1
|
Shanthanna H, Joshi GP. Opioid-free general anesthesia: considerations, techniques, and limitations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:384-390. [PMID: 38841911 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss the role of opioids during general anesthesia and examine their advantages and risks in the context of clinical practice. We define opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) as the absolute avoidance of intraoperative opioids. RECENT FINDINGS In most minimally invasive and short-duration procedures, nonopioid analgesics, analgesic adjuvants, and local/regional analgesia can significantly spare the amount of intraoperative opioid needed. OFA should be considered in the context of tailoring to a specific patient and procedure, not as a universal approach. Strategies considered for OFA involve several adjuncts with low therapeutic range, requiring continuous infusions and resources, with potential for delayed recovery or other side effects, including increased short-term and long-term pain. No evidence indicates that OFA leads to decreased long-term opioid-related harms. SUMMARY Complete avoidance of intraoperative opioids remains questionable, as it does not necessarily ensure avoidance of postoperative opioids. Multimodal analgesia including local/regional anesthesia may allow OFA for selected, minimally invasive surgeries, but further research is necessary in surgeries with high postoperative opioid requirements. Until there is definitive evidence regarding procedure and patient-specific combinations as well as the dose and duration of administration of adjunct agents, it is imperative to practice opioid-sparing approach in the intraoperative period.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects
- Anesthesia, General/methods
- Anesthesia, General/adverse effects
- Anesthesia, General/standards
- Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
- Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
- Pain, Postoperative/etiology
- Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsha Shanthanna
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Z, Zuo Z, Song X, Zuo Y, Zhang L, Ye Y, Ma Y, Pan L, Zhao X, Jin Y. Mapping Theme Trends and Research Frontiers in Dexmedetomidine Over Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18:3043-3061. [PMID: 39050803 PMCID: PMC11268573 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s459431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) agonist, is extensively used in clinical and animal studies owing to its sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic effects. The diverse range of research domains associated with dexmedetomidine poses challenges in defining pivotal research directions. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a qualitative and quantitative bibliometric study in the field of dexmedetomidine over the past decade to establish current research trends and emerging frontiers. Methods Relevant publications in the field of dexmedetomidine between 2014 and 2023 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliometric analysis, incorporating statistical and visual analyses, was conducted using CiteSpace (6.1.R6) and R (4.3.1). Results The present study encompassed a total of 5,482 publications, exhibiting a consistent upward trend over the past decade. The United States and its institutions had the highest centrality. Ji, Fuhai, and Ebert, Thomas J. were identified as the most productive author and the most cited author, respectively. As anticipated, the most cited journal was Anesthesiology. Moreover, cluster analysis of cited references and co-occurrence of keywords revealed that recent studies were primarily focused on sedation, delirium, and opioid-free anesthesia. Finally, a timeline view of keywords clusters and keywords burst demonstrated that primary research frontiers were stress response, neuroinflammation, delirium, opioid-free anesthesia, peripheral nerve block, and complications. Conclusion Current research trends and directions are focused on sedation, delirium, and opioid-free anesthesia, as evidenced by our results. The frontier of future research is anticipated to encompass basic investigations into dexmedetomidine, including stress response and neuroinflammation, as well as clinical studies focusing on delirium, opioid-free anesthesia, peripheral nerve block, and associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheping Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenxiang Zuo
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinyu Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yaqun Zuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Le Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuyang Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yufeng Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lili Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanwu Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dai J, Li S, Weng Q, Long J, Wu D. Opioid-free anesthesia with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in the supine position for lower abdominal or pelvic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4652. [PMID: 38409359 PMCID: PMC10897418 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55370-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In the past, quadratus lumborum block (QLB) was mostly used for postoperative analgesia in patients, and few anesthesiologists applied it during surgery with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA). Consequently, it is still unclear whether QLB in the supine position can provide perfect analgesia and inhibit anesthetic stress during surgery under the OFA strategy. To observe the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (US-QLB) in the supine position with OFA for lower abdominal and pelvic surgery. A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in People's Hospital of Wanning between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and divided into a quadratus lumborum block group (Q) (n = 62) and control group (C) (n = 60) according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent general anesthesia combined with QLB in the supine position. After sedation, unilateral or bilateral QLB was performed via the ultrasound guided anterior approach based on images resembling a "human eye" and "baby in a cradle" under local anesthesia according to the needs of the operative field. In group Q, 20 ml of 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine diluted in normal saline (NS) were injected into each side. In group C, 20 ml of NS was injected into each side. The values of BP, HR, SPO2, SE, RE, SPI, NRS, Steward score, dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium, the number of patients who needed remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem, puncture point, block plane, duration of anesthesia, catheter extraction, and wakefulness during the operation were monitored. There were no significant differences in the general data, number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem treatment, as well as puncture point and puncture plane between the two groups (P > 0.05). HR, SBP, and DBP values were higher in group Q than in group C at T1; HR, SPI, and SE, while RE values were lower in group Q than in group C at T3, SE, and RE; the Steward score was higher in group Q than in group C at T4 and T5, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The extubation and awake times were lower in group Q than in group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SE, RE, and SPI values were lower at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. The Steward scores at T4 and T5 were higher in group Q than in group C, and were lower than at T0, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia between the two groups at t1, t3 and t4 (P < 0.05). US-QLB in the supine position with OFA is effective in patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery with stable intraoperative vital signs, complete recovery and better postoperative analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwei Dai
- Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Wanning, Wanning, 571500, Hainan, China
| | - Shanliang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Wanning, Wanning, 571500, Hainan, China
| | - Qijun Weng
- Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Wanning, Wanning, 571500, Hainan, China
| | - Jinxiong Long
- Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Wanning, Wanning, 571500, Hainan, China
| | - Duozhi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, 570311, Hainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hao C, Xu H, Du J, Zhang T, Zhang X, Zhao Z, Luan H. Impact of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:3539-3547. [PMID: 38046284 PMCID: PMC10693280 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s439674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Opioid analgesics may delay discharge and affect postoperative quality of recovery because of their significant adverse effects, such as hyperalgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering and urine retention. We aimed to compare the quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) between patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and those with opioid-based anesthesia (OA). Patients and Methods 80 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to an opioid-free anesthesia group (Group OFA) or an opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OA). The primary outcome was the quality of postoperative recovery using QoR-15 scale on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) and 2 (POD 2). The secondary outcomes included the incidence of opioid-related adverse symptoms, perioperative hemodynamic data, duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and duration of extubation, and the incidences of hypotension and bradycardia. Results A statistically significant difference in total QoR-15 was observed between the two groups on POD 1 and POD 2 (91.00 (90.00, 92.00) vs 113.00 (108.25, 115.00), 106.00 (104.00, 112.00) vs 133.00 (130.00, 135.00), P < 0.001). The incidence of opioid-related symptoms was significantly different between the two groups on POD 1 (P < 0.05). There were between-group differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at T3 (P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups (P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the duration of PACU stay, duration of extubation and the incidence of bradycardia (P > 0.05). There was no difference in heart rate between the two groups at all observed time points, either (P > 0.05). Conclusion We concluded that the quality of recovery of patients receiving OFA was superior to those receiving OA after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conghui Hao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate Training Base of Lianyungang First People’s Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hai Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate Training Base of Lianyungang First People’s Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jingjing Du
- Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate Training Base of Lianyungang First People’s Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianyu Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate Training Base of Lianyungang First People’s Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaobao Zhang
- Department of anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhibin Zhao
- Department of anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hengfei Luan
- Department of anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoffman C, Shah S, Mai M, Miller A, Banki F. Feasibility and Outcomes of Same-Day Surgery in Primary and Reoperative Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2287-2296. [PMID: 37670107 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05807-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and outcomes of same-day surgery in primary and reoperative laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs. METHODS Same-day surgery was planned in elective procedures with ASA II-IV. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol was implemented to achieve same-day surgery, and opioid-based anesthesia was replaced by opioid-free anesthesia. Outcomes were assessed by length of stay, transition from same-day surgery to observation or inpatient, and postoperative emergency department visits/readmissions. The predictors of same-day surgery were assessed. Values are presented as median (interquartile range). RESULTS From 04/13/2017 to 09/29/2022, there were 518 laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs in 491 patients, 428/518 (82.6%) were primary, and 90/518 (17.4%) were reoperative. In the primary group, 314/428 (73.4%) were planned as same-day surgery and 246/314 (78.3%) were performed as same-day surgery. Same-day surgery with opioid-based anesthesia protocol was performed in 77/314 (24.5%) vs. same-day surgery with opioid-free anesthesia protocol in 169/314 (53.8%), p < 0.001, 41/246 (16.7%) same-day surgery primary procedures had emergency department visit post-discharge, and 26/246 (10.6%) were readmitted. In the reoperative group, 51/90 (56.7%) were planned as same-day surgery, and 27/51 (52.9%) were performed as same-day surgery. Same-day surgery with opioid-based anesthesia protocol was performed in 2/51 (3.9%) vs. same-day surgery with opioid-free anesthesia protocol in 25/51 (49.0%), p < 0.001, 3/27 (11.1%) same-day surgery reoperative procedures had emergency department visit post-discharge, and 3/27 (11.1%) were readmitted. Opioid-free anesthesia protocol was the positive predictor of same-day surgery compared to opioid-based anesthesia protocol (OR 7.44 [95% CI: 2.94, 18.83]), p < 0.001. Negative predictors were ASA III compared to II (OR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.28, 0.94]), p = 0.031, and duration of operation (OR 0.98 [0.97, 0.99]) p < 0.001. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair can be performed as same-day surgery in the majority of primary and reoperative procedures with good outcomes and low postoperative emergency department visits and readmissions. The odds of same-day surgery are higher with opioid-free anesthesia, lower ASA, and shorter operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Hoffman
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), 6400 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shalin Shah
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), 6400 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Megan Mai
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), 6400 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andre Miller
- Memorial Hermann Southeast Esophageal Disease Center, 11914 Astoria Blvd. # 260, Houston, TX, 77089, USA
| | - Farzaneh Banki
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), 6400 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Memorial Hermann Southeast Esophageal Disease Center, 11914 Astoria Blvd. # 260, Houston, TX, 77089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cukierman DS, Cata JP, Gan TJ. Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2023; 37:285-303. [PMID: 37938077 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23 h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Cukierman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tong Joo Gan
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|