Mucoadhesive films inside the colonic tube: performance in a three-dimensional world

Macro-Scale Tread Patterns for Traction in the Intestine

GOAL

Tread patterns are widely used to increase traction on different substrates, with the tread scale, geometry and material being tailored to the application. This work explores the efficacy of using macro-scale tread patterns for a medical application involving a colon substrate - renowned for its low friction characteristics.

METHODS

Current literature was first summarized before an experimental approach was used, based on a custom test rig with ex vivo porcine colon, to assess different macro-scale tread patterns. Performance was based on increasing traction while avoiding significant trauma. Repeated testing (n = 16) was used to obtain robust results.

RESULTS

A macro-scale tread pattern can increase the traction coefficient significantly, with a static traction coefficient of 0.74 ± 0.22 and a dynamic traction coefficient of 0.35 ± 0.04 compared to a smooth (on the macro-scale) Control (0.132 ± 0.055 and 0.054 ± 0.015, respectively). Decreasing the scale and spacing between the tread features reduced apparent trauma but also reduced the traction coefficient.

CONCLUSION

Significant traction can be achieved on colon tissue using a macro-scale tread but a compromise between traction (large feature sizes) and trauma (small feature sizes) may have to be made.

SIGNIFICANCE

This work provides greater insight into the complex frictional mechanisms of the intestine and gives suggestions for developing functional tread surfaces for a wide range of clinical applications.

Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy requires highly skill-dependent manoeuvres that demand a significant amount of training, and can cause considerable discomfort to patients, which increases the use of sedatives. Understanding the underlying fundamental mechanics behind insertion difficulties and pain during colonoscopy may help to simplify colonoscopy and reduce the required extent of training and reliance on sedatives.

METHODS

A literature search, anatomical studies, models of the colon and colonoscope, and bench tests were used to qualitatively analyze the fundamental mechanical causes of insertion difficulties and pain. A categorized review resulted in an overview of potential alternatives to current colonoscopes.

RESULTS

To advance a colonoscope through the colon, the colon wall, ligaments and peritoneum must be stretched, thus creating tension in the colon wall, which resists further wall deformation. This resistance forces the colonoscope to bend and follow the curves of the colon. The deformations that cause insertion difficulties and pain (necessitating the use of complex conventional manoeuvres) are the stretching of ligaments, and stretching of colon wall in the transverse and longitudinal directions, and the peritoneum.

CONCLUSIONS

Four fundamental mechanical solutions to prevent these deformations were extracted from the analysis. The current results may help in the development of new colonoscopy devices that reduce - or eliminate - the necessity of using highly skill-dependent manoeuvres, facilitate training and reduce the use of sedatives.

Preliminary mechanical characterization of the small bowel for in vivo robotic mobility

In this work we present test methods, devices, and preliminary results for the mechanical characterization of the small bowel for intra luminal robotic mobility. Both active and passive forces that affect mobility are investigated. Four investigative devices and testing methods to characterize the active and passive forces are presented in this work: (1) a novel manometer and a force sensor array that measure force per cm of axial length generated by the migrating motor complex, (2) a biaxial test apparatus and method for characterizing the biomechanical properties of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, (3) a novel in vitro device and protocol designed to measure the energy required to overcome the self-adhesivity of the mucosa, and (4) a novel tribometer that measures the in vivo coefficient of friction between the mucus membrane and the robot surface. The four devices are tested on a single porcine model to validate the approach and protocols. Mean force readings per cm of axial length of intestine that occurred over a 15 min interval in vivo were 1.34 ± 0.14 and 1.18 ± 0.22 N cm(-1) in the middle and distal regions, respectively. Based on the biaxial stress/stretch tests, the tissue behaves anisotropically with the circumferential direction being more compliant than the axial direction. The mean work per unit area for mucoseparation of the small bowel is 0.08 ± 0.03 mJ cm(-2). The total energy to overcome mucoadhesion over the entire length of the porcine small bowel is approximately 0.55 J. The mean in vivo coefficient of friction (COF) of a curved 6.97 cm(2) polycarbonate sled on live mucosa traveling at 1 mm s(-1) is 0.016 ± 0.002. This is slightly lower than the COF on excised tissue, given the same input parameters. We have initiated a comprehensive program and suite of test devices and protocols for mechanically characterizing the small bowel for in vivo mobility. Results show that each of the four protocols and associated test devices has successfully gathered preliminary data to confirm the validity of our test approach.