Reducing Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Extravasation in Neonates: A Quality Improvement Project

[A clinical study on the optimal placement depth for peripherally inserted central catheter through the great saphenous vein in preterm infants]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between optimal placement depth (OPD) and physical measurement parameters in preterm infants receiving placement of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) through the great saphenous vein (GSV), and to establish a predictive formula for OPD during the placement of PICC through the GSV.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for the preterm infants who received the placement of PICC through the GSV in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from December 2022 to February 2024. According to the site of puncture [GSV of the knee joint (KJ) or the ankle joint (AJ)], they were divided into a GSV-KJ placement group (n=38) and a GSV-AJ placement group (n=33). The infants were measured in terms of body weight (BW), body length, the length of the upper and lower parts of the body, head circumference, and abdominal circumference at the time of placement. The Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between the above variables and OPD. A predictive formula was established for OPD in the placement of PICC via the GSV in preterm infants, and the predicted residual between the predicted depth and the ideal OPD was compared between the conventional predictive formula and the new predictive formula.

RESULTS

The Pearson correlation analysis showed that PICC OPD was significantly positively correlated with BW, body length, the length of the upper and lower parts of the body, head circumference, and abdominal circumference in both the GSV-KJ placement group and GSV-AJ placement group (P<0.05), with the highest degree of correlation between OPD and BW. The univariate linear regression analysis showed a linear relationship between PICC OPD and BW in both groups. The predictive formulas for OPD were as follows: GSV-KJ PICC OPD (cm) = 13.1 + 2.7 × BW (kg) and GSV-AJ PICC OPD (cm) = 13.4 + 6.0 × BW (kg), and the new predictive formulas had a significantly lower predicted residual than the conventional predictive formula (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

OPD for PICC through the GSV is positively correlated with BW, and the prediction results of the new predictive formula based on BW are closer to the ideal OPD.

Peripheral intravenous therapy infiltration and extravasation (PIVIE) risks in 11 006 paediatric surgery inpatients in China: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors associated with peripheral intravenous therapy infiltration and extravasation (PIVIE) in paediatric surgery inpatients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary general hospital in Sichuan, China. Logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors predictive of PIVIE. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was undertaken to determine the relationship between the occurrence of PIVIE and the duration of that event (survival time).

RESULTS

This study included 11 006 paediatric surgery inpatients and 19 771 peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs). The incidence of PIVIE was 16.93% (3347 of 19 771). The following were significant predictors of PIVIE: sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.834; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.772, 0.900); age (OR 0.945; 95% CI, 0.934, 0.956); disease classification (OR 0.962, 95% CI 0.950, 0.976); puncture site (OR 1.061; 95% CI 1.044, 1.078); and indwelling time (OR 1.257; 95% CI 1.215, 1.300).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, age, type of disease, puncture site and indwelling time were risk factors for PIVIE. The puncture site should be effectively assessed and accurately selected. Informed judgements should be based on the child's sex, age and medical condition, so that the appropriate preventive measures to minimize the risk of PIVIE can be implemented.

Implementation frameworks, strategies and outcomes used in peripheral intravenous catheter studies: A systematic review

AIMS

The aim of this study was to critically evaluate implementation frameworks, strategies and/or outcomes used to optimise peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) care and/or promote guideline adherence.

BACKGROUND

Although a considerable volume of research has investigated the effectiveness of PIVC interventions and treatments to promote performance and prevent harm, how to best implement this evidence into dynamic clinical settings and populations is not well understood. Implementation science is central to translating evidence-based knowledge to the bedside; however, there is a gap in identifying the best implementation framework, strategies and/or outcomes to optimise PIVC care and/or guideline adherence.

DESIGN

A systematic review.

METHOD

The review was conducted using innovative automation tools. Five databases and clinical trial registries were searched on 14 October 2021. Qualitative and quantitative PIVC intervention studies reporting implementation strategies were included in the review. Data were extracted independently by experienced researchers in pairs. The Mixed Method Appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of individual studies. Narrative synthesis was used to present the findings. The systematic review was reported following the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

Of 2189 references identified, 27 studies were included in the review. Implementation frameworks were used in 30% (n = 8) of studies, with most used during the preparation (n = 7, 26%) and delivery phase (n = 7, 26%) and then evaluation phase (n = 4, 15%). Multifaceted strategies were commonly adopted (n = 24, 89%) to promote PIVC care or study interventions which were clinician (n = 25, 93%) and patient-targeted (n = 15, 56%). The most commonly reported implementation outcomes were fidelity (n = 13, 48%) and adoption (n = 6, 22%). Most studies were scored as low quality (n = 18, 67%).

CONCLUSION

We call for researchers and clinicians to work together and use implementation science frameworks to guide study design, implementation and evaluation in future PIVC studies, to improve evidence translation and thereby improve patient outcomes.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Provide Timely Central Vascular Access in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Timely central venous access is essential in the care of critically ill neonates. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are the preferred form of central venous access when umbilical venous catheters cannot be placed or are discontinued. However, time delays increase risk for injury from peripheral intravenous lines and may contribute to inconsistent delivery of necessary fluids and medications.

PURPOSE

The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease wait times for PICC placement in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

A unit-based PICC team was developed consisting of NICU nurses and attending neonatologists and implemented in 2 phases. Data were collected from chart reviews before, during, and after implementation of the team. We tracked time between PICC order and placement and number of attempts. Hospital metrics on peripheral intravenous line infiltrations and central line-associated blood stream infection were also monitored. At the end of the project, we continued tracking outcomes to determine whether gains would be sustained past the project period.

RESULTS

Implementation of a unit-based interdisciplinary specialty team led to a 50% reduction in mean PICC wait times from 1.2 days to 0.58 days. Benefits of the initiative were sustained past the initial project period.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development of a dedicated, local team played a key role in improving vascular access in the NICU.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Proximity of specialized teams provides a solution to address gaps in care in the NICU.

Correlation between visual inspection/physical exam and point-of-care ultrasound exam in the evaluation of neonatal peripheral intravenous catheter site

BACKGROUND

A peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) is used to administer IV fluids and medications. The most common PIVC complication is peripheral intravenous extravasation and infiltration (PIVE/I). Early visual inspection and physical exam (VI/PE) of the insertion site performed by a registered nurse (RN) are essential to prevent or limit tissue damage caused by displaced PIV catheters. Skin ultrasound (US) of the PIVC site provides rapid, real-time, high-resolution images of the anatomic structures at the point of care (POC).

OBJECTIVES

To correlate the standard practice of clinical assessment (VI/PE) with POC-US exam to determine the location and function of PIVC suspicious for malfunctioning.

DESIGN/METHODS

PIVC sites suspicious of malfunctioning were assessed by RN and findings were recorded in the electronic medical record. POC-US exam of the PIVC site was performed immediately after VI/PE. Sonographic exam included B-mode assessment of the PIVC site subcutaneous tissue characteristics and PIVC location as assessed by the Doppler flow tracing during RN's normal saline flush. RN's decision to continue or discontinue the PIVC was based solely on her/his VI/PE.

RESULTS

Forty-four infants were studied. We found sufficient disagreement between the two methodologies (p = .0074), with discordance noted in 15 (34.1%) cases. In 29 (65.9%) cases there was concordance between VI/PE and POC-US, 18 to remove and 11 not to remove PIVC (Gwet AC1 correlation coefficient = 0.34). There was no significant correlation between VI/PE finding of tissue edema, the most common initial clinical evaluation sign, and POC-US finding of tissue edema or fluid pockets (p = .67, p = .21 respectively). RN's findings during the PIVC flush with normal saline (NS) were in perfect agreement with the findings of the Doppler signal on POC-US (Gwet's AC1 = 0.82) as well as with the final US-based decision to remove PIVC (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

We found only a fair correlation between RN's VI/PE of the suspicious PIVC site and the POC-US exam of the same site. However, our data suggest that in the evaluation of questionable PIVC, POC-US could be used in conjunction with VI/PE. This combination may improve the accuracy of decisions to remove or maintain PIVCs, which will result in a decreased number of PIVC placement attempts and complications.