Dipole orientation of receptive fields in the somatosensory cortex after stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in humans

Anatomical and neurophysiological localization of the leg motor area at the medial central sulcus

OBJECTIVE

The exact location of the leg motor area is still in debate due to the lack of landmarks such as 'precentral knob' in the medial cortex. This study tried to identify the leg motor area based on intraoperative neurophysiological data and neuroimaging techniques.

METHODS

Intraoperative data of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) elicited by tibial nerve stimulation and motor evoked potential (MEP) of the leg muscles induced by direct cortical stimulation were recorded using subdural electrodes placed in the medial cortex. We displayed the neurophysiological data on the individual MR images and the MNI52.

RESULTS

Definite N40-P40 phase reversal was observed with the shallow grooves in the medial cortex in 5 cases. Leg MEP was successfully obtained in all 12 cases preserving the leg motor function. Superimposed SEP and leg MEP data on the MNI152 indicated the leg motor area was predominantly located in the posterior two-thirds between the vertical lines passing through the anterior commissure and the posterior commissure (VCP).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the location of the leg motor area and the presence of the 'medial central sulcus' in the medial cortex.

SIGNIFICANCE

The VCP can be useful landmark to identify the sensorimotor border in the medial cortex.

Optimizing the methodology for saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for monitoring upper lumbar roots and femoral nerve during lumbar spine surgery: technical note

The demand for intraoperative monitoring (IOM) of lumbar spine surgeries has escalated to accommodate more challenging surgical approaches to prevent perioperative neurologic deficits. Identifying impending injury of individual lumbar roots can be done by assessing free-running EMG and by monitoring the integrity of sensory and motor fibers within the roots by eliciting somatosensory (SEP), and motor evoked potentials. However, the common nerves for eliciting lower limb SEP do not monitor the entire lumbar plexus, excluding fibers from L1 to L4 roots. We aimed to technically optimize the methodology for saphenous nerve SEP (Sap-SEP) proposed for monitoring upper lumbar roots in the operating room. In the first group, the saphenous nerve was consecutively stimulated in two different locations: proximal in the thigh and distal close to the tibia. In the second group, three different recording derivations (10-20 International system) to distal saphenous stimulation were tested. Distal stimulation yielded a higher Sap-SEP amplitude (mean ± SD) than proximal: 1.36 ± 0.9 µV versus 0.62 ± 0.6 µV, (p < 0.0001). Distal stimulation evoked either higher (73%) or similar (12%) Sap-SEP amplitude compared to proximal in most of the nerves. The recording derivation CPz-cCP showed the highest amplitude in 65% of the nerves, followed by CPz-Fz (24%). Distal stimulation for Sap-SEP has advantages over proximal stimulation, including simplicity, lack of movement and higher amplitude responses. The use of two derivations (CPz-cCP, CPz-Fz) optimizes Sap-SEP recording.