Can dalbavancin be used as a catheter lock solution?

Addressing catheter lock therapy: Does heparin reduce the bioactivity of dalbavancin when together in solution during freezing?

INTRODUCTION

The possible use of dalbavancin as a catheter lock solution was previously demonstrated by our study group. However, it was needed to assess whether heparin could affect dalbavancin bioactivity during freezing storage.

METHODS

We tested the bioactivity of a dalbavancin+heparin (DH) vs. dalbavancin (D) against Staphylococcal biofilms comparing DH median value of cfu counts and metabolic activity with that obtained for D before and during storage under freezing up to 6 months.

RESULTS

Despite there was a slight decrease in the median percentage reduction of metabolic activity at month 3 in Staphylococcus epidermidis between DH and D (97.6 vs. 100, p=0.037), considering the clinical criteria, no significant reduction in any of the variables tested was observed at the end of the experiment between D and DH solutions.

CONCLUSION

The addition of heparin to a dalbavancin lock solution did not affect its bioactivity against staphylococcal biofilms irrespective of its preservation time under freezing.

Antibiofilm approaches as a new paradigm for treating infections

The lack of effective antibiotics for drug-resistant infections has led the World Health Organization to declare antibiotic resistance a global priority. Most bacterial infections are caused by microbes growing in structured communities called biofilms. Bacteria growing in biofilms are less susceptible to antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts. Despite their significant clinical implications, bacterial biofilms have not received the attention they warrant, with no approved antibiotics specifically designed for their eradication. In this paper, we aim to shed light on recent advancements in antibiofilm strategies that offer compelling alternatives to traditional antibiotics. Additionally, we will briefly explore the potential synergy between computational approaches, including the emerging field of artificial intelligence, and the accelerated design and discovery of novel antibiofilm molecules in the years ahead.

Determination of the Elution Capacity of Dalbavancin in Bone Cements: New Alternative for the Treatment of Biofilm-Related Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections Based on an In Vitro Study

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is the most widely used approach for the treatment of biofilm-induced septic sequelae in orthopedic surgery. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide that acts against Gram-positive bacteria and has a long half-life, so we aimed to assess whether it could be a new alternative drug in antibiotic-loaded bone cement for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. We assessed the elution capacity of dalbavancin and compared it with that of vancomycin in bone cement. Palacos®R (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany) bone cement was manually mixed with each of the antibiotics studied at 2.5% and 5%. Three cylinders were obtained from each of the mixtures; these were weighed and incubated in 5 mL phosphate-buffered saline at 37°C under shaking for 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 168 h, and 336 h. PBS was replenished at each time point. The samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (vancomycin) and mass cytometry (dalbavancin). Elution was higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 for both antibiotics after 14 days of study. The release of vancomycin at 14 days was higher than of dalbavancin at each concentration tested (p = 0.05, both). However, the cumulative release of 5% dalbavancin was similar to that of 2.5% vancomycin (p = 0.513). The elution capacity of dalbavancin reached a cumulative concentration similar to that of vancomycin. Moreover, considering that the MIC90 of dalbavancin is one third that of vancomycin (0.06 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively) and given the long half-life of dalbavancin, it may be a new alternative for the treatment of biofilm-related periprosthetic infections when loaded in bone cement.

Role of Extracellular DNA in Dalbavancin Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Biofilms in Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become the leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Biofilm production further complicates patient treatment, contributing to increased bacterial persistence and antibiotic tolerance. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different antibiotics on biofilm-producing MRSA isolated from patients with SSTI. A total of 32 MRSA strains were collected from patients with SSTI. The MIC and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) were measured in planktonic and biofilm growth. The study showed that dalbavancin, linezolid, and vancomycin all inhibited MRSA growth at their EUCAST susceptible breakpoint. Of the MRSA strains, 87.5% (n = 28) were strong biofilm producers (SBPs), while only 12.5% (n = 4) were weak biofilm producers (WBPs). The MBEC90 values for dalbavancin were significantly lower than those of linezolid and vancomycin in all tested strains. We also found that extracellular DNA (eDNA) contributes to the initial microbial attachment and biofilm formation. The amount of eDNA differed among MRSA strains and was significantly higher in those isolates with high dalbavancin and vancomycin tolerance. Exogenously added DNA increased the MBEC90 and protection of biofilm cells from dalbavancin activity. Of note, the relative abundance of eDNA was higher in MRSA biofilms exposed to MBEC90 dalbavancin than in untreated MRSA biofilms and those exposed to sub-MIC90. Overall, dalbavancin was the most active antibiotic against MRSA biofilms at concentrations achievable in the human serum. Moreover, the evidence of a drug-related increase of eDNA and its contribution to antimicrobial drug tolerance reveals novel potential targets for antibiofilm strategies against MRSA. IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) worldwide. In addition, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is increasingly frequent in postoperative infections and responsible for a large number of hospital readmissions and deaths. Biofilm formation by S. aureus is a primary risk factor in SSTIs, due to a higher antibiotic tolerance. Our study showed that the biofilm-forming capacity varied among MRSA strains, although strong biofilm producers were significantly more abundant than weak biofilm producer strains. Notably, dalbavancin demonstrated a potent antibiofilm activity at concentrations achievable in human serum. Nevertheless, dalbavancin activity was affected by an increased concentration of extracellular DNA in the biofilm matrix. This study provides novel insight for designing more targeted therapeutic strategies against MRSA and to prevent or eradicate harmful biofilms.

A Dalbavancin Lock Solution Can Reduce Enterococcal Biofilms After Freezing

Introduction

We previously demonstrated the efficacy of a frozen dalbavancin–heparin (DH) lock solution against biofilms of staphylococci. However, as enterococci also commonly cause catheter-related bloodstream infections (C-RBSI), we assessed the bioactivity of frozen dalbavancin (D) and DH against enterococci.

Methods

Over 6 months, we compared the bioactivity of a solution of DH (1 mg/ml) with that of D in terms of cfu counts and metabolic activity against biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium (four strains each). For each solution, we individually compared results obtained at each time point (months 3 and 6) with baseline (month 0). We also compared the median DH value of each variable at baseline and at months 3 and 6 of freezing with the values obtained for D alone. We used both statistical and clinical criteria when results were within 25% of the reference value.

Results

At the end of the experiment (month 6), neither a statistically nor a clinically significant reduction in the bioactivity of D solution was observed in terms of cfu count and metabolic activity against enterococcal biofilms. Regarding the DH solution, we found both statistical and clinical significance in the median percentage reduction in metabolic activity between months 0 and 6 in E. faecalis strains (51.8% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.007). Moreover, after freezing, the DH solution lost significant bioactivity compared with the D solution, especially in E. faecalis.

Conclusion

A dalbavancin lock solution can be frozen for up to 6 months with no negative effect on its bioactivity against enterococcal biofilms. However, when combined with heparin, its efficacy was reduced. Therefore, we recommend that if lock therapy with frozen dalbavancin is used in the management of enterococcal C-RBSI, heparin should be added simultaneously at the time of catheter lock.

In Vitro Study To Evaluate the Bioactivity of Freezing a Heparin-Based Dalbavancin Lock Solution

The use of dalbavancin as a catheter lock solution must be addressed in depth before implementation in clinical practice. We assessed whether a heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution could be frozen in single-dose vials for 6 months without affecting its bioactivity against biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Over 6 months, we tested the bioactivity of a frozen solution of dalbavancin (≈1 mg/ml) plus heparin (60 IU) in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 (MRSE). The Anti-Xa assay was also performed to assess whether the anticoagulant activity of heparin was reduced under freezing. Every month, we compared the mean value of each variable with that obtained at baseline (before freezing, month 0) using both clinical criteria (values were within 25% of the baseline value) and statistical criteria (linear mixed models). At the end of the experiment (month 6), neither a clinically nor a statistically significant reduction in the bioactivity of dalbavancin-heparin solution was observed in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilm of MRSA. Regarding MRSE, considering the clinical criteria, neither CFU counts nor metabolic activity decreased significantly. However, the reduction was statistically significant for all variables. Anti-Xa values (mean [standard deviation] international units per milliliter) for heparin in combination with dalbavancin were within 25% of the heparin-water value. A heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution can be frozen for up to 6 months with no effect on its bioactivity against MRSA and MRSE biofilms.

Advances in the therapy of bacterial bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND

Advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) have been achieved in the last years, improving clinical outcome. However, mortality associated with some pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp., is still high. In addition, the spread of antibiotic resistance, mainly among Gram-negative bacteria, reduces treatment options in some circumstances. Therefore, interest in new drugs, combination regimens and optimal dosing schedules is rising.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to summarize the current evidence on available antibiotic regimens for patients with bacterial BSI, focusing on drug choice, combination regimens and optimal dosing schedules. We selected bacteria that are difficult to manage because of virulence factors (i.e. methicillin-susceptible S. aureus), tolerance to antibiotic activity (i.e. Enterococcus faecalis), and/or susceptibility patterns (i.e. methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii).

SOURCES

MEDLINE search with English language and publication in the last 5 years as limits.

CONTENT AND IMPLICATIONS

The literature gaps on the use of new drugs, the uncertainties regarding the use of combination regimens, and the need to optimize dosing schedules in some circumstances (e.g. augmented renal clearance, renal replacement therapy, high inoculum BSI sources, and isolation of bacteria showing high MICs) have been revised.

DALBACEN cohort: dalbavancin as consolidation therapy in patients with endocarditis and/or bloodstream infection produced by gram-positive cocci

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the effectiveness of dalbavancin (DBV) in clinical practice as consolidation therapy in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and/or infective endocarditis (IE) produced by gram-positive cocci (GPC), as well as its safety and pharmacoeconomic impact.

METHODS

A multicentre, observational and retrospective study was conducted of hospitalised patients with IE and/or BSI produced by GPC who received at least one dose of DBV. Clinical response was assessed during hospitalization, at 3 months and at 1 year.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with median age of 73 years were enrolled; 73.5% were male; 59.04% had BSI and 49.04% IE (44.04% prosthetic valve IE, 32.4% native IE, 23.5% pacemaker lead). The most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus in BSI (49%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in IE (44.1%). All patients with IE were clinically cured in hospital; at 12 months, there was 2.9% loss to follow-up, 8.8% mortality unrelated to IE, and 2.9% therapeutic failure rate. The percentage effectiveness of DBV to treat IE was 96.7%. The clinical cure rate for BSI was 100% during hospital stay and at 3 months; there were no recurrences or deaths during the follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment for adverse events. The saving in hospital stay was 636 days for BSI (315,424.20€) and 557 days for IE (283,187.45€).

CONCLUSIONS

DBV is an effective consolidation antibiotic therapy in clinically stabilized patients with IE and/or BSI. It proved to be a cost-effective treatment, reducing the hospital stay, thanks to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this drug.