Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations of Nimodipine Correlate With Long-term Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pilot Study

Risks of nimodipine dose reduction during the high-risk period for delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Nimodipine dose reduction is recommended in case of high vasopressor demand after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The aim of this study was to assess potential adverse effects of nimodipine reduction during the high-risk period for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and cerebral vasospasm (CVS) between days 5 and 10 after hemorrhage. Demographic and clinical data as well as daily nimodipine dose of aSAH patients admitted between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with DCI, angiographic CVS, DCI-related infarction, and unfavorable outcome. A total of 205 patients were included. Nimodipine dose reduction occurred in 108 (53%) patients ('nimodipine reduction group'), while 97 patients (47%) received the full dose ('no nimodipine reduction group'), Patients in the 'nimodipine reduction group' had significant worse WFNS and Fisher grades and developed significantly more often DCI and angiographic CVS. DCI-related infarction and unfavorable outcome were also significantly increased in the 'nimodipine reduction group.' 'Reduced nimodipine dose' was the only independent predictor for the occurrence of DCI and angiographic CVS in multivariable regression analysis. 'Poor WFNS grade' and 'reduced nimodipine dose' were identified as independent risk factors for DCI-related infarction while 'older age,' 'poor WFNS grade,' and 'reduced nimodipine dose' were associated with unfavorable outcome at 3 months after discharge. Nimodipine dose reduction during the high-risk period of DCI and CVS between days 5 and 10 after hemorrhage might abrogate the positive prognostic effects of nimodipine and should be critically evaluated.

Nimodipine systemic exposure and outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot prospective observational study (ASH-1 study)

Background

Nimodipine improves outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Guidelines recommend that all patients should receive a fixed-dose nimodipine for 21 days. However, studies reported variability of nimodipine concentrations in aSAH. It is not clear if reduced systemic exposure contributes to worsening outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare nimodipine systemic exposure in those who experienced poor outcomes to those who experienced favorable outcomes.

Methods

This was a pilot prospective observational study in 30 adult patients admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital with aSAH. Data were collected from the electronic health records following enrollment. Blood samples were collected around one nimodipine 60 mg dose at a steady state, and nimodipine [total, (+)-R and (-)-S enantiomers] plasma concentrations were determined. The poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days of 3-6, while the favorable outcome was an mRS score of 0-2. The correlation between nimodipine concentrations and percent changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) before and after nimodipine administration was also determined. Furthermore, covariates potentially associated with nimodipine exposure were explored.

Results

In total, 20 (69%) participants had favorable outcomes and 9 (31%) had poor outcomes. Following the exclusion of those with delayed presentation (>96 h from aSAH onset), among those presented with the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade 3-5, nimodipine median (interquartile range) area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-3h) in those with favorable outcomes were 4-fold higher than in those with poor outcomes [136 (52-192) vs. 33 (23-39) ng.h/mL, respectively, value of p = 0.2]. On the other hand, among those presented with WFNS grade 1-2, nimodipine AUC0-3h in those with favorable outcomes were significantly lower than in those with poor outcomes [30 (28-36) vs. 172 (117-308) ng.h/mL, respectively, value of p = 0.03)]. (+)-R-nimodipine AUC0-3h in those who did not develop vasospasm were 4-fold significantly higher than those who had vasospasm (value of p = 0.047). (-)-S-nimodipine was significantly correlated with percentage MAP reduction. Similar results were obtained when the whole cohort was analyzed.

Conclusion

The study was the first to investigate the potential association between nimodipine exposure following oral dosing and outcomes. In addition, it suggests differential effects of nimodipine enantiomers, shedding light on the potential utility of nimodipine enantiomers. Larger studies are needed.

Ultrasound-Induced Release of Nimodipine from Drug-Loaded Block Copolymer Micelles: In Vivo Analysis

Nimodipine prevents cerebral vasospasm and improves functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The beneficial effect is limited by low oral bioavailability of nimodipine, which resulted in an increasing use of nanocarriers with sustained intrathecal drug release in order to overcome this limitation. However, this approach facilitates only a continuous and not an on-demand nimodipine release during the peak time of vasospasm development. In this study, we aimed to assess the concept of controlled drug release from nimodipine-loaded copolymers by ultrasound application in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model. Nimodipine-loaded copolymers were produced with the direct dissolution method. Vasospasm of the CAM vessels was induced by means of ultrasound (Physiomed, continuous wave, 3 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2). The ultrasound-mediated nimodipine release (Physiomed, continuous wave, 1 MHz, 1.7 W/cm2) and its effect on the CAM vessels were evaluated. Measurements of vessel diameter before and after ultrasound-induced nimodipine release were performed using ImageJ. The CAM model could be successfully carried out in all 25 eggs. After vasospasm induction and before drug release, the mean vessel diameter was at 57% (range 44-61%) compared to the baseline diameter (set at 100%). After ultrasound-induced drug release, the mean vessel diameter of spastic vessels increased again to 89% (range 83-91%) of their baseline diameter, which was significant (p = 0.0002). We were able to provide a proof of concept for in vivo vasospasm induction by ultrasound application in the CAM model and subsequent resolution by ultrasound-mediated nimodipine release from nanocarriers. This concept merits further evaluation in a rat SAH model.

Nimodipine Pharmacokinetic Variability in Various Patient Populations

Nimodipine has been shown to improve outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Guidelines recommend that all patients receive a fixed dose of oral nimodipine for 21 days. However, pharmacokinetic studies have suggested variability of nimodipine pharmacokinetics in subarachnoid hemorrhage and in other patient populations. The clinical relevance of such variability is unknown. Therefore, the objective of the present review is, first, to conduct a literature review and summarize nimodipine pharmacokinetic data and sources of variability in various patient groups. Second, to determine if there is any evidence reporting an association between nimodipine exposure and clinical outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE. The following keywords were used: ("nimodipine" OR "nymalize" OR "nimotop") AND ("pharmacokinetic*", OR "PK"). The search results were limited to English language and human studies. A large interpatient variability in nimodipine pharmacokinetics has been reported. Patient-specific factors that had an influence on pharmacokinetic parameters are age, comorbidities, variabilities in metabolism due to genetic polymorphism and co-administered medications, as well as nimodipine administration technique. The association between nimodipine exposure and clinical outcomes remains unclear and data available are too scarce to reach a firm conclusion. Here, we present a narrative review with a systematic literature search discussing nimodipine pharmacokinetic variability in various patient populations. It is not clear if minimal or lack of systemic exposure to nimodipine denies its benefit and contributes to worsening outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Further studies are needed to determine if such an association exists.

Precision Medicine in Acute Brain Injury: A Narrative Review

Over the past few years, the concept of personalized medicine has percolated into the management of different neurological conditions. Improving outcomes after acute brain injury (ABI) continues to be a major challenge. Unrecognized individual multiomic variations in addition to multiple interacting processes may explain why we fail to observe comprehensive improvements in ABI outcomes even when applied treatments appear to be beneficial logically. The provision of clinical care based on a multiomic approach may revolutionize the management of traumatic brain injury, delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and several other neurological diseases. The challenge is to incorporate all the information obtained from genomic studies, other omic data, and individual variability into a practical tool that can be used to assist clinical decision-making. The effective execution of such strategies, which is still far away, requires the development of protocols on the basis of these complex interactions and strict adherence to management protocols. In this review, we will discuss various omics and physiological targets to guide individualized patient management after ABI.

Strategies for Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis and the Role of Calcium

Calcium ions are vital for maintaining the physiological and biochemical processes inside cells. The central nervous system (CNS) is particularly dependent on calcium homeostasis and its dysregulation has been associated with several neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Huntington’s disease (HD), as well as with multiple sclerosis (MS). Hence, the modulation of calcium influx into the cells and the targeting of calcium-mediated signaling pathways may present a promising therapeutic approach for these diseases. This review provides an overview on calcium channels in neurons and glial cells. Special emphasis is put on MS, a chronic autoimmune disease of the CNS. While the initial relapsing-remitting stage of MS can be treated effectively with immune modulatory and immunosuppressive drugs, the subsequent progressive stage has remained largely untreatable. Here we summarize several approaches that have been and are currently being tested for their neuroprotective capacities in MS and we discuss which role calcium could play in this regard.