The Efficacy and Safety of Piribedil Relative to Pramipexole for the Treatment of Early Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparison of the effectiveness, safety, and costs of anti-Parkinson drugs: A multiple-center retrospective study

AIMS

This study aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness, safety, and costs of different anti-Parkinson drugs (APDs).

METHODS

This is a multi-center study that retrospectively analyzed the data of 8420 outpatients with PD from 2014 to 2019 across 30 tertiary hospitals in China. The effectiveness was evaluated by changes in total dosages of APDs, normalized by levodopa equivalent dose (LED) and presented as ΔLEDs; levodopa equivalent dose cost (LEDc) represented the daily cost of APDs; and newly added diagnostics were represented as APDs-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients with eligible medical records for three consecutive years were enrolled. Patients treated with carbidopa/levodopa or levodopa/benserazide had significantly lower mean ΔLEDs than other groups (p < 0.01), followed by pramipexole and selegiline. The piribedil group had the highest ΔLEDs, with mean differences of 112.56-355.04 mg compared to other groups (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, LEDc in the levodopa/benserazide, carbidopa/levodopa, and piribedil groups were significantly lower than those in pramipexole or selegiline groups ($0.088-0.135/day for levodopa/benserazide; $0.070-0.126/day for carbidopa/levodopa; $0.112-0.138/day for piribedil; $0.290-0.332/day for pramipexole; $0.229-0.544/day for selegiline; p < 0.01). Patients with piribedil had more adverse events, with an incidence rate of 35.7%, followed by levodopa/benserazide (25.6%), selegiline (23.5%), carbidopa/levodopa (23.3%), and pramipexole (16.4%). Pramipexole showed a lower incidence rate of adverse events than piribedil, including neuropsychiatric symptoms (p = 0.006), headache/dizziness (p = 0.016), and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Carbidopa/levodopa or levodopa/benserazide might exhibit better clinical improvement with less medical cost, while piribedil presented less clinical improvement but a higher risk of headache/dizziness, gastrointestinal, and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Rasagiline or Pramipexole in the Treatment of Early Parkinson's Disease

Background

Rasagiline or pramipexole monotherapy has been suggested for the management of early Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this research was to systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of rasagiline or pramipexole in early PD (defined as disease duration ≤5 years and Hoehn and Yahr stage of ≤3).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rasagiline or pramipexole for early PD published up to September 2021 were retrieved. Outcomes of interest included changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II and III and the incidence of adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated, and heterogeneity was measured with the I2 test.

Results

Nine rasagiline and eleven pramipexole RCTs were included. One post hoc analysis of one rasagiline study was included. Five studies for each drug were included in meta-analyses of the UPDRS scores. The rasagiline meta-analysis focused on patients receiving 1 mg/day. Rasagiline and pramipexole significantly improved UPDRS Part II and III scores when compared to placebo. Significant heterogeneity among the studies was present (I2 > 70%). Neither rasagiline nor pramipexole increased the relative risk for any adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to withdrawal when compared with placebo.

Conclusion

Applying a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to summarize the evidence, we found moderate confidence in the body of evidence for the efficacy of rasagiline or pramipexole in early PD, suggesting further well-designed, multicenter comparative RCTs remain needed.

Comparative efficacy and safety of six non-ergot dopamine-receptor agonists in early Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Non-ergot dopamine agonists (NEDAs) have been used as monotherapy or as an adjunctive therapy to levodopa for many years. Novel long-acting formulations of NEDAs including pramipexole extended-release (ER), ropinirole prolonged-release (PR), and rotigotine transdermal patch have been developed. However, there is no strong evidence that a given NEDA is more potent than another. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of six commonly used NEDAs in early Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods

Six NEDAs including piribedil, rotigotine transdermal patch, pramipexole immediate-release (IR)/ER, and ropinirole IR/PR were investigated. The efficacy outcomes including Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities in daily life (UPDRS-II), motor function (UPDRS-III), and their subtotal (UPDRS-II + III), tolerability and safety outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 20 RCTs (5,355 patients) were included in the current study. The result indicated that compared with placebo, all six investigated drugs had statistically significant differences in the improvement of UPDRS-II, UPDRS-III, and UPDRS-II + III (except ropinirole PR in UPDRS-II). There were no statistically significant differences between six NEDAs for the UPDRS-II and UPDRS-III. For UPDRS-II + III, the improvement of ropinirole IR/PR and piribedil were higher than that of rotigotine transdermal patch, and piribedil was higher than that of pramipexole IR. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that piribedil resulted in best improvement in UPDRS-II and UPDRS-III (0.717 and 0.861, respectively). For UPDRS-II + III, piribedil and ropinirole PR exhibited similar improvement and both had high rates (0.858 and 0.878, respectively). Furthermore, piribedil performed better as monotherapy, ranking first in the improvement of UPDRS-II, III, and II + III (0.922, 0.960, and 0.941, separately). With regard to tolerability, there was a significant increase in overall withdrawals with pramipexole ER (0.937). In addition, the incidence of adverse reaction of ropinirole IR was relatively high (nausea: 0.678; somnolence: 0.752; dizziness: 0.758; fatigue: 0.890).

Conclusions

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of six NEDAs, piribedil exhibited better efficacy, especially as monotherapy, and ropinirole IR was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events in patients with early PD.

[Postural stability and walking in Parkinson's disease]

The article is of an overview nature and is devoted to movement disorders in Parkinson's disease. The article discusses the existing problems according to the latest literature data, a review on the treatment and rehabilitation of postural instability. Special attention in the article is paid to dopamine receptor agonists - namely, piribedil, prescribed for the correction of these disorders.

Terazosin Analogs Targeting Pgk1 as Neuroprotective Agents: Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation

Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds have shown promising therapeutic effects in a variety of inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. Recently, terazosin (TZ), a heterocyclic compound with a quinazoline core, was found to combine with phosphoglycerol kinase 1 (Pgk1) and protect neurons by enhancing Pgk1 activity and promoting glycolysis, thereby slowing, or preventing the neurodegeneration of PD. These findings indicated that terazosin analogs have bright prospects for the development of PD therapeutics. In this study, a series of terazosin analogs were designed and synthesized for neuroprotective effects by targeting Pgk1. Among them, compound 12b was obtained with the best Pgk1 agonistic activity and neuroprotective activity. Further study indicates that it can increase intracellular ATP content and reduce ROS levels by stimulating the activity of Pgk1, thereby playing a role in protecting nerve cells. In conclusion, this study provides a new strategy and reference for the development of neuroprotective drugs.

The role of pramipexole in the treatment of patients with depression and Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this report was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pramipexole therapy for patients with depression and Parkinson's disease (dPD), in order to confer a reference for clinical practice.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pramipexole for dPD published up to June 2020 were retrieved. Standardised mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR), and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The outcomes included efficacy, Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) score, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores, self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score or adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs with 1789 participants were included. Clinical efficacy in pramipexole treatment group was significantly better than control group (RR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.20-1.33, P < 0.00001). Compared with control group, the pooled effects of pramipexole therapy on depression were (SMD -1.90, 95 % CI -2.58 to -1.23, P < 0.00001) for HAMD score, (SMD -3.94, 95 % CI -4.73 to -3.15, P < 0.00001) for SDS score, pramipexole therapy also decreased SAS score markedly (P < 0.0001). Compared with control group, the pooled effects of pramipexole on motor UPDRS score and activities of daily living UPDRS score were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Furthermore, pramipexole therapy didn't increase the number of any adverse events in dPD patients (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.37-1.41, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Pramipexole therapy can alleviate depressive symptoms and motor dysfunction in dPD patients, and there were no more side effects associated with drug intervention. These findings should be further validated by high-quality and well-designed RCTs.