Deleterious Impact of HLA-DRB1 Allele Mismatch in Sensitized Recipients of Kidney Retransplants

How to Deal With Kidney Retransplantation-Second, Third, Fourth, and Beyond

Kidney transplantation is the best health option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Ideally, a kidney transplant would last for the lifetime of each recipient. However, depending on the age of the recipient and details of the kidney transplant, there may be a need for a second, third, fourth, or even more kidney transplants. In this overview, the outcome of multiple kidney transplants for an individual is presented. Key issues include surgical approach and immunologic concerns. Included in the surgical approach is an analysis of transplant nephrectomy, with indications, timing, and immunologic impact. Allograft thrombosis, whether related to donor or recipient factors merits investigation to prevent it from happening again. Other posttransplant events such as rejection, viral illness (polyomavirus hominis type I), recurrent disease (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease may lead to the need for retransplantation. The pediatric recipient is especially likely to need a subsequent kidney transplant. Finally, noncompliance/nonadherence can affect both adults and children. Innovative approaches may reduce the need for retransplantation in the future.

Donor-specific antibodies detected by single antigen beads alone can help risk stratify patients undergoing retransplantation across a repeat HLA mismatch

Whether reexposure to mismatched HLA antigens (RMM) in the setting of a negative crossmatch is associated with increased immunological risk remains an area of uncertainty. This is due to evidence derived predominantly from registry data, which lacks comprehensive information on alloantibody and rejection. In this study, we analyze the impact of low-level preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against an RMM on transplant outcomes. From 1988 consecutive renal transplant recipients, we analyzed 179 patients undergoing retransplantation, of whom 55 had a RMM. All patients were crossmatch negative and preformed DSA were detected by single antigen beads alone. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with preformed DSA against an RMM were independently at risk of antibody-mediated rejection (HR 8.70 [3.42-22.10], P < .0001) and death-censored allograft loss (HR 3.08 [1.17-8.14], P = .023). In addition, prior transplant nephrectomy (HR 2.04 [1.00-4.17], P = .0495) was also associated with allograft failure, whereas receiving a retransplant that was matched at HLA class II was associated with a favorable outcome (HR 0.37 [0.14-0.99], P = .047). In the absence of preformed DSA, an RMM was not associated with de novo DSA development, rejection, or allograft loss. In conclusion, an RMM portends increased immunological risk only in the presence of a preformed DSA in patients undergoing retransplantation.

Should HLA mismatch acceptability for sensitized transplant candidates be determined at the high-resolution rather than the antigen level?

Defining HLA mismatch acceptability of organ transplant donors for sensitized recipients has traditionally been based on serologically defined HLA antigens. Now, however, it is well accepted that HLA antibodies specifically recognize a wide range of epitopes present on HLA antigens and that molecularly defined high resolution alleles corresponding to the same low resolution antigen can possess different epitope repertoires. Hence, determination of HLA compatibility at the allele level represents a more accurate approach to identify suitable donors for sensitized patients. This approach would offer opportunities for increased transplant rates and improved long term graft survivals.

HLA-DRB1 and susceptibility to kidney allograft rejection in Southern Iranian patients

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for the patients with end-stage renal disease. Viral infections and genetic factors such as HLA-II antigens may affect the kidney transplant outcome. The compatibility of HLA-DRB1 molecules in the survival of kidney transplant is important. Also, the correlation between these molecules and viral infections is significant. The current study investigates the allele frequency of HLA-DRB1 in 41 recipient kidney transplant and 203 normal healthy controls by polymerase chain reaction using sequence specific primers. Moreover the relation between HLA-DRB1 allelic groups and hepatitis B, hepatitis C and cytomegalovirus viral infections was also studied. However statistical analysis of the allele frequencies didn't show any significant association between HLA-DRB1 allelic group distributions or sharing and susceptibility to acute kidney transplant rejection (P > 0.05). Comparing the allele frequencies between HLA-DRB1*14 and DRB1*04 allelic showed a significant difference in controls and patients (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05 respectively). The results of the present study also showed a significant association between possession of HLA-DRB1*07 allele in kidney transplant recipients and hepatitis C virus infection (P = 0.009). In conclusion however the results of the present study did not showed relation between HLA-DRB1 allele's frequencies or sharing and kidney transplantation outcome, the results indicated that HLA-DRB1 alleles may susceptible individuals to renal disease or play a role in susceptibility to viral infection in kidney transplant patients.

Current role of human leukocyte antigen matching in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With graft survival rates steadily improving during the recent years, there is debate whether donor kidneys should still be allocated according to compatibility for human leukocyte antigens (HLA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies argue for continued kidney exchange efforts for achieving better HLA compatibility. In this modern era of immunosuppression, better HLA matching is associated not only with better graft survival, but also with the administration of lower dosages of immunosuppressive agents, a lower incidence of side-effects of immunosuppression such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, hip fractures, and death from infection, and a lower grade of sensitization if a patient has lost a kidney graft and is relisted for a retransplant.

SUMMARY

Despite the overall improved graft survival rates in the recent years, the data continue to support organ sharing based on HLA matching in kidney transplantation.

A glow of HLA typing in organ transplantation

The transplant of organs and tissues is one of the greatest curative achievements of this century. In organ transplantation, the adaptive immunity is considered the main response exerted to the transplanted tissue, since the main goal of the immune response is the MHC (major histocompatibility complex) molecules expressed on the surface of donor cells. Cell surface molecules that induce an antigenic stimulus cause the rejection immune response to grafted tissue or organ. A wide variety of transplantation antigens have been described, including the major histocompatibility molecules, minor histocompatibility antigens, ABO blood group antigens and endothelial cell antigens. The sensitization to MHC antigens may be caused by transfusions, pregnancy, or failed previous grafts leading to development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that are important factor responsible for graft rejection in solid organ transplantation and play a role in post-transfusion complication Anti-HLA Abs may be present in healthy individuals. Methods for HLA typing are described, including serological methods, molecular techniques of sequence-specific priming (SSP), sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing (SSOP), Sequence based typing (SBT) and reference strand-based conformation analysis (RSCA) method. Problems with organ transplantation are reservoir of organs and immune suppressive treatments that used to decrease rate of rejection with less side effect and complications.