Crossmatch-positive liver transplantation in patients receiving thymoglobulin-rituximab induction

Dual Antibody Treatment for Simultaneous Acute Cellular Rejection and Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but sometimes has a grave prognosis. We herein describe a 40-year-old man who developed simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR due to de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after living donor liver transplantation. He underwent living donor liver transplantation with his brother-in-law as the donor. Hepatic function deteriorated on postoperative day 6, and a liver biopsy revealed histologic findings of typical acute cellular rejection. However, steroid pulse therapy and thymoglobulin did not produce a clinical response, and his liver function dramatically deteriorated on postoperative day 13 (aspartate aminotransferase, 2787 IU/L; total bilirubin, 14.1 mg/dL). We diagnosed acute AMR based on positive immunohistochemical staining for C4d in portal areas and added plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin after rituximab. The patient's clinical state improved and ultimately resolved. To our knowledge, this is the first report of dual antibody treatment for simultaneous acute cellular rejection and acute AMR induced by de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Despite his fulminant clinical course, we successfully rescued the recipient with immediate anti-humoral therapy. The rapid treatment decision and adequate understanding of the mechanisms of anti-humoral therapy were crucial to overcoming acute AMR in this case.

Liver Transplantation from a Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Sibling Donor: Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy against Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Through living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor, it may be possible to stop the use of immunosuppressants. It is possible that acute antibody-mediated rejection and chronic active antibody-mediated rejection through the positivity of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and/or T cell-mediated rejection may affect the prognosis of liver transplantation. The etiologies of liver diseases of the recipient may also affect the post-transplantation course. Herein, we report on the successful re-treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a patient who underwent a LDLT from HLA-matched sibling donor. After liver transplantation for HCV-related liver diseases, it is easy for HCV to re-infect the graft liver under a lack of immunosuppressants. DAA therapy against HCV re-infection immediately after transplantation should be commenced, and it is important to eradicate HCV for better prognosis of the recipients in LDLT for HCV-related liver diseases.

Long-term outcomes of crossmatch positive simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations in the United States

The long-term outcomes of positive crossmatch (+XM) simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantations are conflicting. We examined the association between crossmatch status and SLK outcomes in recipients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids. We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for all primary SLK recipients between 2003 and 2020 with available crossmatch and induction data. We grouped recipients according to the crossmatch status: negative crossmatch (-XM; n = 3040) and +XM (n = 407). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to examine recipient, death-censored liver, and death-censored kidney survival by crossmatch status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between crossmatch status and outcomes of interest with follow-up censored at 10 years. Models were adjusted for recipient age, sex, diabetes mellitus, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, duration on the liver waiting list, induction immunosuppression, steroid maintenance, hepatitis C infection, donor age and sex, local vs. shared organ, cold ischemia time, and previous liver transplantation status. In the univariable analysis, crossmatch status was not associated with recipient survival (log-rank p = 0.63), death-censored liver graft survival (log-rank p = 0.05), or death-censored kidney graft survival (log-rank p = 0.11). Compared with -XM, +XM recipients had a similar 1-year liver rejection rate, but higher kidney rejection rate (4.6% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.002). In the multivariable models, +XM status was not associated with deleterious long-term recipient, liver, or kidney grafts survival. -XM and +XM SLK transplantations have comparable long-term recipient, liver graft, and kidney survival with a slightly increased risk of early kidney allograft rejection in the +XM group. Crossmatch positivity in SLK transplantations should not influence the decision to use organs from a specific donor.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation with positive crossmatch: Role of delayed kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Positive crossmatch (XM+) combined liver-kidney transplantation due to preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies has produced mixed results. We sought to understand the role of delayed kidney transplant approach in XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations.

METHODS

XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations were retrospectively reviewed. T- and B-cell XM, complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch, and flow cytometric crossmatch were performed prospectively.

RESULTS

Of 183 combined liver-kidney transplantations performed (2002-2019), 114 (62%) were with "delayed" kidney transplant approach and 19 (19 of 183, 10%) were XM+. Of 19 XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations, kidney transplant was "delayed" in 14 by an average of 47 hours (range 24-64 hours) from liver transplant. There was a significant reduction in both class I (mean pre-liver transplant mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 26,230 versus mean post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 3,272, P = .01) and total MFI (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 27,233 vs mean post liver transplant and predelayed kidney transplant MFI 11,469, P = .01). However, there was no significant change in the MFI of class II donor-specific antibodies (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 17,899 versus post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 14,341, P = .19). None of XM+ delayed kidney transplants had delayed graft function, and there was no antibody-mediated rejection. One-year patient survival for the XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantation with delayed kidney transplant approach was 92.9%, which is comparable to patient survival of XM- combined liver-kidney transplantation. Whereas patient survival in recipients before "delayed" approach ("simultaneous"; n = 5) was 40% when liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously (P = .06).

CONCLUSION

In sensitized combined liver-kidney transplantation recipients, the "delayed" kidney transplant approach is associated with a significant reduction in total and class I donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant before kidney transplant, enabling therapeutic interventions such as plasmapheresis, if needed, providing optimal outcomes similar to crossmatch recipients.

HLA matching and rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy to avoid multiple forms of rejection after a third liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite immunosuppressive drug regimens, T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection with donor-specific antibodies, and chronic rejection occur after liver transplantation (LTx). Rejection may significantly impact allograft survival and often a standard re-LTx is required. However, in some cases rejection recurs. Little is known on how to approach this and which aspects to consider.

CASE

Here we describe a case in which two successive liver grafts where lost due to T cell-mediated rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection with de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and chronic rejection that occurred within a month. In an attempt to avoid recurrence with the third graft, we decided to administer a more rigorous immunosuppressive drug induction regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, while applying HLA matching between recipient and donor. This resulted in rejection free survival for 337 days until a mild T cell-mediated rejection occurred, which could then be easily treated with high dose steroids. Graft survival is now at least 683 days without chronic rejection, antibody-mediated rejection or de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, when a liver graft is lost due to multiple forms of rejection short after LTx, the combination applied in this case could be considered as a viable option to improve graft and patient survival instead of a standard re-LTx.

Identification of peripheral CD154+ T cells and HLA-DRB1 as biomarkers of acute cellular rejection in adult liver transplant recipients

Decreasing graft rejection and increasing graft and patient survival are great challenges facing liver transplantation (LT). Different T cell subsets participate in the acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the allograft. Cell-mediated immunity markers of the recipient could help to understand the mechanisms underlying acute rejection. This study aimed to analyse different surface antigens on T cells in a cohort of adult liver patients undergoing LT to determine the influence on ACR using multi-parametric flow cytometry functional assay. Thirty patients were monitored at baseline and during 1 year post-transplant. Two groups were established, with (ACR) and without (NACR) acute cellular rejection. Leukocyte, total lymphocyte, percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between recipient-donor and their relation with ACR as well as the acute rejection frequencies were analysed. T cells were stimulated with concanavalin A (Con-A) and surface antigens were analysed by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. A high percentage of CD4+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·001) and a low percentage of CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002) at baseline were statistically significant in ACR. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the cut-off values capable to stratify patients at high risk of ACR with high sensitivity and specificity for CD4+ CD154+ (P = 0·001) and CD8+ CD154+ T cells (P = 0·002). In logistic regression analysis, CD4+ CD154+ , CD8+ CD154+ and HLA mismatch were confirmed as independent risk factors to ACR. Post-transplant percentages of both T cell subsets were significantly higher in ACR, despite variations compared to pretransplant. These findings support the selection of candidates for LT based on the pretransplant percentages of CD4+ CD154+ and CD8+ CD154+ T cells in parallel with other transplant factors.

Lack of Benefit and Potential Harm of Induction Therapy in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplants

The number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) and use of induction therapy for SLKT have increased recently, without much published evidence, especially in the context of maintenance immunosuppression containing tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolic acid (MPA). We queried the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registry for SLKT recipients maintained on TAC/MPA at discharge in the United States for 2002-2016. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of induction type: rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG; n = 831), interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA; n = 1558), and no induction (n = 2333). Primary outcomes were posttransplant all-cause mortality and acute rejection rates in kidney and liver allografts at 12 months. Survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A propensity score analysis was used to control potential selection bias. Multivariate inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios. Among SLKT recipients, survival estimates at 3 years were lower for recipients receiving r-ATG (P = 0.05). Compared with no induction, the multivariate analyses showed an increased mortality risk with r-ATG (HR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.52; P = 0.002) and no difference in acute liver or kidney rejection rates at 12 months across all induction categories. No difference in outcomes was noted with IL2RA induction over the no induction category. In conclusion, there appears to be no survival benefit nor reduction in rejection rates for SLKT recipients who receive induction therapy, and r-ATG appears to increase mortality risk compared with no induction.

Class II Human Leukocyte Antigen Epitope Mismatch Predicts De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation After Liver Transplantation

Formation of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dn-DSAs) has been associated with longterm immunologic complications after liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitope/eplet mismatch (MM) is a marker of immunogenicity and a risk factor for dn-DSA formation. Sera from 80 LT recipients were prospectively screened for dn-DSA by a Luminex single-antigen test (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after LT. HLA typing of the recipients and donors was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-SSP and PCR-SSOP Luminex low-resolution methods (One Lambda, Inc.). The HLAMatchmaker computer algorithm was used for identification of MM eplets at HLA-DRB1 and -DQA1/B1 loci. Luminex single-antigen bead solid phase assay was used for antibody analysis. Standard immunosuppression included thymoglobulin-rituximab induction and tacrolimus maintenance. There were 27 (34%) patients who developed dn-DSA. There were no episodes of antibody-mediated rejection, and 9 (11%) developed acute cellular rejection (ACR). A positive crossmatch status and a higher number of HLA-A, -B, -DR, and -ABDR MMs were not associated with dn-DSA formation. Patients developing dn-DSA had a significantly higher number of total (38 ± 2.7 versus 28 ± 2.3; P = 0.01) and antibody-verified (AbVer; 14 ± 1.1 versus 10 ± 1; P = 0.015) class II MM eplets. By a multivariate regression analysis, the number of class II MM eplets was strongly associated with risk of class II dn-DSA formation (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P < 0.01). Patients with ACR had a significantly higher number of total (20.2 ± 1.3 versus 13.9 ± 0.9; P < 0.01) as well as AbVer (10.7 ± 1.1 versus 7.5 ± 0.6; P = 0.03) class I MM eplets. In conclusion, donor-recipient HLA epitope MM is associated with a risk of dn-DSA formation and rejection after LT. However, further studies are required to evaluate the clinical utility of epitope matching in LT.

Successful living donor liver retransplantation for graft failure within 7 days due to acute de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody-mediated rejection

Growing evidence suggests a relationship between antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and early graft failure due to a previously unknown etiology in liver transplantation (LTx). We herein report a 3-year-old boy who developed rapid graft failure due to de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA)-driven AMR a week after living donor LTx, requiring a second transplant on the 10th day after the first LTx. The pathology of the first graft showed massive necrosis in zone 3 along with positive C4d and inflammatory cell infiltrates in portal areas. The mean fluorescence intensity against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR15, which was possessed by both the first and the second donor, peaked at 12 945 on the day before the second LTx. Antithymocyte globulin, plasma exchange along with i.v. immunoglobulin, rituximab, and the local infusion of prostaglandin E1, steroids, and Mesilate gabexate through a portal catheter were provided to save the second graft. To our knowledge, this is the first report to show a clear association between de novo DSA and acute AMR within 7 days of a LTx. Furthermore, we successfully rescued the recipient with a second graft despite possessing the same targeted HLA. The rapid decision to carry out retransplantation and specific strategies overcoming AMR were crucial to achieving success in this case of immunologically high-risk LTx.

Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group

Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.

Five-year histological and serological follow-up of operationally tolerant pediatric liver transplant recipients enrolled in WISP-R

Pediatric liver transplant recipients arguably have the most to gain and the most to lose from discontinuing immunosuppression (IS). Whereas IS undoubtedly exerts a cumulative toll, there is concern that insufficient or no IS may contribute to allograft deterioration. Twelve pediatric recipients of parental living donor liver grafts, identified as operationally tolerant through complete IS withdrawal (WISP-R; NCT00320606), were followed for a total of 5 years (1 year of IS withdrawal and 4 years off IS) with serial liver tests and autoantibody and alloantibody assessments. Liver biopsies were performed 2 and 4 years off IS, and, at these time points, immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass and C1q binding activity for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were determined. There were no cases of chronic rejection, graft loss, or death. Allografts did not exhibit progressive increase in inflammation or fibrosis. Smooth-muscle actin expression by stellate cells and CD34 expression by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells remained stable, consistent with the absence of progressive graft injury. Three subjects never exhibited DSA. However, 3 subjects showed intermittent de novo class I DSA, 4 subjects showed persistent de novo class II DSA, and 5 subjects showed persistent preexisting class II DSA. Class II DSA was predominantly against donor DQ antigens, often of high mean fluorescence intensity, rarely of the IgG3 subclass, and often capable of binding C1q.

CONCLUSION

Operationally tolerant pediatric liver transplant recipients maintain generally stable allograft histology in spite of apparently active humoral allo-immune responses. The absence of increased inflammation or progressive fibrosis suggests that a subset of liver allografts seem resistant to the chronic injury that is characteristic of antibody-mediated damage. (Hepatology 2017;65:647-660).

Prevention and treatment of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and the role of the 'two-hit hypothesis'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, prevention strategies, and possible treatment options for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although rare, severe acute AMR (aAMR) usually occurs in patients with high mean fluorescence intensity despite serial dilutions or high-titer preformed class I donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). The diagnosis is suspected when allograft dysfunction occurs with DSA, diffuse C4d staining, and a microvascular injury, and may be aided by the aAMR score. However, the incidence of and treatment approach to combined T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with DSA present and some but not all features of AMR is yet to be determined. Chronic liver allograft AMR is characterized by low-grade chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis with DSA, the chronic AMR (cAMR) score may facilitate diagnosis. The 'two-hit' hypothesis, whereby a coexistent insult upregulates human leukocyte antigen class II target antigens on the microvascular endothelium, may explain why suboptimal donors with lower sensitization levels might suffer from acute AMR and those with chronic complications (e.g., recurrent original disease) might be more susceptible to chronic AMR. Although treatment algorithms are needed, prevention is preferable and at a minimum includes transfusion minimization, and medication adherence.

SUMMARY

Severe acute AMR is rare but diagnosable, and there is need to determine the incidence of and optimal therapy for less severe combined AMR and TCMR. Chronic AMR is likely more common and of significant relevance to long-term allograft survival improvement. The two-hit hypothesis may help to explain the rarity of both findings and shed insight onto future prevention and treatment strategies.

Advances in Pretransplant Donor-Specific Antibody Testing in Solid Organ Transplantation: From Bench to Bedside

Immunological risk stratification has a central role in determining both the feasibility of solid organ transplantation and the type (and amount) of induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Currently there is poor consensus on how to exactly estimate the global immunological risk, and most transplant centers adopt complicated internal guidelines for risk stratification. Here we systematically review published evidences that should drive appropriateness in risk stratification, focusing on donor-specific antibodies against HLA and other antigens.

The Influence of Immunosuppressive Agents on the Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibody Production in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Production of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) is a major risk factor for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss after all solid organ transplantation. In this article, we review the data available on the risk of individual immunosuppressive agents and their ability to prevent dnDSA production. Induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin may achieve a short-term decrease in dnDSA production in moderately sensitized patients. Rituximab induction may be beneficial in sensitized patients, and in abrogating rebound antibody response in patients undergoing desensitization or treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. Use of bortezomib for induction therapy in at-risk patients is of interest, but the benefits are unproven. In maintenance regimens, nonadherent and previously sensitized patients are not suitable for aggressive weaning protocols, particularly early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal without lymphocyte-depleting induction. Early conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor monotherapy has been reported to increase the risk of dnDSA formation, but a combination of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor does not appear to alter the risk. Early steroid therapy withdrawal in standard-risk patients after induction has no known dnDSA penalty. The available data do not demonstrate a consistent effect of mycophenolic acid on dnDSA production. Risk minimization for dnDSA requires monitoring of adherence, appropriate risk stratification, risk-based immunosuppression intensity, and prospective DSA surveillance.

Prospective Monitoring of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies After Intestine/Multivisceral Transplantation: Significance of De Novo Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA) may be associated with worse clinical outcomes after intestine/multivisceral transplantation.

METHODS

In 79 intestine/multivisceral recipients, sera were prospectively screened for DSA by Luminex Single antigen test at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after transplantation. Standard immunosuppression included thymoglobulin-rituximab induction and tacrolimus-prednisone maintenance. C4d staining was performed retrospectively on biopsies in patients that developed acute rejection (AR).

RESULTS

Twenty-two (28%) patients developed de novo DSA at a median posttransplant period of 3 (1-36) months. De novo DSA were observed in 10 of 40 liver-including and 12 of 39 liver-excluding transplants (P = 0.57). Occurrence of AR was slightly higher in patients with de novo DSA (45% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.41). Similarly, chronic rejection (14% vs 5%; P = 0.21) and graft loss due to AR (18% vs 7%; P = 0.14) were numerically higher in patients with de novo DSA. Only 35% patients experiencing AR had circulating de novo DSA at the time of AR. Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed in 6 patients based on C4d staining, of these 2 patients had circulating de novo DSA at the time of biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo DSA formation, particularly early in the posttransplant course may be associated with trends toward worse outcomes. However, its significance in the pathophysiology of AR remains uncertain. Studies focusing mechanisms of DSA-related graft injury and intragraft DSA detection might provide further insight into this issue.

New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity

In the 30 years since the rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) Thymoglobulin^® was first licensed, its use in solid organ transplantation and hematology has expanded progressively. Although the evidence base is incomplete, specific roles for rATG in organ transplant recipients using contemporary dosing strategies are now relatively well-identified. The addition of rATG induction to a standard triple or dual regimen reduces acute cellular rejection, and possibly humoral rejection. It is an appropriate first choice in patients with moderate or high immunological risk, and may be used in low-risk patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimen from time of transplant, or if early steroid withdrawal is planned. Kidney transplant patients at risk of delayed graft function may also benefit from the use of rATG to facilitate delayed CNI introduction. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rATG has become an important component of conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, following demonstration of reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. More recently, a role for rATG has also been established in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. In autoimmunity, rATG contributes to the treatment of severe aplastic anemia, and has been incorporated in autograft projects for the management of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, and systemic sclerosis. Finally, research is underway for the induction of tolerance exploiting the ability of rATG to induce immunosuppresive cells such as regulatory T-cells. Despite its long history, rATG remains a key component of the immunosuppressive armamentarium, and its complex immunological properties indicate that its use will expand to a wider range of disease conditions in the future.