1
|
Herr F, Dekeyser M, Le Pavec J, Desterke C, Chiron AS, Bargiel K, Mercier O, Vernochet A, Fadel E, Durrbach A. mTOR Inhibition Impairs the Activation and Function of Belatacept-Resistant CD4 +CD57 + T Cells In Vivo and In Vitro. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041299. [PMID: 37111784 PMCID: PMC10142381 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Calcineurin inhibitors have improved graft survival in solid-organ transplantation but their use is limited by toxicity, requiring a switch to another immunosuppressor in some cases. Belatacept is one option that has been shown to improve graft and patient survival despite being associated with a higher risk of acute cellular rejection. This risk of acute cellular rejection is correlated with the presence of belatacept-resistant T cells. We performed a transcriptomic analysis of in vitro-activated cells to identify pathways affected by belatacept in belatacept-sensitive cells (CD4+CD57-) but not in belatacept-resistant CD4+CD57+ T cells. mTOR was significantly downregulated in belatacept-sensitive but not belatacept-resistant T cells. The inhibition of mTOR strongly decreases the activation and cytotoxicity of CD4+CD57+ cells. In humans, the use of a combination of mTOR inhibitor and belatacept prevents graft rejection and decreases the expression of activation markers on CD4 and CD8 T cells. mTOR inhibition decreases the functioning of belatacept-resistant CD4+CD57+ T cells in vitro and in vivo. It could potentially be used in association with belatacept to prevent acute cellular rejection in cases of calcineurin intolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Herr
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Immunologie Intégrative des Tumeurs et Immunothérapie des Cancers, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Manon Dekeyser
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Immunologie Intégrative des Tumeurs et Immunothérapie des Cancers, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94010 Creteil, France
| | - Jerome Le Pavec
- Inserm, Hypertension Pulmonaire: Physiopathologie et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
- Centre Hospitalier Marie Lannelongue, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Christophe Desterke
- Inserm, Modèles de Cellules Souches Malignes et Thérapeutiques, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Andrada-Silvana Chiron
- Unité des Technologies Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé, CNRS, INSERM, UTCBS, Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France
- Clinical Immunology Laboratory, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Kremlin-Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | - Karen Bargiel
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Immunologie Intégrative des Tumeurs et Immunothérapie des Cancers, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Olaf Mercier
- Inserm, Hypertension Pulmonaire: Physiopathologie et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
- Centre Hospitalier Marie Lannelongue, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Amelia Vernochet
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Immunologie Intégrative des Tumeurs et Immunothérapie des Cancers, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Elie Fadel
- Inserm, Hypertension Pulmonaire: Physiopathologie et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
- Centre Hospitalier Marie Lannelongue, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Antoine Durrbach
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Immunologie Intégrative des Tumeurs et Immunothérapie des Cancers, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94010 Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Jong E, Quint KD, El Ghalbzouri A, Verdijk RM, Goeman JJ, Heidt S, Claas FHJ, de Fijter JW, Genders RE, Vermeer MH, Bouwes Bavinck JN. HLA expression as a risk factor for metastases of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma in organ- transplant recipients. Hum Immunol 2023; 84:208-213. [PMID: 36621381 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ-transplant recipients (SOTR) have an increased risk of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC), metastasis and death from cSCC. In immunocompetent patients with mucosal SCC, downregulation of HLA class I is associated with poor prognosis. Since the degree of HLA expression on tumor cells could play a role in immunogenicity and pathophysiology of cSCC metastasis, we hypothesized that decreased HLA expression is associated with an increased risk of metastasis. METHODS We compared HLA expression between primary metastasized cSCCs, their metastases, and non-metastasized cSCCs from the same patients. Samples were stained for HLA-A, HLA-B/-C and quantified by calculating the difference in immunoreactivity score (IRS) of the primary cSCC compared with all non-metastasized cSCCs. RESULTS The mean IRS score for HLA-B/C expression was 2.07 point higher in metastasized compared to non-metastasized cSCCs (p = 0.065, 95 % CI -0.18-4.32). 83.3 % of the primary metastasized cSCCs had an IRS score of 4 or higher, compared to 42.9 % in non-metastasized cSCCs. Moderately to poorly differentiated cSCCs had more HLA class I expression compared to well-differentiated cSCCs. CONCLUSION Contrary to immunocompetent patients, HLA-B/C expression tends to be upregulated in metastasized cSCC compared to non-metastasized cSCC in SOTR, suggesting that different tumor escape mechanisms play a role in SOTR compared to immunocompetent patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella de Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Koen D Quint
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Abdoelwaheb El Ghalbzouri
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Robert M Verdijk
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle J Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roel E Genders
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten H Vermeer
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Nico Bouwes Bavinck
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hullegie-Peelen DM, van der Zwan M, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Mustafa DAM, Baart SJ, Reinders MEJ, Baan CC, Hesselink DA. Clinical and Molecular Profiling to Develop a Potential Prediction Model for the Response to Alemtuzumab Therapy for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111:1155-1164. [PMID: 35202481 PMCID: PMC9314084 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that depletes CD52‐bearing immune cells, is an effective drug for the treatment of severe or glucocorticoid‐resistant acute kidney transplant rejection (AR). Patient‐specific predictions on treatment response are, however, urgently needed, given the severe side effects of alemtuzumab. This study developed a multidimensional prediction model with the aim of generating clinically useful prognostic scores for the response to alemtuzumab. Clinical and histological characteristics were collected retrospectively from patients who were treated with alemtuzumab for AR. In addition, targeted gene expression profiling of AR biopsy tissues was performed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression modeling was used to construct the ALEMtuzumab for Acute Rejection (ALEMAR) prognostic score. Response to alemtuzumab was defined as patient and allograft survival and at least once an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the first 6 months after treatment. One hundred fifteen patients were included, of which 84 (73%) had a response to alemtuzumab. The ALEMAR‐score accurately predicted the chance of response. Gene expression analysis identified 13 differentially expressed genes between responders and nonresponders. The combination of the ALEMAR‐score and selected genes resulted in improved predictions of treatment response. The present preliminary prediction model is potentially helpful for the development of stratified alemtuzumab treatment for acute kidney transplant rejection but requires validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne M Hullegie-Peelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke van der Zwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marian C Clahsen-van Groningen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dana A M Mustafa
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kung VL, Sandhu R, Haas M, Huang E. Chronic active T cell–mediated rejection is variably responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. Kidney Int 2021; 100:391-400. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
5
|
Multiplex gene analysis reveals T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection-specific upregulation of complement in renal transplants. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15464. [PMID: 34326417 PMCID: PMC8322413 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94954-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In renal transplantation, complement is involved in ischemia reperfusion injury, graft rejection and dysfunction. However, it is still unclear how induction of complement and its activation are initiated. Using allograft biopsies of a well-characterized cohort of 28 renal transplant patients with no rejection (Ctrl), delayed graft function (DGF), acute T-cell-mediated (TCMR) or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) we analyzed differences in complement reaction. For that mRNA was isolated from FFPE sections, quantified with a multiplex gene expression panel and correlated with transplant conditions and follow-up of patients. Additionally, inflammatory cells were quantified by multiplex immunohistochemistry. In allograft biopsies with TCMR and ABMR gene expression of C1QB was 2-4 fold elevated compared to Ctrl. In TCMR biopsies, mRNA counts of several complement-related genes including C1S, C3, CFB and complement regulators CFH, CR1 and SERPING1 were significantly increased compared to Ctrl. Interestingly, expression levels of about 75% of the analyzed complement related genes correlated with cold ischemia time (CIT) and markers of inflammation. In conclusion, this study suggest an important role of complement in transplant pathology which seems to be at least in part triggered by CIT. Multiplex mRNA analysis might be a useful method to refine diagnosis and explore new pathways involved in rejection.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chronic-active Antibody-mediated Rejection: To Belatacept or Not, That Is the HOT Question. Transplantation 2021; 105:478-479. [PMID: 32732617 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
7
|
Molecular Analysis of Renal Allograft Biopsies: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going? Transplantation 2021; 104:2478-2486. [PMID: 32150035 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A renal core biopsy for histological evaluation is the gold standard for diagnosing renal transplant pathology. However, renal biopsy interpretation is subjective and can render insufficient precision, making it difficult to apply a targeted therapeutic regimen for the individual patient. This warrants a need for additional methods assessing disease state in the renal transplant. Significant research activity has been focused on the role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection. The identification of specific molecular expression patterns in allograft biopsies related to different types of allograft injury could provide valuable information about the processes underlying renal transplant dysfunction and can be used for the development of molecular classifier scores, which could improve our diagnostic and prognostic ability and could guide treatment. Molecular profiling has the potential to be more precise and objective than histological evaluation and may identify injury even before it becomes visible on histology, making it possible to start treatment at the earliest time possible. Combining conventional diagnostics (histology, serology, and clinical data) and molecular evaluation will most likely offer the best diagnostic approach. We believe that the use of state-of-the-art molecular analysis will have a significant impact in diagnostics after renal transplantation. In this review, we elaborate on the molecular phenotype of both acute and chronic T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection and discuss the additive value of molecular profiling in the setting of diagnosing renal allograft rejection and how this will improve transplant patient care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mannon RB, Armstrong B, Stock PG, Mehta AK, Farris AB, Watson N, Morrison Y, Sarwal M, Sigdel T, Bridges N, Robien M, Newell KA, Larsen CP. Avoidance of CNI and steroids using belatacept-Results of the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation 16 trial. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:3599-3608. [PMID: 32558199 PMCID: PMC7710570 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Immunosuppression devoid of corticosteroids has been investigated to avoid long-term comorbidities. Likewise, alternatives to calcineurin inhibitors have been investigated as a strategy to improve long-term kidney function following transplanion. Costimulatory blockade strategies that include corticosteroids have recently shown promise, despite their higher rates of early acute rejection. We designed a randomized clinical trial utilizing depletional induction therapy to mitigate early rejection risk while limiting calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. This trial, Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation 16 (CTOT-16), sought to evaluate novel belatacept-based strategies employing tacrolimus and corticosteroid avoidance. Sixty-nine kidney transplant recipients were randomized from 4 US transplant centers comparing a control group of with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, rapid steroid taper, and maintenance mycophenolate and tacrolimus, to 2 arms using maintenance belatacept. There were no graft losses but there were 2 deaths in the control group. However, the trial was halted early because of rejection in the belatacept treatment groups. Serious adverse events were similar across groups. Although rejection was not uniform in the belatacept maintenance therapy groups, the frequency of rejection limits the practical implementation of this strategy to avoid both calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roslyn B. Mannon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Peter G. Stock
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Aneesh K. Mehta
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta GA,Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta GA
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta GA
| | - Natasha Watson
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Yvonne Morrison
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tara Sigdel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nancy Bridges
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mark Robien
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Kenneth A. Newell
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dobi D, Vincenti F, Chandran S, Greenland JR, Bowman C, Chen A, Junger H, Laszik ZG. The impact of belatacept on the phenotypic heterogeneity of renal T cell-mediated alloimmune response: The critical role of maintenance treatment and inflammatory load. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14084. [PMID: 32939817 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Belatacept offers superior long-term outcome relative to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. However, the higher frequency of early T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in belatacept-treated patients hampered the widespread adoption of costimulation blockade. Here, we applied gene expression analysis and whole-slide inflammatory cell quantification to assess the impact of belatacept on intragraft immune signature. We studied formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal biopsies from 92 patients stratified by histopathologic diagnosis (TCMR, borderline changes, or normal) and immunosuppression regimen (belatacept, CNI). An interaction model was built to explore maintenance treatment-dependent expression level changes of immune response-related genes across diagnostic categories of normal, borderline changes, and TCMR. Ninety-one percent of genes overexpressed in TCMR showed significant correlation with whole section inflammatory load. There were 27 genes that had a positive association with belatacept treatment. These were mostly related to myeloid cells and innate immunity. Genes negatively associated with costimulation blockade (n = 14) could be linked to B-cell differentiation and proliferation. We concluded that expression levels of genes characteristic of TCMR are strongly interconnected with quantitative changes of the biopsy inflammatory load. Our results might suggest differential involvement of the innate immune system, and an altered B-cell engagement during TCMR in belatacept-treated patients relative to CNI-treated referents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejan Dobi
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Flavio Vincenti
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sindhu Chandran
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John R Greenland
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Bowman
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adeline Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Henrik Junger
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zoltan G Laszik
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mengel M, Loupy A, Haas M, Roufosse C, Naesens M, Akalin E, Clahsen‐van Groningen MC, Dagobert J, Demetris AJ, Duong van Huyen J, Gueguen J, Issa F, Robin B, Rosales I, Von der Thüsen JH, Sanchez‐Fueyo A, Smith RN, Wood K, Adam B, Colvin RB. Banff 2019 Meeting Report: Molecular diagnostics in solid organ transplantation-Consensus for the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) gene panel and open source multicenter validation. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2305-2317. [PMID: 32428337 PMCID: PMC7496585 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This meeting report from the XV Banff conference describes the creation of a multiorgan transplant gene panel by the Banff Molecular Diagnostics Working Group (MDWG). This Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel is the culmination of previous work by the MDWG to identify a broadly useful gene panel based on whole transcriptome technology. A data-driven process distilled a gene list from peer-reviewed comprehensive microarray studies that discovered and validated their use in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant biopsies. These were supplemented by genes that define relevant cellular pathways and cell types plus 12 reference genes used for normalization. The 770 gene B-HOT panel includes the most pertinent genes related to rejection, tolerance, viral infections, and innate and adaptive immune responses. This commercially available panel uses the NanoString platform, which can quantitate transcripts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The B-HOT panel will facilitate multicenter collaborative clinical research using archival samples and permit the development of an open source large database of standardized analyses, thereby expediting clinical validation studies. The MDWG believes that a pathogenesis and pathway based molecular approach will be valuable for investigators and promote therapeutic decision-making and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity of ParisParisFrance
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and InflammationImperial College London and North West London PathologyLondonUK
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and TransplantationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium,Department of NephrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Enver Akalin
- Montefiore‐Einstein Center for TransplantationMontefiore Medical CenterBronxNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Jessy Dagobert
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity of ParisParisFrance
| | - Anthony J. Demetris
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterMontefiore, PittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jean‐Paul Duong van Huyen
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity of ParisParisFrance
| | - Juliette Gueguen
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity of ParisParisFrance
| | - Fadi Issa
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Blaise Robin
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity of ParisParisFrance
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Rex N. Smith
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kathryn Wood
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Benjamin Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| | - Robert B. Colvin
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roufosse C, Drachenberg C, Renaudin K, Willicombe M, Toulza F, Dominy K, McLean A, Simmonds N, de Kort H, Cantarovitch D, Scalea J, Mengel M, Adam B. Molecular assessment of antibody-mediated rejection in human pancreas allograft biopsies. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14065. [PMID: 32805760 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Pancreas transplant longevity is limited by immune rejection, which is diagnosed by graft biopsy using the Banff Classification. The histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are poorly reproducible and inconsistently associated with outcome. We hypothesized that a 34-gene set associated with antibody-mediated rejection in other solid organ transplants could improve diagnosis in pancreas grafts. The AMR 34-gene set, comprising endothelial, natural killer cell and inflammatory genes, was quantified using the NanoString platform in 52 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pancreas transplant biopsies from 41 patients: 15 with pure AMR or mixed rejection, 22 with T cell-mediated rejection/borderline and 15 without rejection. The AMR 34-gene set was significantly increased in pure AMR and mixed rejection (P = .001) vs no rejection. The gene set predicted histological AMR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.714 (P = .004). The AMR 34-gene set was the only biopsy feature significantly predictive of allograft failure in univariate analysis (P = .048). Adding gene expression to DSA and histology increased ROC AUC for the prediction of failure from 0.736 to 0.770, but this difference did not meet statistical significance. In conclusion, assessment of transcripts has the potential to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in pancreas graft biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Cinthia Drachenberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Frederic Toulza
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Dept Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Kathy Dominy
- Molecular Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Adam McLean
- Imperial Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| | - Naomi Simmonds
- Dept Cellular Pathology, Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Diego Cantarovitch
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Joseph Scalea
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Benjamin Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.
Collapse
|
13
|
Multi-gene technical assessment of qPCR and NanoString n-Counter analysis platforms in cynomolgus monkey cardiac allograft recipients. Cell Immunol 2019; 347:104019. [PMID: 31744596 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2019.104019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative gene expression profiling of cardiac allografts characterizes the phenotype of the alloimmune response, yields information regarding differential effects that may be associated with various anti-rejection drug regimens, and generates testable hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of the chronic rejection lesions typically observed in non-human primate heart transplant models. The goal of this study was to assess interplatform performance and variability between the relatively novel NanoString nCounter Analysis System, ΔΔCT (relative) RT-qPCR, and standard curve (absolute) RT-qPCR utilizing cynomolgus monkey cardiac allografts. Methods for RNA isolation and preamplification were also systematically evaluated and effective methods are proposed. In this study, we demonstrate strong correlation between the two RT-qPCR methods, but variable and, at times, weak correlation between RT-qPCR and NanoString. NanoString fold change results demonstrate less sensitivity to small changes in gene expression than RT-qPCR. These findings appear to be driven by technical aspects of each platform that influence the conditions under which each technique is ideal. Collectively, our data contribute to the general effort to optimally utilize gene expression profiling techniques, not only for transplanted tissues, but for many other applications where accurate rank-order of gene expression versus precise quantification of absolute gene transcript number may be relatively valuable.
Collapse
|