1
|
Woodhouse MJ, Aspinall WP, Sparks RSJ, Brooks-Pollock E, Relton C. Alternative COVID-19 mitigation measures in school classrooms: analysis using an agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2022; 9:211985. [PMID: 35958084 PMCID: PMC9363991 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic has impacted children's education, with schools required to implement infection control measures that have led to periods of absence and classroom closures. We developed an agent-based epidemiological model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a school classroom that allows us to quantify projected infection patterns within primary school classrooms, and related uncertainties. Our approach is based on a contact model constructed using random networks, informed by structured expert judgement. The effectiveness of mitigation strategies in suppressing infection outbreaks and limiting pupil absence are considered. COVID-19 infections in primary schools in England in autumn 2020 were re-examined and the model was then used to estimate infection levels in autumn 2021, as the Delta variant was emerging and it was thought likely that school transmission would play a major role in an incipient new wave of the epidemic. Our results were in good agreement with available data. These findings indicate that testing-based surveillance is more effective than bubble quarantine, both for reducing transmission and avoiding pupil absence, even accounting for insensitivity of self-administered tests. Bubble quarantine entails large numbers of absences, with only modest impact on classroom infections. However, maintaining reduced contact rates within the classroom can have a major benefit for managing COVID-19 in school settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. J. Woodhouse
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
| | - W. P. Aspinall
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
- Aspinall and Associates, Tisbury SP3 6HF, UK
| | - R. S. J. Sparks
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
| | - E. Brooks-Pollock
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Churchill Building, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
| | - C. Relton
- Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Clifton, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Powers KA, Sullivan KM, Zadrozny SL, Shook-Sa BE, Byrnes R, Bogojevich DA, Lauen DL, Thompson P, Robinson WR, Gordon-Larsen P, Aiello AE. North Carolina public school teachers' contact patterns and mask use within and outside of school during the prevaccine phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50:608-617. [PMID: 34971715 PMCID: PMC8714247 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teachers are central to school-associated transmission networks, but little is known about their behavioral patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 700 North Carolina public school teachers in 4 districts open to in-person learning in November-December 2020 (pre-COVID-19 vaccines). We assessed indoor and outdoor time spent, numbers of people encountered at <6 feet ("close contacts"), and mask use by teachers and those around them at specific locations on the most recent weekday and weekend day. RESULTS Nearly all respondents reported indoor time at home (98%) and school (94%) on the most recent weekday, while 62% reported indoor time at stores, 18% at someone else's home, and 17% at bars/restaurants. Responses were similar for the most recent weekend day, excepting school (where 5% reported indoor time). Most teachers (>94%) reported wearing masks inside school, stores, and salons; intermediate percentages (∼50%-85%) inside places of worship, bars/restaurants, and recreational settings; and few (<25%) in their or others' homes. Approximately half reported daily close contact with students. CONCLUSIONS As schools reopened in the COVID-19 pandemic, potential transmission opportunities arose through close contacts within and outside of school, along with suboptimal mask use by teachers and/or those around them. Our granular estimates underscore the importance of multilayered mitigation strategies and can inform interventions and mathematical models addressing school-associated transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Powers
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Kristin M Sullivan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sabrina L Zadrozny
- Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bonnie E Shook-Sa
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rosemary Byrnes
- Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David A Bogojevich
- Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Douglas L Lauen
- Department of Public Policy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Peyton Thompson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Whitney R Robinson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Penny Gordon-Larsen
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Allison E Aiello
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aspinall WP, Sparks RSJ, Woodhouse MJ, Cooke RM, Scarrow JH. Pupils returning to primary schools in England during 2020: rapid estimations of punctual COVID-19 infection rates. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2021; 8:202218. [PMID: 34540240 PMCID: PMC8441136 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Drawing on risk methods from volcano crises, we developed a rapid COVID-19 infection model for the partial return of pupils to primary schools in England in June and July 2020, and a full return in September 2020. The model handles uncertainties in key parameters, using a stochastic re-sampling technique, allowing us to evaluate infection levels as a function of COVID-19 prevalence and projected pupil and staff headcounts. Assuming average national adult prevalence, for the first scenario (as at 1 June 2020) we found that between 178 and 924 [90% CI] schools would have at least one infected individual, out of 16 769 primary schools in total. For the second return (July), our estimate ranged between 336 (2%) and 1873 (11%) infected schools. For a full return in September 2020, our projected range was 661 (4%) to 3310 (20%) infected schools, assuming the same prevalence as for 5 June. If national prevalence fell to one-quarter of that, the projected September range would decrease to between 381 (2%) and 900 (5%) schools but would increase to between 2131 (13%) and 9743 (58%) schools if prevalence increased to 4× June level. When regional variations in prevalence and school size distribution were included in the model, a slight decrease in the projected number of infected schools was indicated, but uncertainty on estimates increased markedly. The latter model variant indicated that 82% of infected schools would be in areas where prevalence exceeded the national average and the probability of multiple infected persons in a school would be higher in such areas. Post hoc, our model projections for 1 September 2020 were seen to have been realistic and reasonable (in terms of related uncertainties) when data on schools' infections were released by official agencies following the start of the 2020/2021 academic year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. P. Aspinall
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
- Aspinall and Associates, Tisbury SP3 6HF, UK
| | - R. S. J. Sparks
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
| | - M. J. Woodhouse
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK
- School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK
| | - R. M. Cooke
- Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Building 28, Mourik Broekmanweg 6, 2628 XE Delft, The Netherlands
- Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street NE, Washington, DC, USA
| | - J. H. Scarrow
- Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - the CoMMinS Project
- CoMMinS Project ‘COVID-19 Mapping and Mitigation in Schools', Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, BS8 2PS Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|