TSPO: an emerging role in appetite for a therapeutically promising biomarker

Does neuroscience research change behaviour? A scoping review and case study in obesity neuroscience

The language employed by researchers to define and discuss diseases can itself be a determinant of health. Despite this, the framing of diseases in medical research literature is largely unexplored. This scoping review examines a prevalent medical issue with social determinants influenced by the framing of its pathogenesis: obesity. Specifically, we compare the currently dominant framing of obesity as an addiction to food with the emerging frame of obesity developing from neuroinflammation. We triangulate both corpus linguistic and bibliometric analysis of the top 200 most engaging neuroscience journal articles discussing obesity that were published open access in the past 10 years. The constructed Neurobesity Corpus is available for public use. The scoping review analysis confirmed that neuroinflammation is an emerging way for obesity to be framed in medical research. Importantly, the articles analysed that discussed neuroinflammation were less likely to use crisis terminology, such as referring to an obesity "epidemic". We highlight a potential relationship between the adoption of addiction frames and the use of stigmatising language in medical research.

Translocator protein alleviates allodynia and improves Schwann cell function against diabetic peripheral neuropathy via activation of the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant system and promoting autophagy

AIMS

In diabetes, autophagy and the nuclear factor erythroid-derived-2-like 2 (Nrf2)-dependent antioxidant system are impaired. Translocator protein (TSPO) agonist Ro5-4864 alleviates neuropathic pain, including diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However, the precise mechanisms remain unclear. Thus, we investigated the effects of Ro5-4864 on autophagy and the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant system in the sciatic nerves of DPN rats.

METHODS

All rats were randomly assigned to Sham or DPN group. After type 2 diabetes modelling (established by high-fat diet and streptozotocin injection) followed by behavioural tests, established DPN rats were randomly assigned to the DPN group, the Ro (TSPO agonist Ro5-4864) group, the Ro + 3-MA (autophagy inhibitor) group and the Ro + ML385 (Nrf2 inhibitor) group. Behavioural assessments were performed at baseline, on days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Sciatic nerves were collected on day 28 for immunofluorescence, morphological and western blot analyses.

RESULTS

Ro5-4864 alleviated allodynia and increased myelin sheath thickness and myelin protein expression after DPN. Beclin-1 (p < 0.01) and LC3-II/LC3-I ratio (p < 0.01) decreased and p62 (p < 0.01) accumulated in the DPN rats. Ro5-4864 administration increased the Beclin-1 and LC3-II/LC3-I ratio and decreased p62 accumulation. Furthermore, nuclear Nrf2 contents (p < 0.01) and cytoplasmic HO-1 (p < 0.01) and NQO1 (p < 0.01) expressions were significantly inhibited in the DPN rat, which was also improved by Ro5-4864. All the beneficial effects were abrogated by 3-MA or ML385.

CONCLUSION

TSPO exhibited a potent analgesic effect and improved Schwann cell function and regeneration against DPN by activating the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant system and promoting autophagy.

[Systematic analysis of the results of fundamental and clinical studies of ethifoxin]

The main pharmacological use of etifoxine is the treatment of psychosomatic manifestations of anxiety. The purpose of this work is a systematic analysis of fundamental and clinical studies of etifoxine. In addition to the anxiolytic effect, which partially persists even after discontinuation of therapy, etifoxine is characterized by analgesic, neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties. Such a pharmacological profile of etifoxine is due not only to the activation of GABA receptors, but also to the effect on the levels of neurosteroids in the blood and in the brain. Modulation by etifoxine of neurosteroids' metabolism contributes to the manifestation of anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and other properties of etifoxine.

The limitations of investigating appetite through circuit manipulations: are we biting off more than we can chew?

Disordered eating can underpin a number of debilitating and prevalent chronic diseases, such as obesity. Broader advances in psychopharmacology and biology have motivated some neuroscientists to address diet-induced obesity through reductionist, pre-clinical eating investigations on the rodent brain. Specifically, chemogenetic and optogenetic methods developed in the 21st century allow neuroscientists to perform in vivo, region-specific/projection-specific/promoter-specific circuit manipulations and immediately assess the impact of these manipulations on rodent feeding. These studies are able to rigorously conclude whether a specific neuronal population regulates feeding behaviour in the hope of eventually developing a mechanistic neuroanatomical map of appetite regulation. However, an artificially stimulated/inhibited rodent neuronal population that changes feeding behaviour does not necessarily represent a pharmacological target for treating eating disorders in humans. Chemogenetic/optogenetic findings must therefore be triangulated with the array of theories that contribute to our understanding of appetite. The objective of this review is to provide a wide-ranging discussion of the limitations of chemogenetic/optogenetic circuit manipulation experiments in rodents that are used to investigate appetite. Stepping into and outside of medical science epistemologies, this paper draws on philosophy of science, nutrition, addiction biology and neurophilosophy to prompt more integrative, transdisciplinary interpretations of chemogenetic/optogenetic appetite data. Through discussing the various technical and epistemological limitations of these data, we provide both an overview of chemogenetics and optogenetics accessible to non-neuroscientist obesity researchers, as well as a resource for neuroscientists to expand the number of lenses through which they interpret their circuit manipulation findings.