Staged Biliary Reconstruction After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Practical Surgical Strategy for High-Acuity Adult Recipients

The outcomes and biliary complications of a staged biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled massive bleeding and bowel edema are critical issues during liver transplantation. Temporal intra-abdominal packing with staged biliary reconstruction (SBR) yields acceptable outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, data on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1269 patients who underwent LDLT was performed. After one-to-two propensity score matching, patients who underwent LDLT with SBR were compared with those who underwent LDLT with one-stage biliary reconstruction (OSBR). The primary outcomes were graft survival (GS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were postoperative biliary complications.

RESULTS

There were 55 and 110 patients in the SBR and OSBR groups, respectively. The median blood loss was 6500 mL in the SBR and 4875 mL in the OSBR group. Patients receiving SBR-LDLT had higher incidence of sepsis (69.0% vs. 43.6%; P < 0.01) and intra-abdominal infections (60.0% vs. 30.9%; P < 0.01). Biliary complication rates (14.5% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.47) and 1-and 5-year GS (87.27%, 74.60% vs. 83.64%, 72.71%; P = 0.98) and OS (89.09%, 78.44% vs. 84.55%, 73.70%; P = 0.752) rates were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SBR could serve as a life-saving procedure for patients undergoing complex critical LDLT, with GS, OS, and biliary outcomes comparable to those of OSBR.

Transcriptional Profiling Underscores the Role of Preprocurement Allograft Metabolism and Innate Immune Status on Outcomes in Human Liver Transplantation

Objective

The adverse effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remain a principal barrier to a successful outcome after lifesaving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Gene expression during different phases of IRI is dynamic and modified by individual exposures, making it attractive for identifying potential therapeutic targets for improving the number of suitable organs for transplantation and patient outcomes. However, data remain limited on the functional landscape of gene expression during liver graft IRI, spanning procurement to reperfusion and recovery. Therefore, we sought to characterize transcriptomic profiles of IRI during multiple phases in human OLT.

Methods

We conducted clinical data analyses, histologic evaluation, and RNA sequencing of 17 consecutive human primary OLT. We performed liver allograft biopsies at 4 time points: baseline (B, before donor cross-clamp), at the end of cold ischemia (CI), during early reperfusion (ER, after revascularization), and during late reperfusion (LR). Data were generated and then recipients grouped by post-OLT outcomes categories: immediate allograft function (IAF; n = 11) versus early allograft dysfunction (EAD; n = 6) groups.

Results

We observed that CI (vs B) modified a transcriptomic landscape enriched for a metabolic and immune process. Expression levels of hallmark inflammatory response genes were higher transitioning from CI to ER and decreased from ER to LR. IAF group predominantly showed higher bile and fatty acid metabolism activity during LR compared with EAD group, while EAD group maintained more immunomodulatory activities. Throughout all time points, EAD specimens exhibited decreased metabolic activity in both bile and fatty acid pathways.

Conclusions

We report transcriptomic profiles of human liver allograft IRI from prepreservation in the donor to posttransplantation in the recipient. Immunomodulatory and metabolic landscapes across ER and LR phases were different between IAF and EAD allografts. Our study also highlights marker genes for these biological processes that we plan to explore as novel therapeutic targets or surrogate markers for severe allograft injury in clinical OLT.

A single center analysis of long-term outcomes and survival related risk factors in liver retransplantation

Background

Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors.

Methods

This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated.

Results

Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 vs. 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 vs. 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 vs. 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% vs. 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early vs. late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival.

Conclusions

Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.

Long-term follow-up of temporary abdominal closure in complex abdomens during liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Temporary abdominal closure is commonly employed in liver transplantation when patient factors make primary fascial closure challenging. However, there is minimal data evaluating long-term survival and patient outcomes after temporary abdominal closure.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing liver transplantation from January 2013 through December 2017 was performed with a 5-year follow-up. Patients were characterized as either requiring temporary abdominal closure or immediate primary fascial closure at the time of liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Of 422 patients who underwent 436 liver transplantations, 17.2% (n = 75) required temporary abdominal closure, whereas 82.8% (n = 361) underwent primary fascial closure. Patients requiring temporary abdominal closure had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores preoperatively (27 [22-36] vs 23 [20-28], P = .0002), had higher rates of dialysis preoperatively (28.0% vs 12.5%, P = .0007), and were more likely to be hospitalized within 90 days of liver transplantation (64.0% vs 47.5%, P = .0093). On univariable analysis, survival at 1 year was different between the groups (90.9% surviving at 1 year for primary fascial closure versus 82.7% for temporary abdominal closure, P = .0356); however, there was no significant difference in survival at 5 years (83.7% vs 76.0%, P = .11). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in survival after adjusting for multiple factors. Patients requiring temporary abdominal closure were more likely to have longer hospital stays (median 16 days [9.75-29.5] vs 8 days [6-14], P < .0001), more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (45.3% vs 32.2%, P = .03), and less likely to be discharged home (36.5% vs 74.2%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary abdominal closure after liver transplantation appears safe and has similar outcomes to primary fascial closure, though it is used more commonly in complex patients.

Comprehensive quality initiative leads to immediate postoperative extubation following liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Immediate postoperative extubation (IPE) can reduce perioperative complications and length of stay (LOS), however it is performed variably after liver transplant across institutions and has historically excluded high-risk recipients from consideration. In late 2012, we planned and implemented a single academic institution structured quality improvement (QI) initiative to standardize perioperative care of liver transplant recipients without exceptions. We hypothesized that such an approach would lead to a sustained increase in IPE after primary (PAC) and delayed abdominal closure (DAC).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 591 patients from 2013 to 2018 who underwent liver transplant after initiative implementation. We evaluated trends in incidence of IPE versus delayed extubation (DE), and reintubation, LOS, and mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 476/591 (80.5%) recipients underwent PAC (278 IPE, 198 DE) and 115/591 (19.5%) experienced DAC (39 IPE, 76 DE). When comparing data from 2013 to data from 2018, the incidence of IPE increased from 9/67 (13.4%) to 78/90 (86.7%) after PAC and from 1/12 (8.3%) to 16/23 (69.6%) after DAC. For the same years, the incidence of IPE after PAC for recipients with MELD scores ≥30 increased from 0/19 (0%) to 12/17 (70.6%), for recipients who underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplant increased from 1/8 (12.5%) to 4/5 (80.0%), and for recipients who received massive transfusion (>10 units of packed red blood cells) increased from 0/17 (0%) to 10/13 (76.9%). Reintubation for respiratory considerations <48 h after IPE occurred in 3/278 (1.1%) after PAC and 1/39 (2.6%) after DAC. IPE was associated with decreased intensive care unit (HR of discharge: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.58, 2.33; P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (HR of discharge: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.76; P < 0.001) but demonstrated no association with mortality.

CONCLUSION

A structured QI initiative led to sustained high rates of IPE and reduced LOS in all liver transplant recipients, including those classified as high risk.

Liver Transplantation for Fulminant Hepatic Failure Precipitated by Pheochromocytoma Crisis in the Setting of Using Garcinia cambogia Weight Loss Supplement: A Case Report

We report the first case of liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure precipitated by hepatocellular injury due to the synergistic effect of pheochromocytoma crisis and simultaneous use of Garcinia cambogia. Complex diagnosis and treatment decisions are discussed, as well as possible pathophysiology that led to liver failure.

Risk Factors Related to Early Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation: a Single-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors of early biliary complications (EBC) after liver transplantation (LT) and seek effective treatments based on our single-center experience.

METHODS

A total of 124 adult patients were divided into a non-EBC group and EBC group. EBC usually accounts for biliary leakage, biliary stricture, biliary stones, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and transient jaundice within 3 months after LT. Statistical analysis including logistic regression was performed to determine EBC risk factors. All procedures complied with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.

RESULTS

Non-EBC (n = 95) and EBC (n = 29) were finally compared, which had no difference in their general characteristics. EBC occurred in 29 patients (26.92%): 1 biliary hemorrhage (3.45%), 7 biliary leakage (24.13%), and 16 biliary stricture (55.18%), and 5 others (17.24%). Of all EBC patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (68.96%) was higher used to deal with complications than conservative treatment (10.35%), percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (17.24%), and surgical treatment (3.45%). On univariate analyses, risk factors for EBC were bilirubin (P = .014), warm ischemia time (WIT) (P = .020), second WIT (P = .042), and operative time (OT) (P = .033). On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for BC were WIT (P = .011) and OT (P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of WIT and OT were the independent risk factors for the development of EBC. In addition, we also confirmed that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was beneficial and safe in the management of EBC after LT.

Post-Covid-19 Cholangiopathy-A New Indication for Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Liver injury is one of the nonpulmonary manifestations described in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Post–COVID-19 cholangiopathy is a special entity of liver injury that has been suggested as a variant of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP). In the general population, the outcome of SSC-CIP has been reported to be poor without orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the role of OLT for post–COVID-19 cholangiopathy is unknown. We present a case report of a 47-year-old man who recovered from acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19 and subsequently developed end-stage liver disease from post–COVID-19 cholangiopathy. The patient underwent OLT and is doing well with normal liver tests for 7 months. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient who underwent successful liver transplantation for post–COVID-19 cholangiopathy.