Late acute liver allograft rejection; a study of its natural history and graft survival in the current era. Transplantation. 2013;95:955-959. [PMID: 23442806 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182845f6c]

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Incidence, epidemiology, and outcomes of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation in Australia

Acute allograft rejection is a well-known complication of liver transplantation (LT). The incidence, epidemiology, and outcomes of acute rejection have not been well described in Australia. We retrospectively studied consecutive adults who underwent deceased donor LT at a single center between 2010 and 2020. Donor and recipient data at the time of LT and recipient outcomes were collected from a prospective LT database. Liver biopsy reports were reviewed, and only a graft's first instance of biopsy-proven acute rejection was analyzed. During the study period, 796 liver transplants were performed in 770 patients. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 34.9% of transplants. There were no significant changes in the incidence of rejection over time (linear trend p =0.11). The median time to the first episode of rejection was 71 days after LT: 2.2% hyperacute, 50.4% early (≤90 d), and 47.5% late rejection (>90 d). Independent risk factors for rejection were younger recipient age at transplant (aHR 0.98 per year increase, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00, p =0.01), and ABO-incompatible grafts (aHR 2.55 vs. ABO-compatible, 95% CI: 1.27-5.09, p <0.01) while simultaneous multiorgan transplants were protective (aHR 0.21 vs. LT only, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58, p <0.01). Development of acute rejection (both early and late) was independently associated with significantly reduced graft (aHR 3.13, 95% CI: 2.21-4.42, p <0.001) and patient survival (aHR 3.42, 95% CI: 2.35-4.98, p <0.001). In this 11-year Australian study, acute LT rejection occurred in 35%, with independent risk factors of younger recipient age and ABO-incompatible transplant, while having a simultaneous multiorgan transplant was protective. Acute rejection was independently associated with reduced graft and patient survival after adjustment for other factors.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and end ileostomy result in equivalent graft survival following liver transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease-primary sclerosing cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis may require both liver transplantation and colectomy. There are concerns about increased rates of hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary strictures, and hepatic graft loss in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis compared to those with end ileostomy. We hypothesized that graft survival was not negatively affected by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis compared to end ileostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A tertiary center's database was searched for patients meeting the criteria of liver transplantation because of primary sclerosing cholangitis and total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or end ileostomy because of ulcerative colitis. Primary endpoints were hepatic graft survival and post-transplant complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria between January 1990 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (84%) underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and 9 (16%) underwent end ileostomy. The average age at total proctocolectomy (41.5 vs. 49.1 years; p = 0.12) and sex distribution (female: 26.1% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99) were comparable. The rates of re-transplantation (21.7% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99), hepatic artery thrombosis (10.8% vs. 0; p = 0.58), acute rejection (32.6% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.7), chronic rejection (4.3% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.42), recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (23.9% vs. 22.2%; p = 0.99), and biliary strictures (19.6% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.36) were similar between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and end ileostomy groups, respectively. None of the end ileostomy patients developed parastomal varices. The log-rank tests for graft (p = 0.97), recipient (p = 0.3), and combined graft/recipient survival (p = 0.73) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis did not negatively affect graft, recipient, and combined graft/recipient survival, or the long-term complications, compared to end ileostomy.

Type of calcineurin inhibitor and long-term outcomes following liver transplantation in patients with primary biliary cholangitis - an ELTR study

Background & Aims

Tacrolimus has been associated with recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT), which in turn may reduce survival. This study aimed to assess the association between the type of calcineurin inhibitor used and long-term outcomes following LT in patients with PBC.

Methods

Survival analyses were used to assess the association between immunosuppressive drugs and graft or patient survival among adult patients with PBC in the European Liver Transplant Registry. Patients who received a donation after brain death graft between 1990 and 2021 with at least 1 year of event-free follow-up were included.

Results

In total, 3,175 patients with PBC were followed for a median duration of 11.4 years (IQR 5.9-17.9) after LT. Tacrolimus (Tac) was registered in 2,056 (64.8%) and cyclosporin in 819 (25.8%) patients. Following adjustment for recipient age, recipient sex, donor age, and year of LT, Tac was not associated with higher risk of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.92-1.25, p = 0.402) or death (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.90-1.24, p = 0.473) over cyclosporin. In this model, maintenance mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was associated with a lower risk of graft loss (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87, p <0.001) or death (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87, p <0.001), while these risks were higher with use of steroids (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52, p <0.001, and aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p <0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

In this large LT registry, type of calcineurin inhibitor was not associated with long-term graft or recipient survival, providing reassurance regarding the use of Tac post LT in the population with PBC. Patients using MMF had a lower risk of graft loss and death, indicating that the threshold for combination treatment with Tac and MMF should be low.

Impact and implications

This study investigated the association between immunosuppressive drugs and the long-term survival of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) following donation after brain death liver transplantation. While tacrolimus has previously been related to a higher risk of PBC recurrence, the type of calcineurin inhibitor was not related to graft or patient survival among patients transplanted for PBC in the European Liver Transplant Registry. Additionally, maintenance use of mycophenolate was linked to lower risks of graft loss and death, while these risks were higher with maintenance use of steroids. Our findings should provide reassurance for physicians regarding the continued use of Tac after liver transplantation in the population with PBC, and suggest potential benefit from combination therapy with mycophenolate.

Recurrent rejections after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with stem cell features in an adult patient

Patients with hepatoblastoma featuring carcinoma characteristics have better outcomes after liver transplantation, than after chemotherapy and resection. Possibly this should be extrapolated to aggressive subtypes of hepatocellular carcinomas in non-cirrhotic livers, where early liver transplantation might also be indicated. However, the risks associated with liver transplantation and immunosuppressive treatment after liver transplantation are once again demonstrated by this case of a 32-year-old women with a negative personal and familial history of liver diseases. She underwent transplantation (DBD) for a hepatocellular carcinoma with stem cell features (HCC-HS; an aggressive 'hepatoblast subtype' of hepatocellular carcinoma) after chemotherapeutical downstaging techniques failed to sufficiently downstage the tumor. Despite being on conventional immunosuppressive regimens (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with initial corticosteroids tapered), this patient still developed two severe rejection episodes, one of which necessitated retransplantation (DCD). Both episodes were preceded by alterations in tacrolimus trough levels, either intentionally, when tacrolimus was reduced within a nephroprotective regimen, or unintentionally, when rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, significantly lowered the trough levels. Together, these episodes stress the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus. Furthermore, the patient experienced an everolimus-linked drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy, underwent multiple ERCPs for an anastomotic stricture and only one and a half year after the first liver transplantation she already suffers from long-term immunosuppressive-related side effects such as impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and a potential cardiomyopathy. At present, she is still alive and experienced no recurrence of her primary tumor. Her case underscores the significant challenges in post-liver transplantation care.

Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists

Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.

Defining the T cell transcriptional landscape in pediatric liver transplant rejection at single cell resolution

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) affects >80% of pediatric liver transplant recipients within 5 years, and late ACR is associated with graft failure. Traditional anti-rejection therapy for late ACR is ineffective and has remained unchanged for six decades. Although CD8+ T cells promote late ACR, little has been done to define their specificity and gene expression. Here, we used single-cell sequencing and immune repertoire profiling (10X Genomics) on 30 cryopreserved 16G liver biopsies from 14 patients (5 pre-transplant or with no ACR, 9 with ACR). We identified expanded intragraft CD8+ T cell clonotypes (CD8EXP) and their gene expression profiles in response to anti-rejection treatment. Notably, we found that expanded CD8+ clonotypes (CD8EXP) bore markers of effector and CD56hiCD161- 'NK-like' T cells, retaining their clonotype identity and phenotype in subsequent biopsies from the same patients despite histologic ACR resolution. CD8EXP clonotypes localized to portal infiltrates during active ACR, and persisted in the lobule after histologic ACR resolution. CellPhoneDB analysis revealed differential crosstalk between KC and CD8EXP during late ACR, with activation of the LTB-LTBR pathway and downregulation of TGFß signaling. Therefore, persistently-detected intragraft CD8EXP clones remain active despite ACR treatment and may contribute to long-term allograft fibrosis and failure of operational tolerance.

Post-Transplant Management and Complications of Autoimmune Hepatitis, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis including Disease Recurrence

Autoimmune liver diseases have unique post-transplant considerations. These recipients are at increased risk of rejection, and recurrent disease may also develop, which can progress to graft loss and increase mortality. Monitoring for and managing these complications is therefore important, though data on associated risk factors and immunosuppression strategies has in most cases been mixed. There are also other disease-specific complications that require management and may impact these decisions, including inflammatory bowel disease in PSC. Further work to better understand the optimal management strategies for these patients post-transplant is needed.

Detrimental impact of early biopsy-proven rejection in liver transplantation

Existing literature offers conflicting conclusions about whether early acute cellular rejection influences long-term outcomes in liver transplantation. We retrospectively collected donor and recipient data on all adult, first-time liver transplants performed at a single center between 2008 and 2020. We divided this population into two cohorts based on the presence of early biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (EBPR) within the first 90 days post-transplant and compared outcomes between the groups. There were 896 liver transplants that met inclusion criteria with 112 cases (12.5%) of EBPR. Recipients who developed EBPR had higher biochemical Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (28 vs. 24, p < .01), but other donor and recipient characteristics were similar. Recipients with EBPR had similar overall survival compared to patients without EBPR (p = .09) but had decreased graft survival (p < .05). EBPR was also associated with decreased time to first episode of late (> 90 days post-transplant) rejection (p < .0001) and increased vulnerability to bacterial and viral infection (p < .05). In subgroup analysis of recipients with autoimmune indications for liver transplantation, EBPR had a more pronounced association with patient death (hazard ratio [HR] 3.9, p < .05) and graft loss (HR 4.0, p < .01). EBPR after liver transplant is associated with inferior graft survival, increased susceptibility to late rejections, and increased vulnerability to infection.

The progress of autoimmune hepatitis research and future challenges

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver inflammatory disease with various immune system manifestations, showing a global trend of increased prevalence. AIH is diagnosed through histological abnormalities, clinical manifestations, and biochemical indicators. The biochemical markers involve interfacial hepatitis, transaminase abnormalities, positive autoantibodies, etc. Although AIH pathogenesis is unclear, gene mutations and immunological factors could be the leading factors. AIH usually presents as a chronic liver disease and sometimes as acute hepatitis, making it challenging to distinguish it from drug-related hepatitis due to similar clinical symptoms. Normalizing transaminases and serum IgG levels is essential in assessing the remission status of AIH treatment. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first-line AIH treatment, with lifelong maintenance therapy in some patients. The quality of life and survival can be improved after appropriate treatment. However, certain limitations jeopardize the quality of treatment, including long treatment cycles, side effects, poor patient compliance, and inability to inhibit liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Accurate AIH animal models will help us understand the pathophysiology of the disease while providing fresh perspectives for avoiding and treating AIH. This review will help us understand AIH better, from the cellular and molecular causes to the clinical features, and will provide insight into new therapy techniques with fewer side effects.

Value of Doppler ultrasonography in predicting clinical outcomes for patients with acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

PURPOSE

This study investigated the value of Doppler ultrasonography in predicting clinical outcomes after antirejection treatment for patients with acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 84 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with ACR and received antirejection treatment within 90 days following LT. Two radiologists searched for abnormal Doppler parameters at ACR diagnosis and within 7 days after antirejection treatment initiation, including portal blood velocity (PBV) <20 cm/s, hepatic artery resistive index <0.5, and a monophasic hepatic vein flow pattern. Interval PBV changes were also evaluated. The frequencies of abnormal Doppler parameters and PBV changes were compared by treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The frequency of abnormal PBV in the early post-treatment phase (PBVearly post-treatment) was significantly higher among poor responders (50.0% [10/20]) than among good responders (7.8% [5/64]) (P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of abnormal PBVearly post-treatment as a predictor of poor response to antirejection treatment were 50.0% (10/20), 92.2% (59/64), and 82.1% (69/84), respectively. A decrease (>10%) from the PBV at event (PBVevent) to PBVearly post-treatment was significantly more common among poor responders (50.0% [10/20]) than among good responders (20.3% [13/64]) (P=0.019). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this PBV decrease in predicting poor treatment response were 50.0% (10/20), 79.7% (51/64), and 72.6% (61/84), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal PBVearly post-treatment and a decrease between PBVevent and PBVearly post-treatment were significantly associated with poor treatment response in patients with ACR after LT. Consequently, Doppler ultrasonography may be useful for predicting clinical outcomes in these patients.

Evolving challenges with long-term care of liver transplant recipients

The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.

Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) With or Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-A European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a lead indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the western world. In this article, we present a Consensus Statement on LT practice, developed by a dedicated Guidelines' Taskforce of the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The overarching goal is to provide practical guidance on commonly debated topics, including indications and timing of LT, management of bile duct stenosis in patients on the transplant waiting list, technical aspects of transplantation, immunosuppressive strategies post-transplant, timing and extension of intestinal resection and futility criteria for re-transplantation.

The impact of recipient and donor gender-match and mismatch on the post-liver transplant outcomes of patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In this study, we evaluate the effects of donor gender on post-liver transplant (LT) prognosis. We specifically consider patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

METHODS

The 2005 to 2019 UNOS transplant registry was used to select patients with PBC. The study cohort was stratified by donor gender. All-cause mortality and graft failure hazards were compared using iterative Cox regression analysis. Subanalyses were performed to evaluate gender mismatch on post-LT prognosis.

RESULTS

There were 1885 patients with PBC. Of these cases, 965 entries had male donors and 920 had female donors. Median follow-up was 4.82 (25-75% IQR 1.83-8.93) years. Having a male donor was associated with higher all-cause mortality (aHR 1.28 95%CI 1.03-1.58) and graft failure (aHR 1.70 95%CI 1.02-2.82). Corresponding incidence rates were also relatively increased. In the sub-analysis of female recipients (n = 1581), those with gender-mismatch (male donors, n = 769) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (aHR 1.41 95%CI 1.11-1.78) but not graft failure. In the male recipient subanalysis (n = 304), no associations were found between gender-mismatch (female donors, n = 108) and all-cause mortality or graft failure.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that recipients who have male donors experienced higher rates of all-cause mortality following LT. This finding was consistent in the female recipient-male donor mismatch cohort.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

T-cell infiltrate intensity is associated with delayed response to treatment in late acute cellular rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Late acute cellular rejection (ACR) is associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development, chronic rejection, and allograft loss. However, accurate predictors of late ACR treatment response are lacking. ACR is primarily T-cell mediated, yet B cells and plasma cells (PC) also infiltrate the portal areas during late ACR. To test the hypothesis that the inflammatory milieu is associated with delayed response (DR) to rejection therapy, we performed a single-center retrospective case-control study of pediatric late liver ACR using multiparameter immunofluorescence for CD4, CD8, CD68, CD20, and CD138 to identify immune cell subpopulations.

METHODS

Pediatric liver transplant recipients transplanted at <17 years of age and treated for biopsy-proven late ACR between January 2014 and 2019 were stratified into rapid response (RR) and DR based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization within 30 days of diagnosis. All patients received IV methylprednisolone as an initial rejection treatment. Immunofluorescence was performed on archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) liver biopsy tissue.

RESULTS

Liver biopsies from 60 episodes of late ACR in 54 patients were included in the analysis, of which 33 were DR (55%). Anti-thymocyte globulin was only required in the DR group. The frequency of liver-infiltrating CD20+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and the prevalence of autoantibodies were higher in the DR group. In univariate logistic regression analysis, serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) level at diagnosis, but not ALT, Banff score or presence of DSA, predicted DR.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher serum GGT level, presence of autoantibodies, and increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration portends DR in late ACR treatment in children.

Late-Onset Rejection in Liver Allograft Biopsies: An Analysis of Process, Pattern, and Clinical Implications

OBJECTIVES

Both alloimmune and nonalloimmune factors affect the long-term survival of liver allograft recipients. Various patterns of late-onset rejection are recognized, including typical acute cellular rejection (tACR), ductopenic rejection (DuR), nonspecific hepatitis (NSH), isolated central perivenulitis (ICP), and plasma cell-rich rejection (PCRR). This study compares the clinicopathologic features of late-onset rejection (LOR) in a large-cohort context.

METHODS

For-cause liver biopsies more than 6 months after transplant were included from the University of Minnesota between 2014 and 2019. Histopathologic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and other data were analyzed in nonalloimmune and LOR cases.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 160 patients (122 adults, 38 pediatric patients), with 233 (53%) biopsies showing LOR: 51 (22%) tACR; 24 (10%) DuR; 23 (10%) NSH; 19 (8%) PCRR; and 3 (1%) ICP. Mean onset of 80 vs 61 months was longer for nonalloimmune injury (P = .04), a difference lost without tACR (mean, 26 months). Graft failure was highest with DuR. Response to treatment, as measured by changes in liver function tests, was similar between tACR and other LORs, and NSH occurred more often in pediatric patients (P = .001); tACR and other LOR incidence was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

LORs occur in pediatric and adult patients. Except for tACR, patterns overlap in many ways, with DuR having the greatest risk of graft loss, but other LORs respond well to antirejection treatments.

Regular protocol liver biopsy is useful to adjust immunosuppressant dose after adult liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Adjusting immunosuppression to minimal levels post-adult liver transplantation (LT) is critical; however, graft rejection has been reported in LT recipients with normal liver function evaluated by liver biopsy (LBx). Continual protocol liver biopsy (PLB) is performed regularly in LT recipients with normal liver function in some centers; however, its usefulness remains inadequately evaluated. This study aimed to assess retrospectively the usefulness of late PLB after adult LT.

METHODS

LBx evaluations of LT recipients with normal liver function and hepatitis B and C virus seronegativity were defined as PLB. The cases requiring immunosuppressive therapy for rejection findings based on Banff criteria were extracted from the PLBs, and pathological data collected before and after immunosuppressive dosage adjustment (based on modified histological activity index [HAI] score) were compared.

RESULTS

Among 548 LBx cases, 213 LBx in 110 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for PLB. Immunosuppressive therapy after PLB was intensified in 14 LBx (6.6%) recipients (12.7%); of these, nine had late-onset acute rejection, three had isolated perivenular inflammation, one had plasma cell-rich rejection, and one had early chronic rejection. Follow-up LBx after immunosuppressive dose adjustment showed improvement in the modified HAI score grading in 10 of 14 cases (71.4%). No clinical background and blood examination data, including those from the post-LT period, immunosuppressant trough level, or examination for de novo DSA, predicted rejection in PLB. Complications of PLB were found in only three cases.

CONCLUSION

PLB is useful in the management of seemingly stable LT recipients, to discover subclinical rejection and allow for appropriate immunosuppressant dose adjustment.

Post-Transplant Immunosuppression in Autoimmune Liver Disease

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are a group of conditions where immune-mediated liver damage can lead to the need for transplantation. Collectively, they account for almost a quarter of all liver transplants. Outcomes in terms of graft and patient survival for all liver transplants have improved markedly over decades with improvements in patient selection, surgical techniques and longer-term care and this is also seen in patients with AILDs. The current five- and ten-year survival rates post-transplant in autoimmune disease are excellent, at 88% and 78%, respectively. A key factor in maintaining good outcomes post liver transplant for these autoimmune conditions is the immunosuppression strategy. These patients have increased the rates of rejection, and autoimmune conditions can all recur in the graft ranging from 12 to 60% depending on the population studied. Immunosuppressive regimens are centred on calcineurin inhibitors, often combined with low dose corticosteroids, with or without the addition of antimetabolite therapy. There is no clear evidence-based immunosuppressive regimen for these conditions, and a tailored approach balancing the individuals' immunological profile against the risks of immunosuppression is often used. There are disease-specific considerations to optimised graft function including the role of ursodeoxycholic acid in both primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis and the role and timing of colectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis in inflammatory bowel disease patients. However, unmet needs still exist in the management of AILDs post liver transplantation particularly in building the evidence base for optimal immunosuppression as well as mitigating the risk of recurrent disease.

Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 290 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped into an acute rejection (AR) group and a normal (NM) group based on the confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the risk factors for acute rejection.

RESULTS

244 patients were included in the study. Acute rejection occurred in 27 (11.1%) of the patients. Warm ischemia time (P = 0.137), cold ischemia time (P = 0.064) and chronic liver failure (P = 0.001) were potential risk factors for acute rejection. Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the independent risk factor. There was no significant difference in overall survival between recipients with acute rejection and those without it (P = 0.985). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in the NM group was 98.1%, 85.7% and 78.6% respectively vs 88.9%, 82.5% and 82.5% respectively in the AR group.

CONCLUSION

Acute rejection does not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients. Only chronic liver failure was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. Our findings further illustrate that contradictions still exist on which factors influence acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Clinicopathological data of 290 liver transplant recipients at our center between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine the risk factors for acute rejection and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients. 244 patients were included in the analysis. 27 of the 244 experienced acute rejection. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the confounding effect. Patients were assigned to an acute rejection group (n = 27) and a normal group (n = 54). Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47-27.32) was the determined to be independent risk factor for acute rejection. Acute rejection did not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients with acute rejection and those without it.

Current Status of Biomarkers and Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Rejection in Liver Transplantation: Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Strategies to minimize immune-suppressive medications after liver transplantation are limited by allograft rejection. Biopsy of liver is the current standard of care in diagnosing rejection. However, it adds to physical and economic burden to the patient and has diagnostic limitations. In this review, we aim to highlight the different biomarkers to predict and diagnose acute rejection. We also aim to explore recent advances in molecular diagnostics to improve the diagnostic yield of liver biopsies.

Increased use of split liver grafts in adult recipients following implementation of a pediatric liver transplant program

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation (SLT) is a strategy to address organ shortage, but is a technically more demanding procedure than whole graft liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to determine the outcomes following SLT in adult recipients as well as to highlight the impact that having a pediatric LT program has on SLT implementation.

METHODS

All SLTs conducted at a single-center from 2010 to 2019 were identified. Patient data was obtained through retrospective review of the electronic medical record. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed primary outcomes of 1-,3-, and 5-year graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

We identified 37 SLTs performed at our institution from 2010 to 2019. Twenty-four donated livers resulted in 21 extended right lobes and 16 left lateral segments for adults and pediatrics recipients, respectively. Eighty-one percent (30/37) of the SLTs were performed after introduction of the combined pediatric program in 2016. 13/24 donor livers were split with both grafts allocated and used at our institution and 92% occurred after introduction of the pediatric program. Graft survival rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 94% in adult recipients and 100% for all time periods in pediatric recipients. Actuarial post-transplant patient survival was 100% at 1-, 3-, and 5-years in both.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a pediatric liver transplantation program resulted in more than a fourfold increase in the number of SLTs performed at our center. Increase in allocation and use of both grafts at our institution was also seen.

Biliary Epithelial Senescence in Cellular Rejection Following Live Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

As with the hepatocytes, cholangiocyte senescence can also easily be detected in damaged small bile ducts and bile ductules during liver disease affecting the biliary system and cholangiocytes. Despite cellular senescence being a feature of chronic progressive cholangiopathies in adults, only a few studies have investigated its role in liver transplant rejection.

Method

Transplant biopsies displaying features of rejection were reviewed and classified based on the type of rejection and the time since transplantation. An immunohistochemistry panel has been applied for 3 senescent cell markers (p53, p21, p16).

Results

Immunohistochemical expression analysis for the biliary senescence markers (53 biopsies) was done in the post-transplantation periods (Group 1-4) for the cases with the histologically proven diagnosis of rejection. In post-transplant group 1 (<3 months), group 2 (3-6 months), group 3 (6-12 months) and group 4 (>12 months), any 2 senescent markers' positivity was noted in 5/14 (35.7%), 8/13 (61.5%), 16/17 (94.1%) and 9/9 (100%) biopsies respectively and were comparable in all four groups (P = 0.001). A comparison of early biopsies (Group1; 3 months) and late biopsies (Group 2,3&4; >3 months) revealed significantly higher expression in late biopsies (>3 months) (P = 0.001 for any two markers). In ACR, LAR, ECR, and CR/DR any two senescent markers were positive in 14/28 (50%), 12/13 (92.3%) cases, 9/9 (100%), and 3/3cases (100%). Senescent markers (any two) were comparable in all four histological groups (P < 0.001).LAR group had increased expression (P = 0.009 for any two markers and 0.001 for all three markers) and has increased progression to CR (P = 0.019) as compared to ACR.

Conclusion

This study on a large number of LDLT allograft biopsies demonstrates the role of biliary senescence in rejection and suggests a pathobiological role for senescence in the poor prognosis seen in late acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection.

Immunosuppressive Drugs in Liver Transplant: An Insight

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard of care for end-stage liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the years, immunosuppression regimens have improved, resulting in enhanced graft and patient survival. At present, the side effects of immunosuppressive agents are a significant threat to post-LT quality of life and long-term outcome. The role of personalized immunosuppression is to reach a delicate balance between optimal immunosuppression and minimal side effects. Today, immunosuppression in LT is more of an art than a science. There are no validated markers for overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression, only a few drugs have therapeutic drug monitoring and immunosuppression regimens vary from center to center. The immunosuppressive agents are broadly classified into biological agents and pharmacological agents. Most regimens use multiple agents with different modes of action to reduce the dosage and minimize the toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related toxicities are reduced by antibody induction or using mTOR inhibitor/antimetabolites as CNI sparing or CNI minimization strategies. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression has an intensive phase in the first three months when alloreactivity is high, followed by a maintenance phase when immunosuppression minimization protocols are implemented. Over time some patients achieve "tolerance," defined as the successful stopping of immunosuppression with good graft function and no indication of rejection. Cell-based therapy using immune cells with tolerogenic potential is the future and may permit complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive agents.

Liver Transplantation for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Despite a significant increase in the total number of liver transplants (LTs) performed over the last 3 decades, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has become an uncommon indication for LT, which likely reflects the benefits of earlier diagnosis and available treatment, such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Nonetheless, LT remains the only cure for patients with progressive PBC despite medical therapy with survival rates that are among the highest of all indications for LT. Post-LT PBC patients, however, are at increased risk of rejection and disease recurrence.

Evaluating the Incidence and Risk Factors for Acute Cellular Rejection in a Steroid Sparing Liver Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids has been the mainstay of immunosuppression (IMS) following liver transplant (LT). With the advent of more potent IMS, complete steroid withdrawal has become possible after LT. However, there is limited data regarding the incidence and risk factors for acute cellular rejection (ACR) in LT recipients on steroid sparing regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the incidence and risk factors of ACR in LT recipients at an urban LT center utilizing a steroid-sparing IMS regimen.

METHODS

This was a single center retrospective study evaluating incidence of ACR in adults (>18 years) who received a LT between 01/01/2008 and 6/30/2019 at a steroid-sparing liver transplant center. Data between patients who had ACR and patients who did not were compared and risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were included in this analysis, of which 18.4% experienced ACR within the first year of LT. Median time to first ACR was 134 (interquartile range [IQR]: 34-246) days. Black race (odds ratio [OR]: 4.39, P < 0.001), continued need for prednisone (OR: 2.80, P = 0.015) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia (OR: 6.27, P < 0.001)) were independent risk factors for ACR. Tacrolimus use was associated with less ACR (OR: 0.33, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Steroid sparing regimens for IMS post-LT were not associated with an increased incidence of ACR when compared to reported ACR rates in literature. Potential risk factors for ACR include Black race, the use of prednisone maintenance IMS therapy, and CMV viremia.

Belatacept Treatment of Recurrent Late-onset T Cell-mediated Rejection/Antibody-mediated Rejection With De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies in a Liver Transplant Patient

T cell-mediated rejection that appears and persists late after transplantation is often associated with development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Treatment of this condition often presents a conundrum because of the uncertainty regarding the trade-off between immunosuppression-related toxicities/complications and restoration of allograft function and structure.

Methods

Herein, we report an illustrative case of a young 20-y-old otherwise healthy woman who underwent liver replacement for Alagille's syndrome from an ABO-compatible, 6 antigen-mismatched crossmatch-negative 24-y-old man. Although triple baseline immunosuppression was used (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone), she developed rejection 3 d after liver replacement. Despite verified continual immunosuppression compliance, 1.5 y after liver replacement she experienced 6 more rejection episodes over the following 18 mo and development of de novo donor-specific antibody.

Results

Treatment with belatacept began 3.5 y after transplantation, normalizing her liver tests with no further rejections. A biopsy obtained 6 y after transplantation (postoperative day 2221) was normal, appearing without inflammation or residual fibrosis.

Conclusions

Belatacept may be a useful treatment approach in this setting.

Safety of Tacrolimus Monotherapy within 12 Months after Liver Transplantation in the Era of Reduced Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: National Registry Study

Tacrolimus monotherapy is accepted as a feasible option during early post-liver transplantation as per current international consensus guidelines. However, its effects in the recent era of reduced tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) remain unclear. Liver recipients who either received TAC monotherapy from the treatment onset or switched from TAC/MMF to TAC-mono within 12 months (TAC-mono group; n = 991) were chronologically matched to patients who continued to receive TAC/MMF (TAC/MMF group; n = 991) at the corresponding time points on time-conditional propensity scores. Outcomes within 12 months after matched time points were compared. Biopsy-proven rejection (TAC/MMF: 3.5% vs. TAC-mono: 2.6%; p = 0.381) and graft failure (0.2% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.082) were similar in both groups. However, the decline in eGFR was 3.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI: 0.8–5.3) greater at six months (p = 0.008) and 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI: −0.05–4.9) greater at 12 months (p = 0.048) after the matched time points in TAC-mono group than that in TAC/MMF group. TAC trough levels were also higher in the TAC-mono group throughout the study period. TAC-mono within 12 months after liver transplantation is immunologically safe. However, it can increase the required TAC dose and the decline in renal function than that in TAC/MMF combination therapy.

Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers distinguishing early immune activation before acute rejection (AR) could more objectively inform immunosuppression management in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We previously reported a genomic profile distinguishing LTR with AR versus stable graft function. This current study includes key phenotypes with other causes of graft dysfunction and uses a novel random forest approach to augment the specificity of predicting and diagnosing AR.

METHODS

Gene expression results in LTRs with AR versus non-AR (combination of other causes of graft dysfunction and normal function) were analyzed from single and multicenter cohorts. A 70:30 approach (61 ARs; 162 non-ARs) was used for training and testing sets. Microarray data were normalized using a LT-specific vector.

RESULTS

Random forest modeling on the training set generated a 59-probe classifier distinguishing AR versus non-AR (area under the curve 0.83; accuracy 0.78, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.81, positive predictive value 0.54, negative predictive value [NPV] 0.89; F-score 0.61). Using a locked threshold, the classifier performed well on the testing set (accuracy 0.72, sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.73, positive predictive value 0.48, NPV 0.86; F-score 0.56). Probability scores increased in samples preceding AR versus non-AR, when liver function tests were normal, and decreased following AR treatment (P < 0.001). Ingenuity pathway analysis of the genes revealed a high percentage related to immune responses and liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a blood-based biologically relevant biomarker that can be detected before AR-associated graft injury distinct from LTR never developing AR. Given its high NPV ("rule out AR"), the biomarker has the potential to inform precision-guided immunosuppression minimization in LTRs.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA levels predict graft injury in liver transplant recipients

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been evaluated as a rejection marker in organ transplantation. This study sought to assess the utility of dd-cfDNA to diagnose graft injury in liver transplant recipients (LTR) and as a predictive biomarker prior to different causes of graft dysfunction. Plasma from single and multicenter LTR cohorts was analyzed for dd-cfDNA. Phenotypes of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR, N = 57), normal function (TX, N = 94), and acute dysfunction no rejection (ADNR; N = 68) were divided into training and test sets. In the training set, dd-cfDNA was significantly different between AR versus TX (AUC 0.95, 5.3% cutoff) and AR versus ADNR (AUC 0.71, 20.4% cutoff). Using these cutoffs in the test set, the accuracy and NPV were 87% and 100% (AR vs. TX) and 66.7% and 87.8% (AR vs. ADNR). Blood samples collected serially from LTR demonstrated incremental elevations in dd-cfDNA prior to the onset of graft dysfunction (AR > ADNR), but not in TX. Dd-cfDNA also decreased following treatment of rejection. In conclusion, the serial elevation of dd-cfDNA identifies pre-clinical graft injury in the context of normal liver function tests and is greatest in rejection. This biomarker may help detect early signs of graft injury and rejection to inform LTR management strategies.

The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells

Human biology is tightly linked to proteins, yet most measurements do not precisely determine alternatively spliced sequences or posttranslational modifications. Here, we present the primary structures of ~30,000 unique proteoforms, nearly 10 times more than in previous studies, expressed from 1690 human genes across 21 cell types and plasma from human blood and bone marrow. The results, compiled in the Blood Proteoform Atlas (BPA), indicate that proteoforms better describe protein-level biology and are more specific indicators of differentiation than their corresponding proteins, which are more broadly expressed across cell types. We demonstrate the potential for clinical application, by interrogating the BPA in the context of liver transplantation and identifying cell and proteoform signatures that distinguish normal graft function from acute rejection and other causes of graft dysfunction.

Late acute cellular rejection after switch to everolimus monotherapy at 11 months following liver transplantation

Background

Acute cellular rejection beyond the 6th month posttransplant is an uncommon complication after liver transplantation. The inadequate immunosuppression (IS) remains the main risk factor. We report a case of acute cellular rejection after a switch to everolimus monotherapy at 11 months following liver transplantation.

Case presentation

This was a 69-year-old man who underwent liver transplantation after hepatocellular carcinoma. The initial immunosuppression was a combination of three immunosuppressive drugs (corticosteroids + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil). The corticosteroid therapy was stopped at the 4th month posttransplant. Serious side effects of the immunosuppressive drugs (agranulocytosis and renal dysfunction), which occurred 4 months after transplantation, required a reduction and then a discontinuation of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Everolimus was introduced as a replacement. The patient was consulted at 11 months after liver transplantation, 1 month after stopping the two immunosuppressive drugs, for liver function test abnormalities such as cytolysis and anicteric cholestasis. A moderate late acute cellular rejection was confirmed by a liver biopsy. A satisfactory biological evolution was observed following corticosteroid boluses and optimization of basic immunosuppressive drugs.

Conclusion

Late acute cellular rejection remains an uncommon complication, observed mostly in the first year after liver transplantation. The main risk factor is usually the decrease of immunosuppression.

Nomograms for Predicting the Incidence of Late-Onset Acute Cellular Rejection in Patients After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Late-onset acute cellular rejection (LACR) is a special type of acute rejection (AR) only rarely studied after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT). Our study aimed to explore the influencing factors of LACR after pLT and establish a nomogram to provide an individualized prediction of LACR after pLT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 640 children who underwent pLT at Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were collected as part of this retrospective study. The nomogram was then established through the results of the multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients experienced LACR > 1 ≤ 2 years after pLT. Cold ischemia time, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and tacrolimus concentration were independent influencing factors, and a nomogram was established with an AUC value of 0.834 (95% confidence interval, 0.755-0.912). Ten-fold cross-validation showed that the accuracy of the nomogram was about 76%. Sixty-three patients experienced LACR > 2 years after pLT. Child-Pugh grade, cold ischemic time, DSAs, early acute cellular rejection, and tacrolimus concentration were independent influencing factors, and a nomogram was established with an AUC value of 0.827 (95% confidence interval, 0.774-0.881). Ten-fold cross-validation showed that the accuracy of the nomogram was about 80.9%.

CONCLUSION

We established nomograms to predict the incidence of LACR > 1 ≤ 2 and > 2 years after pLT, respectively. The verification results showed that nomograms had good accuracy and clinical practicability.

Recipient gender and body mass index are associated with early acute rejection in donation after cardiac death liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early acute rejection (EAR) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT).

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of EAR in donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation recipients.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed the data of 461 DCD liver transplants performed during the period from January 2010 to June 2016 to study the relationship between EAR and various clinical factors. EAR was defined as histologically proven acute cellular rejection occurring less than 90 days after transplantation.

RESULT

The median follow-up time for this study was 33.1 months (range: 0.03-92.8 months). Thirty-two (6.9%) patients developed EAR with a median period of 20.5 days (5-88 days) after transplantation. A multivariate analysis revealed that female recipient (hazard ratio: 2.801; P=0.024) and high recipient body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio: 1.005; P=0.049) were two independent risk factors for early acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

In DCD liver transplantation, recipient female gender and high BMI were associated with a higher incidence of EAR, while the use of CD25-Ab and/or MMF had a protective effect.

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: TACROLIMUS BLOOD LEVELS VARIATION AND SURVIVAL, REJECTION AND DEATH OUTCOMES

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive drugs have important role in transplant of solid grafts, it aim avoid episodes of acute and chronic rejection and improving graft survival and patient survival. In Brazil, in 2016, liver transplantation was the third most frequent, with 1,880 transplants performed, of which 150 in Rio Grande do Sul. Several studies evaluated the association between variability in blood levels of immunosuppressive tacrolimus and late acute cellular graft rejection.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of tacrolimus blood levels with clinical outcomes late acute cellular rejection, death, patient survival and graft survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective longitudinal study including patients submitted to adult liver transplantation by the Liver Transplantation Group in the Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital of Porto Alegre, from January 2006 to January 2013, and who used tacrolimus as immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients included in the study, the majority were male (70.1%), 52-60 years old (33.9%) at the transplant. The most frequent causes of liver transplantation in this series were hepatitis C virus and hepatocellular carcinoma (24.4%) and alcohol (15.7%). Thirteen patients had late acute cellular rejection (10.2%); of these, three had two episodes. Regarding severity classification, seven patients had mild late acute cellular rejection. The mean time of rejection after liver transplantation was 14 months (ranging from 8 to 33 months). Overall survival was 8.98 years. Regarding tacrolimus blood levels, 52 patients with a variation ≥2 standard deviations were identified. Of these patients, eight had rejection; however, the association was not significant (P=0.146). A significant association was found between variation ≥2 standard deviations in tacrolimus blood levels and death (P=0.023) and survival (P=0.019). Regarding 5-year follow-up of graft survival, being two standard deviations above increases by 2.26 times the risk of transplanted graft loss, and for each unit of increase of standard deviation of tacrolimus blood levels there is a two-fold increase in the risk of graft loss in 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Increased risk of graft loss associated with increased standard deviations of tacrolimus blood levels may indicate the need for more rigorous and prospective monitoring of tacrolimus blood levels.

Immunotherapy after liver transplantation: Where are we now?

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the safety of immunotherapy use after liver transplantation and its efficacy in treating post-liver transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence.

AIM

To assess the safety of immunotherapy after liver transplant and its efficacy in treating post-liver transplant HCC recurrence.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify patients with prior liver transplantation and subsequent immunotherapy. We reviewed the rejection rate and risk factors of rejection. In patients treated for HCC, the oncological outcomes were evaluated including objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We identified 25 patients from 16 publications and 3 patients from our institutional database (total n = 28). The rejection rate was 32% (n = 9). Early mortality occurred in 21% (n = 6) and was mostly related to acute rejection (18%, n = 5). Patients who developed acute rejection were given immunotherapy earlier after transplantation (median 2.9 years vs 5.3 years, P = 0.02) and their graft biopsies might be more frequently programmed death ligand-1-positive (100% vs 33%, P = 0.053). Their PFS (1.0 ± 0.1 mo vs 3.5 ± 1.1 mo, P = 0.02) and OS (1.0 ± 0.1 mo vs 19.2 ± 5.5 mo, P = 0.001) compared inferiorly to patients without rejection. Among the 19 patients treated for HCC, the rejection rate was 32% (n = 6) and the overall objective response rate was 11%. The median PFS and OS were 2.5 ± 1.0 mo and 7.3 ± 2.7 mo after immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Rejection risk is the major obstacle to immunotherapy use in liver transplant recipients. Further studies on the potential risk factors of rejection are warranted.

Recurrent Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current Understanding, Management, and Future Directions

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) constitute 5 to 15% of patients listed for liver transplantation worldwide. Although post-transplant outcomes are favorable, recurrent PSC (rPSC) occurs in an important subset of patients, with higher prevalence rates reported with increasing time from transplant. Given its association with poor graft outcomes and risk of retransplant, effort has been made to understand rPSC, its pathophysiology, and risk factors. This review covers these facets of rPSC and focuses on implicated risk factors including pretransplant recipient characteristics, inflammatory bowel-disease-related factors, and donor-specific and transplant-specific factors. Confirming a diagnosis of rPSC requires thoughtful consideration of alternative etiologies so as to ensure confidence in diagnosis, management, subsequent risk assessment, and counseling for patients. Unfortunately, no cure exists for rPSC; however, future large-scale efforts are underway to better characterize the natural history of rPSC and its associated risk factors with hopes of identifying potential key targets for novel therapies.

Long-term results of pediatric liver transplantation for autoimmune liver disease

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are rare indications for liver transplantation (LT) in children. The aim of the present retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate long-term outcome after LT for autoimmune liver disease in childhood.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 30 children who underwent a first LT from 1988 to 2018 were collected.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 18 girls and 12 boys, transplanted for AIH type 1 (n=14), AIH type 2 (n=7) or PSC (n=9). Mean age at LT was 11.8±5.2 years. The main indications for LT were acute (36.7%) or chronic end-stage liver failure (63.3%). Graft rejection occurred in 19 patients (63.3%); 6 pts required retransplantation for chronic rejection. Recurrence of initial disease was observed in 6 patients (20.0%), all of them with type 1 AIH, after a median time of 42 months, requiring retransplantation in 2 cases. Overall patient survival rates were 96.4%, 84.6%, 74.8%, 68.0%, 68.0%, 68.0% and 68.0% at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years, respectively. Age at LT<1year (p<0.0001), LT for fulminant failure (p=0.023) and LT for type 2 AIH (p=0.049) were significant predictive factors of death.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcome after LT for pediatric autoimmune liver disease is impaired in patients with AIH because of consistent complications such as rejection and disease recurrence.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Moving Toward Personalized Management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tolerance is transplantation's holy grail, as it denotes allograft health without immunosuppression and its toxicities. Our aim was to determine, among stable long-term pediatric liver transplant recipients, the efficacy and safety of immunosuppression withdrawal to identify operational tolerance.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a multicenter, single-arm trial of immunosuppression withdrawal over 36-48 weeks. Liver tests were monitored biweekly (year 1), monthly (year 2), and bimonthly (years 3-4). For-cause biopsies were done at investigators' discretion but mandated when alanine aminotransferase or gamma glutamyltransferase exceeded 100 U/L. All subjects underwent final liver biopsy at trial end. The primary efficacy endpoint was operational tolerance, defined by strict biochemical and histological criteria 1 year after stopping immunosuppression. Among 88 subjects (median age 11 years; 39 boys; 57 deceased donor grafts), 33 (37.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.4%, 48.5%) were operationally tolerant, 16 were nontolerant by histology (met biochemical but failed histological criteria), and 39 were nontolerant by rejection. Rejection, predicted by subtle liver inflammation in trial entry biopsies, typically (n = 32) occurred at ≤32% of the trial-entry immunosuppression dose and was treated with corticosteroids (n = 32) and/or tacrolimus (n = 38) with resolution (liver tests within 1.5 times the baseline) for all but 1 subject. No death, graft loss, or chronic, severe, or refractory rejection occurred. Neither fibrosis stage nor the expression level of a rejection gene set increased over 4 years for either tolerant or nontolerant subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression withdrawal showed that 37.5% of selected pediatric liver-transplant recipients were operationally tolerant. Allograft histology did not deteriorate for either tolerant or nontolerant subjects. The timing and reversibility of failed withdrawal justifies future trials exploring the efficacy, safety, and potential benefits of immunosuppression minimization.

Long-Term Tacrolimus Blood Trough Level and Patient Survival in Adult Liver Transplantation

Tacrolimus is the most widely used immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. However, the ideal long-term target level for these patients is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of tacrolimus blood concentration five years after LT on long-term patient survival outcomes in adult LT recipients. Patients who underwent LT between January 2004 and July 2014 at a tertiary medical center were included in this study (n = 189). The mean tacrolimus blood concentrations of each patient during the fifth year after LT were recorded and the overall survival rate was determined. A multivariate analysis of factors associated with long-term survival was conducted using a Cox’s model. The median follow-up period was 9.63 years, and 144 patients (76.2%) underwent live donor LT. Sixteen patients died within 5 years of LT. In the Cox’s model, patients with a mean tacrolimus blood trough level of 4.6–10.2 ng/mL had significantly better long-term survival than those with a mean tacrolimus blood trough level outside this range (estimated hazard ratio = 4.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.34–16.9, p = 0.016). Therefore, a tacrolimus level no lower than 4.6 ng/mL would be recommended in adult LT patients.

Advances in Rejection Management: Prevention and Treatment

Extended survival of liver transplant recipients has brought rejection management to the forefront of liver transplant research. This article discusses T-cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic rejection. We focus on the prevention and then discuss treatment options. Future directions of rejection management include biomarkers of rejection, which may allow for monitoring of patients who are considered high risk for rejection and detection of rejection before there is any clinical evidence to improve graft and patient survival. With improved graft life and survival of liver transplant recipients, the new frontier of rejection management focuses on immunosuppression minimization, withdrawal, and personalization.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and liver biopsy in the evaluation of elevated liver function tests after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) in post-liver transplant (LT) patients pose a challenge in the timing and selection of diagnostic modalities. There are little data regarding the accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and liver biopsy (LB) in diagnosing post-transplant complications.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ERCP and LB in patients with non-vascular post-LT complications.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients undergoing both ERCP and LB for evaluation of elevated LFTs within 6 mo of LT from 2000 to 2017. Diagnostic operating characteristics including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for various diagnoses were calculated for ERCP and LB. The R factor (ratio of alkaline phosphatase to alanine aminotransferase) was also calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

Of the 1284 patients who underwent LT, 91 patients (74.7% males, mean age of 51) were analyzed. Anastomotic strictures (AS, 24.2%), acute cellular rejection (ACR, 11%) and concurrent AS/ACR (14.3%) were the most common diagnoses. ERCP carried an accuracy of 79.1% (95%CI: 69.3-86.9), LB had an accuracy of 93.4% (95%CI: 86.2-97.5), and the combination of the two had an accuracy of 100% (95%CI: 96-100). There was no difference between patients with AS and ACR in mean R factor (AS: 1.9 vs ACR: 1.1, P = 0.24). Adverse events did not differ between the two tests (ERCP: 3.1% vs LB: 1.1%, P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

In patients with abnormal LFTs after LT without vascular complications, the combination of LB and ERCP carries low risk and improves diagnostic accuracy over either test alone.

Approaches to Research Determination of Late Acute Cellular Rejection in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients

A central pathology or site reading of biopsy slides is used in liver transplant clinical trials to determine rejection. We evaluated interrater reliability of readings of "rejection or not" using digitized slides from the Medication Adherence in Children who had a Liver Transplant (MALT) study. Four masked experienced pathologists read the digitized slides and then reread them after a study-specific histologic endpoint development program. Agreement was expressed throughout as a Kappa or Fleiss Kappa statistic (ҡ). A ҡ > 0.6 was predefined as desirable. Readings were correlated with immunosuppressant adherence (the Medication Level Variability Index, [MLVI]), and maximal liver enzyme levels during the study period. Interrater agreement between site and central review in MALT, and between 4 pathologists later on, was low (ҡ = 0.44, Fleiss ҡ = 0.41, respectively). Following the endpoint development program, agreement improved and became acceptable (ҡ = 0.71). The final reading was better-aligned with maximal gamma-glutamyl transferase levels and MLVI as compared with the original central reading. We found substantial disagreement between experienced pathologists reading the same slides. A unique study-specific procedure improved interrater reliability to the point it was acceptable. Such a procedure may be indicated to increase reliability of histopathologic determinations in future research, and perhaps also clinically.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts early acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in acute cellular rejection (ACR) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT from September 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR was calculated on 3 occasions; (1) 4 weeks prior to liver transplantation (LT), (2) the day of LT, and (3) the day before liver biopsy.

Results

Among 66 patients who underwent ABOc LDLT, ACR was identified in 15 patients (22.7%) on protocol liver biopsy performed routinely on the postoperative day 7. There was no significant difference in NLR at 4 weeks prior to LT and the day of LT between no-ACR and ACR group (2.98 ± 1.92 vs. 2.54 ± 1.15, P = 0.433; 17.9 ± 8.31 vs. 20.5 ± 13.4, P = 0.393). However, NLR was significantly lower in ACR group compared to non-ACR group just prior to liver biopsy (5.82 ± 3.42 vs. 18.4 ± 17.2, P = 0.035). NLR tends to decrease 3.5 days before the onset of ACR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for optimal cut-off value of NLR was 6.49, with sensitivity and specificity of 80.4% and 73.3% respectively.

Conclusion

NLR has a potential as a noninvasive predictor of early ACR in ABOc LDLT.

Recipient risk factors for acute cellular rejection after orthotopic liver transplant - a single-center, retrospective study

The use of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score for liver allocation has resulted in transplanting sicker patients. As such, it is unclear whether the risk factors and severity of acute cellular rejection (ACR) have changed. To identify ACR characteristics where average MELD score at transplant is higher than previously published studies. This is a single-center, retrospective study designed to assess risk factors associated with ACR after adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) using a steroid sparing regimen. This study included 174 OLT patients transplanted from 2008 to 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Recipient demographics, preoperative clinical, and laboratory data were recorded for each transplant. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify variables that are significant predictors for ACR. The median MELD at transplantation was 29.5. The average time from transplant to ACR diagnosis was 283.9 days and a majority of ACR episodes were mild to moderate. Serum creatinine, primary sclerosing cholangitis etiology, and tacrolimus use were significant predictors for ACR (P < 0.05). This study confirmed a change in timing and severity of ACR in the MELD era. Recipient characteristics may affect the risk for developing ACR and should be considered when managing immunosuppression.

De novo and recurrent liver disease

Decompensated cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT). AILD include autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). NASH and AILD share some peculiarities as they can recur in the new graft, compromising the quality of life, and graft and patient survival. De novo NASH or AIH connotes the development of these liver diseases in patients transplanted for other indications. The diagnosis of recurrent or de novo liver disease usually requires a liver biopsy aside from recurrent PSC, which can be diagnosed with compatible imaging studies and exclusion of other causes of biliary strictures. The treatment of recurrent NASH is lifestyle modifications aiming for weight loss. Recurrent and de novo AIH is usually treated with corticosteroids with or without azathioprine. Recurrent PBC should be treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. There are no proven treatment options for recurrent PSC. Patients with graft failure should be considered for repeat LT. Future investigations should use standardized diagnostic criteria for each disease, seek diagnostic biomarkers, and evaluate treatments that improve outcomes.

The Immunological Basis of Liver Allograft Rejection

Liver allograft rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and graft failure in liver transplant recipients. Rejection is caused by the recognition of non-self donor alloantigens by recipient T-cells. Antigen recognition results in proliferation and activation of T-cells in lymphoid tissue before migration to the allograft. Activated T-cells have a variety of effector mechanisms including direct T-cell mediated damage to bile ducts, endothelium and hepatocytes and indirect effects through cytokine production and recruitment of tissue-destructive inflammatory cells. These effects explain the histological appearances of typical acute T-cell mediated rejection. In addition, donor specific antibodies, most typically against HLA antigens, may give rise to antibody-mediated rejection causing damage to the allograft primarily through endothelial injury. However, as an immune-privileged site there are several mechanisms in the liver capable of overcoming rejection and promoting tolerance to the graft, particularly in the context of recruitment of regulatory T-cells and promotors of an immunosuppressive environment. Indeed, around 20% of transplant recipients can be successfully weaned from immunosuppression. Hence, the host immunological response to the liver allograft is best regarded as a balance between rejection-promoting and tolerance-promoting factors. Understanding this balance provides insight into potential mechanisms for novel anti-rejection therapies.