Adjustment to an Ostomy: An Integrative Literature Review

Is it "all in the bag?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on ostomy surgery in pediatric IBD across the ImproveCareNow network

Objectives

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic illness with various treatments, including ostomy surgery. Ostomy-related medical decision-making (MDM) is complex for multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study sought to understand national multidisciplinary HCPs' perceptions about pediatric IBD ostomy surgery in the United States.

Methods

This cross-sectional REDCap survey recruited HCPs in pediatric IBD HCP roles from the ImproveCareNow (ICN) Learning Health System. The survey gathered data on, (1) demographics, (2) participants' perspectives on patients/families' ostomy perceptions, (3) participants' own perspectives on ostomies, and (4) participants' perspectives on multidisciplinary collaboration in ostomy surgery.

Results

Participants (n = 69, across n = 30 American ICN sites) were 84% White, 62% female, and 54% gastroenterologists. In reflecting on patients/families' perceptions, participants endorsed most (86%) view ostomies as a "failure," various psychosocial concerns (e.g., 97% endorsed body image concerns), and most (81%) have moderate to significant stigma about ostomies. In reflecting on their own perceptions, nearly half (44%) endorsed some to moderate stigma about ostomies and felt ostomy discussions were difficult when families had negative perceptions (88%). Over half (54%) endorsed currently having multidisciplinary care for pediatric IBD surgery. Most (70%) endorsed variability in the amount and/or quality of multidisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusion

MDM related to pediatric IBD ostomy surgery presents nuanced clinical complexities for HCPs. This work underscores interest in multidisciplinary care, notable ostomy-related psychosocial needs, and ostomy-related stigma. Future work should develop systematic approaches to multidisciplinary pediatric IBD ostomy care, bolster psychosocial support, and evaluate how systematic care may impact psychosocial, and healthcare utilization outcomes.

'That gave me a lot of comfort, that he would ask my opinion about how we wanted to talk about this': A qualitative analysis of clinical communication experiences of ostomy patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the communication challenges and successes that people with ostomies experienced during their healthcare encounters.

DESIGN

We conducted semistructured interviews of people with ostomies. Interviews focused on important social situations and health communication strategies for managing these situations. We transcribed interviews and coded them to create themes.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were eligible to participate if they were above the age of 18 and have had an ostomy for at least a year. 27 people participated in the study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a university setting.

RESULTS

Interviews with ostomates surfaced several themes related to ostomate needs. Participants benefited from communication that was open, thorough and had a positive outlook on ostomies. Participants found patient-clinician communication to be challenging when there was a lack of knowledge surrounding ostomy care, communication was unclear or inadequate, and when clinicians had a negative outlook on ostomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this project are intended to amplify existing patient and clinician education materials and to inform the creation of a communication guide specifically for the ostomy context.

The Effect of Education Via Videoconferencing at Home on Individuals' Self-efficacy and Adaptation to Life with a Stoma: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of education via videoconferencing at home on individuals' self-efficacy and adaptation to life with a stoma.

METHODS

A randomized controlled experimental study was conducted between November 2021 and July 2022 in an education and research hospital (face-to-face) and at the homes of individuals with a stoma (online). The study sample consisted of 60 individuals with a stoma: 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Study data were collected using the Individuals with Stoma Identification Form, Stoma Self-efficacy Scale (SSES), and Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 (OAI-23). After discharge, participants in the experimental group received educational booklets and education on stoma care in four video conference sessions. The authors analyzed the data using frequency and percentage distributions, χ2 analyses, independent-sample t tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the median pretest SSES and OAI-23 scores and the median posttest SSES and OAI-23 scores in the experimental group. At the end of the study, more individuals in the experimental group cared for their own stoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The education provided to individuals with a stoma significantly increased their self-efficacy and stoma adaptation scores. Hence, providing structured, continuous education on stoma care by nurses and using videoconferencing as an education method are recommended.

Comparison of Adjustment or Adaptation to the Formation of a Temporary Versus a Permanent Ostomy: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to review evidence on adjustment or adaptation to an ostomy in persons with a temporary versus permanent ostomy.

METHOD

Systematic review.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We comprehensively searched the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), PsycINFO, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs, Scopus, and EThOS and ProQuest dissertations from inception to July 21, 2021. We located 570 studies. Data were extracted into Covidence, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs tool.

FINDINGS

Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria and were included; only 2 assessed adjustment using a validated adjustment tool (Ostomy Adjustment Inventory, OAI-23). One found better adjustment in those with a permanent ostomy at 6 months; the second did not formally test for statistically significant differences between groups. Other included studies assessed aspects of adjustment such as health-related quality of life and psychological symptoms. Findings differed between studies; the majority of studies were deemed at a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence among studies evaluating adjustment to an ostomy in permanent versus temporary stomas was poor; the majority did not measure adjustment using a validated adjustment instrument. Therefore, differences in the ways those with a temporary ostomy or permanent ostomy adjust or adapt remain largely unknown.

IMPLICATIONS

Further high-quality studies are needed that compare adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using a validated instrument. An understanding of differences in adjustment in those with a temporary and permanent ostomy is important for planning how health care services can be better tailored to meet the needs of ostomy patients beyond the initial postoperative period of recovery.

Characteristics of Interventional Trials for Patients Living With Intestinal Stoma Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov With a Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

This systematic review was performed to characterize the landscape of research conducted in patients with intestinal stoma (IS) and highlight unmet needs for clinical research in Crohn's disease (CD) and IS.

METHODS

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 25, 2022, to identify clinical trials assessing interventions in patients with an IS, as well as those with an IS and CD. Studies were grouped according to type of intervention. We excluded observational studies with no treatment arm.

RESULTS

A total of 253 studies were included in the final analysis. Most studies investigated devices (n = 122 [48.2%]), or surgical procedures (n = 63 [24.9%]), followed by behavioral interventions (n = 30 [11.8%]), drugs (n = 20 [7.9%]), dietary interventions (n = 2 [0.8%]), skin care products (n = 2 0.8%]), and others (n = 14 [5.5%]). A total of 50.9% (n = 129) of studies had completed recruitment, enrolling 11 116 participants. Only 6 studies (surgery: n = 3; physiological studies: n = 2; drugs: n = 1) exclusively included patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 16 studies commented that patients with IBD were excluded in their eligibility criteria. No study assessed efficacy of drugs in patients with CD and IS. Approximately one-quarter of studies (n = 65 of 253) included quality of life as an outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of research in IBD patients with IS, with the majority focusing on devices and surgical procedures. There have been no drug trials evaluating efficacy in patients with CD and IS. There is an urgent need to identify barriers to enrollment and develop eligibility and outcome measures that enable the inclusion of patients with CD with stoma into clinical trials.

Living with and without an intestinal stoma: Factors that promote psychological well-being and self-care: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

This study compared those living with and without an intestinal stoma in relation to physical and psychological health, stress and coping, quality of life and resilience. Also, identifying factors that could be used to promote better self-care in stoma patients in the future.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional and comparative study design was employed.

METHODS

Participants were recruited via email and social media (Facebook and Twitter) between August 2018 and March 2019, to complete an online survey. The data were analysed using analysis of variance to examine group difference and a series of hierarchical linear regression analyses determining predictors of psychological well-being.

RESULTS

Of 278 participants aged 18-68 years who completed the survey, 129 (46%) had a stoma and reported significantly poorer physical health. Approximately one-fifth experienced problems with stoma management. Psychological well-being was mediated by the duration of living with a stoma (under 3 years) and frequency of leaks (weekly and monthly).

Does Resilience Predict Ostomy Adjustment in Patients With Permanent Ostomy?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate associations between resilience and ostomy adjustment in a group of patients with a permanent ostomy.

DESIGN

Descriptive, correlational study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

One hundred participants were interviewed; most were male (N = 56; 56%), married (N = 77; 77%), illiterate (N = 46; 46%), and self-employed (N = 35; 35%). The most frequent condition leading to ostomy surgery was colorectal cancer (N = 24; 24%). A majority (N = 43; 43%) had been diagnosed with cancer 1 to 5 years before data collection, and 35 (35%) had lived with an ostomy for 1 to 5 years. Participants were recruited from an ostomy clinic of in Kerman, located in southeastern Iran. Data were collected from August to October 2019.

METHODS

Data were collected via interviews. A questionnaire, developed for purposes of this study, was developed that included items querying demographic and pertinent clinical characteristics and 2 validated instruments, the Resilience Scale and the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 (OAI-23). Data were analyzed using t tests, analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression.

RESULTS

The mean score for ostomy adjustment was 43.37 (SD = 11.57) indicating less than optimal adjustment to life with an ostomy. The mean score of the Resilience Scale was 104.56 (SD = 25.98); most participants (n = 67, 67%) had very low and low resilience. Resilience was weakly associated with ostomy adjustment; specifically, participants who scored higher on the Resilience Scale tended to score higher on the OAI-23 (r = 0.32, P = .006). Linear regression indicated that resilience had the greatest predictive effect on ostomy adjustment (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that higher levels of resilience may facilitate adjustment to a permanent ostomy. Findings indicate that nurses should design and implement programs to aid ostomy adjustment via resilience assessment.

Factors Affecting Psychosocial Adjustment in Persons With a Recent Ostomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of personal and clinical factors on psychosocial adjustment in persons living with an ostomy for less than 1 year.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The study sample comprised 183 adult individuals who had a colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy for less than 1 year, residing in the Northeastern United States.

METHODS

Data were collected from May through November 2018 using 2 instruments: a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 (OAI-23). The OAI-23 items measured 4 psychosocial subscales: acceptance, anxious preoccupation, social engagement, and anger. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of variance, Cramer's V correlations, and multiple regression.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis indicated that factors influencing psychosocial adjustment to an ostomy include age, assistance with care, educational background, stomal type, body mass index, ostomy height, preoperative education, and stoma siting. Multivariate analysis of variance identified that those who reported independence with ostomy care experienced higher levels of adjustment in all areas of the OAI-23.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study may assist nurses and other care providers to better understand the physical and emotional needs of those with ostomies and to identify interventions to promote optimal health in this population.

The lived experience of colorectal cancer patients with a temporary ileostomy and the patient's perception of the ostomy nurses' educational interventions

PURPOSE

This study is aimed at exploring the lived experiences of colorectal cancer patients regarding temporary ileostomy and the educational interventions of ostomy nurses.

METHODS

This study is conducted using Heideggerian phenomenological focus group. Focus group interviews were conducted from November 2021 to February 2022 using a semi-structured guide with nine colorectal cancer patients having a temporary ileostomy. The interview data were analyzed using latent content analysis RESULTS: Four main categories and 13 sub-categories are identified as the result of data analysis. Main categories were "colorectal cancer and ileostomy: patient's adaptation," "supporting resources for the patient with ileostomy," "ileostomy closure: hope and concerns," and "ostomy nurse's professionalism." The main categories reflect the shared experiences and perceptions of colorectal cancer patients, across the timeline from colorectal cancer diagnosis to ileostomy closure.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a timely response to a pilot project for recognizing ostomy nurse's education for patients with stomas. Also, the findings of this study contribute to nursing knowledge by providing patients' perspectives on the education provided to them by the ostomy nurse. Lastly, this study inspires future studies to evaluate and recognize ostomy nurse's practice by using various methodological approaches.