Preserving the Pancreas Graft: Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Duodenal Leaks in Enterically Drained Pancreas Allografts

Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Indications and Surgical Techniques

Intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation are technically challenging and complex procedures mainly performed on patients with irreversible and non-medically manageable end-stage intestinal failure. Increasingly, other organs besides small intestines are included in the allograft for which the terms "composite intestinal transplantation" and "multivisceral transplantation" are used. Commonly, complex vascular reconstructions are used for these procedures. Knowledge of surgical anatomy hence is essential for accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging in these patients. This article reviews the indications and most common surgical techniques for intestinal and multivisceral transplantations.

Post-pancreatic transplant enteric leaks: The role of the salvage operation

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation is complicated by an enteric leak in 5%-8%, frequently necessitating pancreatectomy. Pancreatic salvage outcomes are not well studied. Risk factors for enteric leak were examined and outcomes of attempted graft salvage were compared to immediate pancreatectomy. Pancreas transplants performed between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed. Donor, recipient, and organ variables including demographics, donor type, ischemic time, kidney donor profile index, and pancreas donor risk index were analyzed. Among 1153 patients, 33 experienced enteric leaks (2.9%). Donors of allografts that developed leak were older (37.9y vs. 29.0y, p = .001), had higher KDPI (37% vs. 24%, p < .001), higher pancreas donor risk index (1.83 vs. 1.32, p < .001), and longer cold ischemic time (16.5 vs. 14.8 h, p = .03). Intra-abdominal abscess and higher blood loss decreased the chance of successful salvage. Enteric leak increased 6-month graft loss risk (HR 13.9[CI 8.5-22.9], p < .001). However, 50% (n = 12) of allografts undergoing attempted salvage survived long-term. After 6 months of pancreas graft survival, salvage and non-leak groups had similar 5-year graft survival (82.5% vs. 81.5%) and mortality (90.9% vs. 93.5%). Enteric leaks remain a challenging complication. Pancreatic allograft salvage can be attempted in suitable patients and accomplished in 50% of cases without significantly increased graft failure or mortality risk.

Current state of pancreas transplantation in Japan based on the nationwide registry

In Japan, 437 pancreas transplantations (PTx) were carried out between 2000 and 2019. Clinical data for all PTx cases are registered in the Japan Pancreas Transplant Registry of the Japan Society for Pancreas and Islet Transplantation. Here we analyzed the registry data to describe the current status of PTx in Japan. The 437 PTx included 410 from deceased donors (407 from brain-dead and 3 from non-heart-beating donors) and 27 from living donors. We investigated the clinical characteristics of the 410 PTx from deceased donors. The rate of marginal donors using expanded donor criteria was higher in Japan than in other countries. At 1/5/10 years post-PTx, the overall survival rates were 95.8%/94.2%/88.7%, and the graft survival rates were 85.9%/76.2%/67.4% for pancreas and 93.2%/90.8%/78.2% for kidney (non-censored for death). These rates were comparable to those in other countries. When stratified by PTx category, survival was significantly better following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) compared to pancreas-after-kidney transplantation (PAK) or PTx alone (PTA). Immunological rejection was more frequently the cause of graft loss in PAK/PTA cases than in SPK cases, potentially contributing to the poorer survival in PAK/PTA. These outcomes highlight two main concerns: substantial incidence of pancreas graft loss, and inferior outcomes after PAK/PTA. Overall, PTx outcome is favorable in Japan, despite the high rate of marginal donors. To improve outcomes, it is important to prevent and manage each cause of pancreas graft loss. Overcoming the poorer survival in PAK/PTA may require new immunosuppressive protocols or allogenic islet transplantation.

Exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation: Complications and management

The aim of this minireview is to compare various pancreas transplantation exocrine drainage techniques i.e., bladder vs enteric. Both techniques have different difficulties and complications. Numerous comparisons have been made in the literature between exocrine drainage techniques throughout the history of pancreas transplantation, detailing complications and their impact on graft and patient survival. Specific emphasis has been made on the early postoperative management of these complications and the related surgical infections and their consequences. In light of the results, a number of bladder-drained pancreas grafts required conversion to enteric drainage. As a result of technical improvements, outcomes of the varied enteric exocrine drainage techniques (duodenojejunostomy, duodenoduodenostomy or gastric drainage) have also been discussed i.e., assessing specific risks vs benefits. Pancreatic exocrine secretions can be drained to the urinary or intestinal tracts. Until the late 1990s the bladder drainage technique was used in the majority of transplant centers due to ease of monitoring urine amylase and lipase levels for evaluation of possible rejection. Moreover, bladder drainage was associated at that time with fewer surgical complications, which in contrast to enteric drainage, could be managed with conservative therapies. Nowadays, the most commonly used technique for proper driving of exocrine pancreatic secretions is enteric drainage due to the high rate of urological and metabolic complications associated with bladder drainage. Of note, 10% to 40% of bladder-drained pancreata eventually required enteric conversion at no detriment to overall graft survival. Various surgical techniques were originally described using the small bowel for enteric anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop or a direct side-to-side anastomosis. Despite the improvements in surgery, enteric drainage complication rates ranging from 2%-20% have been reported. Treatment depends on the presence of any associated complications and the condition of the patient. Intra-abdominal infection represents a potentially very serious problem. Up to 30% of deep wound infections are associated with an anastomotic leak. They can lead not only to high rates of graft loss, but also to substantial mortality. New modifications of established techniques are being developed, such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option, in which the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main concern of this technique is the challenge of repairing the native duodenum when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary. Identification and prevention of technical failure remains the main objective for pancreas transplantation surgeons. In conclusion, despite numerous techniques to minimize exocrine pancreatic drainage complications e.g., leakage and infection, no universal technique has been standardized. A prospective study/registry analysis may resolve this.

Early intestinal complications following pancreas transplantation: lessons learned from over 300 cases - a retrospective single-center study

Enteric complications remain a major cause of morbidity in the post-transplant period of pancreas transplantation despite improvements surgical technique. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze retrospectively the early intestinal complications and their potential relation with vascular events. From 2000 to 2016, 337 pancreas transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage. For exocrine secretion, intestinal drainage was done with hand-sewn anastomosis duodenojejunostomy. Twenty-three patients (6.8%) had early intestinal complications. Median age was 39 years (male: 65.2%). Median cold ischemia time was 11 h [IQR: 9-12.4]. Intestinal complications were intestinal obstruction (n = 7); paralytic ileus (n = 5); intestinal fistula without anastomotic dehiscence (n = 3); ischemic graft duodenum (n = 3); dehiscence of duodenojejunostomy (n = 4); and anastomotic dehiscence in jejunum after pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1). Eighteen cases required relaparotomy: adhesiolysis (n = 6); repeated laparotomy without findings (n = 1); transplantectomy (n = 6); primary leak closure (n = 3); re-positioning of the graft (n = 1); and intestinal resection (n = 1). Of the intestinal complications, 4 were associated with vascular thrombosis, resulting in two pancreatic graft losses. Enteric drainage with duodenum-jejunum anastomosis is safe and feasible, with a low rate of intra-abdominal complications. Vascular thrombosis associated with intestinal complications presents a risk factor for the viability of pancreatic grafts, so prevention and early detection is vital.

Insulin-Independent Reversal of Type-1 Diabetes Following Transplantation of Adult Brown Adipose Tissue Supplemented With IGF-1

As our previous publications show, it is feasible to reverse type 1 diabetes (T1D) without insulin in multiple mouse models, through transplantation of embryonic brown adipose tissue (BAT) in the subcutaneous space. Embryonic BAT transplants result in rapid and long-lasting euglycemia accompanied by decreased inflammation and regenerated healthy white adipose tissue, with no detectable increase in insulin. To translate this approach to human patients, it is necessary to establish practical alternatives for embryonic tissue. Adult adipose tissue transplants or BAT-derived stem cell lines alone fail to reverse T1D. A likely reason is transplant failure resulting from lack of growth factors abundant in embryonic tissue. Adding growth factors may enable transplants to survive and vascularize as well as stimulate adipogenesis and decrease inflammation in the surrounding host tissue. Previous data points to insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) as the most likely candidate. Embryonic BAT abundantly expresses IGF-1, and embryonic BAT transplant recipients exhibit increased plasma levels of IGF-1. Therefore, we tested the ability of temporary administration of exogenous IGF-1 to enable adult BAT transplants to correct T1D.

Methods

Fresh BAT from healthy adult CB7BL/6 donors were transplanted in the subcutaneous space of hyperglycemic nonobese diabetic recipients. Exogenous IGF-1 was administered daily for a week following transplant, at 100 µg/kg SC.

Results

Adult BAT transplants with IGF-1 supplementation produced rapid long-lasting euglycemia at a 57% success rate, in contrast with no recovery in the control groups who received adult BAT alone, IGF-1 alone, or no treatment.

Conclusions

Temporary supplementation with IGF-1 enables adult BAT transplants to correct T1D phenotypes independent of insulin, providing a possible route to translate this treatment to human patients.

Two-stage Enteric Exclusion to Salvage a Pancreas Transplant After an Early Post-transplant Leak

Early technical complications after pancreas transplantation are almost always unsalvageable. The two most common complications are vascular thrombosis and duodenal anastomotic leaks. We present a case of a duodenal stump leak that led to a large abscess and severe sepsis. The pancreas was salvaged by repairing the leak and creating a proximal diverting ileostomy. Several months later, the ileostomy was reversed. This was done by creating a defunctionalized Roux limb to exclude the pancreas. The patient healed well and continued to enjoy excellent glucose control.

Pancreas Transplantation: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Pancreas transplantation treats insulin-dependent diabetes with or without concurrent end-stage renal disease. Pancreas transplantation increases survival versus no transplant, increases survival when performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus deceased-donor kidney alone, and improves quality of life. Careful donor and recipient selection are paramount to good outcomes. Several technical variations exist for implantation: portal versus systemic vascular drainage and jejunal versus duodenal versus bladder exocrine drainage. Complications are most frequently technical in the first year and immunologic thereafter. Graft rejection is challenging to diagnose and is treated selectively. Islet cell transplantation currently has inferior outcomes to whole-organ pancreas transplantation.