Prenatal bias in sex ratios in a marsupial, Antechinus agilis

Parental effects on offspring sex ratio in the Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus): does captivity influence paternal sex allocation?

Sex allocation theories predict that under different ecological conditions the production of sons and daughters will affect parental fitness differently. Skewed offspring sex ratios often occur under captive conditions where individuals are exposed to nutritional and social conditions that differ from nature. Here, we analyzed 29 years of offspring sex ratio data from a captive population of an endangered marsupial, the Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus). We partitioned variation in offspring sex ratio based on parental origin (captive- vs. wild-bred), parental weight, maternal age, and maternal reproductive history. Our analyses revealed no effect of parental weight or maternal origin on offspring sex ratio-however, there was a significant effect of paternal origin. Data visualization indicated that captive-bred males tended to produce male-biased litters. We discuss the result in relation to recent studies that have shown that male mammals have the capacity to be arbiters of sex allocation and highlight candidate mechanisms, but consider it with caution due to the small sample size from which the result was derived. We performed a population viability analysis (PVA) to explore the potential impact of a sex ratio skew on the sustainability of the captive Numbat population under hypothetical scenarios. Our PVA revealed that supplementation with wild individuals is critical to the persistence of the captive Numbat population and that a biased sex ratio will lead to extinction of the captive colony under certain conditions. Overall, our study demonstrates that covert sex ratio skews can persist undetected in captive populations, which have the potential to become impactful and compromise population sustainability under changed management processes.

Sex ratios deviate across killifish species without clear links to life history

Sex ratios can differ from an expected equal proportion of males and females, carrying substantial implications for our understanding of how mating systems evolve. Typically, macro-evolutionary studies have been conducted without assessing how deviations from an equal sex ratio could be explained by sex-biased mortality or dispersal. Our understanding of sex ratio evolution independent of these confounds, in addition to any putative links between skewed sex ratios and other factors (e.g. life history), therefore remains largely unexplored. Here, we conducted an exploratory study investigating differences in sex ratios across closely related species while controlling for extrinsic mortality. We also tested two factors, non-overlapping/overlapping generations and the social environment, which have both been hypothesised to affect sex ratios. Specifically, we raised 15 species of killifish, which have either overlapping or discrete generations, under both solitary and social treatments. We found substantial divergences in sex ratios across closely related species, which exhibited both male and female biases. In conjunction with a low phylogenetic signal, our results suggest that sex ratios can evolve rapidly in this group. However, we found no evidence that overlapping generations or the social environment affected sex biases, suggesting that other factors drive the rapid evolution of sex ratios in killifishes.

Developmental sexual dimorphism and the evolution of mechanisms for adjustment of sex ratios in mammals

Sex allocation theory predicts biased offspring sex ratios in relation to local conditions if they would maximize parental lifetime reproductive return. In mammals, the extent of the birth sex bias is often unpredictable and inconsistent, leading some to question its evolutionary significance. For facultative adjustment of sex ratios to occur, males and females would need to be detectably different from an early developmental stage, but classic sexual dimorphism arises from hormonal influences after gonadal development. Recent advances in our understanding of early, pregonadal sexual dimorphism, however, indicate high levels of dimorphism in gene expression, caused by chromosomal rather than hormonal differences. Here, we discuss how such dimorphism would interact with and link previously hypothesized mechanisms for sex-ratio adjustment. These differences between males and females are sufficient for offspring sex both to be detectable to parents and to provide selectable cues for biasing sex ratios from the earliest stages. We suggest ways in which future research could use the advances in our understanding of sexually dimorphic developmental physiology to test the evolutionary significance of sex allocation in mammals. Such an approach would advance our understanding of sex allocation and could be applied to other taxa.

The evolution of sex ratio adjustment in the presence of sexually antagonistic selection

Sex ratio adjustment (SRA) of broods has received widespread interest as a means for optimizing parental investment in offspring. Classical explanations for the evolution of SRA focus on improving offspring fitness in light of resource availability or mate attractiveness. Here, we use genetic models to demonstrate that SRA can evolve to alleviate sexual antagonism by improving the chance that the alleles of a sexually antagonistic trait are transmitted to the sex they benefit. In cases where the trait is autosomally inherited, this result is obtained regardless of whether SRA is based on the mother's or the father's genotype and irrespective of the recombination rate between the trait and SRA loci. SRA also evolves in this manner when the trait is sex-linked, provided that SRA decisions are based on the homogametic genotype (XX mothers or ZZ fathers). By contrast, when based on traits in the heterogametic sex, SRA promotes fixation of the allele that is detrimental to that sex, preventing the evolution of substantial levels of SRA. Our models indicate that the evolution of SRA in nature should be strongly influenced by the genetic architecture of the traits on which it is based and the form of selection affecting them.

Male-biased sex ratio: why and what consequences for the genus Schistosoma?

Schistosomes are the cause of the most significant helminth disease of humans. Their unusual sexual biology is intriguing. Instead of being hermaphroditic, as is the rule in other trematode species, they are gonochoric. Furthermore, their mating system is considered to be monogamous, a characteristic shared by only 1% of living species, and their sex ratio is male-biased. In this paper we propose an explanation of the origin of the male-biased sex ratio in schistosomes and highlight the ecological and evolutionary consequences of this bias. We argue that schistosome gonochorism, monogamy and the biased sex ratio can be integrated into a single evolutionary scheme.

Generation of sex ratio biases in the red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura)

Male semelparous dasyurid species are annual breeders that use a promiscuous mating system. These species have shown biases in litter sex ratios and, with females producing more young than they have available teats, this provides an opportunity for the manipulation of the sex ratio at birth. The sex ratio of embryos and pouch young, and the degree of embryonic overproduction, in red-tailed phascogales (Phascogale calura) was investigated to gain an understanding of the mechanism by which sex biases may be generated. The sex ratio of embryos did not differ from parity, but a male bias was observed in young attaching to teats. Females produced an average of 15.1 +/- 1.9 corpora lutea and 10.5 +/- 3.5 viable embryos, with no difference in fecundity observed with female age or weight. Because females only have eight teats, the overproduction of young, and male-biased attachment, was sufficient to explain the observed male bias in pouch young. No relationship was observed between maternal weight and sex ratio, but heavier females did tend to produce more ova. Meta-analysis of studies providing information on litter sex ratios in male semelparous dasyurid species did not show any consistent trend.

Genetic reconstruction of the population dynamics of a carnivorous marsupial (Antechinus flavipes) in response to floods

Human activities such as regulating river flows, logging and removing fallen timber adversely affect floodplain ecosystems around the world. Studies of the dynamics of floodplain-dwelling populations will help to understand the effects of altered flood regimes and to manage and restore floodplains. The yellow-footed antechinus (Antechinus flavipes) is the only small, native, carnivorous mammal (Marsupialia) on many degraded floodplains in south-eastern Australia, where its abundance appears to increase with proximity to floods, which is partly due to enhanced survival (as inferred from increased abundance of second-year females). We analysed population genetic patterns and maternity among samples collected following the period of postnatal dispersal, in the years preceding and following planned floods, at different distances from flood locations along the Murray River. Our genic and genotypic analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region haplotypes and 11 microsatellite loci demonstrated high immigration rates into sites in close proximity to floods. All sampled males emigrated from their natal sites to points of capture, while some females were philopatric. There were high rates of dispersal of males among all sites within a partially flooded forest, while females dispersed more to locations closest to inundations rather than to distant places. These results suggest that environmental flows are beneficial to antechinus both by enhancing adult survival and promoting dispersal of females.

Viviparity as a constraint on sex-ratio evolution

In polytocous mammals, the sex ratio during gestation can influence a variety of morphological, physiological, and life-history traits because of steroid leakage between fetuses. Similar phenomena have also recently been described for a viviparous lizard. Some of these effects have important fitness consequences by influencing reproductive success later in life. Thus, biasing the sex ratio toward one sex may lead to a decreased fitness for the other sex, and therefore constrain the evolution of skewed sex ratios. By incorporating effects of sex ratio on offspring fitness in a simple sex-allocation model, I show that, under some circumstances (1) skewed sex ratios are predicted to evolve, and (2) this cost can constrain the evolution of skewed sex ratios.

Pre-ovulation control of hatchling sex ratio in the Seychelles warbler

Females of some bird species have a high degree of control over the sex ratio of their offspring at laying. Although several mechanisms have been put forward to explain how females might control the sex of their eggs, virtually nothing is known. As females are the heterogametic sex in birds, adjustment of the clutch sex ratio could arise either by pre- or post-ovulation control mechanisms. The Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) exhibits extreme adaptive egg sex ratio bias. Typically, warblers produce only single-egg clutches, but by translocating pairs to vacant habitat of very high quality, most females were induced to produce two-egg clutches. Overall, females skewed clutch sex ratios strongly towards daughters (86.6%). This bias was evident in the first egg, but critically, also in the second eggs laid a day apart, even when all absent, unhatched, or unsexed second eggs were assumed to be male. Although a bias in the first egg may arise through either pre- or post-ovulation mechanisms, the skew observed in second eggs could only arise through pre-ovulation control. Post-ovulation adjustment may also contribute to skewed hatchling sex ratios, but as sex-biased release of gametes is likely to be a more efficient process of control, pre-ovulation mechanisms may be the sole means of adjustment in this species. High fitness differentials between sons and daughters, as apparent in the Seychelles warblers, may be necessary for primary sex ratio adjustment to evolve.

Adjustment of offspring sex ratios in relation to the availability of resources for philopatric offspring in the common brushtail possum

The local-resource-competition hypothesis predicts that where philopatric offspring compete for resources with their mothers, offspring sex ratios will be biased in favour of the dispersing sex. This should produce variation in sex ratios between populations in relation to differences in the availability of resources for philopatric offspring. However, previous tests of local resource competition in mammals have used indirect measures of resource availability and have focused on sex-ratio variation between species or individuals rather than between local populations. Here, we show that the availability of den sites predicts the offspring sex ratio in populations of the common brushtail possum. Female possums defend access to dens, and daughters, but not sons, occupy dens within their mother's range. However, the abundances of possums in our study areas were determined principally by food availability. Consequently, in food-rich areas with a high population density, the per-capita availability of dens was low, and the cost of having a daughter should have been high. This cost was positively correlated with male bias in the sex ratio at birth. Low per capita availability of dens was correlated with male bias in the sex ratio at birth.