A Proposal for Early Dosing Regimens in Heart Transplant Patients Receiving Thymoglobulin and Calcineurin Inhibition

Retrospective Evaluation of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Heart Transplant Patients

The dosing intensity of antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy in heart transplantation remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rabbit antithymocyte globulin at a total dose of 4.5 mg/kg compared with <4.5 mg/kg.

Lower Platelet Count Following Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Is Associated With Less Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Unlike lymphodepletion, a decrease in platelet count following induction immunosuppressive therapy with polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is deemed as an adverse event. However, this phenomenon may represent a particular rATG antirejection mechanism.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 156 patients who received a heart transplant (HTx) between 2010 and 2018. All patients received rATG induction therapy for 5 days. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and platelet counts were assessed on days 0, 7, and 14 following HTx. The primary outcome of the study was the first occurrence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) defined as grade ≥ 1B within 24 months after HTx.

RESULTS

Both ALC and platelet counts decreased rapidly after induction. During the 24-month follow-up period, 17% of patients had ACR. Patients with ACR had significantly higher platelet count on day 7 (145 vs 104, P < .001) and higher ALC on day 14 (162 vs 130, P = .035) than those without rejection. Patients in the highest platelet count quartile showed more ACR (50% in quartile 4 vs 0% in quartile 1, P = .006) as well as a higher cumulative total rejection score. Univariate analysis showed that ACR was associated with platelet count on day 7, recipient age, and pretransplant cytomegalovirus IgG serology. In multivariable regression analysis, platelet count on day 7 was the most accurate predictor of ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower platelet count after induction with rATG is associated with less ACR. This suggests platelet involvement in antirejection mechanisms of rATG and a possible rationale for targeting platelets in future immunosuppressive strategies.

The pharmaceutical management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major limitation to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Its peculiar pathophysiology involves multifactorial pathways including immune-mediated and metabolic risk factors, which are associated with the development of specific pathological lesions. The often diffuse and chronic nature of the disease reduces the effectiveness of revascularization procedures, and pharmacological prevention of the disease is the sole therapeutic approach with some proven efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, after briefly outlining the risk factors for CAV, the authors revise the potential pharmacological approaches that may reduce the burden of CAV. While several therapies have shown convincing efficacy in terms of CAV prevention diagnosed by coronary imaging, very few have been reported to improve prognosis with any meaningful level of evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors believe that a customizable approach is necessary for clinical practice given the currently available evidence. Furthermore, it is important, in the future, to address the glaring therapeutic gap of an effective treatment against donor-specific antibodies, whose effect on endothelial injury is currently one of the major mechanisms of CAV development and for which no pharmacological treatment is currently available.

The meaning of donor-specific antibodies after heart transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major contributor of impaired long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). The presence of circulating donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) is considered as a mandatory criterion for AMR after HTx. DSA are known prognostic biomarkers of outcome, for example, recipients with de-novo DSA have a three-fold increased risk of mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the awareness of the impact and prognosis of DSA on the survival has been increased in the HTx community over the last decade, the management of DSA pre and posttransplant varies among centers and is mainly based on the experience of transplant physicians. Thus, firm consensus strategies for each HTx recipient should be established by a center advisory board of experts in the field of HLA genetics, transplantation immunology, and HTx to evaluate the immunological risk preoperatively and also continuously during the posttransplant course. Consequently, the recent advances of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tools should be applied, according to the risk, laboratory findings, and clinical events of the recipient. Such individual strategy will result in tailored therapeutic options.

SUMMARY

Novel standards for the management of DSA in HTx recipients on the basis of an interdisciplinary approach of experts will improve diagnostics for personalized medicine.

A Review of Induction with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

Pediatric heart transplantation (pHTx) represents only a small proportion of cardiac transplants. Due to these low numbers, clinical data relating to induction therapy in this special population are far less extensive than for adults. Induction is used more widely in pHTx than in adults, mainly because of early steroid withdrawal or complete steroid avoidance. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is the most frequent choice for induction in pHTx, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin^®) (Sanofi Genzyme) is the most widely-used ATG preparation. In the absence of large, prospective, blinded trials, we aimed to review the current literature and databases for evidence regarding the use, complications, and dosages of rATG. Analyses from registry databases suggest that, overall, ATG preparations are associated with improved graft survival compared to interleukin-2 receptor antagonists. Advantages for the use of rATG have been shown in low-risk patients given tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-free regimen, in sensitized patients with pre-formed alloantibodies and/or a positive donor-specific crossmatch, and in ABO-incompatible pHTx. Registry and clinical data have indicated no increased risk of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in children given rATG after pHTx. A total rATG dose in the range 3.5–7.5 mg/kg is advisable.