Regulatory RNAs in Bacillus subtilis: A review on regulatory mechanism and applications in synthetic biology

Bacteria exhibit a rich repertoire of RNA molecules that intricately regulate gene expression at multiple hierarchical levels, including small RNAs (sRNAs), riboswitches, and antisense RNAs. Notably, the majority of these regulatory RNAs lack or have limited protein-coding capacity but play pivotal roles in orchestrating gene expression by modulating transcription, post-transcription or translation processes. Leveraging and redesigning these regulatory RNA elements have emerged as pivotal strategies in the domains of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology. While previous investigations predominantly focused on delineating the roles of regulatory RNA in Gram-negative bacterial models such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, this review aims to summarize the mechanisms and functionalities of endogenous regulatory RNAs inherent to typical Gram-positive bacteria, notably Bacillus subtilis. Furthermore, we explore the engineering and practical applications of these regulatory RNA elements in the arena of synthetic biology, employing B. subtilis as a foundational chassis.

Type I toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria: from regulation to biological functions

Toxin-antitoxin systems are ubiquitous in the prokaryotic world and widely distributed among chromosomes and mobile genetic elements. Several different toxin-antitoxin system types exist, but what they all have in common is that toxin activity is prevented by the cognate antitoxin. In type I toxin-antitoxin systems, toxin production is controlled by an RNA antitoxin and by structural features inherent to the toxin messenger RNA. Most type I toxins are small membrane proteins that display a variety of cellular effects. While originally discovered as modules that stabilize plasmids, chromosomal type I toxin-antitoxin systems may also stabilize prophages, or serve important functions upon certain stress conditions and contribute to population-wide survival strategies. Here, we will describe the intricate RNA-based regulation of type I toxin-antitoxin systems and discuss their potential biological functions.

Small proteins in Gram-positive bacteria

Small proteins comprising less than 100 amino acids have been often ignored in bacterial genome annotations. About 10 years ago, focused efforts started to investigate whole peptidomes, which resulted in the discovery of a multitude of small proteins, but only a number of them have been characterized in detail. Generally, small proteins can be either membrane or cytosolic proteins. The latter interact with larger proteins, RNA or even metal ions. Here, we summarize our current knowledge on small proteins from Gram-positive bacteria with a special emphasis on the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Our examples include membrane-bound toxins of type I toxin-antitoxin systems, proteins that block the assembly of higher order structures, regulate sporulation or modulate the RNA degradosome. We do not consider antimicrobial peptides. Furthermore, we present methods for the identification and investigation of small proteins.

Cis- and Trans-Encoded Small Regulatory RNAs in Bacillus subtilis

Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) that act by base-pairing are the most abundant posttranscriptional regulators in all three kingdoms of life. Over the past 20 years, a variety of approaches have been employed to discover chromosome-encoded sRNAs in a multitude of bacterial species. However, although largely improved bioinformatics tools are available to predict potential targets of base-pairing sRNAs, it is still challenging to confirm these targets experimentally and to elucidate the mechanisms as well as the physiological role of their sRNA-mediated regulation. Here, we provide an overview of currently known cis- and trans-encoded sRNAs from B. subtilis with known targets and defined regulatory mechanisms and on the potential role of RNA chaperones that are or might be required to facilitate sRNA regulation in this important Gram-positive model organism.

Intermolecular Communication in Bacillus subtilis: RNA-RNA, RNA-Protein and Small Protein-Protein Interactions

In bacterial cells we find a variety of interacting macromolecules, among them RNAs and proteins. Not only small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), but also small proteins have been increasingly recognized as regulators of bacterial gene expression. An average bacterial genome encodes between 200 and 300 sRNAs, but an unknown number of small proteins. sRNAs can be cis- or trans-encoded. Whereas cis-encoded sRNAs interact only with their single completely complementary mRNA target transcribed from the opposite DNA strand, trans-encoded sRNAs are only partially complementary to their numerous mRNA targets, resulting in huge regulatory networks. In addition to sRNAs, uncharged tRNAs can interact with mRNAs in T-box attenuation mechanisms. For a number of sRNA-mRNA interactions, the stability of sRNAs or translatability of mRNAs, RNA chaperones are required. In Gram-negative bacteria, the well-studied abundant RNA-chaperone Hfq fulfils this role, and recently another chaperone, ProQ, has been discovered and analyzed in this respect. By contrast, evidence for RNA chaperones or their role in Gram-positive bacteria is still scarce, but CsrA might be such a candidate. Other RNA-protein interactions involve tmRNA/SmpB, 6S RNA/RNA polymerase, the dual-function aconitase and protein-bound transcriptional terminators and antiterminators. Furthermore, small proteins, often missed in genome annotations and long ignored as potential regulators, can interact with individual regulatory proteins, large protein complexes, RNA or the membrane. Here, we review recent advances on biological role and regulatory principles of the currently known sRNA-mRNA interactions, sRNA-protein interactions and small protein-protein interactions in the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. We do not discuss RNases, ribosomal proteins, RNA helicases or riboswitches.

Discovery of new type I toxin-antitoxin systems adjacent to CRISPR arrays in Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile, a major human enteropathogen, must cope with foreign DNA invaders and multiple stress factors inside the host. We have recently provided an experimental evidence of defensive function of the C. difficile CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) system important for its survival within phage-rich gut communities. Here, we describe the identification of type I toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems with the first functional antisense RNAs in this pathogen. Through the analysis of deep-sequencing data, we demonstrate the general co-localization with CRISPR arrays for the majority of sequenced C. difficile strains. We provide a detailed characterization of the overlapping convergent transcripts for three selected TA pairs. The toxic nature of small membrane proteins is demonstrated by the growth arrest induced by their overexpression. The co-expression of antisense RNA acting as an antitoxin prevented this growth defect. Co-regulation of CRISPR-Cas and type I TA genes by the general stress response Sigma B and biofilm-related factors further suggests a possible link between these systems with a role in recurrent C. difficile infections. Our results provide the first description of genomic links between CRISPR and type I TA systems within defense islands in line with recently emerged concept of functional coupling of immunity and cell dormancy systems in prokaryotes.

Toxin⁻Antitoxin Systems in Bacillus subtilis

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems were originally discovered as plasmid maintenance systems in a multitude of free-living bacteria, but were afterwards found to also be widespread in bacterial chromosomes. TA loci comprise two genes, one coding for a stable toxin whose overexpression kills the cell or causes growth stasis, and the other coding for an unstable antitoxin that counteracts toxin action. Of the currently known six types of TA systems, in Bacillus subtilis, so far only type I and type II TA systems were found, all encoded on the chromosome. Here, we review our present knowledge of these systems, the mechanisms of antitoxin and toxin action, and the regulation of their expression, and we discuss their evolution and possible physiological role.

Type I Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Clostridia

Type I toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules are abundant in both bacterial plasmids and chromosomes and usually encode a small hydrophobic toxic protein and an antisense RNA acting as an antitoxin. The RNA antitoxin neutralizes toxin mRNA by inhibiting its translation and/or promoting its degradation. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the type I TA modules identified in Clostridia species focusing on the recent findings in the human pathogen Clostridium difficile. More than ten functional type I TA modules have been identified in the genome of this emerging enteropathogen that could potentially contribute to its fitness and success inside the host. Despite the absence of sequence homology, the comparison of these newly identified type I TA modules with previously studied systems in other Gram-positive bacteria, i.e., Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, revealed some important common traits. These include the conservation of characteristic sequence features for small hydrophobic toxic proteins, the localization of several type I TA within prophage or prophage-like regions and strong connections with stress response. Potential functions in the stabilization of genome regions, adaptations to stress conditions and interactions with CRISPR-Cas defence system, as well as promising applications of TA for genome-editing and antimicrobial developments are discussed.

A new sRNA-mediated posttranscriptional regulation system for Bacillus subtilis

Many genetic tools for gene regulation have been developed during the past decades. Some of them edit genomic DNA, such as nucleotides deletions and insertions, while the others interfere with the gene transcriptions or messenger RNA translation. Here, we report a posttranscriptional regulation tool which is termed "Modulation via the small RNA (sRNA)-dependent operation system: MS-DOS" by engineering the type I toxin-antitoxin system in Bacillus subtilis. MS-DOS depends simply on insertion of an operation region (OPR; partial toxin-encoding region) downstream of a genomic open reading frame of interest and overexpression of the coupling antitoxin sRNA from a plasmid. Pairing between the OPR and the sRNA will trigger the RNAse degradation of the transcripts of selected genes. MS-DOS allows for the quantitative, specific, and reversible knockdown of single or multiple genomic genes in B. subtilis. We also showed that the truncated antitoxin SR4 with 53 nt length is sufficient to repress gene expression. Superior to other existing RNA based interfering systems, MS-DOS allows simultaneous knockdown of multiple genes with effortless expression of a single antitoxin RNA. This sRNA-guided repression system will further enrich the gene regulation tools and expand the gene regulation flexibility.

Bacillus subtilis Type I antitoxin SR6 Promotes Degradation of Toxin yonT mRNA and Is Required to Prevent Toxic yoyJ Overexpression

yonT/SR6 is the second type I toxin-antitoxin (TA) system encoded on prophage SPβ in the B. subtilis chromosome. The yonT ORF specifying a 58 aa toxin is transcribed on a polycistronic mRNA under control of the yonT promoter. The antitoxin SR6 is a 100 nt antisense RNA that overlaps yonT at its 3′ end and the downstream gene yoyJ encoding a second, much weaker, toxin at its 5′ end. SR6 displays a half-life of >60 min, whereas yonT mRNA is less stable with a half-life of ≈8 min. SR6 is in significant excess over yonT mRNA except in minimal medium with glucose. It interacts with the 3′ UTR of yonT mRNA, thereby promoting its degradation by RNase III. By contrast, SR6 does not affect the amount or half-life of yoyJ mRNA. However, in its absence, a yoyJ overexpression plasmid could not be established in Bacillus subtilis suggesting that SR6 inhibits yoyJ translation by directly binding to its ribosome-binding site. While the amounts of both yonT RNA and SR6 were affected by vancomycin, manganese, heat-shock and ethanol stress as well as iron limitation, oxygen stress decreased only the amount of SR6.

A multistress responsive type I toxin-antitoxin system: bsrE/SR5 from the B. subtilis chromosome

bsrE/SR5 is a type I TA system from prophage-like element P6 of the B. subtilis chromosome. The 256 nt bsrE RNA encodes a 30 aa toxin. The antitoxin SR5 is a 163 nt antisense RNA. Both genes overlap at their 3' ends. Overexpression of bsrE causes cell lysis on agar plates, which can be neutralized by sr5 overexpression, whereas deletion of the chromosomal sr5 copy has no effect. SR5 is short-lived with a half-life of ≈7 min, whereas bsrE RNA is stable with a half-life of >80 min. The sr5 promoter is 10-fold stronger than the bsrE promoter. SR5 interacts with the 3' UTR of bsrE RNA, thereby promoting its degradation by recruiting RNase III. RNase J1 is the main RNase responsible for SR5 and bsrE RNA degradation, and PnpA processes an SR5 precursor to the mature RNA. Hfq stabilizes SR5, but is not required for its inhibitory function. While bsrE RNA is affected by temperature shock and alkaline stress, the amount of SR5 is significantly influenced by various stresses, among them pH, anoxia and iron limitation. Only the latter one is dependent on sigB. Both RNAs are extremely unstable upon ethanol stress due to rapid degradation by RNase Y.