Pretransplantation erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness is associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies and 372,156 hemodialysis patients

Introduction

Prior studies on the association between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients have yielded conflicting findings. We aimed to clarify this relationship through a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence.

Methods

We comprehensively searched major databases for observational and interventional studies on ESA use and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients published from 1980 to September 2023. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. The study data were analyzed using Stata 15 software.

Findings

Upon conducting the initial search, we extracted 792 articles and, after screening and considering the research criteria, 17 studies with 372,156 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, ESA use was associated with a 27 % increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.15-1.40, p < 0.001). This risk varied by geographical location, with RRs of 1.27 (95 % CI: 1.14-1.41; p-value≤0.001) for America, 1.33 (95 % CI: 1.12-1.58; p-value = 0.001) for Asia, and 1.23 (95 % CI: 1.02-1.49; p-value = 0.028) for Europe. Importantly, a gender disparity was revealed, with studies involving a higher proportion of males showing greater risks (RR 1.51, 95 % CI: 1.25-1.83, p < 0.001) than female-predominant studies (RR 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.86-1.36, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis indicates ESA use is associated with heightened cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients, especially in males. These findings have implications for optimizing dosing strategies while balancing efficacy and safety. Further research is warranted, particularly randomized controlled trials, to establish definitive ESA dosing guidelines.

Investigating the relationship between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, various studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and mortality in hemodialysis patients, who showed contradictory results. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between ESAs and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational and interventional studies published in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases between 1980 and the end of 2022. Jadad scale checklist and Newcastle Ottawa scale were used to evaluate the quality of articles. The study data were analyzed using Stata 15 software.

RESULTS

In the initial search, 3933 articles were extracted, and by screening and considering the research criteria, 68 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. According to the meta-analysis results, the risk ratio (RR) of overall mortality in hemodialysis patients receiving ESAs was equal to 1.19 (95% CI: 1.16-1.23, P ≤ 0.001). The RR of mortality in patients aged 60 years and under was equal to 1.33 (1.15-1.55, P ≤ 0.001), in the age group over 60 years was equal to 1.13 (1.10-1.16, P ≤ 0.001), in randomized clinical trial studies was equal to 1.06 (0.80-1.40, P = 0.701), in cohort studies was equal to 1.20 (1.16-1.25, P ≤ 0.001), in American countries was equal to 1.19 (1.10-1.29, P ≤ 0.001), in Asian countries was equal to 1.15 (1.10-1.19, P ≤ 0.001), and in European countries was equal to 1.18 (1.05-1.34, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study show that receiving ESAs is associated with a 19% increase in the risk of overall mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Spectrum and Burden of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness Among Contemporary Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis patients with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness have been a topic of active research. However, there have been no studies of ESA hyporesponsiveness among US patients following the dramatic change in anemia management that resulted from the 2011 changes in ESA product labeling and bundling of dialysis remuneration.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We studied prevalent hemodialysis patients treated at a large dialysis organization in calendar years 2012 to 2013 (N=98,972).

PREDICTOR

ESA hyporesponsiveness, defined as 2 consecutive hemoglobin measurements < 10g/dL (every other week) with contemporaneous ESA dose > 7,700U/treatment. Patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness were identified during the first quarter of 2012 and followed up through 2013 using intention-to-treat principles.

OUTCOMES

Associations between the study exposure (ESA hyporesponsiveness) and mortality, missed hemodialysis treatments, ESA and iron use, and hemoglobin levels were determined using generalized estimating equations adjusting for imbalanced baseline covariates.

RESULTS

At baseline, 12,361 (12.5%) patients were identified as having ESA hyporesponsiveness. The mean hemoglobin level among patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness was ∼1g/dL lower than in patients without ESA hyporesponsiveness at baseline, narrowing over follow-up to 0.4g/dL. Initially, mean ESA use was approximately 3-fold greater for patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness than for those without ESA hyporesponsiveness, decreasing to 2-fold greater at study end; iron use and missed hemodialysis treatment rates were also greater among patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness throughout. ESA hyporesponsiveness was associated with enhanced mortality risk versus non-ESA hyporesponsiveness: adjusted incidence rate ratios were estimated at 2.24 (95% CI, 1.93-2.60) in the second quarter, gradually decreasing to 1.48 (95% CI, 1.18-1.84) by study end.

LIMITATIONS

It is possible that an alternative ESA hyporesponsiveness definition may be optimal. As such, the associations we observed may be conservative estimates of true relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

When using a contemporary definition at one point in time, ESA hyporesponsiveness was potently and persistently associated with greater mortality, greater iron and ESA use, and lower hemoglobin levels compared to non-ESA hyporesponsiveness.