Searching for Brain Aneurysm in Third Cranial Nerve Palsy

Importance of the "Rule of the Pupil" in the Modern Neuroimaging Era

ABSTRACT

The "Rule of the Pupil" states that when aneurysms compress the oculomotor nerve, a dilated or sluggishly reactive pupil will result. In previous decades, when cerebral angiography was required to detect an intracranial aneurysm, the "Rule of the Pupil" was used to determine the relative risk of angiography and the likelihood of aneurysmal compression in patients with third nerve palsies (3NPs). Noninvasive imaging including computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography has become readily accessible and can detect all aneurysms large enough to cause 3NPs. It is therefore recommended that all patients with 3NP undergo neuroimaging regardless of pupil status because the consequences of missing an aneurysm are high. The question therefore remains as to whether the "Rule of the Pupil" still has relevance in today's era of modern neuroimaging. We describe a 73-year-old man who developed a left complete, pupil-sparing 3NP and was found to have a paraclinoid meningioma in the left cavernous sinus. As compressive lesions are expected to impair the iris sphincter muscle, no intervention was recommended and his 3NP spontaneously improved within 3 months. We also describe a 54-year-old woman with diabetes and a complete 3NP with a dilated, nonreactive pupil. Initial CTA was reported as normal, but re-review of imaging revealed a posterior communicating artery aneurysm and immediate intervention to coil the aneurysm occurred. The "Rule of the Pupil" is still important in the modern neuroimaging era as demonstrated in cases of incidentally found lesions along the course of the oculomotor nerve and missed radiological findings.

Intracranial Aneurysms of Neuro-Ophthalmologic Relevance

BACKGROUND

Intracranial saccular aneurysms are acquired lesions that often present with neuro-ophthalmologic symptoms and signs. Recent advances in neurosurgical techniques, endovascular treatments, and neurocritical care have improved the optimal management of symptomatic unruptured aneurysms, but whether the chosen treatment has an impact on neuro-ophthalmologic outcomes remains debated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A review of the literature focused on neuro-ophthalmic manifestations and treatment of intracranial aneurysms with specific relevance to neuro-ophthalmologic outcomes was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Cavernous sinus aneurysms were not included in this review.

RESULTS

Surgical clipping vs endovascular coiling for aneurysms causing third nerve palsies was compared in 13 retrospective studies representing 447 patients. Complete recovery was achieved in 78% of surgical patients compared with 44% of patients treated with endovascular coiling. However, the complication rate, hospital costs, and days spent in intensive care were reported as higher in surgically treated patients. Retrospective reviews of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for all ocular motor nerve palsies (third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerves) revealed similar results of complete resolution in 76% and 49%, respectively. Improvement in visual deficits related to aneurysmal compression of the anterior visual pathways was also better among patients treated with clipping than with coiling. The time to treatment from onset of visual symptoms was a predictive factor of visual recovery in several studies. Few reports have specifically assessed the improvement of visual deficits after treatment with flow diverters.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions regarding the choice of therapy for intracranial aneurysms causing neuro-ophthalmologic signs ideally should be made at high-volume centers with access to both surgical and endovascular treatments. The status of the patient, location of the aneurysm, and experience of the treating physicians are important factors to consider. Although a higher rate of visual recovery was reported with neurosurgical clipping, this must be weighed against the potentially longer intensive care stays and increased early morbidity.

Third nerve palsy as the initial manifestation of giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is rarely reported as a cause of third nerve palsy. We describe the presentation and course of patients with third nerve palsy as the sole initial ocular manifestation of GCA.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients with third nerve palsy as the presenting sign of GCA. Symptoms, signs, and inflammatory marker levels at presentation and on follow-up were analyzed. All patients had imaging of the brain and circle of Willis, to exclude a compressive or inflammatory lesion, and had a temporal artery biopsy showing granulomatous arteritis.

RESULTS

Four patients (aged 63-82) were identified and included. One patient had a complete third nerve palsy with pupil involvement, whereas the other 3 had third nerve palsies without pupil involvement. Three patients had ipsilateral periorbital/brow pain, and the other patient had temporal headache. Two patients reported no systemic symptoms of GCA but had elevated inflammatory markers. One patient had normal inflammatory markers but reported systemic symptoms of GCA. All patients had rapid improvement in symptoms and signs after high-dose oral prednisone was started with all showing complete recovery within weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

GCA can rarely present with acute painful third nerve palsy, mimicking the presentation of a microvascular cause. The third nerve palsy often improves rapidly after steroid treatment is started. The presence of GCA symptoms or elevated inflammatory markers in a patient older than 50 years with an acute third nerve palsy should prompt initiation of high-dose steroid treatment and temporal artery biopsy.

Underdiagnosis of posterior communicating artery aneurysm in noninvasive brain vascular studies

BACKGROUND

Expert interpretation of modern noninvasive neuroimaging such as computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or MRA should detect nearly all aneurysms responsible for an isolated third nerve palsy. Whether a catheter angiogram should still be obtained in cases with negative CTA or MRA remains debated and mostly relies on whether the noninvasive study was correctly performed and interpreted. The aim of our study was to review the diagnostic strategies used to evaluate patients with isolated aneurysmal third nerve palsy at a large academic center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all cases with posterior communicating artery (PCom A) aneurysmal third nerve palsies seen at our institution since 2001.

RESULTS

We identified 417 cases with third nerve palsy, aneurysm, or subarachnoid hemorrhage, among which 17 presented with an acute isolated painful third nerve palsy related to an ipsilateral PCom A aneurysm (mean age: 52 years; range: 33-83 years). Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the results of the noninvasive imaging obtained at initial presentation. Group I included 4 cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage on initial noncontrast head CT initially obtained in an emergency department for evaluation of their isolated third nerve palsy. Group II included 5 cases with isolated third nerve palsy and normal noncontrast head CT at presentation, immediately correctly diagnosed with a PCom A aneurysm at the referring institution. Group III included the 8 remaining cases who all had aneurysms that were missed on noninvasive studies at outside institutions. Review of these outside studies at our institution showed a PCom A aneurysm, confirming misinterpretation of these tests by the outside radiologists, rather than inadequate technique. Absence of specific training in neuroradiology and inaccurate clinical information provided to the interpreting radiologist were associated with test misinterpretation at the outside institutions. The average size of PCom A aneurysms causing an isolated third nerve palsy across all 3 groups was 7.3 mm and was similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that aside from an accurate history, the training and experience of the interpreting radiologist is probably the most important factor in determining the reliability of a noninvasive scan in patients with isolated third nerve palsies.