Well-Being Intervention in General Surgery: Multicenter Study of Program Director and Resident Perspectives

Effects of Mentorship on Surgery Residents' Burnout and Well-Being: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

In surgical training, a mentor is a more senior and experienced surgeon who guides a surgical trainee to meet personal, professional, and educational goals. Although mentorship is widely assumed to positively affect surgical residents' professional development, a more nuanced understanding of mentorship's impact is lacking and urgently needed as burnout rates among residents increase. This study aims to summarize the current literature on the effects of mentorship on surgical residents' burnout and well-being.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed with key terms related to "surgical resident" and "mentor" using Pubmed, Embase, and ProQuest databases for primary studies published in the United States or Canada from January 1, 2010 to December 9, 2022 that measured outcomes related to burnout and well-being. Multiple reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance, then full-text articles for eligibility.

RESULTS

Initial search resulted in 1,468 unique articles, and 19 articles were included after review. Only one article was a randomized controlled trial. Twelve studies described a decrease in burnout rates or in outcomes related to burnout. In contrast, 4 studies identified negative outcomes related to burnout. Six studies showed improved well-being or related outcomes. One study was not able to show a change in self-valuation between coached and noncoached residents.

CONCLUSION

High quality mentorship can be associated with improved well-being and decreased burnout in surgical residents, but the key elements of effective and helpful mentorship remain poorly characterized. This summary highlights the importance of making mentorship accessible to surgical residents, and training faculty to be effective mentors.

Implementation of Flexible Days Off Improves Surgical Resident Attendance of Personal Health Appointments, Perceived Wellbeing, and Sense of Control

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resident schedules are demanding. Despite ACGME requirements that residents be able to attend personal appointments, many residents put off essential health tasks due to work hours. We designed a method for surgical residents to request a "flex" or personal day utilizing an online system for requesting and tracking.

DESIGN

Residents were given 5 days to use during 1 academic year. A float rotation was implemented to cover scheduled absences. We conducted an anonymous REDCap survey pre and postimplementation regarding resident ability to attend personal appointments and wellbeing. The results of these surveys were compared using descriptive statistics, t-test, and chi-square testing.

SETTING

Single large academic training institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty general surgery residents.

RESULTS

Over 9 months, we scheduled 195 flex days and 91% of residents had used the program. The most common uses were travel, time with family/friends, and attending personal health appointments Postimplementation, of residents who needed an appointment, an increased percentage attended a physician (92% vs. 71%, p 0.02), dental (94% vs. 65%, p < 0.01) or mental health (96% vs. 64%, p < 0.01) appointment. A decreased percentage delayed a necessary appointment due to work hours (45% vs. 19.5%, p 0.01), 94% reported improved schedule control, and 100% believed the program was important for wellbeing. When comparing Mayo Wellbeing Index scores pre and postimplementation there was a decrease in the number of trainees reporting high distress (18.8% vs. 29.3%, p 0.03). Postimplementation, our program noted an 80% decrease in the number of duty hours violations (16 vs. 3 violations) and a 12% increase in compliance with the ACGME survey for ability to attend personal appointments.

CONCLUSION

"Flex" days offer surgical residents improved schedule control and the ability to schedule essential personal appointments. They are feasible, even within large training programs, with significant uptake in our sample.

Belonging in Surgery: A Validated Instrument and Single Institutional Pilot

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to measure Belonging in Surgery among surgical residents.

BACKGROUND

Belonging is the essential human need to maintain meaningful relationships and connections to one's community. Increased belongingness is associated with better well-being, job performance, and motivation to learn. However, no tools exist to measure belonging among surgical trainees.

METHODS

A panel of experts adapted a belonging instrument for use among United States surgery residents. After administration of the 28-item instrument to residents at a single institution, a Cronbach alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency, and exploratory principal component analyses were performed. Multiple iterations of analyses with successively smaller item samples suggested the instrument could be shortened. The expert panel was reconvened to shorten the instrument. Descriptive statistics measured demographic factors associated with Belonging in Surgery.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 52% (114 responses). The Cronbach alpha among the 28 items was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.96). The exploratory principal component analyses and subsequent Promax rotation yielded 1 dominant component with an eigenvalue of 12.84 (70% of the variance). The expert panel narrowed the final instrument to 11 items with an overall Cronbach alpha of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92). Belonging in Surgery was significantly associated with race (Black and Asian residents scoring lower than White residents), graduating with one's original intern cohort (residents who graduated with their original class scoring higher than those that did not), and inversely correlated with resident stress level.

CONCLUSIONS

An instrument to measure Belonging in Surgery was validated among surgical residents. With this instrument, Belonging in Surgery becomes a construct that may be used to investigate surgeon performance and well-being.

Investigating First Year Surgery Residents' Expectations of Demand, Control, and Support During Training

OBJECTIVE

To provide a more granular understanding of the expectations of general surgery interns regarding workplace demand, control, and support prior to starting training.

SUMMARY/BACKGROUND DATA

General surgery (GS) interns are at highest risk for burnout and attrition. Maslach frames burnout as resulting from a mismatch between workplace expectations and reality. Occupational science demonstrates workplace demand, control, and support (DCS) as strong influencers of job strain. GS interns' realistic expectations of demands are associated with decreased likelihood of attrition, but their expectations regarding this factor are poorly understood.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 incoming surgical residents at UCSF: University of California, San Francisco (57% women, 71% non-White), exploring expectations regarding workplace DCS. Transcripts were uploaded to analytic software and coded in dyads using an iterative approach to consensus. Transcripts were thematically analyzed using inductive and deductive reasoning, applying job-demand-resource theory frameworks, and following a published 6-step approach.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged: past experiences, expected rewards, anticipated challenges, and the desire to belong. Past experiences describes the expectation to successfully cope with future stressors via self-reliance. Rewards such as professional mastery, personal growth, and sense of meaning were expected outcomes seen as balancing anticipated challenges. Anticipated challenges included low control, toxic cultural elements, and discrimination. Desire to belong (i.e., earned recognition as a peer, inclusion in an elite culture) emerged as a powerful motivator, with survival connotations for women and non-Whites.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest incoming interns overestimate the efficacy of self-reliance for coping; count on specific rewards; express realistic expectations regarding challenges; and see inclusion among surgeons as an aspiration that off-sets prolonged effort. Further study is warranted to understand expectation-reality mismatch and potential interventions to target dissonance.

MINI-ABSTRACT

In this institutional study of general surgery interns, we provide a more granular understanding of the expectations of general surgery interns regarding workplace demand, control, and support prior to starting training, and how we might target "expectations-reality" mismatch and the "desire to belong" as a means of mitigating burnout and minimizing attrition from training.

Investigating Workplace Support and the Importance of Psychological Safety in General Surgery Residency Training

OBJECTIVE

Workplace interventions that increase support can mitigate burnout, improve workplace satisfaction, and increase well-being. Our aim is to provide evidence-based targets to inform future work for operationalizing support in general surgery residency.

DESIGN

This is a 2-part mixed-methods cross-sectional study. Part 1 analyzed qualitative data from focus groups (April 2021-May 2022). Part 2 comprised an online survey (informed by findings in Part 1) in May 2022 to assess the association between perceived psychological safety (PS) and flourishing, as well as PS and languishing.

SETTING

National multi-center study including 16 ACGME-accredited academic programs.

PARTICIPANTS

General surgery residents at various training levels, in both clinical and research.

RESULTS

A total of 28 residents participated in the focus groups which revealed both enhancers and inhibitors of support pertaining to PS in the workplace. Enhancers of support included those currently implemented (i.e., allyship of mentors) and those proposed by residents (i.e., nonpunitive analysis of mistakes). Inhibitors of support included both systems (i.e., wellness initiatives as a 'band-aid' for systems issues) and culture (i.e., indefatigability, stoicism). About 251 residents (31%) responded to the survey which revealed higher perception of PS was significantly associated with flourishing at the level of residency program and departmental leadership. Lower perception of PS was significantly associated with languishing at the level of residency program leadership only.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the promotion of PS, such as expansion of mentorship to include advocacy (advocating on a resident's behalf, recognition when mistreated) and affirmation (i.e., soliciting opinions on controversial social matters/events, recognizing different life experiences), cultural acceptance of asking for help (without being perceived as weak), formal help navigating interpersonal dynamics (i.e., guidance from senior residents), and leadership presentations and modeling to destigmatize asking for help, as a means of operationalizing workplace support to increase flourishing and decrease languishing.

Investigating influential factors and mechanisms of surgical resident well-being using social network analysis

BACKGROUND

Burnout and depression in General Surgery residents affect patient care and drive attrition. Few impactful interventions exist, in part because little is known about influential drivers and mechanistic relationships.

METHODS

Residents from 16 general surgery programs completed published well-being scales in January 2021. Social network analysis demonstrated influential relationships between factors, and path analysis revealed drivers of burnout and depression.

RESULTS

300 residents completed the survey (34% response rate). Workplace demand and mindfulness influenced depressive symptoms and emotional exhaustion, mediated by perceived stress. Mindfulness increased personal accomplishment, mediated by psychological well-being (p ​< ​0.05 for all results). All mediated effects were greater than direct effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study yielded a quantitative conceptual model of mechanistic relationships affecting well-being in surgical residency, identifying stress and psychological well-being (measuring sense of purpose) as central mediators, and triangulating workplace demand and mindfulness as potentially high-yield interventional targets for reducing burnout and depression in surgical residency.

The Current State of Plastic Surgery Residency Wellness Programs: Benefits and Barriers

Background

Wellness programs are especially important in residency. However, the resources available to plastic surgery residents through residency wellness programs have not been described. This study reports current plastic surgery residency wellness programs' organization, leadership, and resources.

Methods

An anonymous and voluntary e-mail survey was sent to 106 plastic surgery residency program directors through May and June 2022. Features of residency wellness programs were detailed, and program directors' sentiments towards residency wellness programs were evaluated.

Results

A 30.2% (32 of 106) complete response rate was achieved. Nearly 90% (87.5%, 28 of 32) of program directors indicated the presence of a wellness program. More than 75% (21 of 28) of programs are supported by the Office of Graduate Medical Education. Wellness events were offered by 92.9% (26 of 28) of programs. More than half of programs offered resources for mental health, physical health, mentorship, and protected time. Several resources were associated with the presence of wellness leadership roles, suggesting residents can positively shape wellness program offerings. Program directors strongly indicated that wellness programs are important, relevant, and effective. Additionally, 75% (24 of 32) report a desire to learn about wellness programs at other plastic surgery residency programs.

Conclusions

Resources offered through plastic surgery residency wellness programs are comparable to those in other specialties. However, plastic surgery programs vary in the resources offered to residents and barriers to access exist. Greater involvement of residents in plastic surgery wellness programs may better support physician wellness.

Operationalizing the Culture of Burnout and Well-Being: Multicenter Study of Value Congruence and Flourishing in General Surgery Residency

BACKGROUND

Value congruence (VC) is the degree of alignment between worker and workplace values and is strongly associated with reduced job strain and retention. Within general surgery residency, the impact of VC and how to operationalize it to improve workplace well-being remain unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

This 2-part mixed-methods study comprised 2 surveys of US general surgery residents and qualitative interviews with program directors. In Part 1, January 2021, mixed-level surgical residents from 16 ACGME-accredited general surgery residency programs participated in survey #1. This survey was used to identify shared or conflicting perspectives on VC concerning well-being initiatives and resources. In April 2021, interviews from 8 institutions were conducted with 9 program directors or their proxies. In Part 2, May to June 2022, a similar cohort of surgical residents participated in survey #2. Unadjusted logistic and linear regression models were used in this survey to assess the association between VC and individual-level global well-being (ie flourishing), respectively.

RESULTS

In survey #1 (N = 300, 34% response rate), lack of VC was an emergent theme with subthemes of inaccessibility, inconsiderateness, inauthenticity, and insufficiency regarding well-being resources. Program directors expressed variable awareness of and alignment with these perceptions. In survey #2 (N = 251, 31% response rate), higher VC was significantly associated with flourishing (odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.52, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Exploring the perceived lack of VC within general surgery residency reveals an important cultural variable for optimizing well-being and suggests open dialogue as a first step toward positive change. Future work to identify where and how institutional actions diminish perceived VC is warranted.