1
|
Young HS, McCauley FO, Micheli F, Dunbar RB, McCauley DJ. Shortened food chain length in a fished versus unfished coral reef. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2024; 34:e3002. [PMID: 38840322 DOI: 10.1002/eap.3002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Direct exploitation through fishing is driving dramatic declines of wildlife populations in ocean environments, particularly for predatory and large-bodied taxa. Despite wide recognition of this pattern and well-established consequences of such trophic downgrading on ecosystem function, there have been few empirical studies examining the effects of fishing on whole system trophic architecture. Understanding these kinds of structural impacts is especially important in coral reef ecosystems-often heavily fished and facing multiple stressors. Given the often high dietary flexibility and numerous functional redundancies in diverse ecosystems such as coral reefs, it is important to establish whether web architecture is strongly impacted by fishing pressure or whether it might be resilient, at least to moderate-intensity pressure. To examine this question, we used a combination of bulk and compound-specific stable isotope analyses measured across a range of predatory and low-trophic-level consumers between two coral reef ecosystems that differed with respect to fishing pressure but otherwise remained largely similar. We found that even in a high-diversity system with relatively modest fishing pressure, there were strong reductions in the trophic position (TP) of the three highest TP consumers examined in the fished system but no effects on the TP of lower-level consumers. We saw no evidence that this shortening of the affected food webs was being driven by changes in basal resource consumption, for example, through changes in the spatial location of foraging by consumers. Instead, this likely reflected internal changes in food web architecture, suggesting that even in diverse systems and with relatively modest pressure, human harvest causes significant compressions in food chain length. This observed shortening of these food webs may have many important emergent ecological consequences for the functioning of ecosystems impacted by fishing or hunting. Such important structural shifts may be widespread but unnoticed by traditional surveys. This insight may also be useful for applied ecosystem managers grappling with choices about the relative importance of protection for remote and pristine areas and the value of strict no-take areas to protect not just the raw constituents of systems affected by fishing and hunting but also the health and functionality of whole systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillary S Young
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | | | - Fiorenza Micheli
- Oceans Department, Hopkins Marine Station, and Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, USA
| | - Robert B Dunbar
- Oceans Department and Earth Systems Science, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, USA
| | - Douglas J McCauley
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller-ter Kuile A, Apigo A, Bui A, Butner K, Childress JN, Copeland S, DiFiore BP, Forbes ES, Klope M, Motta CI, Orr D, Plummer KA, Preston DL, Young HS. Changes in invertebrate food web structure between high- and low-productivity environments are driven by intermediate but not top-predator diet shifts. Biol Lett 2022; 18:20220364. [PMID: 36287142 PMCID: PMC9601239 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Predator-prey interactions shape ecosystem stability and are influenced by changes in ecosystem productivity. However, because multiple biotic and abiotic drivers shape the trophic responses of predators to productivity, we often observe patterns, but not mechanisms, by which productivity drives food web structure. One way to capture mechanisms shaping trophic responses is to quantify trophic interactions among multiple trophic groups and by using complementary metrics of trophic ecology. In this study, we combine two diet-tracing methods: diet DNA and stable isotopes, for two trophic groups (top predators and intermediate predators) in both low- and high-productivity habitats to elucidate where in the food chain trophic structure shifts in response to changes in underlying ecosystem productivity. We demonstrate that while top predators show increases in isotopic trophic position (δ15N) with productivity, neither their isotopic niche size nor their DNA diet composition changes. Conversely, intermediate predators show clear turnover in DNA diet composition towards a more predatory prey base in high-productivity habitats. Taking this multi-trophic approach highlights how predator identity shapes responses in predator-prey interactions across environments with different underlying productivity, building predictive power for understanding the outcomes of ongoing anthropogenic change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Miller-ter Kuile
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Austen Apigo
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - An Bui
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Kirsten Butner
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jasmine N. Childress
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Copeland
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Bartholomew P. DiFiore
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth S. Forbes
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maggie Klope
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Carina I. Motta
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Departamento de Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Av. 24 A, 1515 - Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-752, Brasil
| | - Devyn Orr
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- USDA ARS Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, OR, USA
| | | | - Daniel L. Preston
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Hillary S. Young
- Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|