1
|
Bujanda L, Nyssen OP, Ramos J, Bordin DS, Tepes B, Perez-Aisa A, Pavoni M, Castro-Fernandez M, Lerang F, Leja M, Rodrigo L, Rokkas T, Kupcinskas J, Jonaitis L, Shvets O, Gasbarrini A, Simsek H, Phull PS, Buzás GM, Machado JC, Boltin D, Boyanova L, Tonkić A, Marlicz W, Venerito M, Vologzanina L, Fadieienko GD, Fiorini G, Resina E, Muñoz R, Cano-Català A, Puig I, García-Morales N, Hernández L, Moreira L, Megraud F, Morain CO, Montes M, Gisbert JP. Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori Treatments According to Antibiotic Resistance. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:646-654. [PMID: 37983769 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antibiotic resistance is one of the main factors that determine the efficacy of treatments to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line and rescue treatments against H. pylori in Europe according to antibiotics resistance. METHODS Prospective, multicenter, international registry on the management of H. pylori (European Registry on H. pylori Management). All infected and culture-diagnosed adult patients registered in the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology-Research Electronic Data Capture from 2013 to 2021 were included. RESULTS A total of 2,852 naive patients with culture results were analyzed. Resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and quinolones was 22%, 27%, and 18%, respectively. The most effective treatment, regardless of resistance, were the 3-in-1 single capsule with bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (91%) and the quadruple with bismuth, offering optimal cure rates even in the presence of bacterial resistance to clarithromycin or metronidazole. The concomitant regimen with tinidazole achieved an eradication rate of 99% (90/91) vs 84% (90/107) with metronidazole. Triple schedules, sequential, or concomitant regimen with metronidazole did not achieve optimal results. A total of 1,118 non-naive patients were analyzed. Resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and quinolones was 49%, 41%, and 24%, respectively. The 3-in-1 single capsule (87%) and the triple therapy with levofloxacin (85%) were the only ones that provided encouraging results. DISCUSSION In regions where the antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori is high, eradication treatment with the 3-in-1 single capsule, the quadruple with bismuth, and concomitant with tinidazole are the best options in naive patients. In non-naive patients, the 3-in-1 single capsule and the triple therapy with levofloxacin provided encouraging results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastián; CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid; Department of Medicine, Universidad Del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Olga P Nyssen
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - June Ramos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastián; CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid; Department of Medicine, Universidad Del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Dmitry S Bordin
- Department of Pancreatic, Biliary and Upper Digestive Tract Disorders, A. S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow; Department of Propaedeutic of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow; Department of Outpatient Therapy and Family Medicine, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia
| | - Bojan Tepes
- Department of Gastroenterology, DC Rogaska, Slatina, Slovenia
| | | | - Matteo Pavoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Frode Lerang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | - Mārcis Leja
- Gastro, Digestive Diseases Centre, Riga; Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Luis Rodrigo
- Gastroenterology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Theodore Rokkas
- Gastroenterology Clinic, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Juozas Kupcinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Laimas Jonaitis
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Oleg Shvets
- Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Halis Simsek
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University, Ankara; Department of Gastroenterology, HC International Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Jose C Machado
- 3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação Em Saúde da Universidade Do Porto, Porto; Ipatimup-Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade Do Porto, Porto; Pathology, FMUP-Faculdade de Medicina Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Doron Boltin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, PetahTikva; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, TelAviv, Israel
| | - Lyudmila Boyanova
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ante Tonkić
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Wojciech Marlicz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin; The Centre for Digestive Diseases, Endoklinika, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marino Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Galina D Fadieienko
- L.T. Malaya Therapy National Institute of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Giulia Fiorini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Resina
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Muñoz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Cano-Català
- GOES Research Group, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Ignasi Puig
- Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa and Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVicUCC), Manresa, Spain
| | - Natalia García-Morales
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo (CHUVI) and Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur); SERGAS-UVIGO, Spain
| | - Luis Hernández
- Unidad de Gastroenterología, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain
| | - Leticia Moreira
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), IDIBAPS (Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Milagrosa Montes
- Department of Microbiology, Donostia University Hospital-Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li B, Liu Y, Sun S. Pump proton inhibitors display anti-tumour potential in glioma. Cell Prolif 2022:e13321. [PMID: 35961680 DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glioma is one of the most aggressive brain tumours with poor overall survival despite advanced technology in surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation. Progression and recurrence are the hinge causes of low survival. Our aim is to explain the concrete mechanism in the proliferation and progression of tumours based on tumour microenvironment (TME). The main purpose is to illustrate the mechanism of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in affecting acidity, hypoxia, oxidative stress, inflammatory response and autophagy based on the TME to induce apoptosis and enhance the sensitivity of chemoradiotherapy. FINDINGS TME is the main medium for tumour growth and progression. Acidity, hypoxia, inflammatory response, autophagy, angiogenesis and so on are the main causes of tumour progress. PPIs, as a common clinical drug to inhibit gastric acid secretion, have the advantages of fast onset, long action time and small adverse reactions. Nowadays, several kinds of literature highlight the potential of PPIs in inhibiting tumour progression. However, long-term use of PPIs alone also has obvious side effects. Therefore, till now, how to apply PPIs to promote the effect of radio-chemotherapy and find the concrete dose and concentration of combined use are novel challenges. CONCLUSIONS PPIs display the potential in enhancing the sensitivity of chemoradiotherapy to defend against glioma based on TME. In the clinic, it is also necessary to explore specific concentrations and dosages in synthetic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bihan Li
- Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| | - Shilong Sun
- NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|