The architectural design of networks of protein domain architectures

Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery

Genes duplicate, mutate, recombine, fuse or fission to produce new genes, or when genes are formed from de novo, novel functions arise during evolution. Researchers have tried to quantify the causes of these molecular diversification processes to know how these genes increase molecular complexity over a period of time, for instance protein domain organization. In contrast to global sequence similarity, protein domain architectures can capture key structural and functional characteristics, making them better proxies for describing functional equivalence. In Prokaryotes and eukaryotes it has proven that, domain designs are retained over significant evolutionary distances. Protein domain architectures are now being utilized to categorize and distinguish evolutionarily related proteins and find homologs among species that are evolutionarily distant from one another. Additionally, structural information stored in domain structures has accelerated homology identification and sequence search methods. Tools for functional protein annotation have been developed to discover, protein domain content, domain order, domain recurrence, and domain position as all these contribute to the prediction of protein functional accuracy. In this review, an attempt is made to summarise facts and speculations regarding the use of protein domain architecture and modularity to identify possible therapeutic targets among cellular activities based on the understanding their linked biological processes.

Evolution of Protein Domain Architectures

This chapter reviews current research on how protein domain architectures evolve. We begin by summarizing work on the phylogenetic distribution of proteins, as this will directly impact which domain architectures can be formed in different species. Studies relating domain family size to occurrence have shown that they generally follow power law distributions, both within genomes and larger evolutionary groups. These findings were subsequently extended to multi-domain architectures. Genome evolution models that have been suggested to explain the shape of these distributions are reviewed, as well as evidence for selective pressure to expand certain domain families more than others. Each domain has an intrinsic combinatorial propensity, and the effects of this have been studied using measures of domain versatility or promiscuity. Next, we study the principles of protein domain architecture evolution and how these have been inferred from distributions of extant domain arrangements. Following this, we review inferences of ancestral domain architecture and the conclusions concerning domain architecture evolution mechanisms that can be drawn from these. Finally, we examine whether all known cases of a given domain architecture can be assumed to have a single common origin (monophyly) or have evolved convergently (polyphyly). We end by a discussion of some available tools for computational analysis or exploitation of protein domain architectures and their evolution.

The language of the protein universe

Proteins, the main cell machinery which play a major role in nearly every cellular process, have always been a central focus in biology. We live in the post-genomic era, and inferring information from massive data sets is a steadily growing universal challenge. The increasing availability of fully sequenced genomes can be regarded as the 'Rosetta Stone' of the protein universe, allowing the understanding of genomes and their evolution, just as the original Rosetta Stone allowed Champollion to decipher the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. In this review, we consider aspects of the protein domain architectures repertoire that are closely related to those of human languages and aim to provide some insights about the language of proteins.

K-core decomposition of a protein domain co-occurrence network reveals lower cancer mutation rates for interior cores

Background

Network biology currently focuses primarily on metabolic pathways, gene regulatory, and protein-protein interaction networks. While these approaches have yielded critical information, alternative methods to network analysis will offer new perspectives on biological information. A little explored area is the interactions between domains that can be captured using domain co-occurrence networks (DCN). A DCN can be used to study the function and interaction of proteins by representing protein domains and their co-existence in genes and by mapping cancer mutations to the individual protein domains to identify signals.

Results

The domain co-occurrence network was constructed for the human proteome based on PFAM domains in proteins. Highly connected domains in the central cores were identified using the k-core decomposition technique. Here we show that these domains were found to be more evolutionarily conserved than the peripheral domains. The somatic mutations for ovarian, breast and prostate cancer diseases were obtained from the TCGA database. We mapped the somatic mutations to the individual protein domains and the local false discovery rate was used to identify significantly mutated domains in each cancer type. Significantly mutated domains were found to be enriched in cancer disease pathways. However, we found that the inner cores of the DCN did not contain any of the significantly mutated domains. We observed that the inner core protein domains are highly conserved and these domains co-exist in large numbers with other protein domains.

Conclusion

Mutations and domain co-occurrence networks provide a framework for understanding hierarchal designs in protein function from a network perspective. This study provides evidence that a majority of protein domains in the inner core of the DCN have a lower mutation frequency and that protein domains present in the peripheral regions of the k-core contribute more heavily to the disease. These findings may contribute further to drug development.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13336-015-0016-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.