Cumulative Motor Index: An Index to Study Progression of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Neurophysiological and imaging biomarkers of lower motor neuron dysfunction in motor neuron diseases/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: IFCN handbook chapter

This chapter discusses comprehensive neurophysiological biomarkers utilised in motor neuron disease (MND) and, in particular, its commonest form, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These encompass the conventional techniques including nerve conduction studies (NCS), needle and high-density surface electromyography (EMG) and H-reflex studies as well as novel techniques. In the last two decades, new methods of assessing the loss of motor units in a muscle have been developed, that are more convenient than earlier methods of motor unit number estimation (MUNE),and may use either electrical stimulation (e.g. MScanFit MUNE) or voluntary activation (MUNIX). Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is another novel approach for the evaluation that relies upon the application and measurement of high-frequency, low-intensity electrical current. Nerve excitability techniques (NET) also provide insights into the function of an axon and reflect the changes in resting membrane potential, ion channel dysfunction and the structural integrity of the axon and myelin sheath. Furthermore, imaging ultrasound techniques as well as magnetic resonance imaging are capable of detecting the constituents of morphological changes in the nerve and muscle. The chapter provides a critical description of the ability of each technique to provide neurophysiological insight into the complex pathophysiology of MND/ALS. However, it is important to recognise the strengths and limitations of each approach in order to clarify utility. These neurophysiological biomarkers have demonstrated reliability, specificity and provide additional information to validate and assess lower motor neuron dysfunction. Their use has expanded the knowledge about MND/ALS and enhanced our understanding of the relationship between motor units, axons, reflexes and other neural circuits in relation to clinical features of patients with MND/ALS at different stages of the disease. Taken together, the ultimate goal is to aid early diagnosis, distinguish potential disease mimics, monitor and stage disease progression, quantify response to treatment and develop potential therapeutic interventions.

Revisiting the compound muscle action potential (CMAP)

The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is among the first recorded waveforms in clinical neurography and one of the most common in clinical use. It is derived from the summated muscle fiber action potentials recorded from a surface electrode overlying the studied muscle following stimulation of the relevant motor nerve fibres innervating the muscle. Surface recorded motor unit potentials (SMUPs) are the fundamental units comprising the CMAP. Because it is considered a basic, if not banal signal, what it represents is often underappreciated. In this review we discuss current concepts in the anatomy and physiology of the CMAP. These have evolved with advances in instrumentation and digitization of signals, affecting its quantitation and measurement. It is important to understand the basic technical and biological factors influencing the CMAP. If these influences are not recognized, then a suboptimal recording may result. The object is to obtain a high quality CMAP recording that is reproducible, whether the study is done for clinical or research purposes. The initial sections cover the relevant CMAP anatomy and physiology, followed by how these principles are applied to CMAP changes in neuromuscular disorders. The concluding section is a brief overview of CMAP research where advances in recording systems and computer-based analysis programs have opened new research applications. One such example is motor unit number estimation (MUNE) that is now being used as a surrogate marker in monitoring chronic neurogenic processes such as motor neuron diseases.

Far-field potential of the compound muscle action potential as a reliable marker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Reliable neurophysiological markers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are of great interest. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude has been a conventional marker, although it is greatly influenced by the electrode position. We propose the far-field potential of the CMAP (FFP-CMAP) as a new neurophysiological marker in ALS.

METHODS

Patients with ALS and age-matched healthy controls were enrolled. We used a proximal reference (pref) in addition to the conventional distal reference (dref). Routine CMAP was recorded from the belly-dref lead and FFP-CMAP from the dref-pref lead for the ulnar and tibial nerves. Multiple point stimulation motor unit number estimation (MUNE) was also examined in the ulnar nerve. Inter-rater reproducibility was evaluated by two examiners, and some patients were followed up every 3 mo for 1 y.

RESULTS

We tested 17 patients with ALS and 10 controls. The amplitudes of routine CMAP and FFP-CMAP in the ulnar and tibial nerves, and hypothenar MUNE value in the ulnar nerve were significantly decreased in ALS compared to controls. Ulnar FFP-CMAP achieved the highest inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value (0.942) when compared with routine CMAP (0.880) and MUNE (0.839). The tibial FFP-CMAP had a higher ICC value (0.986) than the routine CMAP (0.697). In this way, the FFP-CMAP showed high inter-rater reproducibility because its shape was not much influenced by the electrode position. During 1-y follow-up, decline of CMAP, FFP, and MUNE showed significant correlations with the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R).

DISCUSSION

The FFP-CMAP shows promise as a reliable marker for ALS.

Influence of reference electrode position on the compound muscle action potential

OBJECTIVE

When the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is recorded in motor nerve conduction studies, the reference (E2) electrode can make a significant contribution to the CMAP. This study investigates the E2 recorded signal and its effect on CMAP measurements when E2 electrode is placed at different sites.

METHODS

The CMAP was recorded using the active electrode on the muscle belly and 4 different E2 electrodes placed at distal and proximal sites. The signal recorded by each electrode was also measured using a reference electrode on the contralateral limb. Signals were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, tibialis anterior and biceps muscles.

RESULTS

The E2 recorded a smaller signal when it was placed near or off the proximal tendon or muscle origin. This affected CMAP latency, duration for tibialis anterior. Contrary to expectation, initial upward deflection was noted for E2 signal.

CONCLUSION

A proximal E2 position records a lower volume conducted signal and yields a CMAP that is more representative of the muscle over which the E1 (active) electrode is placed.

SIGNIFICANCE

The proposed 'Proximal E2' montage may be better suited to assess pathology.

Electrodiagnostic Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Electrodiagnostic testing provides insight into subclinical aspects of disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and helps to diagnose and exclude other diagnoses. It may also help to manage or track disease progression. Mapping the extent of subclinical disease may guide the clinician to supportive interventions. There is considerable interest in establishing electrodiagnostic biomarkers to monitor disease progression. This article details the usefulness of electrodiagnostic testing across the disease spectrum. A review of clinical presentations and differential diagnoses, diagnostic evaluation, and emerging applications of electrodiagnostic studies to guide management and assess response to treatment interventions are presented with considerations for clinical practice.