Populations of genetic circuits are unable to find the fittest solution in a multilevel genotype-phenotype map

Non-Poissonian Bursts in the Arrival of Phenotypic Variation Can Strongly Affect the Dynamics of Adaptation

Modeling the rate at which adaptive phenotypes appear in a population is a key to predicting evolutionary processes. Given random mutations, should this rate be modeled by a simple Poisson process, or is a more complex dynamics needed? Here we use analytic calculations and simulations of evolving populations on explicit genotype-phenotype maps to show that the introduction of novel phenotypes can be "bursty" or overdispersed. In other words, a novel phenotype either appears multiple times in quick succession or not at all for many generations. These bursts are fundamentally caused by statistical fluctuations and other structure in the map from genotypes to phenotypes. Their strength depends on population parameters, being highest for "monomorphic" populations with low mutation rates. They can also be enhanced by additional inhomogeneities in the mapping from genotypes to phenotypes. We mainly investigate the effect of bursts using the well-studied genotype-phenotype map for RNA secondary structure, but find similar behavior in a lattice protein model and in Richard Dawkins's biomorphs model of morphological development. Bursts can profoundly affect adaptive dynamics. Most notably, they imply that fitness differences play a smaller role in determining which phenotype fixes than would be the case for a Poisson process without bursts.

The non-deterministic genotype-phenotype map of RNA secondary structure

Selection and variation are both key aspects in the evolutionary process. Previous research on the mapping between molecular sequence (genotype) and molecular fold (phenotype) has shown the presence of several structural properties in different biological contexts, implying that these might be universal in evolutionary spaces. The deterministic genotype-phenotype (GP) map that links short RNA sequences to minimum free energy secondary structures has been studied extensively because of its computational tractability and biologically realistic nature. However, this mapping ignores the phenotypic plasticity of RNA. We define a GP map that incorporates non-deterministic (ND) phenotypes, and take RNA as a case study; we use the Boltzmann probability distribution of folded structures and examine the structural properties of ND GP maps for RNA sequences of length 12 and coarse-grained RNA structures of length 30 (RNAshapes30). A framework is presented to study robustness, evolvability and neutral spaces in the ND map. This framework is validated by demonstrating close correspondence between the ND quantities and sample averages of their deterministic counterparts. When using the ND framework we observe the same structural properties as in the deterministic GP map, such as bias, negative correlation between genotypic robustness and evolvability, and positive correlation between phenotypic robustness and evolvability.

Maximum mutational robustness in genotype-phenotype maps follows a self-similar blancmange-like curve

Phenotype robustness, defined as the average mutational robustness of all the genotypes that map to a given phenotype, plays a key role in facilitating neutral exploration of novel phenotypic variation by an evolving population. By applying results from coding theory, we prove that the maximum phenotype robustness occurs when genotypes are organized as bricklayer's graphs, so-called because they resemble the way in which a bricklayer would fill in a Hamming graph. The value of the maximal robustness is given by a fractal continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere sums-of-digits function from number theory. Interestingly, genotype-phenotype maps for RNA secondary structure and the hydrophobic-polar (HP) model for protein folding can exhibit phenotype robustness that exactly attains this upper bound. By exploiting properties of the sums-of-digits function, we prove a lower bound on the deviation of the maximum robustness of phenotypes with multiple neutral components from the bricklayer's graph bound, and show that RNA secondary structure phenotypes obey this bound. Finally, we show how robustness changes when phenotypes are coarse-grained and derive a formula and associated bounds for the transition probabilities between such phenotypes.

Random and Natural Non-Coding RNA Have Similar Structural Motif Patterns but Differ in Bulge, Loop, and Bond Counts

An important question in evolutionary biology is whether (and in what ways) genotype–phenotype (GP) map biases can influence evolutionary trajectories. Untangling the relative roles of natural selection and biases (and other factors) in shaping phenotypes can be difficult. Because the RNA secondary structure (SS) can be analyzed in detail mathematically and computationally, is biologically relevant, and a wealth of bioinformatic data are available, it offers a good model system for studying the role of bias. For quite short RNA (length L≤126), it has recently been shown that natural and random RNA types are structurally very similar, suggesting that bias strongly constrains evolutionary dynamics. Here, we extend these results with emphasis on much larger RNA with lengths up to 3000 nucleotides. By examining both abstract shapes and structural motif frequencies (i.e., the number of helices, bonds, bulges, junctions, and loops), we find that large natural and random structures are also very similar, especially when contrasted to typical structures sampled from the spaces of all possible RNA structures. Our motif frequency study yields another result, where the frequencies of different motifs can be used in machine learning algorithms to classify random and natural RNA with high accuracy, especially for longer RNA (e.g., ROC AUC 0.86 for L = 1000). The most important motifs for classification are the number of bulges, loops, and bonds. This finding may be useful in using SS to detect candidates for functional RNA within ‘junk’ DNA regions.

Predicting phenotype transition probabilities via conditional algorithmic probability approximations

Unravelling the structure of genotype-phenotype (GP) maps is an important problem in biology. Recently, arguments inspired by algorithmic information theory (AIT) and Kolmogorov complexity have been invoked to uncover simplicity bias in GP maps, an exponentially decaying upper bound in phenotype probability with the increasing phenotype descriptional complexity. This means that phenotypes with many genotypes assigned via the GP map must be simple, while complex phenotypes must have few genotypes assigned. Here, we use similar arguments to bound the probability P(x → y) that phenotype x, upon random genetic mutation, transitions to phenotype y. The bound is [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the estimated conditional complexity of y given x, quantifying how much extra information is required to make y given access to x. This upper bound is related to the conditional form of algorithmic probability from AIT. We demonstrate the practical applicability of our derived bound by predicting phenotype transition probabilities (and other related quantities) in simulations of RNA and protein secondary structures. Our work contributes to a general mathematical understanding of GP maps and may facilitate the prediction of transition probabilities directly from examining phenotype themselves, without utilizing detailed knowledge of the GP map.

Phenotype Bias Determines How Natural RNA Structures Occupy the Morphospace of All Possible Shapes

Morphospaces-representations of phenotypic characteristics-are often populated unevenly, leaving large parts unoccupied. Such patterns are typically ascribed to contingency, or else to natural selection disfavoring certain parts of the morphospace. The extent to which developmental bias, the tendency of certain phenotypes to preferentially appear as potential variation, also explains these patterns is hotly debated. Here we demonstrate quantitatively that developmental bias is the primary explanation for the occupation of the morphospace of RNA secondary structure (SS) shapes. Upon random mutations, some RNA SS shapes (the frequent ones) are much more likely to appear than others. By using the RNAshapes method to define coarse-grained SS classes, we can directly compare the frequencies that noncoding RNA SS shapes appear in the RNAcentral database to frequencies obtained upon a random sampling of sequences. We show that: 1) only the most frequent structures appear in nature; the vast majority of possible structures in the morphospace have not yet been explored; 2) remarkably small numbers of random sequences are needed to produce all the RNA SS shapes found in nature so far; and 3) perhaps most surprisingly, the natural frequencies are accurately predicted, over several orders of magnitude in variation, by the likelihood that structures appear upon a uniform random sampling of sequences. The ultimate cause of these patterns is not natural selection, but rather a strong phenotype bias in the RNA genotype-phenotype map, a type of developmental bias or "findability constraint," which limits evolutionary dynamics to a hugely reduced subset of structures that are easy to "find."

Insertions and deletions in the RNA sequence-structure map

Genotype-phenotype maps link genetic changes to their fitness effect and are thus an essential component of evolutionary models. The map between RNA sequences and their secondary structures is a key example and has applications in functional RNA evolution. For this map, the structural effect of substitutions is well understood, but models usually assume a constant sequence length and do not consider insertions or deletions. Here, we expand the sequence-structure map to include single nucleotide insertions and deletions by using the RNAshapes concept. To quantify the structural effect of insertions and deletions, we generalize existing definitions for robustness and non-neutral mutation probabilities. We find striking similarities between substitutions, deletions and insertions: robustness to substitutions is correlated with robustness to insertions and, for most structures, to deletions. In addition, frequent structural changes after substitutions also tend to be common for insertions and deletions. This is consistent with the connection between energetically suboptimal folds and possible structural transitions. The similarities observed hold both for genotypic and phenotypic robustness and mutation probabilities, i.e. for individual sequences and for averages over sequences with the same structure. Our results could have implications for the rate of neutral and non-neutral evolution.

From genotypes to organisms: State-of-the-art and perspectives of a cornerstone in evolutionary dynamics

Understanding how genotypes map onto phenotypes, fitness, and eventually organisms is arguably the next major missing piece in a fully predictive theory of evolution. We refer to this generally as the problem of the genotype-phenotype map. Though we are still far from achieving a complete picture of these relationships, our current understanding of simpler questions, such as the structure induced in the space of genotypes by sequences mapped to molecular structures, has revealed important facts that deeply affect the dynamical description of evolutionary processes. Empirical evidence supporting the fundamental relevance of features such as phenotypic bias is mounting as well, while the synthesis of conceptual and experimental progress leads to questioning current assumptions on the nature of evolutionary dynamics-cancer progression models or synthetic biology approaches being notable examples. This work delves with a critical and constructive attitude into our current knowledge of how genotypes map onto molecular phenotypes and organismal functions, and discusses theoretical and empirical avenues to broaden and improve this comprehension. As a final goal, this community should aim at deriving an updated picture of evolutionary processes soundly relying on the structural properties of genotype spaces, as revealed by modern techniques of molecular and functional analysis.