Analytical evaluation of the cobas® 6800 system for the detection and quantification of BK Virus (BKV) and Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) at a US solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant center

The cobas® EBV and BKV assays are the first FDA-approved, quantitative assays for monitoring posttransplant reactivation of these viruses. In this study, we assessed performance of the fully-automated cobas® assays, compared with Diasorin Molecular ASR, our laboratory developed test, and demonstrated a strong interassay correlation for BK and EBV monitoring.

Advances in pathogenesis and precision medicine for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a squamous carcinoma with apparent geographical and racial distribution, mostly prevalent in East and Southeast Asia, particularly concentrated in southern China. The epidemiological trend over the past decades has suggested a substantial reduction in the incidence rate and mortality rate due to NPC. These results may reflect changes in lifestyle and environment, and more importantly, a deeper comprehension of the pathogenic mechanism of NPC, leading to much progress in the preventing, screening, and treating for this cancer. Herein, we present the recent advances on the key signal pathways involved in pathogenesis of NPC, the mechanism of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) entry into the cell, and the progress of EBV vaccine and screening biomarkers. We will also discuss in depth the development of various therapeutic approaches including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. These research advancements have led to a new era of precision medicine in NPC.

Epstein-Barr virus-infected plasma cells in periodontitis lesions

Growing evidence supports that the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a putative periodontal pathogen, but little is known regarding EBV behavior in periodontitis. Here, EBV infection was monitored in saliva and periodontal pocket (PP), at baseline and 3 months after periodontal non-surgical therapy (p-NST) in 20 patients diagnosed with periodontitis. After the treatment, the patients with the improved periodontal condition (good responders) showed a significant decrease in salivary EBV load. In contrast, in poor responders, EBV load was slightly increased. Moreover, after the therapy, most patients showed clear signs of EBV infection in a deep PP (≥5 mm) selected as a study site. To investigate how EBV can persist in a PP, we further investigate cellular sites of viral replication in PP. We identified large amounts of infiltrated EBV-infected cells, mostly overlapping with CD138⁺ plasma cells (PC). EBV-infected PCs formed high-density clusters within the infiltrate and along the periodontal epithelium which were commonly associated with CD3⁺ T-cells and CD20⁺ B-cells to evoke diffuse ectopic lymphoid-like structures. Taking together, this study provides new insights to support a model where the periodontal condition may play a major role in oral EBV shedding. Since PC harbors the late productive phases of EBV replication, the periodontal condition may favor B-cell differentiation with possible amplification of periodontal EBV infection and viral spreading. PCs have long been recognized as pathogenic markers in inflammatory lesions. Our finding sheds new light on the role of EBV infection and PC in periodontitis.

Comparison of two commercial quantitative PCR assays and correlation with the first WHO International Standard for human CMV

Comparability between CMV assays could be facilitated by the first WHO International Standard for human CMV (standard). Standard dilutions were submitted to nucleic acid extraction with Versant kPCR Molecular systems SP or MagNA Pure LC System followed by the kPCR PLX™ CMV DNA (kPCR) or the CMV R-gene™ assay (R-gene), respectively; 139 clinical specimens were tested. Both assays correlated well with the standard (R² > 0.96) and a matrix effect was observed. Quantitative results correlated reasonably between both assays for whole blood (R² = 0.79) and well for other specimen types (R² = 0.93). Quantification differences were within one log₁₀ of the averaged log₁₀ results for 25/27 blood specimens and for 32/33 other specimens. Calibration to the standard did not increase this percentage. In conclusion, results of both assays showed reasonable correlation with each other and good correlation with the standard. Calibration to the standard did not improve comparability of quantitative results.