Seizure Prediction Models in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Treating Seizures and Improving Newborn Outcomes for Infants with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is the most common cause of neonatal seizures. Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring is recommended given high rates of subclinical seizures. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of seizures may improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. International League Against Epilepsy guidelines indicate that (1) phenobarbital remains the first-line treatment of neonatal seizures and (2) early discontinuation of antiseizure medications following resolution of acute provoked seizures, and prior to discharge home, is recommended. Long-term follow-up of these infants is necessary to screen for postneonatal epilepsy and support neurodevelopment.

Advances in Electroencephalographic Biomarkers of Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a key objective biomarker of newborn brain function, delivering critical, cotside insights to aid the management of encephalopathy. Access to continuous EEG is limited, forcing reliance on subjective clinical assessments. In hypoxia ischaemia, the primary cause of encephalopathy, alterations in EEG patterns correlate with. injury severity and evolution. As HIE evolves, causing secondary neuronal death, EEG can track injury progression, informing neuroprotective strategies, seizure management and prognosis. Despite its value, challenges with interpretation and lack of on site expertise has limited its broader adoption. Technological advances, particularly in digital EEG and machine learning, are enhancing real-time analysis. This will allow EEG to expand its role in HIE diagnosis, management and outcome prediction.

Clinical prediction models for treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy: A systematic review

Up to 35% of individuals diagnosed with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite treatment, commonly referred to as drug-resistant epilepsy. Uncontrolled seizures can directly, or indirectly, negatively impact an individual's quality of life. To inform clinical management and life decisions, it is important to be able to predict the likelihood of seizure control. Those likely to achieve seizure control will be able to return sooner to their usual work and leisure activities and require less follow-up, whereas those with a poor prognosis will need more frequent clinical attendance and earlier consideration of epilepsy surgery. This is a systematic review aimed at identifying demographic, clinical, physiological (e.g., electroencephalographic), and imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging) factors that may be predictive of treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy (NDE). MEDLINE and Embase were searched for prediction models of treatment outcomes in patients with NDE. Study characteristics were extracted and subjected to assessment of risk of bias (and applicability concerns) using the PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) tool. Baseline variables associated with treatment outcomes are reported as prognostic factors. After screening, 48 models were identified in 32 studies, which generally scored low for concerns of applicability, but universally scored high for susceptibility to bias. Outcomes reported fit broadly into four categories: drug resistance, short-term treatment response, seizure remission, and mortality. Prognostic factors were also heterogenous, but the predictors that were commonly significantly associated with outcomes were those related to seizure characteristics/types, epilepsy history, and age at onset. Antiseizure medication response was often included as a baseline variable, potentially obscuring other factor relationships at baseline. Currently, outcome prediction models for NDE demonstrate a high risk of bias. Model development could be improved with a stronger adherence to recommended TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) practices. Furthermore, we outline actionable changes to common practices that are intended to improve the overall quality of prediction model development in NDE.

A Comparison of Automatically Extracted Quantitative EEG Features for Seizure Risk Stratification in Neonatal Encephalopathy

PURPOSE

Seizures occur in up to 40% of neonates with neonatal encephalopathy. Earlier identification of seizures leads to more successful seizure treatment, but is often delayed because of limited availability of continuous EEG monitoring. Clinical variables poorly stratify seizure risk, and EEG use to stratify seizure risk has previously been limited by need for manual review and artifact exclusion. The goal of this study is to compare the utility of automatically extracted quantitative EEG (qEEG) features for seizure risk stratification.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of neonates with moderate-to-severe neonatal encephalopathy who underwent therapeutic hypothermia at a single center. The first 24 hours of EEG underwent automated artifact removal and qEEG analysis, comparing qEEG features for seizure risk stratification.

RESULTS

The study included 150 neonates and compared the 36 (23%) with seizures with those without. Absolute spectral power best stratified seizure risk with area under the curve ranging from 63% to 71%, followed by range EEG lower and upper margin, median and SD of the range EEG lower margin. No features were significantly more predictive in the hour before seizure onset. Clinical examination was not associated with seizure risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatically extracted qEEG features were more predictive than clinical examination in stratifying neonatal seizure risk during therapeutic hypothermia. qEEG represents a potential practical bedside tool to individualize intensity and duration of EEG monitoring and decrease time to seizure recognition. Future work is needed to refine and combine qEEG features to improve risk stratification.

Scalp high-frequency oscillations differentiate neonates with seizures from healthy neonates

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate (1) whether an automated detector can capture scalp high-frequency oscillations (HFO) in neonates and (2) whether scalp HFO rates can differentiate neonates with seizures from healthy neonates.

METHODS

We considered 20 neonates with EEG-confirmed seizures and four healthy neonates. We applied a previously validated automated HFO detector to determine scalp HFO rates in quiet sleep.

RESULTS

Etiology in neonates with seizures included hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in 11 cases, structural vascular lesions in 6, and genetic causes in 3. The HFO rates were significantly higher in neonates with seizures (0.098 ± 0.091 HFO/min) than in healthy neonates (0.038 ± 0.025 HFO/min; P = 0.02) with a Hedge's g value of 0.68 indicating a medium effect size. The HFO rate of 0.1 HFO/min/ch yielded the highest Youden index in discriminating neonates with seizures from healthy neonates. In neonates with seizures, etiology, status epilepticus, EEG background activity, and seizure patterns did not significantly impact HFO rates.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neonatal scalp HFO can be detected automatically and differentiate neonates with seizures from healthy neonates. Our observations have significant implications for neuromonitoring in neonates. This is the first step in establishing neonatal HFO as a biomarker for neonatal seizures.

Clinical and electroencephalography characteristics of 45 patients with neonatal seizures

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to retrospectively research the semiology of neonatal seizures (NSs) based on the 2021 classification scheme of the International League Against Epilepsy, and the relationship between etiology and electroclinical features.

METHODS

Patients admitted to Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 1, 2020 to March 30, 2022 and diagnosed with NSs were included to retrospectively investigate the etiology, seizure characteristics, prognosis, and ictal and interictal video electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients, 73.3% had definite etiology. Twenty-seven patients had electro-clinical seizures, of which two had both electro-clinical and electrographic-only seizures. Electrographic-only seizures were reported in 18 patients. The tonic, clonic, and electrographic-only seizures were associated with various etiologies. Both tonic and clonic seizures occurred in acute symptomatic seizures and were associated with neonatal epilepsy. 50% of tonic seizures were related to genetic factors. Among the clonic seizures, 50.0% occurred in acute symptomatic seizures. Epileptic spasms always indicated neonatal epilepsy. There were few patients who experienced automatisms and sequential seizures, and these two seizure types were associated with brain malformation and genetic factors, respectively. Patients with a normal interictal EEG had acute symptomatic seizures. whereas the interictal EEG of patients with neonatal epilepsy mainly showed burst-suppression or multifocal discharges. The ictal EEG recordings were related to seizure semiology.

CONCLUSION

Seizure semiology and video EEG are suggestive of potential causes but do not provide a definite etiology.

Leveraging electronic medical record-embedded standardised electroencephalogram reporting to develop neonatal seizure prediction models: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of seizures can help to direct resource-intense continuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) monitoring to neonates at high risk of seizures. We aimed to use data from standardised EEG reports to generate seizure prediction models for vulnerable neonates.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included neonates who underwent CEEG during the first 30 days of life at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA). The hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy subgroup included only patients with CEEG data during the first 5 days of life, International Classification of Diseases, revision 10, codes for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, and documented therapeutic hypothermia. In January, 2018, we implemented a novel CEEG reporting system within the electronic medical record (EMR) using common data elements that incorporated standardised terminology. All neonatal CEEG data from Jan 10, 2018, to Feb 15, 2022, were extracted from the EMR using age at the time of CEEG. We developed logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest models of neonatal seizure prediction using EEG features on day 1 to predict seizures on future days.

FINDINGS

We evaluated 1117 neonates, including 150 neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, with CEEG data reported using standardised templates between Jan 10, 2018, and Feb 15, 2022. Implementation of a consistent EEG reporting system that documents discrete and standardised EEG variables resulted in more than 95% reporting of key EEG features. Several EEG features were highly correlated, and patients could be clustered on the basis of specific features. However, no simple combination of features adequately predicted seizure risk. We therefore applied computational models to complement clinical identification of neonates at high risk of seizures. Random forest models incorporating background features performed with classification accuracies of up to 90% (95% CI 83-94) for all neonates and 97% (88-99) for neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; recall (sensitivity) of up to 97% (91-100) for all neonates and 100% (100-100) for neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; and precision (positive predictive value) of up to 92% (84-96) in the overall cohort and 97% (80-99) in neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.

INTERPRETATION

Using data extracted from the standardised EEG report on the first day of CEEG, we predict the presence or absence of neonatal seizures on subsequent days with classification performances of more than 90%. This information, incorporated into routine care, could guide decisions about the necessity of continuing EEG monitoring beyond the first day, thereby improving the allocation of limited CEEG resources. Additionally, this analysis shows the benefits of standardised clinical data collection, which can drive learning health system approaches to personalised CEEG use.

FUNDING

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, the Hartwell Foundation, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Wolfson Foundation.

Machine learning for the early prediction of infants with electrographic seizures in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess if early clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features predict later seizure development in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

METHODS

Clinical and EEG parameters <12 h of birth from infants with HIE across eight European Neonatal Units were used to develop seizure-prediction models. Clinical parameters included intrapartum complications, fetal distress, gestational age, delivery mode, gender, birth weight, Apgar scores, assisted ventilation, cord pH, and blood gases. The earliest EEG hour provided a qualitative analysis (discontinuity, amplitude, asymmetry/asynchrony, sleep-wake cycle [SWC]) and a quantitative analysis (power, discontinuity, spectral distribution, inter-hemispheric connectivity) from full montage and two-channel amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG). Subgroup analysis, only including infants without anti-seizure medication (ASM) prior to EEG was also performed. Machine-learning (ML) models (random forest and gradient boosting algorithms) were developed to predict infants who would later develop seizures and assessed using Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The study included 162 infants with HIE (53 had seizures). Low Apgar, need for ventilation, high lactate, low base excess, absent SWC, low EEG power, and increased EEG discontinuity were associated with seizures. The following predictive models were developed: clinical (MCC 0.368, AUC 0.681), qualitative EEG (MCC 0.467, AUC 0.729), quantitative EEG (MCC 0.473, AUC 0.730), clinical and qualitative EEG (MCC 0.470, AUC 0.721), and clinical and quantitative EEG (MCC 0.513, AUC 0.746). The clinical and qualitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model alone (MCC 0.470 vs 0.368, p-value .037). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model (MCC 0.513 vs 0.368, p-value .012). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model for infants without ASM (n = 131) had MCC 0.588, AUC 0.832. Performance for quantitative aEEG (n = 159) was MCC 0.381, AUC 0.696 and clinical and quantitative aEEG was MCC 0.384, AUC 0.720.

SIGNIFICANCE

Early EEG background analysis combined with readily available clinical data helped predict infants who were at highest risk of seizures, hours before they occur. Automated quantitative-EEG analysis was as good as expert analysis for predicting seizures, supporting the use of automated assessment tools for early evaluation of HIE.

Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part I: neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures

The blooming of neonatal neurocritical care over the last decade reflects substantial advances in neuromonitoring and neuroprotection. The most commonly used brain monitoring tools in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG), full multichannel continuous EEG (cEEG), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). While some published guidelines address individual tools, there is no consensus on consistent, efficient, and beneficial use of these modalities in common NICU scenarios. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for best utilization of neuromonitoring modalities in neonates with encephalopathy or with possible seizures. Neuromonitoring approaches in extremely premature and critically ill neonates are discussed separately in the companion paper. IMPACT: Neuromonitoring techniques hold promise for improving neonatal care. For neonatal encephalopathy, aEEG can assist in screening for eligibility for therapeutic hypothermia, though should not be used to exclude otherwise eligible neonates. Continuous cEEG, aEEG and NIRS through rewarming can assist in prognostication. For neonates with possible seizures, cEEG is the gold standard for detection and diagnosis. If not available, aEEG as a screening tool is superior to clinical assessment alone. The use of seizure detection algorithms can help with timely seizures detection at the bedside.

Current and Future Uses of Continuous EEG in the NICU

Continuous EEG (cEEG) is a fundamental neurodiagnostic tool in the care of critically ill neonates and is increasingly recommended. cEEG enhances prognostication via assessment of the background brain activity, plays a role in predicting which neonates are at risk for seizures when combined with clinical factors, and allows for accurate diagnosis and management of neonatal seizures. Continuous EEG is the gold standard method for diagnosis of neonatal seizures and should be used for detection of seizures in high-risk clinical conditions, differential diagnosis of paroxysmal events, and assessment of response to treatment. High costs associated with cEEG are a limiting factor in its widespread implementation. Centralized remote cEEG interpretation, automated seizure detection, and pre-natal EEG are potential future applications of this neurodiagnostic tool.

Management of seizures in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy treated with hypothermia

Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is the most common etiology of acute neonatal seizures - about half of neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia for NE have EEG-confirmed seizures. These seizures are best identified with continuous EEG monitoring, as clinical diagnosis leads to under-diagnosis of subclinical seizures and over-treatment of events that are not seizures. High seizure burden, especially status epilepticus, is thought to augment brain injury. Treatment, therefore, is aimed at minimizing seizure burden. Phenobarbital remains the mainstay of treatment, as it is more effective than levetiracetam and easier to administer than fosphenytoin. Emerging evidence suggests that, for many neonates, it is safe to discontinue the phenobarbital after acute seizures resolve and prior to hospital discharge.

Evaluation of Seizure Risk in Infants After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in the Absence of Deep Hypothermic Cardiac Arrest

Background

Guidelines recommend evaluation for electrographic seizures in neonates and children at risk, including after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Although initial research using screening electroencephalograms (EEGs) in infants after CPB found a 21% seizure incidence, more recent work reports seizure incidences ranging 3–12%. Deep hypothermic cardiac arrest was associated with increased seizure risk in prior reports but is uncommon at our institution and less widely used in contemporary practice. This study seeks to establish the incidence of seizures among infants following CPB in the absence of deep hypothermic cardiac arrest and to identify additional risk factors for seizures via a prediction model.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was completed of all consecutive infants ≤ 3 months who received screening EEG following CPB at a single center within a 2-year period during 2017–2019. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the perioperative period. A prediction model for seizure risk was fit using a random forest algorithm, and receiver operator characteristics were assessed to classify predictions. Fisher’s exact test and the logrank test were used to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and EEG seizures.

Results

A total of 112 infants were included. Seizure incidence was 10.7%. Median time to first seizure was 28.1 h (interquartile range 18.9–32.2 h). The most important factors in predicting seizure risk from the random forest analysis included postoperative neuromuscular blockade, prematurity, delayed sternal closure, bypass time, and critical illness preoperatively. When variables captured during the EEG recording were included, abnormal postoperative neuroimaging and peak lactate were also highly predictive. Overall model accuracy was 90.2%; accounting for class imbalance, the model had excellent sensitivity and specificity (1.00 and 0.89, respectively).

Conclusions

Seizure incidence was similar to recent estimates even in the absence of deep hypothermic cardiac arrest. By employing random forest analysis, we were able to identify novel risk factors for postoperative seizure in this population and generate a robust model of seizure risk. Further work to validate our model in an external population is needed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01313-1.

Does the first hour of continuous electroencephalography predict neonatal seizures?

OBJECTIVE

Prolonged continuous video-electroencephalography (cEEG) is recommended for neonates at risk of seizures. The cost and expertise required to provide a real-time response to detected seizures often limits its utility. We hypothesised that the first hour of cEEG could predict subsequent seizures.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

PATIENTS

266 term neonates at risk of seizure or with suspected seizures.

INTERVENTION

The first hour of cEEG was graded by expert and novice interpreters as normal, mildly, moderately or severely abnormal; seizures were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Association between abnormalities in the first hour of cEEG and the presence of seizures during total cEEG monitoring.

RESULTS

50/98 (51%) of neonates who developed seizures had their first seizure in the first hour of cEEG monitoring. The 'time-to-event' risk of seizure from 0 to 96 hours was 0.38 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.44) while the risk in the first hour was 0.19 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.24). cEEG background was normal in 48% of neonates, mildly abnormal in 30%, moderately abnormal in 13% and severely abnormal in 9%. Inter-rater agreement for determination of background was very good (weighted kappa=0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91). When neonates with seizures during the first hour were excluded, an abnormal background resulted in 2.4 times increased risk of seizures during the subsequent monitoring period (95% CI 1.3 to 4.4, p<0.003) while a severely abnormal background resulted in a sevenfold increased risk (95% CI 3.4 to 14.3, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The first hour of cEEG in at-risk neonates is useful in identifying and predicting whether seizures occur during cEEG monitoring up to 96 hours. This finding enables identification of high-risk neonates who require closer observation.

Voxyvi: A system for long-term audio and video acquisitions in neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

In the European Union, 300,000 newborn babies are born prematurely every year. Their care is ensured in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) where vital signs are constantly monitored. In addition, other descriptors such as motion, facial and vocal activities have been shown to be essential to assess neurobehavioral development.

AIM

In the scope of the European project Digi-NewB, we aimed to develop and evaluate a new audio-video device designed to non-invasively acquire multi-modal data (audio, video and thermal images), while fitting the wide variety of bedding environment in NICU.

METHODS

Firstly, a multimodal system and associated software and guidelines to collect data in neonatal intensive care unit were proposed. Secondly, methods for post-evaluation of the acquisition phase were developed, including the study of clinician feedback and a qualitative analysis of the data.

RESULTS

The deployment of 19 acquisition devices in six French hospitals allowed to record more than 500 newborns of different gestational and postmenstrual ages. After the acquisition phase, clinical feedback was mostly positive. In addition, quality of more than 300 recordings was inspected and showed that 77% of the data is exploitable. In depth, the percentage of sole presence of the newborn was estimated at 62% within recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that audio-video acquisitions are feasible on a large scale in real life in NICU. The experience also allowed us to make a clear observation of the requirements and challenges that will have to be overcome in order to set up audio-video monitoring methods.

EEG Monitoring After Convulsive Status Epilepticus

After convulsive status epilepticus, patients of all ages may have ongoing EEG seizures identified by continuous EEG monitoring. Furthermore, high EEG seizure exposure has been associated with unfavorable neurobehavioral outcomes. Thus, recent guidelines and consensus statements recommend many patients with persisting altered mental status after convulsive status epilepticus undergo continuous EEG monitoring. This review summarizes the available epidemiologic data and related recommendations provided by recent guidelines and consensus statements.

Development of a model to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

Electroencephalographic seizures (ESs) are common in encephalopathic critically ill children, but ES identification with continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intense. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model that would enable clinicians to stratify patients by ES risk and optimally target limited CEEG resources. We aimed to determine whether incorporating data from a screening EEG yielded better performance characteristics than models using clinical variables alone.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with acute encephalopathy undergoing CEEG in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care institution between April 2017 and February 2019. We identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES. We evaluated model performance with area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), validated the optimal model with the highest AUC using a fivefold cross-validation, and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We applied the optimal operating slope strategy to identify the optimal cutoff to define whether a patient should undergo CEEG.

RESULTS

The incidence of ES was 26%. Variables associated with increased ES risk included age, acute encephalopathy category, clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, EEG background, and epileptiform discharges. Combining clinical and EEG variables yielded better model performance (AUC 0.80) than clinical variables alone (AUC 0.69; P < .01). At a 0.10 cutoff selected to emphasize sensitivity, the optimal model had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 37%, positive predictive value of 34%, and negative predictive value of 93%. If applied, the model would limit 29% of patients from undergoing CEEG while failing to identify 8% of patients with ES.

SIGNIFICANCE

A model employing readily available clinical and EEG variables could target limited CEEG resources to critically ill children at highest risk for ES, making CEEG-guided management a more viable neuroprotective strategy.

The probability of seizures during continuous EEG monitoring in high-risk neonates

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the impact of monitoring indication, early electroencephalography (EEG), and clinical features on seizure risk in all neonates undergoing continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring following a standardized monitoring protocol.

METHODS

All cEEGs from unique neonates 34-48 weeks postmenstrual age monitored from 1/2011-10/2017 (n = 291) were included. We evaluated the impact of cEEG monitoring indication (acute neonatal encephalopathy [ANE], suspicious clinical events [SCEs], or other high-risk conditions [OHRs]), age, medication status, and early EEG abnormalities (including the presence of epileptiform discharges and abnormal background continuity, amplitude, asymmetry, asynchrony, excessive sharp transients, and burst suppression) on time to first seizure and overall seizure risk using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Seizures occurred in 28% of high-risk neonates. Discontinuation of monitoring after 24 hours of seizure-freedom would have missed 8.5% of neonates with seizures. Overall seizure risk was lower in neonates monitored for ANE compared to OHR (P = .004) and trended lower compared to SCE (P = .097). The time course of seizure presentation varied by group, where the probability of future seizure was less than 1% after 17 hours of seizure-free monitoring in the SCE group, but required 42 hours in the OHR group, and 73 hours in the ANE group. The presence of early epileptiform discharges increased seizure risk in each group (ANE: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-15.13, P = .022; SCE: aHR 10.95, 95% CI 4.77-25.14, P < 1e-07; OHR: aHR 56.90, 95% CI 10.32-313.72, P < 1e-05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Neonates who undergo cEEG are at high risk for seizures, and risk varies by monitoring indication and early EEG findings. Seizures are captured in nearly all neonates undergoing monitoring for SCE within 24 hours of cEEG monitoring. Neonates monitored for OHR and ANE can present with delayed seizures and require longer durations of monitoring. Early epileptiform discharges are the best early EEG feature to predict seizure risk.