Transcriptional repressor CopR: dissection of stabilizing motifs within the C terminus

DNA-Binding Proteins Regulating pIP501 Transfer and Replication

pIP501 is a Gram-positive broad-host-range model plasmid intensively used for studying plasmid replication and conjugative transfer. It is a multiple antibiotic resistance plasmid frequently detected in clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium strains. Replication of pIP501 proceeds unidirectionally by a theta mechanism. The minimal replicon of pIP501 is composed of the repR gene encoding the essential rate-limiting replication initiator protein RepR and the origin of replication, oriR, located downstream of repR. RepR is similar to RepE of related streptococcal plasmid pAMβ1, which has been shown to possess RNase activity cleaving free RNA molecules in close proximity of the initiation site of DNA synthesis. Replication of pIP501 is controlled by the concerted action of a small protein, CopR, and an antisense RNA, RNAIII. CopR has a dual function: It acts as transcriptional repressor at the repR promoter and, in addition, prevents convergent transcription of RNAIII and repR mRNA (RNAII), which indirectly increases RNAIII synthesis. CopR binds asymmetrically as a dimer at two consecutive binding sites upstream of and overlapping with the repR promoter. RNAIII induces transcriptional attenuation within the leader region of the repR mRNA (RNAII). Deletion of either control component causes a 10- to 20-fold increase of plasmid copy number, while simultaneous deletions have no additional effect. Conjugative transfer of pIP501 depends on a type IV secretion system (T4SS) encoded in a single operon. Its transfer host-range is considerably broad, as it has been transferred to virtually all Gram-positive bacteria including Streptomyces and even the Gram-negative Escherichia coli. Expression of the 15 genes encoding the T4SS is tightly controlled by binding of the relaxase TraA, the transfer initiator protein, to the operon promoter overlapping with the origin of transfer (oriT). The T4SS operon encodes the DNA-binding proteins TraJ (VirD4-like coupling protein) and the VirB4-like ATPase, TraE. Both proteins are actively involved in conjugative DNA transport. Moreover, the operon encodes TraN, a small cytoplasmic protein, whose specific binding to a sequence upstream of the oriT nic-site was demonstrated. TraN seems to be an effective repressor of pIP501 transfer, as conjugative transfer rates were significantly increased in an E. faecalis pIP501ΔtraN mutant.

Plasmid Replication Control by Antisense RNAs

Plasmids are selfish genetic elements that normally constitute a burden for the bacterial host cell. This burden is expected to favor plasmid loss. Therefore, plasmids have evolved mechanisms to control their replication and ensure their stable maintenance. Replication control can be either mediated by iterons or by antisense RNAs. Antisense RNAs work through a negative control circuit. They are constitutively synthesized and metabolically unstable. They act both as a measuring device and a regulator, and regulation occurs by inhibition. Increased plasmid copy numbers lead to increasing antisense-RNA concentrations, which, in turn, result in the inhibition of a function essential for replication. On the other hand, decreased plasmid copy numbers entail decreasing concentrations of the inhibiting antisense RNA, thereby increasing the replication frequency. Inhibition is achieved by a variety of mechanisms, which are discussed in detail. The most trivial case is the inhibition of translation of an essential replication initiator protein (Rep) by blockage of the rep-ribosome binding site. Alternatively, ribosome binding to a leader peptide mRNA whose translation is required for efficient Rep translation can be prevented by antisense-RNA binding. In 2004, translational attenuation was discovered. Antisense-RNA-mediated transcriptional attenuation is another mechanism that has, so far, only been detected in plasmids of Gram-positive bacteria. ColE1, a plasmid that does not need a plasmid-encoded replication initiator protein, uses the inhibition of primer formation. In other cases, antisense RNAs inhibit the formation of an activator pseudoknot that is required for efficient Rep translation.

Antisense-RNA mediated control of plasmid replication - pIP501 revisited

Over the past decade, a wealth of small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) have been discovered in the genomes of almost all bacterial species, where they constitute the most abundant class of posttranscriptional regulators. These sRNAs are key-players in prokaryotic metabolism, stress response and virulence. However, the first bona-fide antisense RNAs had been found already in 1981 in plasmids, where they regulate replication or maintenance. Antisense RNAs involved in plasmid replication control - meanwhile investigated in depth for almost 35 years - employ a variety of mechanisms of action: They regulate primer maturation, inhibit translation of essential replication initiator proteins (Rep proteins) as well as leader peptides or the formation of activator pseudoknots required for efficient rep translation. Alternatively they attenuate transcription or translation of rep mRNAs. Some antisense RNAs collaborate with transcriptional repressors to ensure proper copy-number control. Here, I summarize our knowledge on replication control of the broad-host range plasmid pIP501 that was originally isolated from Streptococcus agalactiae. Plasmid pIP501 uses two copy number-control elements, RNAIII, a cis-encoded antisense RNA, and transcriptional repressor CopR. RNA III mediates transcription attenuation, a rather widespread concept that found its culmination in the recent discovery of riboswitches. A peculiarity of pIP501 is the unusual stability of RNA III, which requires a second function of CopR: CopR does not only repress transcription from the essential repR promoter, but also prevents convergent transcription between rep mRNA and RNAIII, thereby indirectly increasing the amount of RNAIII. The concerted action of these two control elements is necessary to prevent plasmid loss at dangerously low copy numbers.

Transcriptional repressor CopR acts by inhibiting RNA polymerase binding

CopR is a transcriptional repressor encoded by the broad-host-range streptococcal plasmid pIP501, which also replicates in Bacillus subtilis. It acts in concert with the antisense RNA, RNAIII, to control pIP501 replication. CopR represses transcription of the essential repR mRNA about 10- to 20-fold. In previous work, DNA binding and dimerization constants were determined and the motifs responsible localized. The C terminus of CopR was shown to be required for stability. Furthermore, SELEX of the copR operator revealed that in vivo evolution was for maximal binding affinity. Here, we elucidate the repression mechanism of CopR. Competition assays showed that CopR-operator complexes are 18-fold less stable than RNA polymerase (RNAP)-pII complexes. DNase I footprinting revealed that the binding sites for CopR and RNAP overlap. Gel-shift assays demonstrated that CopR and B. subtilis RNAP cannot bind simultaneously, but compete for binding at promoter pII. Due to its higher intracellular concentration CopR inhibits RNAP binding. Additionally, KMnO(4) footprinting experiments indicated that prevention of open complex formation at pII does not further contribute to the repression effect of CopR.

Transcriptional Repressor CopR: use of SELEX to study the copR operator indicates that evolution was directed at maximal binding affinity

CopR is one of the two copy number control elements of the streptococcal plasmid pIP501. It represses transcription of the repR mRNA encoding the essential replication initiator protein about 10- to 20-fold by binding to its operator region upstream of the repR promoter pII. CopR binds at two consecutive sites in the major groove of the DNA that share the consensus motif 5'-CGTG. Previously, the minimal operator was narrowed down to 17 bp, and equilibrium dissociation constants for DNA binding and dimerization were determined to be 0.4 nM and 1.4 microM, respectively. In this work, we used a SELEX procedure to study copR operator sequences of different lengths in combination with electrophoretic mobility shift assays of mutated copR operators as well as copy number determinations to assess the sequence requirements for CopR binding. The results suggest that in vivo evolution was directed at maximal binding affinity. Three simultaneous nucleotide exchanges outside the bases directly contacted by CopR only slightly affected CopR binding in vitro or copy numbers in vivo. Furthermore, the optimal spacer sequence was found to comprise 7 bp, to be AT rich, and to need an A/T and a T at the 3' positions, whereas broad variations in the sequences flanking the minimal 17-bp operator were well tolerated.