List of new names and new combinations that have appeared in effective publications outside of the IJSEM and are submitted for valid publication

Update on Novel Taxa and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacteria Isolated from Nondomestic Animals Described in 2018 to 2021

Revisions and new additions to bacterial taxonomy can have a significant widespread impact on clinical practice, infectious disease epidemiology, veterinary microbiology laboratory operations, and wildlife conservation efforts. The expansion of genome sequencing technologies has revolutionized our knowledge of the microbiota of humans, animals, and insects. Here, we address novel taxonomy and nomenclature revisions of veterinary significance that impact bacteria isolated from nondomestic wildlife, with emphasis being placed on bacteria that are associated with disease in their hosts or were isolated from host animal species that are culturally significant, are a target of conservation efforts, or serve as reservoirs for human pathogens.

Bacterial nomenclature in the era of genomics

The remarkable success of taxonomic discovery, powered by culturomics, genomics and metagenomics, creates a pressing need for new bacterial names while holding a mirror up to the slow pace of change in bacterial nomenclature. Here, I take a fresh look at bacterial nomenclature, exploring how we might create a system fit for the age of genomics, playing to the strengths of current practice while minimizing difficulties. Adoption of linguistic pragmatism-obeying the rules while treating recommendations as merely optional-will make it easier to create names derived from descriptions, from people or places or even arbitrarily. Simpler protologues and a relaxed approach to recommendations will also remove much of the need for expert linguistic quality control. Automated computer-based approaches will allow names to be created en masse before they are needed while also relieving microbiologists of the need for competence in Latin. The result will be a system that is accessible, inclusive and digital, while also fully capable of naming the unnamed millions of bacteria.

Proposal of Zooshikellaceae fam. nov. to accommodate the genera Zooshikella and Spartinivicinus and reclassification of Zooshikella marina as a later heterotypic synonym of Zooshikella ganghwensis based on whole genome sequence analysis

The genus Spartinivicinus, affiliated to the class Gammaproteobacteria, is an important marine member that produces prodiginines. Currently, its taxonomic assignment to family level is not well presented. Phylogeny of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that Spartinivicinus forms a monophyletic clade with Zooshikella, which is neighboured by Aestuariirhabdus of the family Aestuariirhabdaceae and another monophyletic clade of the family Endozoicomonadaceae. The 16S rRNA gene of Spartinivicinus ruber S2-4-1H^T had sequence similarities to those of Aestuariirhabdus litorea GTF13^T, Zooshikella members and Endozoicomonas members of 93.4%, 93.2-93.4  and <92.5 %, respectively. Phylogenomic analysis based on 120 bacterial conserved single-copy genes highly supported placing Spartinivicinus as a sister member of Zooshikella, neighboured by Aestuariirhabdaceae and Endozoicomonadaceae members, indicating that Spartinivicinus and Zooshikella could be considered to belong to the same family. Thus, Zooshikellaceae fam. nov. is proposed to accommodate the two genera. Colonies of Spartinivicinus and Zooshikella are red-pigmented, which is different from Aestuariirhabdus (pale-yellow pigmented). The major respiratory quinone of S. ruber was ubiquinone (Q-9), similar to Zooshikella, but distinct from Aestuariirhabdus (Q-9 and Q-8). The predominant fatty acids and polar lipids of Spartinivicinus also showed a similar patterns to Zooshikella, but they were different from Aestuariirhabdus. Lastly, Spartinivicinus possessed a genome size of 6.68 Mbp and DNA G+C content of 40.1mol%, similar to Zooshikella, but much larger than Aestuariirhabdus. In addition, the 16S rRNA genes of Z. ganghwensis JC2044^T and Z. marina JC333^T possess sequence similarity of 99.79 %. Whole genome comparisons indicated that they shared 79.8 % digital DNA-DNA hybridization, 97.78 % average nucleotide identity and 97.31 % average amino acid identity values. Activities of catalase and oxidase for the two strains were positive. Hydrolysis of skimmed milk and Tweens (40, 60 and 80) was positive. Interestingly, the two strains produced different kinds of prodiginines. We propose that Z. marina is a later heterotypic synonym of Zooshikella ganghwensis.