Impact of positive flow cytometry crossmatch on outcomes of intestinal/multivisceral transplantation: role anti-IL-2 receptor antibody. Transplantation. 2013;95:1160-1166. [PMID: 23435456 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182888df0]

B-Cell Induction Therapies in Intestinal Transplantation

Despite advancements in short-term outcomes since the inception of intestinal transplant, significant long-term graft failure persists. Early successes are attributed to the utilization of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy, coupled with T-cell modulating induction regimens, which effectively reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, the challenge of chronic allograft injury remains unresolved. There is increasing evidence indicating a correlation between donor-specific antibodies and the survival of visceral allografts. Strategies aimed at reducing the presence or load of these antibodies may potentially enhance long-term outcomes. Consequently, our focus is now turning toward B-cell induction therapies as a possible solution.

Update on Maintenance Immunosuppression in Intestinal Transplantation

Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.

Biologicals in the prevention and treatment of intestinal graft rejection: The state of the art Biologicals in Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation is the standard treatment for patients with intestinal failure with severe complications due to parenteral nutrition; however, rejection leads to graft failure in approximately half of both adult and pediatric recipients within 5 years of transplantation. Although intensive immunosuppressive therapy is used in an attempt to reduce this risk, commonly used treatment strategies are generally practice- and/or expert-based, as head-to-head comparisons are lacking. In this ever-developing field, biologicals designed to prevent or treat rejection are used increasingly, with both infliximab and vedolizumab showing potential in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in individual cases and in relatively small patient cohorts. To help advance progress in clinical care, we review the current use of biologicals in intestinal transplantation, and we provide future perspectives to guide this progress.

Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Intestinal Transplantation at a Single Institution in Japan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of intestinal transplantation (ITX) between 2 groups by using medications for induction treatment and assess the utility of the current protocol.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2020, 11 patients underwent ITX. Recipients were classified into 2 groups: group IL-2Ra (interleukin-2 receptor antagonist therapy, n = 6) and ATG (rabbit antithymocyte globulin therapy, n = 5). We conducted a retrospective review of patient and graft survival rates and the postoperative course.

RESULTS

The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient and graft survival rates of the 11 primary grafts in the 11 recipients were 100%, 88.9%, 62.2% and 90.0%, 78.8%, 56.3%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up for the IL-2Ra and ATG groups was 197.3 and 87.3 months, respectively. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 100%, 83.3%, 50% and 100%, 100%, 100% for the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .25) and 83.3%, 66.7%, 33.3% and 100%, 100%, 100% for graft survival in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .08). The incidence of moderate and severe acute rejection was 100% and 20% in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .02). The 1- and 5-year moderate and severe rejection-free survival rates were 33.3%, 0% and 80%, 80% in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

ATG significantly suppressed moderate and severe acute rejection compared with IL-2Ra, thereby showing better short- and mid-term rejection-free survival rates. Additional clinical experience is needed to determine the optimal regimen for the management of ITX recipients.

Is There a Role for Desensitization in Intestinal Transplantation?

Human leukocyte antigen allosensitization prior to transplant can increase the risk of early graft loss and prolong waitlist times for intestinal transplant candidates. Desensitization offers a potential therapeutic option to reduce the quantity of preformed antibodies prior to organ allocation and facilitate transplantation with a more immunologically compatible donor allograft. However, there remains a paucity of data to guide the use of desensitization in the setting of intestinal transplantation. As a result, in this review we evaluate the existing literature supporting the role of desensitization therapy in intestinal transplant, describe our own experience with the implementation of a risk-stratified desensitization protocol, and finally explore barriers and unanswered questions that continue to limit the widespread adoption of desensitization as a management strategy for highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidates.

Intestinal transplantation: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature on the current indications, surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx).

RECENT FINDINGS

Over recent years, ITx has become a more common operation with approximately 2500 procedures carried out worldwide by 2014. It is reserved for patients with intestinal failure and who have developed complications of home parenteral nutrition or who have a high risk of dying from their underlying disease. Recent advances such as the improvement in survival rates, not only for isolated small bowel transplants but also following inclusion of a liver graft in combined liver-small bowel transplant, and the utility of citrulline as a noninvasive biomarker to appreciate acute rejection herald an exciting shift in the field of ITx.

SUMMARY

With advancements in immunosuppressive drugs, induction regimens, standardization of surgical techniques and improved postoperative care, survival is increasing. In due course, it will most likely become as good as remaining on home parenteral nutrition and as such could become a viable first-line option.

Impacts of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection on outcomes after intestinal transplantation in children

AMR is a risk factor for graft failure after SBTx. We studied impact of DSAs and AMR in 22 children transplanted between 2008 and 2012 (11 isolated SBTx, 10 liver inclusive Tx, and one modified multivisceral Tx). Three patients never developed DSA, but DSAs were found in seven in the pre-Tx period and de novo post-Tx in 19 children. Pathology revealed cellular rejection (15/19), with vascular changes and C4d+. Patients were treated with IV immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and steroids. Rescue therapy included antithymocyte globulins, rituximab, eculizumab, and bortezomib. Pathology and graft function normalized in 13 patients, graft loss occurred in two, and death in seven. At the end of the follow-up, 15 children were alive (68%), 13 with functioning graft (59%). Prognosis factors for poor outcome after Tx were the presence of symptoms at AMR suspicion (P +.033). DSAs were often found following SBTx, mostly de novo. Resistant ACR or severe AMR is still difficult to differentiate, with a high need for immunosuppression in both. DSAs may precede development of severe disease and pathology features on the graft: relationship and correlation need to be better investigated with larger groups before and after Tx.

Intestine Transplantation Across a Positive Crossmatch With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

We describe our experience using a modified protocol for immunosuppression for intestine transplantation across a positive crossmatch. Patients who underwent transplantation in 2013 were evaluated over a 12-month period for rejection and infectious events with comparison to procedure-matched controls on our standard protocol of immunosuppression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a modified protocol for intestine and multivisceral transplantation for patients with a positive flow crossmatch. In addition to our standard protocol, patients with positive crossmatch were given rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preoperatively. DSA was sent for clinical evaluation at monthly intervals. Patients were screened for rejection by endoscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent transplantation within a single year across a positive crossmatch. Two received isolated intestine transplants and 2 had multivisceral transplantation (MVT). During the 12-month follow-up, 1 patients had an episode of severe acute cellular rejection, which was managed with increased immunosuppression. None of the patients had episodes of cytomegalovirus infection. One patient developed major infection and 3 patients developed minor bacterial infections. Among procedure-matched controls with negative final crossmatch on standard management (no preoperative rituximab or IVIg), 2 developed mild acute cellular rejection and 2 developed minor infections. One developed cytomegalovirus viremia with invasion to the colonic mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

We report our protocol for immunosuppression for IT and MVT across a positive crossmatch. This allowed transplantation despite the presence of a positive crossmatch, with low rejection rates but potentially increased risk for major infections compared to the negative crossmatch controls on our standard protocol.

Updates on antibody-mediated rejection in intestinal transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has increasingly emerged as an important cause of allograft loss after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Compelling evidence indicates that donor-specific antibodies can mediate and promote acute and chronic rejection after ITx. However, diagnostic criteria for ABMR after ITx have not been established yet and the mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft injury are not well-known. Effective approaches to prevent and treat ABMR are required to improve long-term outcomes of intestine recipients. Clearly, ABMR after ITx has become an important area for research and clinical investigation.

The role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several biologicals have been used in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation for various indications, such as induction therapy, prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, desensitization, anti-inflammatory treatment, as well as treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Particularly, the administration of biologicals in induction therapy such as T-cell depleting antibodies and interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have significantly contributed to the great improvement of patient and allograft outcome. Novel biologicals, such as B-cell, plasma-cell, and complement-directed agents have been successfully applied to treat antibody and complement-driven alloimmune processes to stabilize long-term outcome. Several other inflammatory allotransplant conditions have been addressed with anti-TNF-α antibodies, such as infliximab.

SUMMARY

Biologicals have contributed significantly to the recent success of intestinal transplantation. Novel developments in this field are supposed to aid in addressing various urgent needs in intestinal transplantation, such as preimmunization, antibody and complement-induced graft injury, as well as pathologies originating from innate immune responses.

Successful living donor intestinal transplantation in cross-match positive recipients: Initial experience

Sensitized patients tend to have longer waiting times on the deceased donor list and are at increased risk of graft loss from acute or chronic rejection compared to non-sensitized candidates. Desensitization protocols are utilized to decrease the levels of alloantibodies and to convert an initial positive cross-match to prospective donors into a negative crossmatch. These procedures are mostly available in the setting of living donation. Due to the elective nature of the procedure, desensitization protocols can be extended until the desire result is obtained prior to transplantation. We present two cases of successful desensitization protocol applied to living donor intestinal transplant candidates that converted to negative cross-match to their donors. We present two cases of intestinal transplant candidates with a potential living donor to whom they are sensitized. Both cases underwent successful transplantation after desensitization protocol. No evidence of humoral rejection has occurred in either recipient. Living donor intestinal transplantation in sensitized recipients against the prospective donors provides the ability to implement a desensitization protocol to convert to negative cross-match.

Prospective Monitoring of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies After Intestine/Multivisceral Transplantation: Significance of De Novo Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA) may be associated with worse clinical outcomes after intestine/multivisceral transplantation.

METHODS

In 79 intestine/multivisceral recipients, sera were prospectively screened for DSA by Luminex Single antigen test at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after transplantation. Standard immunosuppression included thymoglobulin-rituximab induction and tacrolimus-prednisone maintenance. C4d staining was performed retrospectively on biopsies in patients that developed acute rejection (AR).

RESULTS

Twenty-two (28%) patients developed de novo DSA at a median posttransplant period of 3 (1-36) months. De novo DSA were observed in 10 of 40 liver-including and 12 of 39 liver-excluding transplants (P = 0.57). Occurrence of AR was slightly higher in patients with de novo DSA (45% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.41). Similarly, chronic rejection (14% vs 5%; P = 0.21) and graft loss due to AR (18% vs 7%; P = 0.14) were numerically higher in patients with de novo DSA. Only 35% patients experiencing AR had circulating de novo DSA at the time of AR. Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed in 6 patients based on C4d staining, of these 2 patients had circulating de novo DSA at the time of biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo DSA formation, particularly early in the posttransplant course may be associated with trends toward worse outcomes. However, its significance in the pathophysiology of AR remains uncertain. Studies focusing mechanisms of DSA-related graft injury and intragraft DSA detection might provide further insight into this issue.

Intestine and multivisceral transplantation: current status and future directions

Intestinal failure and associated parenteral nutrition-induced liver failure cause significant morbidity, mortality, and health care burden. Intestine transplantation is now considered to be the standard of care in patients with intestinal failure who fail intestinal rehabilitation. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease is an important sequela of intestinal failure, caused by parenteral lipids, requiring simultaneous liver-intestine transplant. Lipid minimization and, in recent years, the emergence of fish oil-based lipid emulsions have been shown to reverse parenteral nutrition-associated hyperbilirubinemia, but not fibrosis. Significant progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has led to improved outcomes after intestine transplantation. Intestine in varying combination with liver, stomach, and pancreas, also referred to as multivisceral transplantation, is performed for patients with intestinal failure along with liver disease, surgical abdominal catastrophes, neuroendocrine and slow-growing tumors, and complete portomesenteric thrombosis with cirrhosis of the liver. Although acute and chronic rejection are major problems, long-term survivors have excellent quality of life and remain free of parenteral nutrition.

The current state of intestine transplantation: indications, techniques, outcomes and challenges

Intestine transplantation is the least common form of organ transplantation in the United States and often deemed one of the most difficult. Patient and graft survival have historically trailed well behind other organ transplants. Over the past 5-10 years registry reports and single center series have demonstrated improvements to patient survival after intestinal transplantation that now match patient survival for those without life-threatening complications on parenteral nutrition. For various reasons including improvements in medical care of patients with intestinal failure and difficulty accessing transplant care, the actual number of intestine transplants has declined by 25% over the past 6 years. In light of the small numbers of intestine transplants, many physicians and the lay public are often unaware that this is a therapeutic option. The aim of this review is to describe the current indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestine transplantation and to explore concerns over future access to this important and life-saving therapy.

Donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx) have markedly improved in recent years. However, there has been a lack of improvement in long-term outcomes. Increasing amounts of data suggest the humoral immune system is a major contributor to rejection and late allograft loss. This review will summarize the available data on donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) in ITx, with a focus on the clinical significance of DSAs, diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and available treatment modalities. Areas requiring further investigation will also be identified.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mounting evidence shows that pre- and/or posttransplant DSAs are associated with rejection and allograft loss following ITx. Preformed DSAs are present in nearly one-third of ITx recipients, and de-novo DSAs develop in up to 40% of patients. Diagnosis and treatment of AMR remains challenging, but reports indicate that when optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive agents are used, the impact of DSAs may be negligible.

SUMMARY

Although data are limited due to center differences with regard to patient population, induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols, and monitoring strategies, DSAs are associated with poor outcomes following ITx. A consensus to define AMR and optimal treatment strategies is needed.