patients should be screened for vaccination history at the time of pre-transplant evaluation and vaccinated at least four weeks prior to transplantation. For non-immune patients, dead-vaccines can be administered starting at six months post-transplant. Live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated after transplant due to concern for infectious complications from the vaccine and every effort should be made to vaccinate prior to transplant. Since transplant recipients are on life-long immunosuppression, these patients may have lower rates of serological conversion, lower mean antibody titers and waning of protective immunity over shorter period as compared to general population. Recommendations regarding booster dose in kidney transplant recipients with sub-optimal serological response are lacking. Travel plans should be part of routine post-transplant assessment and pre-travel vaccines and counseling should be provided. More studies are needed on vaccination schedules, serological response, need for booster doses and safety of live attenuated vaccines in this special population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Arora
- Divisions of Nephrology and Hypertension, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Gretchen Kipp
- Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Nitin Bhanot
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Kalathil K Sureshkumar
- Divisions of Nephrology and Hypertension, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaccination titres pre- and post-transplant in paediatric renal transplant recipients and the impact of immunosuppressive therapy. Pediatr Nephrol 2018; 33:897-910. [PMID: 29322328 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-017-3868-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidance of vaccine-preventable infections in paediatric renal allograft recipients is of utmost importance. However, the development and maintenance of protective vaccination titres may be impaired in this patient population owing to their need for immunosuppressive medication. METHODS In the framework of the Cooperative European Paediatric Renal Transplant Initiative (CERTAIN), we therefore performed a multi-centre, multi-national study and analysed vaccination titres pre- and post-transplant in 155 patients with serial titre measurements in comparison with published data in healthy children. RESULTS The percentage of patients with positive vaccination titres before renal transplantation (RTx) was low, especially for diphtheria (38.5%, control 75%) and pertussis (21.3%, control 96.3%). As few as 58.1% of patients had a hepatitis B antibody (HBsAb) titre >100 IU/L before RTx. 38.1% of patients showed a vaccination titre loss post-transplant. Patients with an HBsAb titre between 10 and 100 IU/L before RTx experienced a significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent hepatitis B vaccination titre loss post-transplant than patients with an HBsAb titre >100 IU/L. The revaccination rate post-transplant was low and revaccination failed to induce positive titres in a considerable number of patients (27.3 to 83.3%). Treatment with rituximab was associated with a significantly increased risk of a vaccination titre loss post-transplant (odds ratio 4.26, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS These data show a low percentage of patients with positive vaccination titres pre-transplant, a low revaccination rate post-transplant with limited antibody response, and a high rate of vaccination titre losses.
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller-Handley H, Paulsen G, Hooper DK, Lake M, Lazear D, Danziger-Isakov L. Durability of the hepatitis B vaccination in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13247. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Miller-Handley
- Department of Internal Medicine; Pediatrics at University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
- Division of Pediatric Infection Disease; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| | - Grant Paulsen
- Division of Pediatric Infection Disease; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| | - David K. Hooper
- Division of Nephrology; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| | - Michael Lake
- Division of Pharmacy; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| | - Danielle Lazear
- Division of Pharmacy; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Division of Pediatric Infection Disease; Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Cincinnati OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bakkaloğlu SA, Özdemir Atikel Y, Paglialonga F, Stefanidis CJ, Askiti V, Vidal E, Ariceta G, Melek E, Verrina E, Printza N, Vondrak K, Zurowska A, Zagozdzon I, Ekim M, Özmert EN, Dufek S, Jankauskiene A, Schmitt CP, Lévai E, Vande Walle J, Canpolat N, Holtta T, Fischbach M, Klaus G, Aufricht C, Shroff R, Edefonti A. Vaccination Practices in Pediatric Dialysis Patients Across Europe. A European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group and European Society for Pediatric Nephrology Dialysis Working Group Study. Nephron Clin Pract 2017; 138:280-286. [PMID: 29232664 DOI: 10.1159/000485398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the immunization practices in pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current vaccination practices for children on dialysis across European pediatric nephrology centers. METHODS A total of 18 tertiary pediatric nephrology centers from 12 European countries were included in the study. The data on universal national immunization programs and immunization practices for children with chronic disease or risk were recorded from European Center for Disease Prevention and Control and the World Health Organization. The immunization practices and center protocols for monitoring antibody titers after vaccination in dialysis patients were obtained through a questionnaire. RESULTS All centers included in the study recommended immunization against hepatitis B virus (HBV), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Hemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), and streptococcus pneumonia in dialysis patients. In 16 centers, dialysis patients were vaccinated against influenza virus annually. HBV protective antibody titers were measured in 17 centers (during dialysis period in 14 centers, during pre-renal transplantation preparations in 14 centers or in both times in 11 centers). Hepatitis A virus (HAV) was reported to be followed in 13 centers, in 8 centers during dialysis period, and in 11 centers during pre-RTx preparations. MMR and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) protective antibody titers were measured during the dialysis period or before renal transplantation (RTx) in 12 and 15 centers, respectively, and in 6 centers both titers were checked both times. CONCLUSION There are variations in vaccination practice across Europe. Children with CKD, those undergoing dialysis, and transplant candidates should receive age-appropriate vaccinations before RTx as well as before the transition to adult nephrology clinics and antibody levels should be monitored to evaluate the immunization status before and after RTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fabio Paglialonga
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Varvara Askiti
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, A. and P. Kyriakou Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Enrico Vidal
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - Gema Ariceta
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Vall d' Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Engin Melek
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Enrico Verrina
- Dialysis Unit, Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nikoleta Printza
- 1st Pediatric Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloníki, Greece
| | - Karel Vondrak
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Aleksandra Zurowska
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Ilona Zagozdzon
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mesiha Ekim
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Stephanie Dufek
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Augustina Jankauskiene
- Pediatric Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Claus Peter Schmitt
- Pediatric Nephrology, Center for Child and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eszter Lévai
- Pediatric Nephrology, Center for Child and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johan Vande Walle
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Utoped, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nur Canpolat
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuula Holtta
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Michel Fischbach
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Hopital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guenter Klaus
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, KfH Children's Kidney Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Aufricht
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rukshana Shroff
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Edefonti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Since first performed in 1954, kidney transplantation has evolved as the preferred long-term treatment of children with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The etiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD in children is broad and can be quite complicated, necessitating a multidisciplinary team to adequately care for these patients and their myriad needs. Precise surgical techniques and modern protocols for immunosuppression provide excellent long-term patient and graft survival. This article reviews the many etiologies of renal failure in the pediatric population focusing on those most commonly leading to the need for kidney transplantation. The processes of evaluation, kidney transplantation, short-term and long-term complications, as well as long-term outcomes are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Roach
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 3123 East 16th Ave, Aurora, Colorado 80045.
| | - Margret E Bock
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jens Goebel
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immunosuppressive treatments increase the life-long risk of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients for severe infections, some of which are vaccine-preventable. In this review of the literature published during the last 15 months, we critically summarize vaccine-oriented articles in SOT candidates or recipients. Because of previously reported differences, vaccine-specific studies are needed for each type of SOT recipients. RECENT FINDINGS Thanks to new data gathered during the H1N1/2009 influenza pandemic, recent research mainly focused on influenza vaccination, especially in kidney transplantation. Lung transplantation, mycophenolate treatment, increasing age and end-stage organ failure were frequently identified as risk factors for nonresponse to immunization in general. New evidence concerning the safety of immunizing SOT recipients with live-attenuated vaccines is obtained. SUMMARY During this last year, more encouraging data have been published regarding safety and immunogenicity of vaccination in SOT recipients. New inventive strategies should be studied to overcome missed opportunities for vaccinating SOT candidates and recipients, and to promote the most effective vaccination schedule and follow-up.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaccine administration in children with chronic kidney disease. Vaccine 2015; 32:6601-6. [PMID: 25275950 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Revised: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) on conservative treatment, on dialysis, and those with renal transplantation are at a higher risk for infectious diseases as the result of impaired immune responses against infectious agents. Infections in these patients can have drastic consequences for disease morbidity and mortality. Immunization is a crucial preventive strategy for disease management in this pediatric population. However, vaccination coverage among children with CKD remains low due to safety concerns and doubts about vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. In this study, we reviewed why children with CKD are at higher risk of infections, the importance of vaccinations among these children, barriers to vaccinations, and recommend the best vaccination schedules. Overall, vaccines have acceptable immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety profiles in children with CKD. However, in some cases, the protective antibody levels induced by vaccines and the benefits and risks of booster vaccine doses must be individually managed. Furthermore, close contacts and household members of these children should complete age-appropriate vaccination schedules to increase the child's indirect protection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Many transplant recipients are not protected against vaccine-preventable illnesses, primarily because vaccination is still an underutilized tool both before and after transplantation. This missed opportunity for protection can result in substantial morbidity, graft loss and mortality. Immunization strategies should be formulated early in the course of renal disease to maximize the likelihood of vaccine-induced immunity, particularly as booster or secondary antibody responses are less affected by immune compromise than are primary or de novo antibody responses in naive vaccine recipients. However, live vaccines should be avoided in immunocompromised hosts. Although some concern has been raised regarding increased HLA sensitization after vaccination, no clinical data to suggest harm currently exists; overall, non-live vaccines seem to be immunogenic, protective and safe. In organ transplant recipients, some vaccines are indicated based on specific risk factors and certain vaccines, such as hepatitis B, can protect against donor-derived infection. Vaccines given to close contacts of renal transplant recipients can provide an additional layer of protection against infectious diseases. In this article, optimal vaccination of adult transplant recipients, including safety, efficacy, indication and timing, is reviewed.
Collapse
|