The Relationship Between Semantic Knowledge and Conceptual Apraxia in Alzheimer Disease

Free-listing and Semantic Knowledge: A Tool for Detecting Alzheimer Disease?

BACKGROUND

Impairment in semantic knowledge contributes to Alzheimer disease (AD)-related decline. However, the particulars of the impact AD has on specific domains of knowledge remain debatable.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of AD on specific semantic categories that are integral to daily functions-living things and man-made objects.

METHOD

We administered a free-listing task (written version) to 19 individuals with AD and 15 cognitively normal older adults and assessed the task's relationship with other cognitive and functional tests in clinical use. We compared the contents of the lists of salient concepts generated by the AD and control groups.

RESULTS

Group membership (AD or control), after controlling for age, sex, formal education, and an estimate of premorbid intellectual ability, predicted the groups' performance on the free-listing task across two categories. Functional status was inversely related to performance on the free-listing task, holding demographic variables constant. Based on a comparison of the contents of the free lists that were generated by the two groups, it was possible to conclude that, in individuals with AD, conceptual knowledge central to the respective categories was well preserved, whereas the peripheral conceptual material showed evidence of degradation.

CONCLUSION

The free-listing task, which is an easy-to-administer and cost-effective tool, could aid in the preliminary detection of semantic knowledge dysfunction, revealing concepts that are better preserved and, possibly, the characterization of AD. Cognitive assessment tools that can be applied across cultures are needed, and the free-listing task has the potential to address this gap.

Progressive transcortical sensory aphasia and progressive ideational apraxia owing to temporoparietal cortical atrophy

Background

In contrast to frontotemporal lobar degeneration, atrophy of the focal posterior lateral cortex has not been thoroughly studied. Three clinical types of focal cortical atrophy have been described: 1) logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, which presents with impaired repetition despite normal articulation; 2) posterior cortical atrophy, which presents with prominent visuospatial deficits; and 3) primary progressive apraxia. All three clinical types are characterized by specific patterns of hypometabolism/hypoperfusion: the left posterior perisylvian area in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, bilateral parietooccipital areas in posterior cortical atrophy, and the parietal cortex in primary progressive apraxia. However, not every patient clearly fits into one of these categories.

Case presentation

Here we describe two patients with atypical focal cortical presentations. They presented with a history of a few years of progressive transcortical sensory aphasia characterized by fluent output with normal grammar and syntax, normal repetition, sentence comprehension deficits, and anomia without loss of word meaning. They also presented with progressive apraxia that began at the initial stages. Some forms of posterior symptoms including acalculia, agraphia, and visuospatial deficits were also observed. Hypoperfusion was noted mainly in the left temporoparietal region, which is slightly posterior to the perisylvian area.

Conclusions

Although our cases lack in CSF findings and PIB scan, these two cases and previous reports might suggest the existence of a subgroup of patients presenting with transcortical sensory aphasia, apraxia, and posterior symptoms (acalculia, agraphia, and visuospatial deficits) in the setting of Alzheimer’s disease. This subgroup may reflect the spectrum of clinical manifestations between logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy.

Apraxia in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: validity and reliability of the Van Heugten test for apraxia

AIM

To assess the reliability and validity of the Van Heugten test for apraxia (VHA), developed for and used in stroke patients, in a memory clinic population. Furthermore, we assess the presence and severity of apraxia in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and investigate which AD patients are likely to develop apraxia.

METHODS

We included 90 controls (age: 60 ± 9 years, MMSE: 28 ± 2), 90 MCI patients (age: 65 ± 7 years, MMSE: 26 ± 2) and 158 AD patients (age: 66 ± 8 years, MMSE: 20 ± 5). Apraxia was evaluated by the VHA assessing ideational and ideomotor praxis. We retested 20 patients to assess reliability.

RESULTS

Intrarater reliability was 0.88 and interrater reliability was 0.73. AD patients performed worse on the VHA (median: 88; range: 51-90) than controls (median: 90; range: 88-90) and MCI patients (median: 89; range: 84-90) (both p < 0.001). Apraxia was prevalent in 35% of AD patients, in 10% of MCI and it was not observed in controls (0%; p < 0.001). In AD, dementia severity was the main risk for apraxia; 15% of mildly versus 52% of moderately demented patients had apraxia (OR = 6.7, 95% CI 2.9-15.6). The second risk factor was APOE genotype. APOE ε4 noncarriers (47%) were at increased risk compared to carriers (30%) (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1-4.7).

CONCLUSION

Apraxia can be reliably measured with the VHA and is present in a proportion of patients with MCI and AD. The presence of apraxia in AD is related to dementia severity and APOE ε4.

Progression of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia to apraxia and semantic memory deficits

BACKGROUND

Due to the nature of neurodegenerative disorders, patients with primary progressive aphasia develop cognitive impairment other than aphasia as the disorder progresses. The progression of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), however, has not been well described. In particular, praxic disorders and semantic memory deficits have rarely been reported.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

We report three patients in the initial stage of lvPPA who subsequently developed apraxia in the middle stage and developed clinically evident semantic memory deficits in the advanced stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The present case series suggests that some patients with lvPPA develop an atypical type of dementia with apraxia and semantic memory deficits, suggesting that these cases should be classified as a type of early-onset Alzheimer's disease.