Monarch butterflies memorize the spatial location of a food source

Heliconius butterflies use wide-field landscape features, but not individual local landmarks, during spatial learning

Spatial learning is vital in foraging ecology. Many hymenopteran insects are adept spatial foragers that rely on visual cues contained within broader wide-field scenes for central place foraging from a central nest. By contrast, for butterflies, which lack central nest sites, visual cue use during spatial foraging is less understood. Heliconius butterflies, however, exhibit stable nocturnal roosts, strong site fidelity and a sophisticated capacity for spatial navigation. This study furthers our understanding of Heliconius spatial learning by testing whether H. erato can associate a spatially informative visual cue with artificial feeders. We explored the relative importance of a visual local landmark compared with broader, wide-field visual cues, through experiments with (i) a fixed rewarded feeder with a local landmark; (ii) a mobile rewarded feeder with the landmark as the sole reliable cue; (iii) the same setup while blocking visual access to external landscape features. Our data suggest that Heliconius butterflies learn static feeder locations without relying on a local individual landmark. Instead, we suggest they integrate broader landscape and celestial cues. This suggests that Heliconius butterflies and central place foraging hymenopterans likely share similar visual navigation strategies, using wide-field, low-resolution views rather than focusing on specific individual landmarks.

A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology

For 100 years, the Journal of Comparative Physiology-A has significantly supported research in the field of neuroethology. The celebration of the journal's centennial is a great time point to appreciate the recent progress in neuroethology and to discuss possible avenues of the field. Animal behavior is the main source of inspiration for neuroethologists. This is illustrated by the huge diversity of investigated behaviors and species. To explain behavior at a mechanistic level, neuroethologists combine neuroscientific approaches with sophisticated behavioral analysis. The rapid technological progress in neuroscience makes neuroethology a highly dynamic and exciting field of research. To summarize the recent scientific progress in neuroethology, I went through all abstracts of the last six International Congresses for Neuroethology (ICNs 2010-2022) and categorized them based on the sensory modalities, experimental model species, and research topics. This highlights the diversity of neuroethology and gives us a perspective on the field's scientific future. At the end, I highlight three research topics that may, among others, influence the future of neuroethology. I hope that sharing my roots may inspire other scientists to follow neuroethological approaches.