The Influence of Donor to Recipient Size Matching on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery. However, the disparity between supply versus demand for organs means many either die or are removed from the waiting-list before receiving a kidney allograft. Reducing unnecessary discard of deceased donor kidneys is important to maximize utilization of a scarce and valuable resource but requires nuanced decision-making. Accepting kidneys from deceased donors with heterogenous characteristics for waitlisted kidney transplant candidates, often in the context of time-pressured decision-making, requires an understanding of the association between donor characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes. Deceased donor clinical factors can impact patient and/or kidney allograft survival but risk-versus-benefit deliberation must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with remaining on the waiting-list. In this article, the association between deceased kidney donor characteristics and post kidney transplant outcomes for the recipient are reviewed. While translating this evidence to individual kidney transplant candidates is a challenge, emerging strategies to improve this process will be discussed. Fundamentally, tools and guidelines to inform decision-making when considering deceased donor kidney offers will be valuable to both professionals and patients.

Impact of Size Matching Based on Donor-Recipient Height on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Transplantation of kidneys from shorter donors into taller recipients may lead to suboptimal allograft survival. The effect of discrepancy in donor and recipient heights (ΔHeight) on long term transplant outcomes is not known. Adult patients ≥18 years undergoing living or deceased donor (LD or DD) kidney transplants alone from donors ≥18 years between 2000 and 2016 in the United States were included in this observational study. The cohort was divided into three groups based on ΔHeight of 5 inches as 1) Recipient < Donor (DD: 31,688, LD: 12,384), 2) Recipient = Donor (DD: 84,711, LD: 54,709), and 3) Recipient > Donor (DD: 21,741, LD: 18,753). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of DCGL and mortality in both DD and LD (p < 0.001 for both). The absolute difference in graft and patient survival between the two extremes of ΔHeight was 5.7% and 5.7% for DD, and 0.4% and 1.4% for LD. On multivariate analysis, the HR of DCGL for Recipient < Donor and Recipient > Donor was 0.95 (p = 0.05) and 1.07 (p = 0.01) in DD and 0.98 (p = 0.55) and 1.14 (p < 0.001) in LD. Similarly, the corresponding HR of mortality were 0.97 (p = 0.07) and 1.07 (p = 0.003) for DD and 1.01 (p < 0.001) and 1.05 (p = 0.13) for LD. For DGF, the HR were 1.04 (p = 0.1) and 1.01 (p = 0.7) for DD and 1.07 (p = 0.45) and 0.89 (p = 0.13) for LD. Height mismatch between the donor and recipient influences kidney transplant outcomes.

Risk Due to ABO Incompatibility and Donor-Recipient Weight Mismatch in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study

The effect of donor-recipient weight mismatch is not well established in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). A total of 2584 LDKT patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of ABO incompatibility and donor-recipient weight mismatch (donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) < 0.8). In a multivariable Cox analysis, the combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility (n = 124) was an independent risk factor for graft survival (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.11-6.70) and patient survival (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.39-9.04), whereas neither factor alone was a significant risk factor for either outcome. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was not an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven graft rejection (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88-1.82); however, it was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.64-5.57). The mortality rate due to infection was higher among patients with both ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility than among patients with neither factor or with either factor alone. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was an independent risk factor for graft and patient survival after LDKT, whereas neither factor alone significantly affected graft or patient survival. Thus, donor-recipient weight matching should be cautiously considered in LDKT with ABO incompatibility.

Small donors for small recipients - excellent growth and long-term function of single kidney grafts

Small-donor kidneys (≤20 kg donor weight, SDK) are preferably transplanted en bloc in adults. Concerns about thrombotic complications or hyperfiltration hinder their use in children, particularly as single grafts. Low centre experience and donor-to-recipient size are rated critical regarding outcomes. We evaluated SDK transplantation (SDTx) in paediatric recipients at a specialized transplant centre. Between 2008 and 2018, SDTx was performed in 40 children (mean age 5.4 ± 1.4 years, single grafts n = 38, donor weight ≤10 kg: n = 10). Perioperative complications were rare (n = 3), mainly thromboses despite immediate heparinization and resulted in graft loss in one patient. Overall, early and long-term GFR were excellent (76 ± 21 and 100 ± 11 ml/min/1.73 m² , first month and year 5, respectively). Three patients presented with delayed graft function. Graft volume increased significantly (69 ± 38 vs. 111 ± 33 ml within 5 years; P < 0.0001). Patients showed catch-up growth to normal range (SDS for height -2.06 ± 1.6 to -1.60 ± 1.5). Stratification by recipient age and donor weight revealed superior results in young recipients (≤3 years) and ≤10 kg donors, respectively. Outcome of single SDK grafts was excellent. Gain of GFR and graft volume was even higher in patients with very small donor or recipient size, regardless of a reduced donor-to-recipient weight ratio. Therefore, SDTx should be considered favouring small paediatric recipients.

US deceased kidney transplantation: Estimated GFR, donor age and KDPI association with graft survival

BACKGROUND

Despite a significant shortage of kidneys for transplantation in the US, kidneys from older deceased donors are infrequently transplanted. This is primarily over concern of graft quality and transplant durability.

METHODS

The US national transplant database (2000-2018) was assessed for deceased donor kidney transplant patient and graft survival, graft durability and stratified by donor age (<65 years>), Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and estimated glomerual filtration rate (GFR) one year post-transplantation (eGFR-1) were calculated.

FINDINGS

Recipients of kidneys transplanted from deceased donors >65 years had a lower eGFR-1, (median 39 ml/min) than recipients of younger donor kidneys (median 54 ml/min). However, death-censored graft survival, stratified by eGFR-1, demonstrated similar survival, irrespective of donor age or KDPI. The durability of kidney survival decreases as the achieved eGFR-1 declines. KDPI has a poor association with eGFR-1 and lesser for graft durability. While recipients of kidneys > 65 years had a higher one year mortality than younger kidney recipients, recipients of kidneys > 65 years and an eGFR-1 <30 ml/min, had a lower survival than an untransplanted waitlist cohort (p<0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The durability of kidney graft survival after transplantation was associated with the amount of kidney function gained through the transplant (eGFR-1) and the rate of graft loss (return to dialysis) was not significantly associated with donor age. 24.9% of recipients of older donor kidneys failed to achieve sufficient eGFR-1 providing a transplant survival benefit. While there is significant benefit from transplanting older kidneys, better decision-making tools are required to avoid transplanting kidneys that provide insufficient renal function.

FUNDING

None.

The implications of donor-recipient size mismatch in renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Transplanting kidneys small for recipient's size results in inferior graft function. Body surface area (BSA) is related to kidney size. We used the BSA index (BSAi) (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether the renal graft size is sufficient for the recipient.

METHODS

We included 26,223 adult single kidney transplants (01/01/2007-31/12/2019) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided renal transplants into groups: BSAi ≤ 0.75, 0.75 < BSA ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25, BSAi > 1.25. We compared delayed graft function rates, primary non-function rates and graft survival among them. (Reference category: BSAi ≤ 0.75).

RESULTS

Cases with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the highest delayed graft function rates in living-donor renal transplants (11.1%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.32-1.1, p = 0.095, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23-0.89, p = 0.022, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.13-0.77, p = 0.011) and in renal transplants from donors after brain death (26.2%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.96, p = 0.024, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.47-0.83, p = 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47-0.9, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death regarding delayed graft function rates (~ 40% in all groups). Graft survival was similar among BSAi groups in renal transplants from living donors and donors after brain death. Renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the shortest graft survival (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.74, p < 0.001, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66, p < 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31-0.66, p < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival rate was 58.4% for renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function risk is higher in renal transplants with BSAi ≤ 0.75 coming from living donors and donors after brain death. Graft survival is greatly reduced in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75.

Kidney transplantation outcomes for adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys

Despite a paucity of data assessing transplantation of deceased-donor pediatric donor kidneys into adult recipients, utilization of pediatric organs is declining in the UK, likely due to concerns that such organs may have inferior outcomes. However, we hypothesized that these concerns may be unfounded. As such, the aim of the study was to compare kidney transplant outcomes between adult recipients of pediatric and adult deceased-donor organs. Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry for all adult (18+ years) deceased-donor single-kidney transplant recipients between January 2000 and January 2016. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken, to compare a range of outcomes between recipients of kidneys from pediatric and adult donors. Transplants were stratified by the donor age (years) as follows: 0-16 (n = 666), 17-18 (n = 465), and 19-44 (n = 7378). Recipients of pediatric donor kidneys were observed to have improved long-term graft function, with a median creatinine at 1 year of 109 vs. 117 μmol/L for recipients of donors aged 0-16 vs. 19-44 years (P < .001). However, on multivariable analysis, this was not found to correspond to a significant difference in patient (P = .914) or graft survival (P = .190) between the donor age groups. Subgroup analysis within the younger donors found no significant differences in recipient outcomes between donors aged 0-6, 7-12, and 13-16 years. In this population cohort study, we identified excellent outcomes among adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys. Pediatric donors are a valuable source of organs for adult recipients in an era where organ demand is rising.

Donor-Recipient Matching to Optimize the Utility of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys

BACKGROUND

In December 2014, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was developed to give more precise information on donor kidney quality. Kidneys with KDPI scores ≥ 85 (K ≥ 85) have been reported to have inferior outcomes to kidneys with KDPI scores < 85.

METHODS

After the implementation of the new Kidney Allocation System, we developed a protocol to evaluate K ≥ 85 use. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of our institutional criteria and evaluated post-transplant outcomes. K ≥ 85 recipients were stratified based on their 1-year creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates to elucidate characteristics associated with serum creatinine < 1.7 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rates ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m².

RESULTS

From December 2014 to December 2019, 304 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at Hartford Hospital; 58 (19%) were K ≥ 85 with an average KDPI of 91%. There were 4 graft losses; 2 were death censored. Prolonged cold ischemia time and black recipient race were associated with inferior recipient graft function at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

High KDPI kidney use requires a multifaceted evaluation that takes into account donor and recipient characteristics for an ideal match. We have identified several characteristics that may predict optimal post-transplant kidney function.

Kidney Transplantation From a 5-Day-Old Donor With a Single Functioning Kidney

Kidney transplant restores renal function in eligible patients with end-stage renal failure who require renal replacement therapy. There remains a significant disparity between the demand and supply of suitable kidneys for transplant. In recent years, pediatric donors have formed an important area for expansion of the donor pool. However, neonatal donation (< 28 days) remains an underutilized resource. We describe a case of en bloc kidney transplant from a 5-day-old donor after circulatory death into an adult recipient. One kidney thrombosed almost immediately, leaving a single 4.5-cm, poorly functioning kidney. Eighteen months after transplant, the recipient has shown good function with the estimated glomerular filtration rate continuing to improve. This case demonstrates that a single neonatal kidney can grow and adapt to provide adequate renal function in an adult. This experience suggests that a single kidney from a neonate can sustain renal function in adults, and every effort should be made to maximize their use in transplant.

Long-term outcomes of adult-size and size-matched kidney transplants in small pediatric recipients

INTRODUCTION

Adult-size kidneys are usually used for kidney transplantation in small pediatric recipients, but the influence of graft size in transplant outcome remains controversial. Our aim is to compare long-term transplant outcomes of using adult-size and size-matched kidneys in small pediatric recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1999, 61 of 226 kidney transplants were achieved in recipients weighing <20 kg with 5 years of follow-up. Patients were analyzed according to the graft size received: (group-A) adult-size (n = 32), (group-B) size-matched (n = 29). Kidney size (KS), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) proteinuria and rejection were compared between groups at transplant time (T₀), at one (T₁), two (T₂), five years (T₅), and at the end of the follow-up (T_F) (median follow-up 8.47(0-17) years). Graft and patient survival were determined and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Mean KS was significantly different between groups at T₀ (A:11.3 ± 1.1 cm, B:8.8 ± 0.9 cm), (pT₀<0.01), group-B evidenced graft growth, reaching similar sizes to group-A at T₅ (A:11.7±1 cm, B:11.2±1 cm; pT₅ = 0.13) and T_F (A:12.2 ± 1.1 cm, B:12.4 ± 1.2 cm; pT_F = 0.63), and group-A had a slight graft growth at T_F (pT₀-T_F<0.01). Mean Schwartz-GFR at T₀ was greater in group-A (138 ± 33 ml/min/1.73 m²) than group-B (109 ± 34 mL/min/1.73 m²) (pT₀ = 0.01); during follow-up, it evidenced a reduction in group-A (T₅:90 ± 27, T_F:71 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m²; pT₀-T₅<0.01; pT₀-T_F<0.01), meanwhile in group-B was stable until T₅ (104 ± 33 mL/min/1.73 m²; pT₀-T₅ = 0.54), declining at T_F (76 ± 31 mL/min/1.73 m²; pT₀-T_F<0.01); with no significant differences at T₁, T₂, T₅, and TF between groups. Similar results were observed in mean Filler-GFR of both groups (Figure). Proteinuria and episodes of rejection were no significantly different between groups during the follow-up (p > 0.01; p = 0.23). Graft and patient survival at 5 and 10 years did not show significant differences (p = 0.45; p = 0.10).

DISCUSSION

Despite the initial kidney size difference between groups, we have demonstrated that they tended to the same size during the follow-up. Adult-size kidneys presented a slight size increase in the long-term, suggesting that they have some growth potential in small recipients, in contrast to previous literature. Mean GFR between groups showed no significant differences in the long-term, suggesting that optimal graft perfusion and function can be achieved despite the size of the graft. We have demonstrated that there were no significant differences in long-term graft and patient survival; this results were similar to the most recent literature about this topic and different from the 90-2000s decades literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-size kidneys may be transplanted to small recipients (<20 kg) with comparable outcomes to size-matched kidneys, with no significant differences in long-term KS, GFR, proteinuria, rejection, graft or patient survival.

The role of protocol biopsies after pediatric kidney transplantation

Data on protocol biopsies (PBs) after pediatric kidney transplantation are rare.We evaluated 6-month post-transplantation renal function in 86 children after PB as observational study. Patients were divided into 3 groups:Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and delta GFR were determined.PBs 6 months post-kidney transplantation did not influence the clinical course in stable pediatric patients and are therefore of questionable value. Decreased kidney function may however be stabilized by therapeutic intervention according to results of PB.