Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients Using Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Urine Samples: A Multicenter Diagnostic Phase III Trial

Peptides as "better biomarkers"? Value, challenges, and potential solutions to facilitate implementation

Peptides carry important functions in normal physiological and pathophysiological processes and can serve as clinically useful biomarkers. Given the ability to diffuse passively across endothelial barriers, endogenous peptides can be examined in several body fluids, including among others urine, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. This review article provides an update on the recently published literature that reports on investigating native peptides in body fluids using mass spectrometry-based platforms, specifically those studies that focus on the application of peptides as biomarkers to improve clinical management. We emphasize on the critical evaluation of their clinical value, how close they are to implementation, and the associated challenges and potential solutions to facilitate clinical implementation. During the last 5 years, numerous studies have been published, demonstrating the increased interest in mass spectrometry for the assessment of endogenous peptides as potential biomarkers. Importantly, the presence of few successful examples of implementation in patients' management and/or in the context of clinical trials indicates that the peptide biomarker field is evolving. Nevertheless, most studies still report evidence based on small sample size, while validation phases are frequently missing. Therefore, a gap between discovery and implementation still exists.

Advancing kidney transplant outcomes: the role of urinary proteomics in graft function monitoring and rejection detection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation significantly improves the lives of those with end-stage kidney disease, offering best alternative to dialysis. However, transplant success is threatened by the acute and chronic rejection mechanisms due to complex immune responses against the new organ.

AREAS COVERED

The ongoing research into biomarkers holds promise for revolutionizing the early detection and monitoring of the graft health. Liquid biopsy techniques offer a new avenue, with several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers showing promise in detecting and monitoring kidney diseases and an early and chronic allograft rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Evaluating the protein composition related to kidney transplant results could lead to identifying biomarkers that provide insights into the graft functionality. Non-invasive proteomic biomarkers can drastically enhance clinical outcomes and change the way how kidney transplants are evaluated for patients and physicians if they succeed in this transition. Hence, the advancement in proteomic technologies, leads toward a significant improvement in understanding of the protein markers and molecular mechanisms linked to the outcomes of kidney transplants. However, the road from discovery to the use of such proteins in clinical practice is long, with a need for continuous validation and beyond the singular research team with comprehensive infrastructure and across research groups collaboration.

Screening of novel biomarkers for acute kidney transplant rejection using DIA-MS based proteomics

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, acute rejection poses a threat to the graft long-term survival. The aim of this study was to identify novel biomarkers to detect acute kidney transplant rejection.

METHODS

The serum proteomic profiling of kidney transplant patients with T cell-mediated acute rejection (TCMR) and stable allograft function (STA) was analyzed using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS). The differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of interest were further verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

A total of 131 DEPs were identified between STA and TCMR patients, 114 DEPs were identified between mild and severe TCMR patients. The verification results showed that remarkable higher concentrations of serum amyloid A protein 1 (SAA1) and insulin like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), and lower fetuin-A (AHSG) concentration were found in TCMR patients when compared with STA patients. We also found higher SAA1 concentration in severe TCMR group when compared with mild TCMR group. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis further confirmed that combination of SAA1, AHSG, and IGFBP2 had excellent performance in the acute rejection diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated that serum SAA1, AHSG, and IGFBP2 could be effective biomarkers for diagnosing acute rejection after kidney transplantation. DIA-MS has great potential in biomarker screening of kidney transplantation.

Predicting Cellular Rejection of Renal Allograft Based on the Serum Proteomic Fingerprint

Kidney transplantation is an essential medical procedure that significantly enhances the survival rates and quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies, allograft rejection remains a leading cause of organ loss. Notably, predictions of cellular rejection processes primarily rely on biopsy analysis, which is not routinely performed due to its invasive nature. The present work evaluates if the serum proteomic fingerprint, as acquired by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, can predict cellular rejection processes. We analyzed 28 serum samples, corresponding to 17 without cellular rejection processes and 11 associated with cellular rejection processes, as based on biopsy analyses. The leave-one-out-cross validation procedure of a Naïve Bayes model enabled the prediction of cellular rejection processes with high sensitivity and specificity (AUC > 0.984). The serum proteomic profile was obtained in a high-throughput mode and based on a simple, rapid, and economical procedure, making it suitable for routine analyses and large-scale studies. Consequently, the current method presents a high potential to predict cellular rejection processes translatable to clinical scenarios, and that should continue to be explored.

Contribution of Proteomics in Transplantation: Identification of Injury and Rejection Markers

Solid organ transplantation saves thousands of lives suffering from end-stage diseases. Although early transplants experienced acute organ injury, medical breakthroughs, such as tissue typing, and use of immunosuppressive agents have considerably improved graft survival. However, the overall incidence of allograft injury and chronic rejection remains high. Often the clinical manifestations of organ injury or rejection are nonspecific and late. Current requirement for successful organ transplantation is the identification of reliable, accurate, disease-specific, noninvasive methods for the early diagnosis of graft injury or rejection. Development of noninvasive techniques is important to allow routine follow-ups without the discomfort and risks associated with a graft biopsy. Multiple biofluids have been successfully tested for the presence of potential proteomic biomarkers; these include serum, plasma, urine, and whole blood. Kidney transplant research has provided significant evidence to the potential of proteomics-based biomarkers for acute and chronic kidney rejection, delayed graft function, early detection of declining allograft health. Multiple proteins have been implicated as biomarkers; however, recent observations implicate the use of similar canonical pathways and biofunctions associated with graft injury/rejection with altered proteins as potential biomarkers. Unfortunately, the current biomarker studies lack high sensitivity and specificity, adding to the complexity of their utility in the clinical space. In this review, we first describe the high-throughput proteomics technologies and then discuss the outcomes of proteomics profiling studies in the transplantation of several organs. Existing literature provides hope that novel biomarkers will emerge from ongoing efforts and guide physicians in delivering specific therapies to prolong graft survival.

Proteomics: Its Promise and Pitfalls in Shaping Precision Medicine in Solid Organ Transplantation

Solid organ transplantation is an established treatment of choice for end-stage organ failure. However, all transplant patients are at risk of developing complications, including allograft rejection and death. Histological analysis of graft biopsy is still the gold standard for evaluation of allograft injury, but it is an invasive procedure and prone to sampling errors. The past decade has seen an increased number of efforts to develop minimally invasive procedures for monitoring allograft injury. Despite the recent progress, limitations such as the complexity of proteomics-based technology, the lack of standardization, and the heterogeneity of populations that have been included in different studies have hindered proteomic tools from reaching clinical transplantation. This review focuses on the role of proteomics-based platforms in biomarker discovery and validation in solid organ transplantation. We also emphasize the value of biomarkers that provide potential mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of allograft injury, dysfunction, or rejection. Additionally, we forecast that the growth of publicly available data sets, combined with computational methods that effectively integrate them, will facilitate a generation of more informed hypotheses for potential subsequent evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. Finally, we illustrate the value of combining data sets through the integration of 2 independent data sets that pinpointed hub proteins in antibody-mediated rejection.

Biomarker-Development Proteomics in Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Review

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage renal disease. The key to post-transplantation management is careful surveillance of allograft function. Kidney injury may occur from several different causes that require different patient management approaches. However, routine clinical monitoring has several limitations and detects alterations only at a later stage of graft damage. Accurate new noninvasive biomarker molecules are clearly needed for continuous monitoring after KT in the hope that early diagnosis of allograft dysfunction will lead to an improvement in the clinical outcome. The advent of “omics sciences”, and in particular of proteomic technologies, has revolutionized medical research. Proteomic technologies allow us to achieve the identification, quantification, and functional characterization of proteins/peptides in biological samples such as urine or blood through supervised or targeted analysis. Many studies have investigated proteomic techniques as potential molecular markers discriminating among or predicting allograft outcomes. Proteomic studies in KT have explored the whole transplant process: donor, organ procurement, preservation, and posttransplant surgery. The current article reviews the most recent findings on proteomic studies in the setting of renal transplantation in order to better understand the effective potential of this new diagnostic approach.

Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Kidney Transplantation Rejection

Renal transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney disease, enabling a quality of life superior to dialysis. Despite this, all transplanted patients are at risk of allograft rejection processes. The gold-standard diagnosis of graft rejection, based on histological analysis of kidney biopsy, is prone to sampling errors and carries high costs and risks associated with such invasive procedures. Furthermore, the routine clinical monitoring, based on urine volume, proteinuria, and serum creatinine, usually only detects alterations after graft histologic damage and does not differentiate between the diverse etiologies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new biomarkers enabling to predict, with high sensitivity and specificity, the rejection processes and the underlying mechanisms obtained from minimally invasive procedures to be implemented in routine clinical surveillance. These new biomarkers should also detect the rejection processes as early as possible, ideally before the 78 clinical outputs, while enabling balanced immunotherapy in order to minimize rejections and reducing the high toxicities associated with these drugs. Proteomics of biofluids, collected through non-invasive or minimally invasive analysis, e.g., blood or urine, present inherent characteristics that may provide biomarker candidates. The current manuscript reviews biofluids proteomics toward biomarkers discovery that specifically identify subclinical, acute, and chronic immune rejection processes while allowing for the discrimination between cell-mediated or antibody-mediated processes. In time, these biomarkers will lead to patient risk stratification, monitoring, and personalized and more efficient immunotherapies toward higher graft survival and patient quality of life.