Natural variation at the Drosophila melanogaster Or22 odorant receptor locus is associated with changes in olfactory behaviour

The maxillary palps of Tephritidae are selectively tuned to food volatiles and diverge with ecology

The maxillary palp is an auxiliary olfactory organ in insects, which, different from the antennae, is equipped with only a few olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) types. We postulated that these derived mouthpart structures, positioned at the base of the proboscis, may be particularly important in mediating feeding behaviors. As feeding is spatio-temporally segregated from oviposition in most Tephritidae, this taxonomic group appears quite suitable to parse out sensory breadth and potential functional divergence of palps and antennae. Scanning electron microscopy and anterograde staining underlined the limited palpal olfactory circuit in Tephritidae: only three morphological subtypes of basiconic sensilla were found, each with two neurons, and project to a total of six antennal lobe glomeruli in Bactrocera dorsalis. Accordingly, the palps detected only few volatiles from the headspace of food (fermentation and protein lures) and fruit (guava and mango) compared to the antennae (17 over 77, using gas-chromatography coupled electrophysiology). Interestingly, functionally the antennae were more tuned to fruit volatiles, detecting eight times more fruit than food volatiles (63 over 8), whereas the number of fruit and food volatile detection was more comparable in the palps (14 over 8). As tephritids diverge in oviposition preferences, but converge on food substrates, we postulated that the receptive ranges of palpal circuits would be more conserved compared to the antennae. However, palpal responses of three tephritid species that differed in phylogenetic relatedness and ecologically niche, diverged across ecological rather than phylogenetic rifts. Two species with strongly overlapping ecology, B. dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata, showed inseparable response profiles, whereas the cucurbit specialist Zeugodacus cucurbitae strongly diverged. As Z. cucurbitae is phylogenetically placed between B. dorsalis and C. capitata, the results indicate that ecology overrides phylogeny in the evolution of palpal tuning, in spite of being predisposed to detecting food volatiles.

The roles of enteroendocrine cell distribution and gustatory receptor expression in regulating peptide hormone secretion in the midgut of Bombyx mori larvae

To regulate physiological homeostasis and behavior in Bombyx mori, more than 20 peptide hormones in the midgut of larvae are secreted upon detection of food substances at the lumen. Although it is logical to assume that the timings of peptide hormone secretions are regulated, little is known about the mechanisms. In this study, the distributions of enteroendocrine cells (EECs) producing five peptide hormones and EECs expressing gustatory receptors (Grs), as candidate receptors for luminal food substances and nutrients, were examined via immunostaining in B. mori larvae. Three patterns of peptide hormone distribution were observed. Tachykinin (Tk)- and K5-producing EECs were located throughout the midgut; myosuppressin-producing EECs were located in the middle-to-posterior midgut; and allatostatin C- and CCHamide-2-producing EECs were located in the anterior-to-middle midgut. BmGr4 was expressed in some Tk-producing EECs in the anterior midgut, where food and its digestive products arrived 5 min after feeding began. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed secretion of Tk starting approximately 5 min after feeding began, suggesting that food sensing by BmGr4 may regulate Tk secretion. BmGr6 was expressed in a few Tk-producing EECs in the middle-to-posterior midgut, although its significance was unclear. BmGr6 was also expressed in many myosuppressin-producing EECs in the middle midgut, where food and its digestive products arrived 60 min after feeding began. ELISA revealed secretion of myosuppressin starting approximately 60 min after feeding began, suggesting that food sensing by BmGr6 may regulate myosuppressin secretion. Finally, BmGr9 was expressed in many BmK5-producing EECs throughout the midgut, suggesting that BmGr9 may function as a sensor for the secretion of BmK5.

Drosophila olfaction: past, present and future

Among the many wonders of nature, the sense of smell of the fly Drosophila melanogaster might seem, at first glance, of esoteric interest. Nevertheless, for over a century, the 'nose' of this insect has been an extraordinary system to explore questions in animal behaviour, ecology and evolution, neuroscience, physiology and molecular genetics. The insights gained are relevant for our understanding of the sensory biology of vertebrates, including humans, and other insect species, encompassing those detrimental to human health. Here, I present an overview of our current knowledge of D. melanogaster olfaction, from molecules to behaviours, with an emphasis on the historical motivations of studies and illustration of how technical innovations have enabled advances. I also highlight some of the pressing and long-term questions.

Mechanisms of Variability Underlying Odor-Guided Locomotion

Changes in locomotion mediated by odors (odor-guided locomotion) are an important mechanism by which animals discover resources important to their survival. Odor-guided locomotion, like most other behaviors, is highly variable. Variability in behavior can arise at many nodes along the circuit that performs sensorimotor transformation. We review these sources of variability in the context of the Drosophila olfactory system. While these sources of variability are important, using a model for locomotion, we show that another important contributor to behavioral variability is the stochastic nature of decision-making during locomotion as well as the persistence of these decisions: Flies choose the speed and curvature stochastically from a distribution and locomote with the same speed and curvature for extended periods. This stochasticity in locomotion will result in variability in behavior even if there is no noise in sensorimotor transformation. Overall, the noise in sensorimotor transformation is amplified by mechanisms of locomotion making odor-guided locomotion in flies highly variable.